PDA

View Full Version : Terrorists Could Use Explosives in Breast Implants to Crash Planes, Experts Warn



Winehole23
03-26-2010, 06:13 AM
Terrorists Could Use Explosives in Breast Implants to Crash Planes, Experts Warn (http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/03/24/terrorists-use-explosives-breast-implants-crash-planes-experts-warn/?loomia_ow=t0:s0:a16:g4:r1:c0.000000:b32181872:z6)




Plastic surgeons using explosive-laden breast implants in homicide bombers could be a new terror tactic that current airport scanning methods may miss.


http://www.foxnews.com/static/managed/img/World/032410_implant_monster_397x224.jpg AP
File photo shows a silicone gel breast implant.




Female homicide bombers are being fitted with exploding breast implants which are almost impossible to detect, British spies have reportedly discovered.


The shocking new Al Qaeda tactic involves radical doctors inserting the explosives in women's breasts during plastic surgery — making them "virtually impossible to detect by the usual airport scanning machines."


It is believed the doctors have been trained at some of Britain's leading teaching hospitals before returning to their own countries to perform the surgical procedures.


MI5 has also discovered that extremists are inserting the explosives into the buttocks of some male bombers.


"Women suicide bombers recruited by Al Qaeda are known to have had the explosives inserted in their breasts under techniques similar to breast enhancing surgery," Terrorist expert Joseph Farah claims.
The lethal explosives called PETN are inserted inside plastic shapes during the operation, before the breast is then sewn up.


The discovery of these methods was made after London-educated Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab came close to blowing up an airliner in the U.S. on Christmas Day.


He had stuffed explosives inside his underpants.


Hours after he had failed, Britain's intelligence services began to pick up "chatter" emanating from Pakistan and Yemen that alerted MI5 to the creation of the lethal implants.


A hand-picked team investigated the threat which was described as "one that can circumvent our defense."


Top surgeons have confirmed the feasibility of the explosive implants.
Explosive experts allegedly told MI5 that a sachet containing as little as five ounces of PETN could blow "a considerable hole" in an airline's skin, causing it to crash.

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 06:15 AM
JxCYYJTLSuU

LnGrrrR
03-26-2010, 06:22 AM
You can only defend against so much, really. A person determined to get through a system eventually will. It's very much like the CIA triangle that IT security goes by. Confidentiality, Availability, Integrity. You have to balance all three.

LnGrrrR
03-26-2010, 06:24 AM
Oh, forgot to add: These f*ckers are crazy. Honestly batsh*t insane.

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 06:29 AM
The Bags?

LnGrrrR
03-26-2010, 06:37 AM
The Bags?

:toast

The bags are the only one in this scenario that I think are reasonable. They're able to spend all day in a woman's breasts, something I find highly reasonable.

But the doctors implanting the explosives, the women undertaking the procedure, the people giving the orders... all cuckoo, to me.

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 06:48 AM
To me, writing an article about it is even more cuckoo...



















...right up there with posting it publicly.

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 06:52 AM
The bags are the only one in this scenario that I think are reasonable. They're able to spend all day in a woman's breasts, something I find highly reasonable.The meaning of "in" is crucial here; I have no desire to find myself trapped within a woman's breast.

Blowhole23
03-26-2010, 07:16 AM
It does posit that the increasing permeability of the membrane between science and terror is an insidious development.

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 07:21 AM
Publicly was the biggest word I used in this thread.

LnGrrrR
03-26-2010, 07:24 AM
The meaning of "in" is crucial here; I have no desire to find myself trapped within a woman's breast.

Cmon now WH; you can't even let a little play on words go there? ;)

Besides, if you were made of silicon, which would you rather be? Inside a woman's breast, or inside a computer chip? If I had my druthers it'd be the former.

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 07:26 AM
It's good point, LNGR. That dilemma hadn't occurred to me.

LnGrrrR
03-26-2010, 07:29 AM
It's good point, LNGR. That dilemma hadn't occurred to me.

Probably because you're more sane than I.

Let's face it, thinking from the perspective of grains of silicon is probably marginally abnormal.

Blowhole23
03-26-2010, 07:29 AM
Publicly was the biggest word I used in this thread.

Andianism?

(raises eyebrow)

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 07:31 AM
However, exploding male buttocks (and bollix).

MI5 has also discovered that extremists are inserting the explosives into the buttocks of some male bombers.

jack sommerset
03-26-2010, 07:35 AM
Exploding titties!?!? I know you lefty dems don't want to hear this but it's time to encourage racial profiling. Every muslim needs her tits examined before getting on an airplane.

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 07:53 AM
(Blowhole23 apparently couldn't hang. Must have a real life or something.)

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 07:59 AM
...belch

Gashole23
03-26-2010, 08:10 AM
approbative feasibly :toast

coyotes_geek
03-26-2010, 08:17 AM
In related news, the TSA is now accepting applications for breast inspectors.

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 08:23 AM
approbative feasibly :toastwino seel of approvl:sleep

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 08:24 AM
In related news, the TSA is now accepting applications for breast inspectors.Wow. It took us twenty posts to get there. :tu

21_Blessings
03-26-2010, 09:19 AM
Exploding titties!?!? I know you lefty dems don't want to hear this but it's time to encourage racial profiling. Every muslim needs her tits examined before getting on an airplane.

"Muslim"

Is not a race, stupid. :lol

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 09:24 AM
I see it more as rationalization after the fact. Isn't the TSA still perfectly entitled to feel up yer granny?

Oh, Gee!!
03-26-2010, 09:45 AM
how does one ignite a breast btw?

Oh, Gee!!
03-26-2010, 09:47 AM
manchurian candidate meets girls gone wild?

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 09:48 AM
(too slow)

spurster
03-26-2010, 09:58 AM
Now I understand why Janet Jackson's breast was so dangerous.

Stringer_Bell
03-26-2010, 09:58 AM
You can only defend against so much, really.

Sort of like how we can only defend against so many gas stations from coordinated attacks in a single city? Or coordinated Mall takeovers in different cities? Or private/personal planes fuel dumping hazardous agents over rural towns? Or attacks on public transportation?

Thank god for the Patriot Act catching all those loonies! I'll gladly trade privacy for security if it protects us from those evil, ingenious, determined, blood thirsty terrorists!

I'm looking forward to the question at security checkpoints, are your tits real or fake? "Ma'am, I'm gonna need to feel those. National security issue."

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 10:02 AM
Now I understand why Janet Jackson's breast was so dangerous.Janet Jackson is a Christian, but one of her breasts got islamized?

Wild Cobra
03-26-2010, 10:14 AM
I guess it's a good thing Clinton is no longer president. The enemy could have just planted one of these women as a White House aide to get access to assassinate him.

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 10:16 AM
A very good thing, too, Mr. Van Winkle. Can you tell me what year it is?

spurster
03-26-2010, 10:26 AM
Now I understand why Janet Jackson's breast was so dangerous.


Janet Jackson is a Christian, but one of her breasts got islamized?

No, that's not it. It's that any breast is a potential WMD, no matter its religion.

Bartleby
03-26-2010, 10:36 AM
Exploding titties!?!? I know you lefty dems don't want to hear this but it's time to encourage racial profiling. Every muslim needs her tits examined before getting on an airplane.


Like this one?

http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii297/babbalanja/Jihad-Jane.jpg

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 10:37 AM
No, that's not it. It's that any breast is a potential WMD, no matter its religion.
http://www.coveringphotography.com/files/images/large/Stock%5BBillSumner%5D-McEnroe72.jpg

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 10:38 AM
http://bahamaderek.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/mc-enroe.jpg

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 10:39 AM
http://www.independent.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00024/mcenroe_24150t.jpg

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 10:41 AM
Like this one?

http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii297/babbalanja/Jihad-Jane.jpgWho dat?

Bartleby
03-26-2010, 10:42 AM
Colleen R. LaRose a.k.a. "Jihad Jane"

http://www.upi.com/Daily-Briefing/2010/03/10/Jihad-Jane/UPI-41871268228371/

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 10:43 AM
has very mannish looks.

Bartleby
03-26-2010, 10:44 AM
has very mannish looks.

Another level of disguise. Those sneaky Pennsylvania Muslims!

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 10:47 AM
Colleen R. LaRose, 46, is alleged to have recruited people, particularly women, who had the ability to travel in Europe to "wage violent jihad"The US apparently exports jihad too.

word
03-26-2010, 11:21 AM
Fotunately, the number one preventer of suicide bombings is and will probably remain, the lack of willing participants.

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 11:36 AM
Ah-yuh.

TeyshaBlue
03-26-2010, 11:42 AM
has very mannish looks.

Ann Coulter's uncle?

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 11:52 AM
http://muscles.org/Carmen/starlapic.jpg

Blake
03-26-2010, 11:55 AM
are we now going to discriminate against tig bittied women and Bill Parcells?

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 11:56 AM
Against Parcells? Why not?

Blake
03-26-2010, 12:07 PM
Against Parcells? Why not?

http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2007/writers/bill_syken/01/25/scorecard.daily/p1_syken.jpg

he might have wmds in those suckers

I'm wondering if they are real or not....they look kind of fake to me

Winehole23
03-26-2010, 12:09 PM
:lmao

Stringer_Bell
03-26-2010, 06:03 PM
Don't mess with the Big Tuna or you'll be sleeping with the feeshes.