PDA

View Full Version : It's official: Mahinmi is garbage



Pages : 1 [2]

underdawg
03-11-2010, 06:32 PM
Totally agree and Pop is slowly coming around to giving playing time to younger guys like Hill, Blair, and it looks like Hairston now. IMO pop is the kind of coach that doesn't want to just throw a young guy out their for the sake of letting them get their feet wet. Instead, Pop micromanages their minutes, and brings them along slowly maybe too slowly to alot of fans, but Pop, like alot of coaches absolutely hates younger, inexpierenced players, because of their penchant for making rookie type mistakes. I have no problem with people criticizing Pop for his philosphy on playing young guys, but Pop does eventually play these type of players when he feels their ready.

I can't say I agree with you on that. He didn't play Hill in the playoffs last year until he ran out of options. Hill (maybe not "ready" to play) could have helped earlier. Don't play these unproven guys when your core is consistently performing to a level that makes you a contender - until you're at that level you need to find something that works.

TDMVPDPOY
03-11-2010, 09:06 PM
I can't say I agree with you on that. He didn't play Hill in the playoffs last year until he ran out of options. Hill (maybe not "ready" to play) could have helped earlier. Don't play these unproven guys when your core is consistently performing to a level that makes you a contender - until you're at that level you need to find something that works.

pops an idiot for not playin ghill last season against the mavs in the playoffs, ghill3 was doing a fine job in the regular season guarding alot of the elite guards in league from kobe, nash, iverson who else did he shit on when given the opportunity

Obstructed_View
03-12-2010, 05:37 AM
fixed

So his teams always win despite his mistakes, which means he must be contributing something. Hint: Watch his defense sometime.

Obstructed_View
03-12-2010, 05:39 AM
I can't say I agree with you on that. He didn't play Hill in the playoffs last year until he ran out of options. Hill (maybe not "ready" to play) could have helped earlier. Don't play these unproven guys when your core is consistently performing to a level that makes you a contender - until you're at that level you need to find something that works.

In addition, Pop benched Bowen last year in favor of Finley until it was too late as well, then comes in this year and touts Bogans as the same type player as Bowen. That's a pretty clear inidication that he's an idiot.

z0sa
03-12-2010, 05:53 AM
In addition, Pop benched Bowen last year in favor of Finley until it was too late as well, then comes in this year and touts Bogans as the same type player as Bowen. That's a pretty clear inidication that he's an idiot.

What pisses me off is the fact some of this shit seems so obvious from a personnel standpoint.

We are lacking a consistent athletic defensive presence in the paint next to Tim Duncan. We have a rookie who could at least somewhat fill the void. Pop's plan? Simply don't play the rookie at all. We'd rather go for broke on a small ball lineup than give ourselves any chance at having the necessary tools for victory.

What makes the situation even worse is that Ian has been decent in his garbage minutes.

It's not just Ian. You've got a guy like Hairston who IMO is significantly more talented than Bogans in every way except shooting. Why not pit him against Bogans for some minutes early in the season? Even if you're Pop and leaning against Hairston, you still give him a chance to succeed, simply because his unrealized potential could be high enough to warrant it.

Even more confusion is caused by Pop when he can't settle on a rotation with the players he's chosen.

The Ian story is just total BS, though. Exact skillset we need, groomed for years in our system, nope, no chance for you.

TimDunkem
03-12-2010, 05:58 AM
I'm pretty sure Hairston is the better mid-ranger shooter too.

MrFundamental
03-12-2010, 10:42 AM
So his teams always win despite his mistakes, which means he must be contributing something.
Correlation =/= causation.

MrFundamental
03-12-2010, 10:44 AM
I can't say I agree with you on that. He didn't play Hill in the playoffs last year until he ran out of options. Hill (maybe not "ready" to play) could have helped earlier. Don't play these unproven guys when your core is consistently performing to a level that makes you a contender - until you're at that level you need to find something that works.
Hill got 24 minutes game 3 in a loss after getting 4 minutes in a win. If we are going by correlation = causation logic, then Hill got too many minutes the rest of the series.

in2deep
03-12-2010, 10:46 AM
So his teams always win despite his mistakes, which means he must be contributing something. Hint: Watch his defense sometime.

way to overrate Ian's defense. It seems ok for a 7 footer but it is nothing to write home about, especially considering his foul rate.

underdawg
03-12-2010, 07:29 PM
Hill got 24 minutes game 3 in a loss after getting 4 minutes in a win. If we are going by correlation = causation logic, then Hill got too many minutes the rest of the series.

so, you're saying Hill wasn't good enough for the playoffs last year and Ian shouldn't play this year - hmmm.

underdawg
03-12-2010, 07:29 PM
way to overrate Ian's defense. It seems ok for a 7 footer but it is nothing to write home about, especially considering his foul rate.

Hear, hear! The Spurs will not tolerate less than excellent defense.

Obstructed_View
03-12-2010, 07:34 PM
way to overrate Ian's defense. It seems ok for a 7 footer but it is nothing to write home about, especially considering his foul rate.

I'm going simply on what he's done on defense this year that I've seen with my own eyes. His rotations and energy are far better than anyone on the team not named Ginobili and he has the height to change shots. It's really hard to overrate a guy's defense when he's the only center over 6'7" with any athletic ability on the entire roster.

Old School 44
03-12-2010, 07:56 PM
I'm going simply on what he's done on defense this year that I've seen with my own eyes. His rotations and energy are far better than anyone on the team not named Ginobili and he has the height to change shots. It's really hard to overrate a guy's defense when he's the only center over 6'7" with any athletic ability on the entire roster.

Yes, but he's not the "centerpiece". :lol

J_Paco
03-12-2010, 11:54 PM
I'm going simply on what he's done on defense this year that I've seen with my own eyes. His rotations and energy are far better than anyone on the team not named Ginobili and he has the height to change shots. It's really hard to overrate a guy's defense when he's the only center over 6'7" with any athletic ability on the entire roster.

Ian could've been playing a similar as Chris Andersen does in Denver. Oh well, we've got Bonner to depend on for rebounding and interior defense.