PDA

View Full Version : illegal inbounds?



anonoftheinternets
12-29-2009, 01:14 AM
WTF boston jus had garnett and perkings, two bigs crowd the GSW inbounder who couldnt see past them. That should be illegal imo. So whats next have three huge guys cordon off the inbounds passer? there really wasnt much room to throw over a couple of 7 footers either.

Culburn369
12-29-2009, 01:16 AM
Moot point. Celtics lost. Mavs won, 4-1.

tee, hee.

SpursRulez4eVeR
12-29-2009, 01:16 AM
i think you can have how many guys guarding the inbounder but need to give him room

mogrovejo
12-29-2009, 01:28 AM
This forum is amazing, haters want to make up rules to try to stop the Celtics. A few weeks ago there was some guy wondering why the referees werent' calling "illegal defence" on the Cs, now comes another with another made up rule.

Go read the rulebook, you know-nothing.

In any case, I agree, things would be more fair if the Cs were forced to play with a more stringent rule set.

Culburn369
12-29-2009, 01:30 AM
Stings, don't it, Mo? Tougheth lucketh. Just show up Wednesday with some balls.

Savvy, asshole?

Muser
12-29-2009, 07:12 AM
Why? That just opens up the paint when you inbound it.

Killakobe81
12-29-2009, 01:52 PM
I thought it was smart and it ALMOST worked ...

noob cake
12-29-2009, 02:46 PM
Celtics have a lot of illegal plays anyways; like Garnett death threat and Garnet illegal screens.