PDA

View Full Version : Ginobili/Jefferson for Grant Hill/Stoudemire



jagland2003
02-11-2010, 11:38 AM
Ginobili & Jefferson for Grant Hill & Stoudemire. Does anyone know where This rumor got started?

ElNono
02-11-2010, 11:39 AM
I don't know, but I don't see the legs on it. Do contracts even match?

CGD
02-11-2010, 11:40 AM
Ginobili & Jefferson for Grant Hill & Stoudemire. Does anyone know where This rumor got started?

Probably by you.

5in10
02-11-2010, 11:42 AM
Probably by you.

FvckMavs
02-11-2010, 11:45 AM
by you.

Juanobili
02-11-2010, 11:51 AM
Ginobili & Jefferson for Grant Hill & Stoudemire. Does anyone know where This rumor got started?

I first heard about it HERE (http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=146460)

we'll see what happens

I. Hustle
02-11-2010, 11:52 AM
AAAWWWWW I just got rickrolled!

jason1301
02-11-2010, 11:52 AM
not sure how i feel about this trade, but it does make our roster more balanced.

yavozerb
02-11-2010, 11:58 AM
Why not post this in the trade speculation thread? :bang

Muser
02-11-2010, 12:02 PM
Cool

MaNu4Tres
02-11-2010, 12:05 PM
Yeah this topic can't go in the trade speculation thread.

Raising the bar one thread at at time...

edgar
02-11-2010, 12:09 PM
Ibtl !!!

Dr. Gonzo
02-11-2010, 12:25 PM
Great Thread!

MaNu4Tres
02-11-2010, 12:32 PM
Jagland should get a spur for this thread.

Bruno
02-11-2010, 12:49 PM
http://twitter.com/Question210/status/8945240568

lefty
02-11-2010, 12:52 PM
:wow
http://twitter.com/Question210/status/8945240568

ElNono
02-11-2010, 12:56 PM
http://i46.tinypic.com/7095yr.png

Wombatzu
02-11-2010, 12:57 PM
well, if it's on Twitter it must be true...

Jefferson would be a decent fit in Phoenix, probably, but i don't see why they would take on RJ's $15m next year to avoid just the possibility of paying Amare $17m.

clubalien
02-11-2010, 12:59 PM
grant hill is a great basketball player A sure allstar talent. However, he was a FA back when Tim was a fa so he might have lost some of his hoops.

If grant hill can play anything like what i think if nothing else he will bring some fan enjoyment. I just am a little nervous since who knows he might bring the performance of RJ.

I guess stoudemire is just a throw in to make the trade work. I think most people believe we should go after Bosh instead of lebron in FA. How will this affect our chances of landing them?

Marcus Bryant
02-11-2010, 12:59 PM
At this point the Spurs will be lucky to find anyone to take Jefferson off their hands. And there's the homecoming angle.

Still, what a steep discount from where things stood before the season. But, then again, the Spurs got Jefferson for crap themselves. It's unfortunate that he hasn't worked out, but the price paid and the fact that you do that trade if it's available anytime softens that.

Manu is the real disappointment. Where would this team be if Mother Argentina didn't F up the program? Of course, at this point his price for an extension should be heavily discounted itself.

On the surface, seems a fair enough deal. Not a season changer, IMO, unless Amare's D will magically improve.

Fpoonsie
02-11-2010, 01:00 PM
:lol Could you imagine Manu playin for PHO?

I like Hill and all, but this thread made me giggle.

Marcus Bryant
02-11-2010, 01:00 PM
Likely the Spurs would take back another contract from Phoenix, if this was to go down.

yavozerb
02-11-2010, 01:00 PM
http://twitter.com/Question210/status/8945240568

:lol, oh brother, now twitter messages off some kids phone is going to lead to rumours..Bruno, why????

ElNono
02-11-2010, 01:01 PM
This is the only way I can make ends meet... I don't know that the Spurs want to take on more salary though...

http://i45.tinypic.com/33tgn80.png

Fpoonsie
02-11-2010, 01:03 PM
And, not to give this proposal any merit, but expect Stoudemire's game to nose-dive w/o a pass-first PG.

Anyways, back to :loling

Marcus Bryant
02-11-2010, 01:05 PM
Assuming Manu's gone otherwise, then there would be a slight increase, but that would be cushioned by the fact that you wouldn't have to extend Manu.

Another thing to consider is that if the Spurs don't move Manu, then they'd be likely forced into extending him by the fanbase (IMO).

What we have to come to terms with is that Manu will never be back to the Manu the championship level series closer of old.

lurker23
02-11-2010, 01:05 PM
I guess stoudemire is just a throw in to make the trade work. I think most people believe we should go after Bosh instead of lebron in FA. How will this affect our chances of landing them?

Even if the Spurs manage to dump RJ's contract, they won't have enough cap space to offer those players max contracts.

As far as the general topic of this thread goes, I said it before when the original Amare rumors came about: I'm willing to give up RJ, but not Manu. Simple as that in my mind.

Marcus Bryant
02-11-2010, 01:07 PM
I guess the Spurs could end the Duncan era like the Bird era in Boston, no longer a serious title contender, but the old crew plays together almost to the end.

Fpoonsie
02-11-2010, 01:12 PM
I guess the Spurs could end the Duncan era like the Bird era in Boston, no longer a serious title contender, but the old crew plays together almost to the end.

The sentimental side of me is perfectly fine w/ that. The '03, watching Dave leave the game a champ w/ a bunch of up-and-comers side of me is not.

I suppose there's a bit of sentiment in both, but whatevs...

IronMexican
02-11-2010, 01:13 PM
:rollin I am sure Phoenix would love to pay to keep RJ around for 3 years

lurker23
02-11-2010, 01:15 PM
:rollin I am sure Phoenix would love to pay to keep RJ around for 3 years

Or 1.25 years, whichever.

bigdog
02-11-2010, 01:16 PM
Or 1.25 years, whichever.

:lol

IronMexican
02-11-2010, 01:16 PM
Or 1.25 years, whichever.

He's an expiring next season? I actually thought he was there till the end of the season after the next. Oh well. Now I get to look like a retard. What a dumbass that ironmexican is. Still, I see no sentiment by Phoenix to do it. Amare is a huge expiring.

lurker23
02-11-2010, 01:33 PM
He's an expiring next season? I actually thought he was there till the end of the season after the next. Oh well. Now I get to look like a retard. What a dumbass that ironmexican is. Still, I see no sentiment by Phoenix to do it. Amare is a huge expiring.

I'm not positive what the Suns' angle is either. Personally, I think RJ would fit in nicely with their style, and perhaps they think the same way. However, I think they could probably get better than RJ for Amare. For example, I would probably take Beasley from Miami (a deal that's said to be on the table) before I'd take RJ's contract.

TimmehC
02-11-2010, 01:34 PM
He's an expiring next season? I actually thought he was there till the end of the season after the next. Oh well. Now I get to look like a retard. What a dumbass that ironmexican is. Still, I see no sentiment by Phoenix to do it. Amare is a huge expiring.

Maybe Pop has convinced Kerr that RJ is a power forward.

Wombatzu
02-11-2010, 01:36 PM
Still, I see no sentiment by Phoenix to do it. Amare is a huge expiring.

Amare is threatening to exercise his option for $17m or so, which is why there are no takers yet... no one wants to pay him that next year.

SpurNation
02-11-2010, 01:57 PM
Amare is threatening to exercise his option for $17m or so, which is why there are no takers yet... no one wants to pay him that next year.

The Spurs would if they are going to be paying RJ approximately the same amount anyway.

But...this deal doesn't make sense for the Suns. What do they gain by allowing Amare to go without having another big on the team to take his place?

They're (Phoenix) 10 games behind the Lakers and a decent record to boot.

But if this has any merit and does go down....I'd be fine with it. Especially if the continuation (developmentation) of small ball is gong to be the "new" way of the Spurs...Amare would be the perfect player to use.

I've always liked Barbosa (if he's included to make it work) and in the past wondered why the Spurs let him go because he always fit that role of defensive perimeter guy that can hit the 3.

Grant Hill?....apparently still playing at a decent level at 29mpg.

I don't know...I never would have thought of this to be a possibility but stranger things have happened in this league.

SpurNation
02-11-2010, 02:06 PM
Was just tinkering...but this worked:
http://www.realgm.com/src_checktrade.php?tradeid=5449862

clubalien
02-11-2010, 02:16 PM
Wait so is this actually coming out from a legit news source?

it has been confirmed on twitter

HarlemHeat37
02-11-2010, 02:20 PM
Read my question again.

:lol


I say no thanks to this, unless the FO feels like Manu is going to leave..

yavozerb
02-11-2010, 02:35 PM
OMG, now we have people thinking twitter is a legit news source..:bang

Whisky Dog
02-11-2010, 02:38 PM
I guess the Spurs could end the Duncan era like the Bird era in Boston, no longer a serious title contender, but the old crew plays together almost to the end.

That sent the Cs into a 2 decade long spiral of suck. Not what we want here.

rascal
02-11-2010, 02:40 PM
I might be one of the few here who still wants to keep jefferson. The problem is in the way he is being used.

Pop needs to get the team to get out and run more and Jefferson's entire game will get a boost.

yavozerb
02-11-2010, 02:43 PM
I think jefferson would do much better on the 2nd unit due to the fact the offense would probably be run more through him and he could dominate the ball a little more.

alchemist
02-11-2010, 02:43 PM
Why would the Suns do this? This makes zero sense to me. (Unless RJ agrees to opt out this year which takes 24 million off the Suns checkbook)

I. Hustle
02-11-2010, 02:43 PM
Yeah I hope Pop just let's Jefferson run... all the way to Phoenix.

rascal
02-11-2010, 02:48 PM
Assuming Manu's gone otherwise, then there would be a slight increase, but that would be cushioned by the fact that you wouldn't have to extend Manu.

Another thing to consider is that if the Spurs don't move Manu, then they'd be likely forced into extending him by the fanbase (IMO).

What we have to come to terms with is that Manu will never be back to the Manu the championship level series closer of old.


It would be a big mistake to extend manu only because of the fanbase and not because the Spurs really believe he is worth it.

phxspurfan
02-11-2010, 03:01 PM
I guess the Spurs could end the Duncan era like the Bird era in Boston, no longer a serious title contender, but the old crew plays together almost to the end.

I thought about this the other day too...how cool would it have been if we had kept Oberto, KT and Bowen? Our chemistry would still be good, Parker would average an additional assist and some more points (probably be an all star), Manu would still suck but Duncan and Pop wouldn't be sad.

Xylus
02-11-2010, 03:07 PM
Would never happen.

If the Suns are trading Amare, it'll be for youth.

Muser
02-11-2010, 03:08 PM
Jerry West got the Lakers Pau, Kerr gets the Spurs Amare?


:blah

scottspurs
02-11-2010, 03:50 PM
I don't think Amare will end up on the Spurs, but one has to wonder what a force he could be on both sides of the ball if he was told to worry about defense before offense.

Amare has never really been on a defensive minded team so this trade would be interesting. It would either wind up being a brilliant trade or a complete bust.

Their are only two reasons we trade Manu:

1. The Front office thinks he doesn't have much left or

2. The Front office has a hunch Manu won't give them a hometown discount to resign because I don't think the Spurs are going to pay Manu much more than he is getting now.

Xylus
02-11-2010, 03:59 PM
Amare's not a defensive-minded player, but that doesn't mean he can't play defense. He's sure as hell a better post defender than Channing Frye.

Thompson
02-11-2010, 04:05 PM
2. The Front office has a hunch Manu won't give them a hometown discount to resign because I don't think the Spurs are going to pay Manu much more than he is getting now.

More? I wouldn't give him but around half of what he's currently getting, and even that's on condition that he doesn't play for the NT any more. They've already blown two years of $10 million + on him so he could play with his NT.

dbestpro
02-11-2010, 04:11 PM
I'd give Manu 15 mil for 3 years. Last year partial guarantee. Pretty much the same as Dice's deal. No more.

scottspurs
02-11-2010, 04:12 PM
More? I wouldn't give him but around half of what he's currently getting, and even that's on condition that he doesn't play for the NT any more. They've already blown two years of $10 million + on him so he could play with his NT.

Yeah, I wrote that wrong and I agree with you. Basically, if Manu wants to stay he will have to take a pay cut. If the the FO thinks he won't he may not be a spur a week from now if the right trade comes along.

sananspursfan21
02-11-2010, 04:16 PM
why would the suns ever want to do this?

CGD
02-11-2010, 04:23 PM
Ginobili & Jefferson for Grant Hill & Stoudemire. Does anyone know where This rumor got started?

Somewhere jagland2003 is laughing his ass off.

easy7
02-11-2010, 04:37 PM
Let Manu walk. We have Dick to take his place...literally.

crc21209
02-11-2010, 04:52 PM
Ginobili/Jefferson for Hill/Stoudemire/filler? If there is ANY truth to this...I think I do it. :tu

TJastal
02-11-2010, 04:56 PM
Ginobili/Jefferson for Hill/Stoudemire/filler? If there is ANY truth to this...I think I do it. :tu

How does getting rid of the one guy on the team that works the pick and roll well with a guy who works best in the pick and roll gonna help?

crc21209
02-11-2010, 05:02 PM
How does getting rid of the one guy on the team that works the pick and roll well with a guy who works best in the pick and roll gonna help?

Because at this point, they HAVE to do SOMETHING. Anything....

Xylus
02-11-2010, 05:04 PM
How does getting rid of the one guy on the team that works the pick and roll well with a guy who works best in the pick and roll gonna help?

Amare gets most of his points off isos these days, anyway. Teams have figured out how to prevent the Nash-Amare pick-and-roll deathtrap by throwing an extra defender at Amare on the roll.

TMTTRIO
02-11-2010, 05:04 PM
Could you imagine Manu playin for PHO?
Well maybe the training and conditioning staff could get Manu back in good condition just like he has with Grant Hill and some of the other guys.

MaNu4Tres
02-11-2010, 05:10 PM
I'd give Manu 15 mil for 3 years. Last year partial guarantee. Pretty much the same as Dice's deal. No more.

Manu would laugh at such an offer.

TJastal
02-11-2010, 05:15 PM
Amare gets most of his points off isos these days, anyway. Teams have figured out how to prevent the Nash-Amare pick-and-roll deathtrap by throwing an extra defender at Amare on the roll.

And? This is a risky strategy for teams to employ however because Nash will find the open man.

Xylus
02-11-2010, 05:16 PM
And? This is a risky strategy for teams to employ however because Nash will find the open man.

But the open man is usually not as effective as Amare Stoudemire running full-steam at the basket.

TJastal
02-11-2010, 05:20 PM
But the open man is usually not as effective as Amare Stoudemire running full-steam at the basket.

Gets the suns exactly what they want though, which are open uncontested shots.

On a similar note, I haven't seen any teams that have been able to stop the Manu/Blair pick and roll. If Blair had Amare's finishing moves and didn't miss so many gimpy shots they would be just as effective as the Nash/Stoud

ffadicted
02-11-2010, 05:22 PM
Worst trade suggestion ever

Muser
02-11-2010, 05:24 PM
Comparing Manu/Blair PnR to Amare/Nash :lmao

yavozerb
02-11-2010, 05:27 PM
Gets the suns exactly what they want though, which are open uncontested shots.

On a similar note, I haven't seen any teams that have been able to stop the Manu/Blair pick and roll. If Blair had Amare's finishing moves and didn't miss so many gimpy shots they would be just as effective as the Nash/Stoud

:lol...your on a roll, keep em coming.

yavozerb
02-11-2010, 05:43 PM
I really cannot imagine this trade going down, cause I would imagine that manu would have to accept a contract extension with the suns before they would consider this move. I am not at all an amare fan, but the guy is an offensive machine, he can drive to it on most bigs and hit some midrange jumpshots as well.

Marcus Bryant
02-11-2010, 05:50 PM
Pop needs to get the team to get out and run more and Jefferson's entire game will get a boost.

Well, there is that theory. Score 120 and lose by 10.

Jace
02-11-2010, 06:05 PM
Would be a giant win for the Spurs, no way it happens.

Lay Jefferson onto the Suns, get an expiring contract+great big man for a year

panic giraffe
02-11-2010, 06:42 PM
http://twitter.com/Question210/status/8945240568

ah yes, because if i trust any name for sporting news its...
shitty local rappers who have been saying their major label debut will be coming out for what seems like 5 years.

nothing to see here.

Thompson
02-11-2010, 06:43 PM
I'd give Manu 15 mil for 3 years. Last year partial guarantee. Pretty much the same as Dice's deal. No more.

Yeah, that's about what I was hoping for.


Manu would laugh at such an offer.

Then he can laugh his butt off somewhere else. Trade him and get something for him before he walks (if he doesn't appear to be open to a reasonable sum).

panic giraffe
02-11-2010, 06:51 PM
I might be one of the few here who still wants to keep jefferson.

yea, you are.
somewhere a gm in WI is counting his blessings all the way to the bank.

DAF86
02-11-2010, 06:55 PM
I might be one of the few here who still wants to keep jefferson. The problem is in the way he is being used.

You were the one arguing with me about RJ > Manu back in the days, right?

clubalien
02-11-2010, 09:08 PM
Wait so is this actually coming out from a legit news source?

TE]proof (http://spursofthemoment.com/2010/01/27/rumor-spurs-after-amare-stoudemire/):lobt2:

Rogue
02-11-2010, 09:54 PM
even as the Suns are well known to be shopping Amaré recently, I don't think the Spurs are one possible destination for him. an old SF who also shoots horribly like RDJ plus a no-D PF, Spurs would definitely reject such an offer anyway even when its practicality is ignored on Suns side.

tee, hee.

Russ
02-11-2010, 10:13 PM
I doubt Ginobili will be traded. But if he is, I bet he's back to the Spurs as a FA this summer. :)

jason1301
02-11-2010, 10:15 PM
I doubt Ginobili will be traded. But if he is, I bet he's back to the Spurs as a FA this summer. :)

I hope so but Manu next to Steve Nash is scary scary duo...

Agloco
02-11-2010, 10:19 PM
somewhere a gm in WI is counting his blessings all the way to the bank.

:lol

Aged Wisconsin Cheddah

Xylus
02-11-2010, 10:22 PM
even as the Suns are well known to be shopping Amaré recently, I don't think the Spurs are one possible destination for him. an old SF who also shoots horribly like RDJ plus a no-D PF, Spurs would definitely reject such an offer anyway even when its practicality is ignored on Suns side.

tee, hee.

Hill shoots 47% from the field, 43% from 3FG, and 81% from the line. He's a step slower but still shooting well.

rascal
02-12-2010, 12:36 PM
You were the one arguing with me about RJ > Manu back in the days, right?

No, I said Carter.

silverblackfan
02-12-2010, 12:44 PM
I hope so but Manu next to Steve Nash is scary scary duo...

Would be a lot of fun to watch those two playing on the same team, but I hope we never see it happen. Unless Nash wants to come to the Spurs as a backup...

vander
02-15-2010, 12:04 AM
PLEASE DEAR GOD NO!!

I'm pretty much the #1 manu hater here, but couldn't we do this with Mcdyess instead of Manu? we have enough freaking bigs.

Ice009
02-15-2010, 12:06 AM
Why did you bring this thread back up?

vander
02-15-2010, 12:10 AM
:lol wow I had no idea this was 2 days old, I could have swore it was at the top of ST when I clicked on it WTF?

murpjf88
02-15-2010, 12:37 AM
Who the hell would want Grant Hill? He's a has been in this league. Manu can run circles around him.

Timmy21Sas
02-15-2010, 11:19 AM
Maybe Brandan Wright is an answer.He is young talented 7'5'' wingspan this means he can play center and blocks shots.

Allanon
02-15-2010, 11:30 AM
I've heard this same rumor with the inclusion of Barbosa.

It does have some merit and appears to be a decent fit for both teams.

hater
02-15-2010, 01:11 PM
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=ykpaehe

8FOR!3
02-15-2010, 04:46 PM
Grant Hill was an all star and he has aged well, but the man is 37 years old, I'd rather have the players that are 5-8 years younger.

SpurNation
02-15-2010, 06:48 PM
Grant Hill was an all star and he has aged well, but the man is 37 years old, I'd rather have the players that are 5-8 years younger.

The man can still play better than RJ and his salary is gone after this year.

FeZZy
02-15-2010, 08:16 PM
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=ykpaehe

:rolleyes

Xylus
02-15-2010, 08:50 PM
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=ykpaehe

The Heat don't need a SG.

ohmwrecker
02-16-2010, 10:58 AM
I am actually a big fan of this deal. Especially if it can be done without Manu. Which, if Steve Kerr is still retarded, could be easily done. If the Suns are willing to take Jefferson and any of our expirings for Hill/Stoudamire you would have to be a fool not to do that deal. Which pretty much makes this whole scenario a pipedream, but since everyone else is waxing fantastical, why can't I? Sure, Hill is old, but his contract is off the books next year and if he wanted to continue playing he probably could be re-signed for the minimum. He is a really smart player and a buddy of Duncan's.
I cannot fathom why anyone would not want Stoudamire on this team. He is not a great defender, but Pop would demand that he improve and his offensive skills would take a ton of pressure of Tim. With Stoudamire beasting under the basket and drawing doubles, Timmy could just shoot his patented 12 footer off glass all day. Stoudamire also comes off the books next year. This coupled with NO MORE JEFFERSON puts the Spurs right back in the Bron/Bosh/Wade sweepstakes.
Yes, I know none of this will ever happen, but I am treating myself to a flight of fancy. It's exhausting to always be the voice of reason.