PDA

View Full Version : LMAO johnsmith


MavDynasty
12-29-2009, 12:05 AM
lol cutler>orton :downspin:
IronMexican
12-29-2009, 12:22 AM
Who's troll is this anyways?
MavDynasty
12-29-2009, 12:24 AM
Who's troll is this anyways?

lolol
ClipshowDynasty
12-29-2009, 12:24 AM
Who's troll is this anyways?

lolol
johnsmith
12-29-2009, 12:37 PM
lol cutler>orton :downspin:

well.........yeah........no shit.
Shank
12-29-2009, 01:27 PM
well.........yeah........no shit.

304/485
62% comp rate
3371 yards
20 TD
9 INT
225 yds/game
89.3 QB rating

314/519
60.5% comp rate
3390 yards
23 TD
26 INT
226 yds/game
73.6 QB rating
Greg Oden
12-29-2009, 02:20 PM
lol making a case for Orton over Cutler.

One gets to throw to Brandon Marshall, the other gets to throw to Devin Hester.
Shank
12-29-2009, 04:26 PM
lol making a case for Orton over Cutler.

One gets to throw to Brandon Marshall, the other gets to throw to Devin Hester.

lol he threw to Marshall last year and where did that get him?

That "he has no WRs" excuse is bullshit. He had all the offensive talent he needed in Denver and still couldn't win games. He knew the situation with the WRs before he got there. Orton threw to Hester and still won games. Fuck Cutler.
LOL texans
12-29-2009, 04:46 PM
lol he threw to Marshall last year and where did that get him?

That "he has no WRs" excuse is bullshit. He had all the offensive talent he needed in Denver and still couldn't win games. He knew the situation with the WRs before he got there. Orton threw to Hester and still won games. Fuck Cutler.

So you are saying they both suck huh?

I happen to agree.
Shank
12-29-2009, 04:50 PM
So you are saying they both suck huh?

I happen to agree.

Actually, yeah. That's about right. Each can do good things for their respective teams but neither is a worldbeater. I actually think Cutler would have cost Denver a few of the games they won earlier in the season. But, at the same time, he would have been able to help the offense with some of the stinkers they've put up lately. For Chicago, Orton wouldn't have put them in the same holes as Cutler did for some of their losses this year.

On a scale of 50-100, they're both around 70-75 in the way of QBs.
LOL texans
12-29-2009, 04:56 PM
Actually, yeah. That's about right. Each can do good things for their respective teams but neither is a worldbeater. I actually think Cutler would have cost Denver a few of the games they won earlier in the season. But, at the same time, he would have been able to help the offense with some of the stinkers they've put up lately. For Chicago, Orton wouldn't have put them in the same holes as Cutler did for some of their losses this year.

On a scale of 50-100, they're both around 70-75 in the way of QBs.


Orton has a better attitude towards the game. More coachable aswell I'd imagine. That puts him a notch above Cutler as a player and 10 notches above Cutler as a man.