View Full Version : Manu Ginobili: The Turnover Machine
SequSpur
02-05-2010, 01:18 AM
If Manu is out instead of RJ, the Spurs win this game....
rayray2k8
02-05-2010, 01:23 AM
What are you talking about? He had just ONE turnover. Fail analyzes.
jbspurs
02-05-2010, 01:25 AM
What are you talking about? He had just ONE turnover. Fail analyzes.
He counted the missed 3's as turnover...:lol
fusionjazzman72
02-05-2010, 01:25 AM
If Duncan doesn't fumble the ball away that turned into a jump ball then maybe we win.
rayray2k8
02-05-2010, 01:26 AM
He counted the missed 3's as turnover...:lol
That's just fucking stupid.. If anything, Ginobili gave us a chance to win. fucking morons. :rolleyes
It's fucking Jefferson who needs to pull his weight.
fusionjazzman72
02-05-2010, 01:26 AM
If Pop calls a timeout when the Blazers are making there run then we win
Tim turned it over at a very inopportune time as well.
honestfool84
02-05-2010, 01:27 AM
If Manu is out instead of RJ, the Spurs win this game....
your stupidity is amazing. :lmao
timvp
02-05-2010, 01:28 AM
If Pop calls a timeout when the Blazers are making there run then we win
Yeah, not calling a timeout during that stretch was a definite headscratcher.
Man In Black
02-05-2010, 01:28 AM
I swear this bum does 3 great things and 4 retarded ass things in return.
If you're talking about sequ, then you're DEAD-ON! If not...FAIL.
ElNono
02-05-2010, 01:30 AM
yeah, not calling a timeout during that stretch was a definite headscratcher.
+14424542245322
pjjrfan
02-05-2010, 01:30 AM
Lack of execution killed this team, but Manu kept them in the game and helped give themthe lead, but when he sat the team couldn't keep it up and Manu just didn't have enough to lead them.
This whole team has me scratching my head..
Lack of execution killed this team, but Manu kept them in the game and helped give themthe lead, but when he sat the team couldn't keep it up and Manu just didn't have enough to lead them.
That's the thing, of all people I expected Manu to nail that shot to tie. It was all we can ask for given the circumstances, right?
SequSpur
02-05-2010, 01:32 AM
lmao....
SequSpur
02-05-2010, 01:33 AM
That's the thing, of all people I expected Manu to nail that shot to tie. It was all we can ask for given the circumstances, right?
manu is done.
SequSpur
02-05-2010, 01:40 AM
listen you little smurf...at least talk shit after Manu has a bad game, not after he kept the Spurs in one.
manu is the spurs worst enemy now.
ffadicted
02-05-2010, 01:41 AM
lol best player on the court tonight
lol leading scorer
lol 50% shooting
lol 1 TO to 5 assists
Should I carry on?
SequSpur
02-05-2010, 01:42 AM
lol best player on the court tonight
lol leading scorer
lol 50% shooting
lol 1 TO to 5 assists
Should I carry on?
lead the trailblazers to a W.
ffadicted
02-05-2010, 01:48 AM
lead the trailblazers to a W.
Enlighten me with your troll skills
rayray2k8
02-05-2010, 01:50 AM
lead the trailblazers to a W.
Did you even watch the game? I mean seriously... You probably got a dart board with Manu's face on it. :lol
But if it makes you feel better, then blame it on him I guess. :wakeup
SequSpur
02-05-2010, 01:51 AM
Did you even watch the game? I mean seriously... You probably got a dart board with Manu's face on it. :lol
But if it makes you feel better, then blame it on him I guess. :wakeup
yeah...he looked great and then he inserted his head up the ass mentality and led the trailblazer charge...
typical manu....
raspsa
02-05-2010, 02:12 AM
Manu had the best all-around game of any Spur. I hope he keeps attacking the basket.
TD 21
02-05-2010, 02:16 AM
What are you talking about? He had just ONE turnover. Fail analyzes.
It's not how many, it's when.
Jason R
02-05-2010, 02:21 AM
TD 21 has a good point. It used to be that whenever Manu didn't really score til the end we chalked it up to clutch. So what do you say when the inverse occurs and Manu turns it over when it hurts the most?
rayray2k8
02-05-2010, 02:22 AM
It's not how many, it's when.
Are you fucking kidding me???? He was probably the spurs best player on the floor, but fuck it, he choked at the end so who cares?
Yeah.. Whatever. Go buy sequ another beer, he's obviously been drinking tonight.
This is the same Manu that we've had since 2003. You gotta take the good with the bad.
It's never a good shot if it doesn't go in. Unreal :lol
TD 21
02-05-2010, 02:35 AM
Are you fucking kidding me???? He was probably the spurs best player on the floor, but fuck it, he choked at the end so who cares?
Yeah.. Whatever. Go buy sequ another beer, he's obviously been drinking tonight.
This is the same Manu that we've had since 2003. You gotta take the good with the bad.
It's never a good shot if it doesn't go in. Unreal :lol
What's your point? He had an awful turnover and missed a wide open three with the game in the balance. He didn't come through in the clutch. I don't care how many points he scored, it was yet another embarrassing loss and he was part of the reason why it was. I'm not blaming the loss solely on him though, if that's what you think I meant by that comment.
Sean Cagney
02-05-2010, 02:56 AM
I swear you are beyond retarded, what about your BOY PARKERS MISS that would have put us up one too since you mention Manu missing a shot? Both were clean shots, both missed. That missed rotation which got the BLAZERS A WIDE OPEN THREE DID IT, period.
sabar
02-05-2010, 03:06 AM
It's not how many, it's when.
Thread title is still fail. A machine should be able to get more than one turnover. Of course, he didn't know he only had 1 turnover. :lmao
PURO SAN ANTO 210!
02-05-2010, 03:37 AM
Manu is my dogg!!!!!! So who eva don like him fuck u puto's !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Puro san anto 210!!!!
raspsa
02-05-2010, 03:56 AM
Doug Collins mentioned that Manu is going to be a free agent after this season. I think Manu is going to give it his all the remainder of the season to drive up his price. I think a number of teams will be interested in him.
greyforest
02-05-2010, 05:09 AM
Yeah, not calling a timeout during that stretch was a definite headscratcher.
seriously wtf
mookie2001
02-05-2010, 06:10 AM
When I see ginobili brick threes in crunchtime and throw the ball away late, I think to myself, why do we brainwash our kids and tell them that they can be anything they want to be?
Slippy
02-05-2010, 06:42 AM
Yeah, not calling a timeout during that stretch was a definite headscratcher.
Go figure? Would of got Tony back in the game a lot sooner too.
All i know is that's the Manu im used to, continuing on from the Sac game . It's a sight for sore eyes. As Tony would say we need "Manu to be Manu" and he certainly was. Manu stepped it up in the second half. Giving up a10 point lead that he help set up in the 4th was a massive letdown. The game was in the bag. :bang
Im more worried about the way Tim is looking health wise. Defensively he's just struggling, very immobile. This team can only go so far on that end with him playing subpar.
Cherry
02-05-2010, 07:04 AM
manu is the spurs worst enemy now.
http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/9433/sequu2.gif ;)
Manu-of-steel
02-05-2010, 07:19 AM
LOL at those blaming ONLY manu for this loss. He shot at 50%, had only 1 to, drove to the hole for lay ups-and still his fault. Wow! Without him, the spurs had no chance against the blazers.
SpurOutofTownFan
02-05-2010, 10:16 AM
Look who created this post. Enough said.
SenorSpur
02-05-2010, 11:18 AM
Manu did take a couple of quickly-hoisted, ill-advised shots, down the stretch.
Chomag
02-05-2010, 11:29 AM
The way all the Spurs (coach included) are playing right now how can you single one player out?
Pauleta14
02-05-2010, 11:58 AM
Knowing who sarted the thread, why feed him???
It's like a thread started by lennylayette about how TP sucks...
What's the point? :lol
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.