View Full Version : Sources: 96-Team March Madness Is “Done Deal”
misterx91578
02-01-2010, 03:29 PM
http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/source-march-madness-with-96-teams-done-deal-27742
Sources at ESPN and inside the administration at a powerhouse NCAA basketball school told me today that the NCAA basketball tournament going to 96 teams is a “done deal.”
An ESPN source said, “It’s a done deal with the expansion of the tournament. Depending on how soon a (TV) deal is done, the added teams could start next year. The NCAA confirmed that bidders would be interested in 96 teams, so they’re going with it.”
Another ESPN source confirmed to me that the network was in the formative stages of pondering a bid for the expanded tournament.
John Ourand and Michael Smith of SPORTSBUSINESS JOURNAL reported this morning that if the NCAA opts out of its current broadcast rights deal with CBS, the governing body will consider, “expanding from a 65-team tournament to either 68 or 96 teams.”
K-State Spur
02-01-2010, 03:39 PM
better than 128 - but beyond a terrible idea.
right now, we have a situation where some losses don't kill you - but you still have to accomplish SOMETHING to go to the dance.
at 96, we're going to get some mediocre teams that beat up on some weaklings and then win 6 home conference games (0 on the road) and still get a bid.
Doug Collins
02-01-2010, 03:43 PM
So basically any mediocre team can get in now, awesome.
Doug Collins
02-01-2010, 03:51 PM
better than 128 - but beyond a terrible idea.
right now, we have a situation where some losses don't kill you - but you still have to accomplish SOMETHING to go to the dance.
at 96, we're going to get some mediocre teams that beat up on some weaklings and then win 6 home conference games (0 on the road) and still get a bid.
+1
I get that SOS and RPI will still factor heavily into seeding, but there's definitely less incentive to schedule good opponents for mid-tier programs. Making a 96 team NCAA tourney now holds the same weight as becoming Bowl eligible in football. Why reward mediocrity? (I know the answer is $$$ but still)
I'd back this if they played these first round games on the higher seed's homecourt. Letting the SWAC runner-up or whatnot at least get to play in Cameron or Allen Fieldhouse might be kind of cool. Anything involving a first round bye - which i suppose is inevitable - kind of sucks. I like that the champ has to play in every round, even if they draw fodder like UTSA or Belmont for their first game.
How's the math going to work on this, anyway? Is it a whole shitload of play in games like the one in Dayton every year or are they adding another round?
There's already three other consolation tourneys for the NCAA's rejects - the NIT, CBI, and CIT. This makes like a third of all hoop teams postseason eligible.
Cry Havoc
02-01-2010, 05:24 PM
Horrible. March Madness is the best event in sports right now. Why change it?
Whisky Dog
02-01-2010, 11:27 PM
Why even play a season? Just make one big ass tournament with every school in the nation that lasts 4 months. Fvcking retarded greedy assholes.
DUNCANownsKOBE2
02-02-2010, 12:57 AM
Soooooooo how do they plan on doing this, do the top 32 teams get a bye and the bottom 64 teams play in the first round. This is beyond retarded.
DUNCANownsKOBE2
02-02-2010, 12:59 AM
I guess if UA makes it in this year then their streak will go on forever.
symple19
02-02-2010, 01:44 AM
Bad idea.
Spurtacus
02-02-2010, 02:42 AM
Why do people always want to mess with something that is already done right.
Obstructed_View
02-02-2010, 06:42 AM
So rather than fix the sport that's fucked up, they decide to fuck up the one sport that works.
vander
02-02-2010, 04:19 PM
:lmao:lmao:lmao
is the college basketball tourney still popular? I never watch it, most people I know don't either, if this is real news and not "onion" news, they are probably doing this because they've been losing viewers and are trying anything to keep the revenue flowing
meanwhile College Football remains as popular as ever
Long live the BCS! :rollin
NFGIII
02-02-2010, 06:11 PM
Why do people always want to mess with something that is already done right.
:greedy :greedy :greedy :greedy :greedy :greedy :greedy :greedy :greedy :greedy :greedy :greedy :greedy :greedy :greedy :greedy :greedy :greedy :greedy :greedy
Why not allow every team with a winning record to get in so long as it is mathematically feasible? That way the NCAA would make even more money!
Disgraceful and as others have stated getting into the Tournament should be based on doing something in the regular season. But the almightly dollar will always have a say in what is going to happen. Hell we are seeing many major universities establishing their own TV networks in order to broadcast their sports. Pretty soon it will be PPV and if you don't like it then tough luck.
Ferengi nation and principles here we come.
Biggems
02-02-2010, 10:10 PM
Ladies and Gentlemen, welcome to March Sadness
K-State Spur
02-02-2010, 11:06 PM
for being a 'done deal', there has been no confirmation as of yet.
this is getting almost universally HAMMERED across the sports watching world.
hopefully, somebody just floated this out there to gauge a reaction - and further hopefully, they have their response. not going to hold my breath though...
Dr. Gonzo
02-03-2010, 02:49 PM
That's fucking retarded. What next, participation trophies?
baseline bum
02-03-2010, 03:56 PM
Boooooooo... why fuck with the greatest sporting event on Earth?
vander
02-03-2010, 05:18 PM
Boooooooo... why fuck with the greatest sporting event on Earth?
:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.