PDA

View Full Version : Better without the big 3?



mathbzh
03-14-2010, 07:36 AM
Things are getting so ridiculous with the "Are we better without Parker"...
I needed to start one... sorry :king

The Spurs are on amazing 3 wins streak (NYK, timber-poodle, and the other team from LA... imagine how tough it is...).
With:
- Parker out
- Duncan averaging only 13 pts/6 rbds
- Ginobili averaging only 16 pts / 6 ast after scoring 38 in a loss

Are we better without the "Big 3"

Should we start
Hill, Bogans, RJ, Bonner, Mahinmi (did you notice he played in all 3 wins)?

TDMVPDPOY
03-14-2010, 07:40 AM
i needed to start one... Sorry :king

should we start
hill, bogans, rj, bonner, mahinmi (did you notice he played in all 3 wins)?

ibtl

PublicOption
03-14-2010, 08:22 AM
only Pop really knows how good Hill is. If he thinks he can lead the office then Parker would be expendable, but Parker was a Finals MVP with Lebron an his 44" vertical on the floor....I say a rested Parker is still a valuable asset.....lets wait before we come to conclusions......but this rest for Parker is what is going to get us to the WCF this year.

greyforest
03-14-2010, 08:25 AM
Better when playing sub 500 teams

TDMVPDPOY
03-14-2010, 09:14 AM
only Pop really knows how good Hill is. If he thinks he can lead the office then Parker would be expendable, but Parker was a Finals MVP with Lebron an his 44" vertical on the floor....I say a rested Parker is still a valuable asset.....lets wait before we come to conclusions......but this rest for Parker is what is going to get us to the WCF this year.

stop bringing up the parker finals mvp bs as a measuring stick, anyone can outplay that scrub gibson who was a rookie who had no business trying to defend parker or whoever was playing against him...

Brazil
03-14-2010, 06:46 PM
Things are getting so ridiculous with the "Are we better without Parker"...
I needed to start one... sorry :king

The Spurs are on amazing 3 wins streak (NYK, timber-poodle, and the other team from LA... imagine how tough it is...).
With:
- Parker out
- Duncan averaging only 13 pts/6 rbds
- Ginobili averaging only 16 pts / 6 ast after scoring 38 in a loss

Are we better without the "Big 3"

Should we start
Hill, Bogans, RJ, Bonner, Mahinmi (did you notice he played in all 3 wins)?

Spurs fans doing what they are supposed to do during this injury. For TP it's a loss loss situation, if spurs loose fuck tp he cannot stay healthy and he wants to play for France if spurs win spurs are better without him nothing new here.

In same range of ideas, I suppose the Lakers are better w/o kobe.

oh and lol at the whole RJ plays better w/o tp, the first 2 games he finished scoreless with a 0-2 on the last one of the two. If RJ sucks it's his fault.

if we have a chance of doing something it's with tim tp and manu.

DesignatedT
03-14-2010, 06:58 PM
this team isnt going anywhere without tp.

Manudona
03-14-2010, 07:00 PM
Only if they had Scola :rolleyes

phxspurfan
03-14-2010, 07:20 PM
I miss Bruce!



































Bring back Bruce Bowen!

iManu
03-14-2010, 08:59 PM
"Gay."
:downspin:

angelbelow
03-14-2010, 11:13 PM
lol wtf

Dr. Gonzo
03-15-2010, 12:19 AM
only Pop really knows how good Hill is. If he thinks he can lead the office then Parker would be expendable, but Parker was a Finals MVP with Lebron an his 44" vertical on the floor....I say a rested Parker is still a valuable asset.....lets wait before we come to conclusions......but this rest for Parker is what is going to get us to the WCF this year.

Pop doesn't know shit. He's an idiot, the worst coach in the NBA, a drunk, etc.

Agloco
03-15-2010, 09:50 AM
Things are getting so ridiculous with the "Are we better without Parker"...
I needed to start one... sorry :king

The Spurs are on amazing 3 wins streak (NYK, timber-poodle, and the other team from LA... imagine how tough it is...).
With:
- Parker out
- Duncan averaging only 13 pts/6 rbds
- Ginobili averaging only 16 pts / 6 ast after scoring 38 in a loss

Are we better without the "Big 3"

Should we start
Hill, Bogans, RJ, Bonner, Mahinmi (did you notice he played in all 3 wins)?

:lmao

This post is kinda like one of those M. Night Shyamalan flicks: He's being sarcastic........is he being sarcastic?......oh, yeah there's the sarcasm........no, now wait a minute, what a dumbass........ :wtf

I suppose the world may never know. :rolleyes

bus driver
03-15-2010, 10:52 AM
Things are getting so ridiculous with the "Are we better without Parker"...
I needed to start one... sorry :king

The Spurs are on amazing 3 wins streak (NYK, timber-poodle, and the other team from LA... imagine how tough it is...).
With:
- Parker out
- Duncan averaging only 13 pts/6 rbds
- Ginobili averaging only 16 pts / 6 ast after scoring 38 in a loss

Are we better without the "Big 3"

Should we start
Hill, Bogans, RJ, Bonner, Mahinmi (did you notice he played in all 3 wins)?

no

mathbzh
03-15-2010, 04:09 PM
:lmao

This post is kinda like one of those M. Night Shyamalan flicks: He's being sarcastic........is he being sarcastic?......oh, yeah there's the sarcasm........no, now wait a minute, what a dumbass........ :wtf

I suppose the world may never know. :rolleyes

Damned... I though sarcasm was obvious :depressed

mathbzh
03-15-2010, 04:10 PM
no
I guess it was not :rolleyes

TJastal
03-15-2010, 04:12 PM
lol @ dumbasses trying to be sarcastic yet unwittingly end up telling it like it is

mathbzh
03-15-2010, 04:21 PM
lol @ dumbasses trying to be sarcastic yet unwittingly end up telling it like it is

My pleasure :toast

legend of united
03-15-2010, 04:32 PM
i don't think so