Spurs get younger quickier than you thought

[iminol]

Just look at numbers.

First half of the season we played 12 man roster, like:

years old/name
20 blair
29 bogans
29 bonner
33 duncan
32 ginobili
23 hill
29 jefferson
29 mason
35 mcdyess
27 parker
36 finley
36 ratlif

Now if you replace Finley (36) and Ratliff (36) adding Mahinmi (23) and Haiston (23) it looks like this.

20 blair
29 bogans
29 bonner
33 duncan
32 ginobili
23 hill
29 jefferson
29 mason
35 mcdyess
27 parker
23 mahinmi
23 hairston


With roster (Finley&Ratliff) the avarage age of Spurs was: 29,83.
With roster (Mahinmi&Hairston) the avarage age of Spurs is: 26,91.

We are no longer old, are we? :hat :whine :pop: ?

[celldweller]

The problem is Bogans, Bonner, McDyess & Jefferson play like 40 year olds.

[Chomag]

IT depends. You got to actualy play that youth or else the point of getting younger is a moot one.

[TIMMYD!]

it depends. You got to actualy play that youth or else the point of getting younger is a moot one.

+1

[Shifty]

IT depends. You got to actualy play that youth or else the point of getting younger is a moot one.

Timmy, Manu and Dice are the only ones in our roster on the wrong side of 30 now and the first 2 are our 2 best players, while the third is very decent role player. I sure would like to play old if I had these guys.

The only 2 players I would like to see their PT reduced are 29 (Bogans and Bonner) but that just to develop to give it to Hairston and Yawn.

[iminol]

:eyebrows:guinJust wanna notice, that without Dice today, our line-up was like 26,1 yo avarage.

[SenorSpur]

it depends. You got to actualy play that youth or else the point of getting younger is a moot one.

+2