PDA

View Full Version : Muni Threat: Cities Weigh Chapter 9



RandomGuy
02-19-2010, 02:21 PM
by Ianthe Jeanne Dugan and Kris Maher
Thursday, February 18, 2010

Just days after becoming controller of financially strapped Harrisburg, Pa., in January, Daniel Miller began uttering an obscure term that baffled most people who had never heard it and chilled those who had: Chapter 9.

The seldom-used part of U.S. bankruptcy law gives municipalities protection from creditors while developing a plan to pay off debts. Created in the wake of the Great Depression, Chapter 9 is widely considered a last resort and filings under it are more taboo than other parts of bankruptcy code because of the resulting uncertainty for everyone from municipal employees to bondholders.

The economic slump, however, is forcing debt-laden cities, towns and smaller taxing districts throughout the U.S. to consider using Chapter 9. As their revenue declines faster than expenses, some public entities are scrambling to keep making payments on municipal bonds. And that is causing experts to worry about the safety of securities traditionally considered low risk.

"People believe that municipal debt is safe based on assumptions that are no longer true," says Kenneth Buckfire, managing director and chief executive of Miller Buckfire & Co., an investment bank that has worked with corporations on restructurings and now is advising municipalities. For example, it isn't safe to assume that governments can raise taxes to cover shortfalls, he says.

Even threatening bankruptcy signals that municipalities are willing to compromise the security of bondholders, says Richard Raphael, an analyst at Fitch Ratings. That makes it harder for cities and towns to raise money from investors and will slow the U.S. economic recovery.

In Harrisburg, which is Pennsylvania's capital and has a population of about 47,000, a March 1 deadline is looming on a payment of $2 million out of the $68 million due this year for the financing of an incinerator plant. The facility has about $288 million in overall debt.

"Bankruptcy is inevitable," Mr. Miller says. "We are in a terrible bind." A budget passed Saturday by Harrisburg's city council didn't include any funds to cover the debt payments, according to the city clerk's office.

More from Yahoo! Finance:

• New Tax Laws to Know

• 7 States With No Income Tax

• A Bizarre Year for the Estate Tax

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the Taxes Center


Harrisburg Mayor Linda Thompson, a Democrat elected in November, opposes a bankruptcy filing and has presented an emergency plan that includes selling some of the city's assets. She couldn't be reached for comment. A spokeswoman for the mayor says Ms. Thompson is working on the plan.

Michele Torres, executive director of the Harrisburg Authority, which oversees the incinerator plant, says there are sufficient reserve funds to make the March 1 payment to bondholders. But that doesn't fix the problem. "No matter how perfect the facility runs, it just can't generate enough … to meet the $288 million debt," she says.

Since Chapter 9 was enacted in 1934, just 600 cases have been filed under the code, partly because they require state approval. Some municipalities have found escape hatches, such as raising taxes. The largest Chapter 9 case was filed in 1994, when Orange County, Calif., lost $1.6 billion on wrong-way bets on interest rates.

But many experts fear that a surge in municipal bankruptcy filings is unavoidable. "The day of reckoning is coming," says Michael Pagano, dean of the University of Illinois at Chicago's College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs.

To keep cities and towns from toppling into Chapter 9, more states are likely to make use of state laws to assume oversight of financially distressed municipalities, he predicts. Pittsburgh, for one, has been operating under such a law since 2004.

Vallejo, Calif., a city of about 116,000 people near San Francisco, has been trying to rejigger worker contracts in bankruptcy court since it filed for Chapter 9 in 2008, after buckling under declining real-estate values. Some union contracts expire later this year, and Vallejo is attempting to scrap them and start over.

In San Diego, political leaders have faced outside pressure to file for Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection as a way to get around benefits packages for public workers. San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders has publicly dismissed the idea.

Last month, Las Vegas Monorail Co., a nonprofit with over $600 million in municipal bonds, filed for Chapter 11. The company runs a 3.9-mile monorail system along the Las Vegas Strip that has been hammered by the downturn. Ridership shrank 21% last year from 2008. According to Fitch, while the monorail is covering its operating costs, default "is virtually certain" on a payment due in July.

Ambac Assurance Corp., the bond-insurance unit of Ambac Financial Group Inc., is seeking to have the case converted to a Chapter 9 proceeding. The insurer contends that the company is akin to a municipality. A judge is set to decide on the petition later this month.

Sandy Hoskins, interim chief executive of Sierra Kings Health District in Reedley, Calif., worked for nearly 30 years as an auditor and financial consultant. He says he never heard of Chapter 9 until October, when Mr. Hoskins filed a bankruptcy petition for the hospital system. "There was no other way around it," he says. With low cash balances, "there were vendors not even willing to do business with us. It was a critical situation."

Mr. Miller, Harrisburg's controller, also sees no way out of the financial squeeze. The city's per-capita debt of $9,500 is the highest in Pennsylvania and triple the debt load of Philadelphia, he says. And selling parking facilities or other properties in a fire sale would cost Harrisburg future revenue. A spokesman for Pennsylvania Gov. Edward Rendell says Harrisburg hasn't sought help from state officials.

"We can't raise taxes; they're already very high," Mr. Miller says. "If we did, people would just leave. It's cheaper to move out to the suburbs."

http://finance.yahoo.com/taxes/article/108866/muni-threat-cities-weigh-chapter-9

boutons_deux
02-19-2010, 04:48 PM
And the Banksters, Treasury, Fed skate forward without even any regulation or transparency.

RandomGuy
02-19-2010, 06:03 PM
And the Banksters, Treasury, Fed skate forward without even any regulation or transparency.

Wonder how long it will be before we get pissed enough to do anything about it.

Winehole23
02-19-2010, 06:22 PM
People are pissed at the bailout, but they're bored by the details. They don't really appreciate their continued exposure to risk, nor do they understand the institutional universe that subsumes the details and continues to consume our income.

It's not an easy thing to understand. I'm not too sure anyone understands it fully. I know I don't.

The information relating to the true financial condition of the institutions and the true level of new risk taken on by the US taxpayer, is still mostly secret. The bailees need to be fully transparent to a resolution authority so we can start taking firms off life support, and limiting the risk to taxpayers.

EVAY
02-19-2010, 06:47 PM
People are pissed at the bailout, but they're bored by the details. They don't really appreciate their continued exposure to risk, nor do they understand the institutional universe that subsumes the details and continues to consume our income.

It's not an easy thing to understand. I'm not too sure anyone understands it fully. I know I don't.

The information relating to the true financial condition of the institutions and the true level of new risk taken on by the US taxpayer, is still mostly secret. The bailees need to be fully transparent to a resolution authority so we can start taking firms off life support, and limiting the risk to taxpayers.

Well said. None of us really understands it.

Financial responsibilities were shoved down more to the state and muni levels in a big way starting in the '80's, and it was done under the generally conservative position that 'local people should decide on the taxes and services they want'. Since there was an economic boom at the time, nobody really got too upset, but it was clear at the time that the services would be unsustainable in the face of economic woes.

Now is the time of economic woes. Lots of cities and states took on debt to provide services voted in by the citizens, but were unable to produce balanced budgets becasue the same citizens who wanted the services also wanted tax reductions. (does any of this sound familiar, California?)

So, let's face it...the cities and states are gonna have to be bailed out in the same way that banks and financial institutions were bailed out, but in the meantime, doesn't it mean that any of us that ran to Muni bonds for a relatively safer investment than stocks are gonna still get rung out?

SnakeBoy
02-19-2010, 11:31 PM
The bailees need to be fully transparent to a resolution authority so we can start taking firms off life support, and limiting the risk to taxpayers.

I suspect if the bailees were fully transparent we'd be right back to talking about our collapsing financial system. It's easy to sleep well in a house made of cards as long as you don't know it's made of cards.

Winehole23
02-20-2010, 04:52 AM
Extend and pretend. That's really where we are? Fuck.

Winehole23
02-20-2010, 04:53 AM
We're still fucking insolvent. Great.

Winehole23
02-20-2010, 05:00 AM
Won't it just get more and more costly the longer we put off the day of reckoning?

That is how compounded interest works, isn't it, SnakeBoy?

SnakeBoy
02-20-2010, 11:17 AM
Won't it just get more and more costly the longer we put off the day of reckoning?

That is how compounded interest works, isn't it, SnakeBoy?

I think of it more like the fire suppression policy of the forest service. We keep putting out the little fires that would clear up the dead wood so the dead wood just keeps accumulating until there is enough that when there is a fire it's so big we can't put it out. I think there's an awful lot of dead wood in our economy right now. Somebody's gonna light a match eventually.

Winehole23
02-21-2010, 04:39 AM
Somebody's gonna light a match eventually.Yep. It might even be us.

Winehole23
02-21-2010, 04:39 AM
Maybe we already lit the match...

Winehole23
02-21-2010, 04:44 AM
...and are just waiting for someone to throw some gasoline on it.

baseline bum
02-21-2010, 05:47 AM
I think of it more like the fire suppression policy of the forest service. We keep putting out the little fires that would clear up the dead wood so the dead wood just keeps accumulating until there is enough that when there is a fire it's so big we can't put it out. I think there's an awful lot of dead wood in our economy right now. Somebody's gonna light a match eventually.

To go off on a tangent, the forest service's fire suppression plan is more in line with with not having artificial persistence of growth (which would normally be destroyed by natural fires) so as to not alter ecosystems through man's intervention. It's not really about saving everything from burning by wiping out the crap. It's more like not having man decide what is strong (or what lives) and what does not. Your analogy would hold more for property owners hacking brush and fire-fighters setting backfires to artificially eliminate it in populated areas though, but then that would seem to argue for intervention against natural occurance (for instance, that left to nature, the populated neighborhoods might burn or the economy could go down in flames).

Back to the first point, natural fire is incredibly important to forests. For example, for 100 years every fire was put out in a huge grove of 2000 year-old Sequoia trees, and in that period not a single new Sequoia sprouted, because their pine-cones need fire to allow them to open and emit seeds. It's a pretty amazing when one comes to think about it, since the seeds are released exactly when most competing trees that would ordinarily steal all the light and water from a young Sequoia would then be burnt to a crisp (the Sequoias survive the fire because they have a chemical in their bark that makes them extremely resistant to it).

EmptyMan
02-22-2010, 09:39 AM
Sup Baseline Bum

http://tobytall.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/treebeard.jpg

coyotes_geek
02-22-2010, 10:51 AM
Too many cities fell into the trap of just assuming that the growth of their tax base could outpace their debt load for all eternity. The debt culture gets bitten in the arse once again.

coyotes_geek
02-22-2010, 11:04 AM
So, let's face it...the cities and states are gonna have to be bailed out in the same way that banks and financial institutions were bailed out, but in the meantime, doesn't it mean that any of us that ran to Muni bonds for a relatively safer investment than stocks are gonna still get rung out?

Depends how you invested. If you bought individual bonds issued by a city that defaults you're screwed. But if you're in a muni bond mutual fund you're probably okay since the fund should be diversified enough to not take all that big a hit. JMO.......