View Full Version : Spurs-Lakers
Which one of you Laker faggots is going to man up and accept a sig bet for this game? Spurs without Longoria, Lakers without Crynum.
TheManFromAcme
03-23-2010, 10:41 AM
nope
Throw the line somewhere else on Lake Spurstalk. :fishing
This fish ain't biting.
:lol
BlackSwordsMan
03-23-2010, 11:56 AM
scared
picc84
03-23-2010, 12:51 PM
No Bynum = doom for Spurs.
nkdlunch
03-23-2010, 12:56 PM
spurs gonna get raped like that white chick from Colorado
TheManFromAcme
03-23-2010, 02:32 PM
scared
Nah
NRHector
03-23-2010, 07:57 PM
The Spurs will win tomorrow because Kobe is playing
Xylus
03-23-2010, 08:01 PM
Which one of you Laker faggots is going to man up and accept a sig bet for this game? Spurs without Longoria, Lakers without Crynum.
So who will you be rooting for?
Blake
03-23-2010, 08:24 PM
Which one of you Laker faggots is going to man up and accept a sig bet for this game? Spurs without Longoria, Lakers without Crynum.
because accepting a sig bet from a troll with 800 posts makes sense
cmon laker faggots! man up against him
scared laker bitches, nothing to see here
LkrFan
03-23-2010, 09:39 PM
Sig bet on a RS game? How about a playoff series? :ihit
According to most Laker fans on here the Spurs blow and the Lakers are poised to repeat...yet no takers :(
because accepting a sig bet from a troll with 800 posts makes sense
cmon laker faggots! man up against him
oh my fault for not being an original spurstalker, sir :rolleyes
gotta love the old timers' self-righteousness
Sig bet on a RS game? How about a playoff series? :ihit
a match up between these two teams in the postseason isnt guaranteed bro
Smooth Criminal
03-23-2010, 10:49 PM
According to most Laker fans on here the Spurs blow and the Lakers are poised to repeat...yet no takers :(
oh my fault for not being an original spurstalker, sir :rolleyes
gotta love the old timers' self-righteousness
a match up between these two teams in the postseason isnt guaranteed bro
Not the Lakers fault the Spurs won't go far enough to meet them
ezzizle
03-23-2010, 11:07 PM
I'd take the Nets any day over the Spurs and Lakers combined.
Allanon
03-24-2010, 02:07 PM
No Longoria, Spurs don't stand a chance.
If you seriously want to take a sig bet on this game, I'll take it but I'm thinking about your own good here.
And Machine has an open bet here too:
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=149339
bostonguy
03-24-2010, 02:18 PM
I know LA is without Bynum but didn't they beat the Spurs in San Antonio last year without him?
picc84
03-24-2010, 02:21 PM
No, because Derek Fisher is a screw-up.
cheguevara
03-24-2010, 02:27 PM
No Longoria, Spurs don't stand a chance.
If you seriously want to take a sig bet on this game, I'll take it but I'm thinking about your own good here.
And Machine has an open bet here too:
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=149339
Kardasian has a bad shoulder too
cheguevara
03-24-2010, 02:27 PM
I know LA is without Bynum but didn't they beat the Spurs in San Antonio last year without him?
lakers raped spurs without Bynum and Bryant, this year
No Longoria, Spurs don't stand a chance.
If you seriously want to take a sig bet on this game, I'll take it but I'm thinking about your own good here.
And Machine has an open bet here too:
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=149339
Im guessing you havent seen much of George Hill, Spurs definitely have a chance.
http://i48.tinypic.com/vni4b8.gif
Use the sig of the other person's choice until the next SAS-LAL game sound good?
Allanon
03-24-2010, 05:29 PM
Im guessing you havent seen much of George Hill, Spurs definitely have a chance.
http://i48.tinypic.com/vni4b8.gif
Use the sig of the other person's choice until the next SAS-LAL game sound good?
George Hill is good, but he's not THAT good :lol
Sounds good to me. I accept the bet if you and Machine can't work it out.
Muser
03-24-2010, 05:44 PM
George Hill is good, but he's not THAT good :lol
Sounds good to me. I accept the bet if you and Machine can't work it out.
You should check the Spurs forum out, they think Hill >>>> Parker and that we should trade Tony for Dwight Howard or something.
kamikazi_player
03-24-2010, 05:59 PM
George Hill is good, but he's not THAT good :lol
Sounds good to me. I accept the bet if you and Machine can't work it out.
He's not even good, I'm surprised Pops is giving him minutes, is he supposed to be the future for the Spurs? I really hope not
George Hill has probably been the most consistant Spur other than Tim Duncan this entire season. I dont know his exact stats but I know he's been averaging 15+ ppg and a couple of boards and assists since being inserted into the starting line-up. He isnt as explosive as Tony obviously but he brings much better defense and a much better jump shot, and players like Dick Jefferson are actually doing decent with him running the point. Now Im not saying the Spurs are better without Tony or anything. But I am in the small boat of Spur fans that would trade Tony if it meant getting a star big man in return. The frontcourt help+Hill filling in respectively at the point would more than outweight losing Tony.
lefty
03-24-2010, 06:34 PM
Canadians, the game is on TheScore
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.