PDA

View Full Version : Possible Amare Trade Scenarios



Xylus
01-26-2010, 08:30 PM
Here are a couple of possible trade scenarios, concerning Amare Stoudemire, that I've found in the media:



http://www.ktar.com/?sid=1256610&nid=750

Gibberman: Possible Amare Trades

The Amar'e Stoudemire trade rumors are starting to heat up with the trade deadline less than a month away. Sports 620 KTAR's John Gambadoro has said the Chicago Bulls, Houston Rockets, Miami Heat, and New Jersey Nets would be teams the Suns could strike a deal with.
Paul Coro from the Arizona Republic mentioned that the Golden State Warriors, Minnesota Timberwolves and Cleveland Cavaliers are possibly interested.
Adrian Wojnarowski from Yahoo! Sports listed the Chicago Bulls, Miami Heat, Philadelphia 76ers, New Jersey Nets and Detroit Pistons as possible destinations.
With the help of ESPN.com's NBA trade machine to ensure that all of these conjured trades meet the guidelines of the NBA's Collective Bargaining Agreement, here are trades that I think make sense for each team.

Phoenix-Houston

Suns get: Luis Scola or Carl Landry, Shane Battier, and Brian Cook

Rockets get: Amar'e Stoudemire

Why - The Rockets can use Amar'e Stoudemire's scoring ability to put them over the top and lock up a playoff spot for this season. Going forward I like a center/power forward combination of STAT and Yao Ming once Ming returns from injury next season. The Suns get a cheaper replacement at the 4 (Scola and Landry both are free agents after this season, but they will be cheaper to keep than Amar'e), Battier is an upgrade over Grant Hill and brings the defensive tenacity the Suns desperately need, and Brian Cook is an expiring contract.

Phoenix-Golden State

Suns get: Monta Ellis, Anthony Randolph, Raja Bell, Speedy Claxton and GSW's 1st round pick (top 3 protected).

Warriors get: Amar'e Stoudemire and Leandro Barbosa
Why - Phoenix gets two young building blocks for the future in Monta Ellis/Anthony Randolph, two expiring contracts with Raja Bell and Speedy Claxton, and a lottery pick in a talented draft as long as the Warriors don't finish in the top 3. The Warriors get a forward who is the perfect complement to Andris Biedrins (Biedrins blocks shots and rebounds…Amar'e needs the ball and won't have to worry about doing the things he does not like to do). Barbosa is a poor man's Monta Ellis.

Phoenix-Minnesota
Suns get: Al Jefferson and Jonny Flynn or Ricky Rubio
Timberwolves get: Amar'e Stoudemire and Earl Clark
Why - The basic premise of this trade is that T'Wolves GM David Kahn is completely incompetent as proven by him drafting Flynn and Rubio, two point guards with back-to-back lottery picks. The fact that Kahn has interest in Stoudemire makes zero sense considering Jefferson is younger than Amare, doesn't have all the baggage, and has more potential. Flynn or Rubio gives the Suns the heir apparent to Steve Nash. For the T'Wolves they would be making the point to Ricky Rubio or Flynn that they are committed to him going forward as the point guard of the future and Earl Clark gives them offensive punch at the small forward position.

Phoenix-Cleveland
Suns get: J.J. Hickson, Zydrunas Illgauskas, Jawad Williams, 2010 1st round pick and 2012 1st round pick
Cleveland gets: Amar'e Stoudemire
Why - J.J. Hickson has shown ability at the power forward position and would be the Suns' replacement for STAT. Zydrunas Illgauskas would get bought out and return to Cleveland and Jawad Williams, in a short time in the rotation, has been a solid role player. The key for the Suns is getting two first round picks that bring an influx of young players to the roster. This year's first round pick is going to be late in the 1st round, but the Suns would bank on LeBron leaving Cleveland and the 2012 pick having more value. Cleveland is in a win now mode with the possibility of LeBron leaving after the year. Amar'e can be the piece that gets them over the top.

Phoenix-Chicago
Suns get: Joakim Noah, Brad Miller and James Johnson
Bulls get: Amar'e Stoudemire
Why - As much as I dislike how Amar'e Stoudemire plays I actually think him and Derrick Rose would develop into an amazing one-two punch. It's not a specific stat or number; I just believe watching the two play, the potential for them to mesh together is high. The Suns get Joakim Noah who they have been high on for years. Noah is an excellent rebounder, gets cheap buckets around the basket, and is solid passer for a big man. James Johnson, a rookie out of Wake Forest has a lot of potential and gives the Suns some fresh blood off the bench, which they desperately need. Brad Miller is an expiring contract, he is no longer the player he once was, but would still be effective playing the pick and pop game with Steve Nash.

Phoenix-Miami
Suns get: Michael Beasley, Udonis Haslem, and Dorrell Wright
Heat get: Amar'e Stoudemire
Why - As you can see a pattern developing in these trades, the Phoenix Suns save money and get a young piece to build upon for the future. In this trade 2nd year player Michael Beasley is the young piece, Udonis Haslem and Dorrell Wright are the expiring contracts. The Heat hope that Amar'e Stoudemire keeps Dwayne Wade happy and stops him from thinking about leaving Miami for another NBA franchise.

Phoenix-Philadelphia
Suns get: Andre Iguodala, Marreese Speights and Jason Kapono
76ers get: Amar'e Stoudemire
Why - This trade improves the Suns bench and their starting lineup. The addition of Andre Igoudala allows Grant Hill to come off the bench and takes a lot of pressure off the veteran. Speights replaces Stoudemire as a starter; the 2nd year player out of Florida has the potential to be a 20 point 8-10 rebound a game player if he develops. Jason Kapono is an expiring contract. The only way the 76ers do this trade is if they believe Stoudemire is someone they can build their franchise around. With Stoudemire, the core of the 76ers going forward would be STAT, Thaddeus Young and Louis Williams.

Phoenix-New Jersey
Suns get: Courtney Lee, Tony Battie, Bobby Simmons, and rights to the Mavericks 2010 first round pick and the rights to the Warriors 2012 first round pick.
Nets get: Amar'e Stoudemire
Why - I cringe that I believe the Suns might consider this trade. This is what is known as a straight salary dump. Battie and Simmons are both in the final year of their contract and would get almost $18 million of the books for the Suns franchise next year. Courtney Lee is a nice player, but he is not someone you can build your franchise around. This is a no brainer for the Nets and I say this is worse than the Pau Gasol to the Lakers trade.

Phoenix-Detroit
I don't see any players on the Pistons that the Suns would possibly be interested in; not enough expiring contracts or talented young players.


And this one is from Hoopsworld, so read at your own discretion:



http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=15090

The trade Monday that sent starting New Orleans Hornets guard Devin Brown to the Chicago Bulls in exchange for seldom-used center Aaron Gray doesn't seem like much on the surface because neither guy is somebody most smart NBA fans would call a "game-changer." While it's obvious that the Hornets made this move to shed salary, Chicago's motivations require a little more digging and imagination.

It's possible that this trade could be an attempt to shore up the Bulls' backcourt should they be able to find a taker for either Kirk Hinrich or John Salmons before the trade deadline. Chicago would like to head into this offseason with enough money to pursue a big name free agent and possibly have the option of extending Tyrus Thomas. As it stands, they'll have to choose one of those options or the other.

Hinrich is scheduled to make $17 million for the next two full seasons, and Salmons is on the books for just under $6 million next year should he exercise his player option this offseason. Brown, on the other hand, can play out the rest of this season for right around $500,000 and do a lot of the same things Hinrich and Salmon can do for a heck of a lot less money.

So, even if Chicago only manages to return non-rotation role players with expiring contracts for a player like Hinrich or Salmons, the Bulls have an answer for the holes left in the lineup. In a lot of ways, just shedding the salary would be considered a big move for the Bulls going forward. But looking at this thing on a grander scale, it seems remotely possible that this could allow Chicago to put together a pretty impressive package in a trade offer for a really big name.

Amar'e Stoudemire is one such big name, as has been reported by multiple news outlets in the last couple of days. Chicago could package Kirk Hinrich or Luol Deng with Tyrus Thomas as the key pieces to a deal for Stoudemire. Either offer would get close to matching the necessary salaries to get a move done; it would just be a question as to whether or not that were enough to get Phoenix to bite. Chicago does have a couple of expiring contracts worth $6-12 million apiece that they could use to sweeten the pot as well.

The bottom line is that should the Bulls trade a key piece to their backcourt, whether that be Hinrich or Salmons, for a more dominant frontcourt player they wouldn't be left too thin at the guard positions.

Even if Chicago does absolutely nothing else before the trade deadline, they acquired a reasonably talented player in Brown for a center they never used. It's a classic something-for-nothing deal that New Orleans could afford to make because Marcus Thornton is too good to be rotting on any bench. This will up his playing time and help the Hornets get a little closer to being under the cap threshold.

This move has the stink of something bigger all over it. Whether that be for Amar'e Stoudemire or just a Bulls cap dump, Brown helps make any upcoming Chicago trade just a little bit easier to swallow.

pauls931
01-26-2010, 08:33 PM
whichever one saves the most money

DUNCANownsKOBE2
01-26-2010, 08:42 PM
All of these trades have one thing in common - none of them help the Suns

Xylus
01-26-2010, 08:44 PM
All of these trades have one thing in common - none of them help the Suns

I really like that Houston trade. Landry, Battier and Cook for Stoudemire. It instantly gives us toughness and defense at two different positions, as well as an expiring contract in Cook.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
01-26-2010, 08:46 PM
I really like that Houston trade. Landry, Battier and Cook for Stoudemire. It instantly gives us toughness and defense at two different positions, as well as an expiring contract in Cook.


It still makes the Suns a worse team IMO.

Chieflion
01-26-2010, 09:03 PM
The Golden State deal is brutal for GS. They lose the lottery balls, the Suns get the pick. They give up their best player and Anthony Randolph + expiring. Minnesota already turned down that deal in the offseason. Unless J.J Hickson is the new Karl Malone, the Suns are not doing that deal.

pawe
01-26-2010, 09:54 PM
No way will Hou make that trade, they're gonna give up quite a few valuable players in Scola or Landry and Battier for product of the system Stoudemire. I can see the Warriors pulling the trigger though, they've been eyeing Stoudemire since the beginning of the season.
Everyone knows Amare owes his career to Steve Nash so he should just stfu.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
01-26-2010, 10:15 PM
Everyone knows Amare owes his career to Steve Nash so he should just stfu.


So his rookie of the year trophy and the 20 point 9 rebound season he had in his 2nd year was cause of Steve Nash?

pawe
01-26-2010, 11:00 PM
The sun shines on a dog's ass too. Let's see how he does on a different team without an elite pg who can feed him the ball inside as Nash does.

bostonguy
01-26-2010, 11:15 PM
Amare to the Cavs would be sick. Lebron/Amare on that pick and roll would just be disgusting.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
01-26-2010, 11:21 PM
The sun shines on a dog's ass too. Let's see how he does on a different team without an elite pg who can feed him the ball inside as Nash does.


Two consecutive years of good play, his first two years in the NBA, is the sun shining on a dog's ass?

Kyle Orton
01-26-2010, 11:24 PM
Amare to the Cavs would be sick. Lebron/Amare on that pick and roll would just be disgusting.

The 2 worst pick and roll defenders of all time. Disgusting indeed.

coachmac87
01-27-2010, 12:07 AM
Suns Get: Gerald Wallace, Boris Diaw

Spurs Get: Stephen Jackson, Marcus Camby

Bobcats Get: Amare Stoudamire, Baron Davis

Clippers Get: Tony Parker, Theo Ratliff

badfish22
01-27-2010, 12:09 AM
Why would teams give this much up for a guy who probably won't resign?

himat
01-27-2010, 12:21 AM
Suns Get: Gerald Wallace, Boris Diaw

Spurs Get: Stephen Jackson, Marcus Camby

Bobcats Get: Amare Stoudamire, Baron Davis

Clippers Get: Tony Parker, Theo Ratliff

Suns wouldn't trade back for Boris Diaw. Thats just weird.

Spurs fans are dreaming that they could get Jackson and Camby.:lol That would be sick for you guys, but it just won't happen.

Bobcats might do that trade, but Gerald Wallace is having a spectacular season. They probably don't want to trade him.

I think Baron Davis and Camby is way better than Parker and Ratliff. The Clippers are actually looking to improve because they could be a playoff team with Griffin next year.

Obstructed_View
01-27-2010, 01:53 AM
So his rookie of the year trophy and the 20 point 9 rebound season he had in his 2nd year was cause of Steve Nash?

Yeah during that first round series against the Spurs (When Marbury was the PG) you could see what a best Amare was going to be. I could make a rather convincing case that the surprise of the Suns turnaround after Nash arrived was more due to Amare's development (and health) than Nash himself, and further claim that Nash owes Amare for his MVP trophies.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
01-27-2010, 02:24 AM
Yeah during that first round series against the Spurs (When Marbury was the PG) you could see what a best Amare was going to be. I could make a rather convincing case that the surprise of the Suns turnaround after Nash arrived was more due to Amare's development (and health) than Nash himself, and further claim that Nash owes Amare for his MVP trophies.


Well, maybe the 2005 trophy, but obviously the 2006 MVP had nothing to do with Amare.

Lars
01-27-2010, 04:07 AM
I think Houston would consider Scola/Battier for Amare.

21_Blessings
01-27-2010, 09:06 AM
Battier would be worthless on a team like the Suns. At least Houston has a chance to be good next year. His effort alone would win Phoenix 4-5 more games when the they need to be tanking and rebuilding through the draft.

Chieflion
01-27-2010, 09:09 AM
Battier would be worthless on a team like the Suns. At least Houston has a chance to be good next year. His effort alone would win Phoenix 4-5 more games when the they need to be tanking and rebuilding through the draft.
21_Dicknorance shows up with his crap again.

21_Blessings
01-27-2010, 09:15 AM
Battier does nothing for a lottery team. It's pointless.

21_Blessings
01-27-2010, 09:18 AM
21_Dicknorance shows up with his crap again.

:lol The only reason the Spurs even won a title was due to them purposely tanking for the first pick in the draft.

That's the only chance Phoenix has at this point.

Chieflion
01-27-2010, 09:22 AM
:lol The only reason the Spurs even won a title was due to them purposely tanking for the first pick in the draft.

That's the only chance Phoenix has at this point.
Cause the Suns are going to tank this season for OKC. LOL 21_Dicknorance.

21_Blessings
01-27-2010, 09:27 AM
Cause the Suns are going to tank this season for OKC. LOL 21_Dicknorance.

I'm talking next year stupid.

Double-Up
01-27-2010, 10:10 AM
That Golden State deal looks good for Phoenix, probably the best out the bunch.

JMarkJohns
01-27-2010, 10:38 AM
21_Dicknorance shows up with his crap again.

I actually agree with him. Battier is a great addition to a team with a chance. Landry or Scola as well. None are foundational pieces for a team rebuilding. Now, if the Suns could keep Amare and acquire Battier and Landry, then they'd be worth acquiring, but since the Suns really don't have any other pieces that hold the value of Amare, that's just an example and nothing more.

If the Suns are trading Amare, they need one player or one pick that could yield a similar foundational talent. Glue men, even great glue men like Battier and Landry, just aren't the answer.

If the Suns trade Amare, then they need to trade everyone not named Dragic, Dudley and Lopez. Frye's value has never been higher and could fetch a late 1st or early second as he's an expiring contract to boot. Hill may bring in a 2nd-rounder or two, Nash maybe a late 1st and a future 1st or early 2nd-rounder... Barbosa and Richardson... trade them for McGrady. Just clear their CAP space. I'm sure Amundson can be acquired for a 2nd by some team needing frontcourt depth.

None of this will happen being that the Suns don't own their own pick, and Sarver needs to fill seats for fan/sponsor revenue, but it's what needs to be done if they trade Amare, as there's really no salvaging the near future by keeping the others (unless the Suns somehow land Iguodala and Speights for Amare).

Chieflion
01-27-2010, 10:41 AM
I actually agree with him. Battier is a great addition to a team with a chance. Landry or Scola as well. None are foundational pieces for a team rebuilding. Now, if the Suns could keep Amare and acquire Battier and Landry, then they'd be worth acquiring, but since the Suns really don't have any other pieces that hold the value of Amare, that's just an example and nothing more.

If the Suns are trading Amare, they need one player or one pick that could yield a similar foundational talent. Glue men, even great glue men like Battier and Landry, just aren't the answer.

If the Suns trade Amare, then they need to trade everyone not named Dragic, Dudley and Lopez. Frye's value has never been higher and could fetch a late 1st or early second as he's an expiring contract to boot. Hill may bring in a 2nd-rounder or two, Nash maybe a late 1st and a future 1st or early 2nd-rounder... Barbosa and Richardson... trade them for McGrady. Just clear their CAP space. I'm sure Amundson can be acquired for a 2nd by some team needing frontcourt depth.

None of this will happen being that the Suns don't own their own pick, and Sarver needs to fill seats for fan/sponsor revenue, but it's what needs to be done if they trade Amare, as there's really no salvaging the near future by keeping the others (unless the Suns somehow land Iguodala and Speights for Amare).
I would say your guys have great value all around, but they need to play some defense. Having Battier may just provide that defensive factor that just pays off for the rest of the team.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
01-27-2010, 11:00 AM
21_Dicknorance shows up with his crap again.


What would Battier do for the Suns? Make them an 8th seed as oppose to a lottery team? I could give a shit.

Chieflion
01-27-2010, 11:04 AM
What would Battier do for the Suns? Make them an 8th seed as oppose to a lottery team? I could give a shit.
It is very possible that Battier does nothing anyway. Your team isn't getting rid of Steve Nash anytime soon.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
01-27-2010, 11:06 AM
It is very possible that Battier does nothing anyway. Your team isn't getting rid of Steve Nash anytime soon.


Yeah I know. Too many fuckin Nash salad tossers like vicphoenix13 who think a good season for the Suns is Nash putting up big numbers (so they've already won a championship in his eyes) make it impossible for the Suns to ever rebuild.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
01-27-2010, 11:09 AM
The Suns could very easily lose the next 4 games on their schedule and drop to 26-25. When that happens, anyone who STILL wants them to keep Nash should go ask their mother how much meth she did during her pregnancy.

Ghazi
01-27-2010, 11:18 AM
I hope the Suns continue their winless TNT streak this Thursday :)

XFactor
01-27-2010, 03:01 PM
If anyone with insider kindly post this article


Spurs eye Stoudemire?

Will the Spurs make an offer for Amare Stoudemire?
http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/features/rumors?&action=login&appRedirect=http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/features/rumors

vicphoenix13
01-27-2010, 03:17 PM
Yeah I know. Too many fuckin Nash salad tossers like vicphoenix13 who think a good season for the Suns is Nash putting up big numbers (so they've already won a championship in his eyes) make it impossible for the Suns to ever rebuild.


WTF? When did I ever say that Nash putting up great numbers is as good as winning a championship? Why would you make such a retarded statement? And I never said that the Suns shouldn't rebuild. What I said was that the Suns should tear it down during the season. I don't have any problem with the Suns dealing the likes of Amare, Nash, Hill and Richardson before the trade deadline.

vicphoenix13
01-27-2010, 03:19 PM
The Suns could very easily lose the next 4 games on their schedule and drop to 26-25. When that happens, anyone who STILL wants them to keep Nash should go ask their mother how much meth she did during her pregnancy.

If Nash asked for a trade, would you criticize him for quitting on the franchise?

DUNCANownsKOBE2
01-27-2010, 03:23 PM
If Nash asked for a trade, would you criticize him for quitting on the franchise?


No. He wouldn't be the first veteran player to want to go to a contender to win a championship. It'd be completely reasonable. No one accused Karl Malone of quitting on the Jazz when he signed with the Lakers in an attempt to win a championship. P.J. Brown didn't quit on the Hornets for signing with the Celtics to be a contender. No one criticized Sam Cassell for wanting the Clippers to buy him out of his contract so he could sign with the C's that year.

Ghazi
01-27-2010, 03:25 PM
J-Ho for Amare

DUNCANownsKOBE2
01-27-2010, 03:29 PM
I don't have any problem with the Suns dealing the likes of Amare, Nash, Hill and Richardson before the trade deadline.


My bad then. I had you read as someone who refused to accept the Suns for what they are (a lottery team) and doesn't want any trades to happen.

vicphoenix13
01-27-2010, 03:29 PM
No. He wouldn't be the first veteran player to want to go to a contender to win a championship. It'd be completely reasonable.

What if he wanted to be a ring chaser and demanded a trade to the Lakers or Cavs?

21_Blessings
01-27-2010, 03:30 PM
J-Ho for Amare

So isntead of Bynum averaging 20 on 70% shooting against Dallas he would drop 25 on 85% shooting instead. :lol

vicphoenix13
01-27-2010, 03:38 PM
My bad then. I had you read as someone who refused to accept the Suns for what they are (a lottery team) and doesn't want any trades to happen.

What I said was that last offseason was a bad time to start the rebuilding process for a few reasons. Amare had a lower trade value because of his eye surgery and there wasn't an heir to Nash at the point guard position.
Now that Amare is recovered and Goran Dragic is improving as a player, its the right time to start over.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
01-27-2010, 03:48 PM
What if he wanted to be a ring chaser and demanded a trade to the Lakers or Cavs?


The criticism I'd have there would be him signing an extension AND THEN expecting the Suns to trade his long term, lucrative contract to one of the few contenders a few months later. Lets say he demanded a trade to a contender last off season before signing the extension, it would be a perfectly reasonable decision. He did enough from 2005-2007 to get to request to be traded to a good team.

As far as the ring chasing part, no fuckin way I'd criticize him for that. What do you think Karl Malone was doing when he left the team he's been on his entire career that was mediocre at the time so he could sign with what people believed to be the favorite? Ring chasing. Players ring chase all the time and I don't ever remember them being viewed badly for it.

baseline bum
01-27-2010, 04:33 PM
If anyone with insider kindly post this article

It's almost certainly referring to this article, and a couple of others posted in this thread.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=145305

I don't know why in the hell the Suns would ever trade for Manu though.

vicphoenix13
01-27-2010, 04:58 PM
The criticism I'd have there would be him signing an extension AND THEN expecting the Suns to trade his long term, lucrative contract to one of the few contenders a few months later. Lets say he demanded a trade to a contender last off season before signing the extension, it would be a perfectly reasonable decision. He did enough from 2005-2007 to get to request to be traded to a good team.

As far as the ring chasing part, no fuckin way I'd criticize him for that. What do you think Karl Malone was doing when he left the team he's been on his entire career that was mediocre at the time so he could sign with what people believed to be the favorite? Ring chasing. Players ring chase all the time and I don't ever remember them being viewed badly for it.


The problem I have with ring chasing is that it is the easy way out. Great players challenge themselves to lead and carry a franchise. What Malone and Payton did was jump on the Shaq and Kobe bandwagon. Nash showed alot of commitment by not following the ring chasing scenario.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
01-27-2010, 05:01 PM
The problem I have with ring chasing is that it is the easy way out. Great players challenge themselves to lead and carry a franchise. What Malone and Payton did was jump on the Shaq and Kobe bandwagon. Nash showed alot of commitment by not following the ring chasing scenario.


Commitment to what? By signing with Phoenix rather than going to a contender, Nash chose a less demanding, less rewarding route. All that's come out of Nash's mouth since that extension are how much better it is to have lowered expectations. That doesn't sound like a "commitment" to anything.

21_Blessings
01-27-2010, 05:10 PM
I agree. Much more telling that Nash doesn't have the desire to win a ring at all costs. He seems comfortable with his life and is focusing on his non-basketball related endeavors. Phoenix to LA is a pretty short plane trip.

vicphoenix13
01-27-2010, 05:19 PM
Commitment to what? By signing with Phoenix rather than going to a contender, Nash chose a less demanding, less rewarding route. All that's come out of Nash's mouth since that extension are how much better it is to have lowered expectations. That doesn't sound like a "commitment" to anything.


Commitment to the franchise which helped make him a hall of fame player. And he's never said its so much better to have lowered expectations. What he did say before the season is that he wanted to see if this group could go deep into the playoffs again. Now that's out of the question and I am sure he's re-evaluating whether he wants to stick around.

vicphoenix13
01-27-2010, 05:23 PM
I agree. Much more telling that Nash doesn't have the desire to win a ring at all costs. He seems comfortable with his life and is focusing on his non-basketball related endeavors. Phoenix to LA is a pretty short plane trip.


Nash would lose alot of support among Suns fans if he signed with the Lakers. Remember how angry Red Sox fans were when Johnny Damon bolted for the Yankees.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
01-27-2010, 05:42 PM
Commitment to the franchise which helped make him a hall of fame player. And he's never said its so much better to have lowered expectations. What he did say before the season is that he wanted to see if this group could go deep into the playoffs again. Now that's out of the question and I am sure he's re-evaluating whether he wants to stick around.


I'll find an exact quote but Nash def. said that lowered expectations were a good thing.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
01-27-2010, 05:53 PM
I agree. Much more telling that Nash doesn't have the desire to win a ring at all costs. He seems comfortable with his life and is focusing on his non-basketball related endeavors. Phoenix to LA is a pretty short plane trip.


On LA he'd be expected to take a back seat to another player, play defense and listen to the coach, 3 things Nash doesn't like doing.

Ghazi
01-27-2010, 06:33 PM
Commitment to what? By signing with Phoenix rather than going to a contender, Nash chose a less demanding, less rewarding route. All that's come out of Nash's mouth since that extension are how much better it is to have lowered expectations. That doesn't sound like a "commitment" to anything.

It's all about the $.

mojorizen7
01-27-2010, 08:52 PM
On LA he'd be expected to take a back seat to another player, play defense and listen to the coach, 3 things Nash doesn't like doing.

You speak the truth. JRich can do some of those things though....not sure what LA has that would make a trade worthy.

21_Blessings
01-27-2010, 09:30 PM
You speak the truth. JRich can do some of those things though....not sure what LA has that would make a trade worthy.

Ammo expiring + Sasha is apparently the hot ticket these days. :lol

DUNCANownsKOBE2
01-27-2010, 09:43 PM
You speak the truth. JRich can do some of those things though....not sure what LA has that would make a trade worthy.


eh, not really. J-Rich's D is almost as bad as Nash's, being on Phoenix has shown he's either the main scorer on a crappy team or he's a chucker, and he's never gotten along with his coach. All I hear about is the respect the team has for Gentry, the only reason they "respect" him is because he lets them chuck contested shots with 18 seconds left on the shot clock and do whatever they want. That's not really respect, or anything close to it.

Pelicans78
01-27-2010, 10:00 PM
I don't think Nash could help a contender win a championship. Not many contenders operate the style of play he performs. Plus, he would be a downgrade on defense. Nash knows that which is why he prefers to stay in Phoenix in the latter stages of his career.

21_Blessings
01-27-2010, 10:02 PM
I don't think Nash could help a contender win a championship. Not many contenders operate the style of play he performs. Plus, he would be a downgrade on defense. Nash knows that which is why he prefers to stay in Phoenix in the latter stages of his career.

He would be downgrade defensively from Fisher but not by much. His shooting and passing ability would make the Lakers unstoppable offensively.

Pelicans78
01-27-2010, 10:06 PM
He would be downgrade defensively from Fisher but not by much. His shooting and passing ability would make the Lakers unstoppable offensively.

You think he would be a good fit in the Lakers half-court offense. He would take shots away from Kobe and Gasol. Actually, that dumbfuck Fisher takes alot of shots away from Kobe and Gasol.

21_Blessings
01-27-2010, 10:18 PM
You think he would be a good fit in the Lakers half-court offense. He would take shots away from Kobe and Gasol. Actually, that dumbfuck Fisher takes alot of shots away from Kobe and Gasol.

Well Nash shoots 50%+ on the Suns. He's going to be wide open every play if he played with Kobe, Bynum and Gasol.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
01-27-2010, 10:22 PM
He would be downgrade defensively from Fisher but not by much. His shooting and passing ability would make the Lakers unstoppable offensively.


His defense would be a major downgrade in the sense that he roams around like an idiot on D and leaves his player wide open lanes to drive, Fisher tries his best and makes the player he's guarding work for his shots, one big difference is how Nash leaves other players out of position all the time on D when Fisher plays as part of the team.

And offensively he wouldn't help them much IMO. There's a reason PJ never has had and never has wanted a PG who dribbles the air out of the ball. You can't run a consistent, reliable half court offense with them. They kill ball movement and only know how to play in their little world.

21_Blessings
01-27-2010, 10:32 PM
His defense would be a major downgrade in the sense that he roams around like an idiot on D and leaves his player wide open lanes to drive, Fisher tries his best and makes the player he's guarding work for his shots, one big difference is how Nash leaves other players out of position all the time on D when Fisher plays as part of the team.

Fishers does everything you described about Nash. All the time. Yeah he tries but it doesn't matter.

The Lakers are the ideal team that you could mask Nash's porous D on with Kobe/Ron at the wings and two 7 footers in the paint.


And offensively he wouldn't help them much IMO. There's a reason PJ never has had and never has wanted a PG who dribbles the air out of the ball.

Not true at all. He wanted Kidd.


You can't run a consistent, reliable half court offense with them. They kill ball movement and only know how to play in their little world.

The triangle is a flexible offense. Phil lets his players be what they are. They would adapt and play at the faster pace. Nash is a smart enough player to make the right pass when it's there.

The Lakers by no means play in a strict, grind-it-out half-court offense.

21_Blessings
01-27-2010, 10:34 PM
You guys don't realize that Fisher would not start for any other team in the entire NBA.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
01-27-2010, 10:48 PM
Fishers does everything you described about Nash. All the time. Yeah he tries but it doesn't matter.

The Lakers are the ideal team that you could mask Nash's porous D on with Kobe/Ron at the wings and two 7 footers in the paint.


To some extent I agree but IMO it just seems different. There's no way Billups has that sub par offensive series if Nash is guarding him instead of Fisher, especially since Billups has a history of shitting on Nash.



Not true at all. He wanted Kidd.

Kidd has proven an ability to play in a structured offense where he plays more of an off ball role and finds ways to be productive. The only offense Nash has ever been successful in is a free-for-all offense where he gets to run around with the ball and do whatever he wants. The one time a coach tried to implement an offense with a slight amount of structure and set plays other than the pick and roll, Nash got that coach fired.





The triangle is a flexible offense. Phil lets his players be what they are. They would adapt and play at the faster pace. Nash is a smart enough player to make the right pass when it's there.

The Lakers by no means play in a strict, grind-it-out half-court offense.

Nash is smart enough to make the right pass but that doesn't mean he does. He loves to hold onto the ball too long waiting for a chance at an assist to pop up. That's kinda the problem. The rest of the team couldn't be what they are with Nash running the offense, unless you can be a compliment to Steve Nash and be a source of assists for him, you're not going to be comfortable.



I have no doubt Nash would be able to adjust and fit in taking on more of a spot up shooter role and less of a do-everything role, I have serious doubt about Nash wanting to adjust to a lesser role.