Trainer and Physician DIDNT agree with Leach.......LMAO [Archive]

lebomb

01-02-2010, 07:32 PM

http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/2010/01/02/texas-tech-trainer-sorry-for-james-treatment/

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/football/ncaa/01/02/texas.tech.trainer.ap/index.html

...........Looks like Leach fucked up after all. :wakeup

ClingingMars

01-02-2010, 08:20 PM

yeah right. Smells like covering their asses and ensuring their job security.

Kermit

01-02-2010, 08:49 PM

Interesting. Because a few days ago, they were covering his ass. Looks like somebody got a "how much do you like your job" talk.

lebomb

01-02-2010, 09:03 PM

Well, now it gets interesting...................shall we say?

ClingingMars

01-02-2010, 09:15 PM

Well, now it gets interesting...................shall we say?

Certainly. Because somebody can discredit both of those people by shoving previous statements in their faces and be like "why the 180 spin"?

lebomb

01-02-2010, 10:13 PM

Certainly. Because somebody can discredit both of those people by shoving previous statements in their faces and be like "why the 180 spin"?

True..........but the signed statements happened on December 21st apparently.

redraiderinfiji

01-02-2010, 10:41 PM

Lebomb your penis is the size of a broken pencil......

leemajors

01-02-2010, 10:47 PM

Jesus ESPN is backpedaling and spinning about this crap. What about James deliberately misleading everyone saying he was handcuffed and blindfolded while his dad pounded at the door demanding his release? And what kind of mild concussion keeps a player out for over two weeks?

DMX7

01-02-2010, 10:52 PM

What a scam Texas Tech and ESPN are running here.

Kermit

01-02-2010, 11:26 PM

True..........but the signed statements happened on December 21st apparently.

I thought it was Jan. 1. If it was in December, they just became a lot more credible.

Thompson

01-03-2010, 12:05 AM

Leach might be up a creek when it comes to his revised contract; the language in his new contract was written to allow Tech to terminate him for anything he did (willful or not) that would affect the health or well-being of a student athlete (from the above links http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/2009/12/30/did-texas-tech-set-trap-for-mike-leach-in-latest-contract?icid=sphere_newsaol_inpage_fanhouse2).

leemajors

01-03-2010, 01:05 AM

Leach might be up a creek when it comes to his revised contract; the language in his new contract was written to allow Tech to terminate him for anything he did (willful or not) that would affect the health or well-being of a student athlete (from the above links http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/2009/12/30/did-texas-tech-set-trap-for-mike-leach-in-latest-contract?icid=sphere_newsaol_inpage_fanhouse2).

He may have been an ass, but he did nothing to endanger the little douchenozzle

DMX7

01-03-2010, 01:53 AM

XLTOYX6_1v4

SpuronyourFace

01-03-2010, 09:58 AM

No one actually believes these trainers. As a previous poster stated, they got the "how much do you like your job" talk.

lebomb

01-03-2010, 10:23 AM

Lebomb your penis is the size of a broken pencil......

Well................it was in your mouth so you should know.

Anyhow, back on point. I think Ruffin would be the best choice by far. Tek wont lose many if not ANY recruits, and Ruffin Im sure would demand much less cash than Leach asked for. This would allow the U to save a little face as well.