Log in

View Full Version : You Guys Ready For The 2010 Superbowl Champion Steelers Yet?!



BeefAnus II
03-08-2010, 03:11 PM
It really is unquestionable

J.T.
03-08-2010, 03:23 PM
there's no way the steelers will be champions in 2010, the saints already won it and the new super bowl winner will win in 2011.

fucking moron.

BeefAnus II
03-08-2010, 03:35 PM
there's no way the steelers will be champions in 2010, the saints already won it and the new super bowl winner will win in 2011.

fucking moron.
its the 2010 season dick head

monosylab1k
03-08-2010, 04:03 PM
I agree, while Ben is in prison having large men do to him what he did to defenseless women, Charlie Batch (a superior QB) will lead the Steelers to the Super Bowl.

Da Boys Da Best
03-08-2010, 04:14 PM
Da Boys will be taking down all the teams next season.

No giving away games on our way to 19-0!!!

LakerHater
03-08-2010, 06:18 PM
They cant win with Ben gettin raped in prison!!

DBryant88
03-09-2010, 10:41 AM
I agree, while Ben is in prison having large men do to him what he did to defenseless women, Charlie Batch (a superior QB) will lead the Steelers to the Super Bowl.

dennis dixon

jacobdrj
03-09-2010, 05:20 PM
If only Rothlisberger wasn't such a moron off the field... Could have won 4 in a row by now.

Phillip
03-09-2010, 05:22 PM
If only Rothlisberger wasn't such a moron off the field... Could have won 4 in a row by now, thanks to a loaded defense, and the zebras giftwrapping wins to the steelers.

fixed

monosylab1k
03-09-2010, 07:22 PM
If only Rothlisberger wasn't such a moron off the field... Could have won 4 in a row by now.

lol what?

monosylab1k
03-09-2010, 07:23 PM
on what universe are the pittsburgh steelers good enough to have been the first ever 4-peat super bowl team? especially considering no team has ever threepeated in the SB era.

only one team should have legitimately 4-peated, and that was the 90's Cowboys. Barry Switzer made sure that didn't happen, though.

IronMexican
03-09-2010, 07:27 PM
What aboot the Pats? If that 2005 team didn't suck ass, it was possible. I mean, the 6 seed did win it all that year. And 2006 was right there for the taking.

Goran Dragic
03-09-2010, 07:37 PM
What aboot the Pats? If that 2005 team didn't suck ass, it was possible. I mean, the 6 seed did win it all that year. And 2006 was right there for the taking.


Yeah the 2005 Pats were closer than people think. Decent chance at winning the superbowl if Brady doesn't throw to Champ Bailey in the endzone. God knows the 2006 and 2007 Pats had a good chance too.

IronMexican
03-09-2010, 07:51 PM
Denver was clearly the better team though. They dominated the entire game. Pats were missing who knows what

monosylab1k
03-10-2010, 01:18 AM
Denver was clearly the better team though. They dominated the entire game. Pats were missing who knows what

LOL what? The Broncos needed two bullshit pass interference calls and the biggest bullshit on the Bailey/Watson call where the ball clearly should have been a touchback for NE, to win that game.

I did the math that offseason, Jake Plummer had to drive his team literally about 40 yards to score 20 of their points.

Goran Dragic
03-10-2010, 01:23 AM
Yeah idk how Denver is clearly better. Either way though NE lost. It just sucks cause imho getting pittsburgh in NE would have been an easy win and they would have killed Seattle in the SB.

IronMexican
03-10-2010, 12:03 PM
Idk brah. From what I remember, the game was never in doubt for Denver. It was over 4 years ago, though.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
03-10-2010, 12:37 PM
Idk brah. From what I remember, the game was never in doubt for Denver. It was over 4 years ago, though.


Well, NE was about to score the go ahead TD before Brady threw that pick. In the end Brady threw the pick which set up Denver for a 2 possession lead so the hypotheticals don't matter but if not for that play NE probably wins. Comparable to the James Harrison pick6 in the superbowl.

The reason I didn't really agree with the "Denver was clearly the better team" is because they needed penalties and turnovers, things NE is known for not doing, in order to win. If I remember correctly New England had way more total yards but repeatedly gave Denver a short field.

clambake
03-10-2010, 12:54 PM
stay on topic please.

this thread is about rape.

symple19
03-10-2010, 01:27 PM
stay on topic please.

this thread is about rape.

:lol


I don't necessarily think Big Ben is a great guy or a saint, but I can't help but be doubtful of this woman's claims. Big stars are such easy targets for this stuff, Ben especially so with his prior history (a history that although sketchy, isn't one that has got him convicted of anything).

DUNCANownsKOBE2
03-10-2010, 03:16 PM
:lol


I don't necessarily think Big Ben is a great guy or a saint, but I can't help but be doubtful of this woman's claims. Big stars are such easy targets for this stuff, Ben especially so with his prior history (a history that although sketchy, isn't one that has got him convicted of anything).


You'd have to be the unluckiest person in the world to get falsely accused of rape twice. There's something fishy.

symple19
03-10-2010, 03:31 PM
You'd have to be the unluckiest person in the world to get falsely accused of rape twice. There's something fishy.

Where there's smoke there's fire tends to ring true in most cases, but with athletes I like to wait and see until more evidence comes out.

Ben has some questionable judgement when it comes to his nocturnal habits(clubbing in Milledgeville Ga Ben...really? :lol), but many 20 year old redneck chicks are known to be stupid, starstruck, skanks who are quick to take advantage of a situation, especially a situation that has millions in the bank account.

All I'm really saying is that I'm not going to jump to conclusions like so many others are doing. It won't surprise me either way this case breaks.

BeefAnus II
03-10-2010, 03:35 PM
Ben is just a fucking idiot for putting himself in situations where he can be accused of crap, great qb but, an idiot off the field.

symple19
03-10-2010, 03:58 PM
Ben is just a fucking idiot for putting himself in situations where he can be accused of crap, great qb but, an idiot off the field.

No doubt about that

clambake
03-10-2010, 04:14 PM
Ben is just a fucking idiot for putting himself in situations where he can be accused of crap, great qb but, an idiot off the field.

thats why there are no steeler cheerleaders.

J.T.
03-10-2010, 04:17 PM
The Pats could have easily threepeated if not for Champ Bailey and Peyton Manning.

J.T.
03-10-2010, 04:18 PM
The Pats could have easily threepeated if not for Champ Bailey and Peyton Manning.

Fourpeat if they could have stopped some some scrub WR named Tyree from making the last catch of his career.

FlavoredIcecream
03-10-2010, 04:25 PM
Fourpeat if they could have stopped some some scrub WR named Tyree from making the last catch of his career.

Actually that would have made it a 5peat.

They already had 2 in a row. If it wasn't for Champ it would have been 3 in a row. If it wasn't for Peyton, it would have been 4 in a row. If it wasn't for that Scrub Tyree it would have been 5 in a row and capping off 19-0. If Brady didn't get hurt the next season, they would have won 6 in a row. And then Brady would have been fully healthy this past season to make it 7 in a row.

:lol That'd be pretty sick if that had happened.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
03-10-2010, 04:32 PM
Fourpeat if they could have stopped some some scrub WR named Tyree from making the last catch of his career.


Fivepeat if they didn't blow a huge lead to the Colts the year before :lol

DUNCANownsKOBE2
03-10-2010, 04:32 PM
nevermind flavoredicecream pointed that out.

Blake
03-10-2010, 04:41 PM
they could have had 5 if not for the lousy superbowl shuffle