PDA

View Full Version : Pistons moving to Pittsburgh?



Thunder Dan
02-04-2010, 10:01 AM
The Detroit Pistons could be sold. Pittsburgh has a new arena, with a lot of dates to fill between Penguins games.

Can the Pittsburgh Pistons be far behind?

Don't count on it. But that hasn't stopped speculation about the potential for the Pistons to move to Pittsburgh, a city littered with the carcasses of professional basketball teams that came and failed.

It started with Detroit Free Press columnist Drew Sharp, who warned in a Jan. 23 column that there is a possibility that a buyer of the Pistons, the National Basketball Association franchise, could move them elsewhere.

"And there's the lure of a new state-of-the-art arena in Pittsburgh later this year, and Kansas City already has its own version of the Palace [the Piston's home arena], waiting to pirate away another city's NBA or NHL franchise," he wrote.

Hockey fans might recall Kansas City. It was where the Penguins were headed during the dark days before the team cut a deal with state and local leaders in 2007 to build the $321 million Consol Energy Center in Pittsburgh. Team owner Mario Lemieux later admitted that the goal all along was to keep the team here.

Now it's Pittsburgh, by virtue of its new state-of-the-art palace, that's on the receiving side.

The Pistons have played in Detroit for more than 50 years. The future of the franchise became an issue last month when principal owner Karen Davidson, who took over the squad after the death of her husband William last year, said she would consider selling the team.

Mrs. Davidson said in an interview with the Daily Tribune that she can't imagine the team playing anywhere but in Motown.

So far, it doesn't appear that any potential buyers have emerged, certainly no one with an interest in moving the franchise to Pittsburgh or anywhere else.

An NBA team in Pittsburgh could pose competition to the Penguins, who now have the winter market all to themselves once the Steelers season ends. In fact, Penguins CEO Ken Sawyer said at one point he didn't believe Pittsburgh was big enough to support pro hockey and basketball.

Still, the Penguins said Wednesday they'd "certainly be willing to listen" to a prospective owner with an interest in moving an NBA team to the Consol Energy Center.

One skeptic is Mt. Lebanon billionaire Mark Cuban, owner of the NBA's Dallas Mavericks. In an e-mail, he said, "I don't see any chance that a team would leave Detroit for any city. And I don't know if Pittsburgh could support an NBA team. They would have to compete with the Penguins, and that's hard to do."

But Yarone Zober, chief of staff to Mayor Luke Ravenstahl, said the naysayers about basketball in Pittsburgh are wrong. He noted that the University of Pittsburgh basketball team typically sells out its home games.

Also, an exhibition game last fall between the Cleveland Cavaliers and the Mavericks drew 10,011 people to Pitt's Petersen Events Center, up nearly 2,000 from a 2008 exhibition game.

Mr. Zober will get an argument from Bill Miller, owner and general manager of the professional Pittsburgh Phantoms of the American Basketball Association. In its first year, the team, which started its season in December, played its home games at the Carnegie Library in Homestead and was "happy if we get 200" people in the stands, he said.

"We can't get anybody to see our guys. I just can't see a following for NBA basketball here in Pittsburgh. It's a football town, a hockey town," Mr. Miller said.

The city at one time was home to a pro basketball pioneer. In 1946-47, the Pittsburgh Ironmen played in the Basketball Association of America, a forerunner to the NBA. The Ironmen played in Duquesne Gardens, a converted trolley barn. The Ironmen folded before their second season.

A team called the Pittsburgh Rens, short for Renaissance, represented the American Basketball League but didn't make it past its second season.

Basketball returned in the form of the Pittsburgh Pipers of the American Basketball Association in 1967. They dispatched the New Orleans Buccaneers in the seventh game of the championship round to win the ABA title.

Owner Gabe Rubin, who claimed losses of $250,000, sold the team to Minneapolis in June of 1968. The franchise lost a reported $400,000 and returned to Pittsburgh for the 1969-70 season. In 1970-71, the team changed its name to the Condors. The Condors failed to qualify for the playoffs in two seasons and were disbanded after the 1972 season.

Yes, it's a sorry history. But a city's sports legacy can change in an instant. Just ask New Orleans. And with NBA superstar LeBron James becoming a free agent after the season ...

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10035/1033328-53.stm

hater
02-04-2010, 10:05 AM
the pittsburg pistons. the pipis

JoeTait75
02-04-2010, 10:07 AM
Pittsburgh isn't big enough to support four teams. They really aren't big enough to support three. The Pirates don't draw squat and the Penguins only draw when they have a superstar player. That's a pure football town, very, very similar to Cleveland.

lefty
02-04-2010, 10:10 AM
Pittsburgh isn't big enough to support four teams. They really aren't big enough to support three. The Pirates don't draw squat and the Penguins only draw when they have a superstar player. That's a pure football town, very, very similar to Cleveland.
True

Their arena was so empty when the Lemieux, Jagr, Crosby and Malkin were not around

Bartleby
02-04-2010, 10:17 AM
If they do move to Pittsburgh they should change their name to the Pisces.

The Gemini Method
02-04-2010, 12:47 PM
The Pirates don't draw sh#$ because they're run like s#$t and play like s#$t...'nuff said.

Whomever becomes owner of the Pistons will face the ire of the fans and for the most part on moving a storied franchise to a new locale. If you thought the uproar for a pretty successful Sonics team to the OKC was bitter, this one could be as well.

JoeTait75
02-04-2010, 12:59 PM
The Pirates don't draw sh#$ because they're run like s#$t and play like s#$t...'nuff said.

That's part of it, yeah. But IIRC they weren't a great draw back during the Bonds-Bonilla-Van Slyke years or in the late '70s We Are Family era either. I'm sure if they started winning they'd get an attendance uptick, but that's never going to be a baseball town like, say, St. Louis.

As for the Penguins, they're to Pittsburgh what the Cavaliers are to Cleveland. When they win they're popular. When they lose, they're the third team in town even behind the baseball club.

The Gemini Method
02-04-2010, 01:02 PM
They wouldn't dominate the attendance, but it was alot better back in the Bonds/We Are Family days than it is now. The new PNC park, by all reports, is a gem of a ballpark and yet, you don't have the fanship to take advantage of such a field.

As a small market team, you need to have a successful product on the field/court/ice to have any hope of making the situation a success.

Pittsburgh will always be a Steelers town and to even think of having a 4th professional sport for a smallish market like that would only exacerbate the situation. The new ownders should keep the team in Detroit, but that never seems to be the outcome.

Killakobe81
02-04-2010, 01:52 PM
That's part of it, yeah. But IIRC they weren't a great draw back during the Bonds-Bonilla-Van Slyke years or in the late '70s We Are Family era either. I'm sure if they started winning they'd get an attendance uptick, but that's never going to be a baseball town like, say, St. Louis.

As for the Penguins, they're to Pittsburgh what the Cavaliers are to Cleveland. When they win they're popular. When they lose, they're the third team in town even behind the baseball club.

Great analogy ...

I hate to see a great franchise move like Browns did to baltimore ...
Sonics to OKC ...
ANd if pistons go that would be a tragedy as well ...

ryan.stroud
02-04-2010, 02:06 PM
dont wanna see them move

admiralsnackbar
02-04-2010, 02:12 PM
Pittsburgh isn't big enough to support four teams. They really aren't big enough to support three. The Pirates don't draw squat and the Penguins only draw when they have a superstar player. That's a pure football town, very, very similar to Cleveland.

This.

23LeBronJames23
02-04-2010, 05:54 PM
If they move they should move to Seattle.

himat
02-04-2010, 08:11 PM
I would be so pissed if that happened. Dammit Dan Gilbert, the owner of the Cavs, would of so owned the Pistons if Bill Davidson's tragic passing happened a few years back.

I don't know what basketball team I would root for. Pittsburgh Piston is not the same as the Detroit Pistons.

BRHornet45
02-04-2010, 08:16 PM
The Pirates don't draw sh#$ because they're run like s#$t and play like s#$t...'nuff said.

Whomever becomes owner of the Pistons will face the ire of the fans and for the most part on moving a storied franchise to a new locale. If you thought the uproar for a pretty successful Sonics team to the OKC was bitter, this one could be as well.

exactly. the Pirates have the worst owners in the history of MLB. the league really should step in and do something about it because those owners make it crystal clear they are ONLY in it for the money. they constantly trade away their legit talent right before the player is able to demand big money, yet their ticket prices steadily rise. its a shame Cuban couldn't have bought them years ago. there is just absolutely NO excuse for any professional team in such a big city like Pittsburgh to suck for decades like they have.

Darthkiller
02-04-2010, 08:20 PM
why would the pistons move from one dead city to another. move to ann arbor imo, so i can walk to games.

scampers
02-04-2010, 08:52 PM
Mr. Davidson is having a serious fit in his grave right now.

Not that long before his death, he stated in an interview that things were in place that would ensure the Pistons would not be sold.

Now, not only is his wife going to sell the Pistons, now there's speculation that they will move out of Detroit??

The Pistons have been in Detroit since the 50's. It would be a tragedy for both the fans of the Pistons and the NBA in general if they were to move to another city--especially considering what happened to the Sonics not that long ago.

:depressed

Biggems
02-04-2010, 08:53 PM
exactly. the Pirates have the worst owners in the history of MLB. the league really should step in and do something about it because those owners make it crystal clear they are ONLY in it for the money. they constantly trade away their legit talent right before the player is able to demand big money, yet their ticket prices steadily rise. its a shame Cuban couldn't have bought them years ago. there is just absolutely NO excuse for any professional team in such a big city like Pittsburgh to suck for decades like they have.

The Penguins ownership is trying desperately to by the Pirates. I guess they are tired of the Pirates being pure trash.

JoeTait75
02-04-2010, 08:59 PM
exactly. the Pirates have the worst owners in the history of MLB. the league really should step in and do something about it because those owners make it crystal clear they are ONLY in it for the money. they constantly trade away their legit talent right before the player is able to demand big money, yet their ticket prices steadily rise. its a shame Cuban couldn't have bought them years ago. there is just absolutely NO excuse for any professional team in such a big city like Pittsburgh to suck for decades like they have.

What's the league supposed to do, draft and develop talent for them? The Pirates really haven't had all that many legit players in the last fifteen or so years. The problem with that club isn't so much that it's cheap; it's that it has done a poor job developing talent and it's thrown a lot of good money at players who aren't really worth it, like Jason Kendall and Jack Wilson.

Really, can anyone name one impact position player the Pirates have developed since 1993? Their best position player in that time was probably Brian Giles, and he came up in Cleveland's system.