Anybody want Tony Parker??

[peskypesky]

Spurs don't need him. :flag:

[BanditHiro]

rofl of course we do against the lakers he is unguardedable because the corpse of Derek Fisher will be guarding him.

its the only clear advantage the spurs have against them

[nkdlunch]

Parker is just gravy. we could win the championship w/out him ;)

[kamikazi_player]

Wow, could you get even dumber?

[TheMACHINE]

we'll take ginobli.

[DAF86]

I'm sure the Spurs want him (Tony).

[jag]

I don't know my mouth from my anooos. And i don't know dick about basketball.


I don't know anything about basketball, either!!

[peskypesky]

hmm. so it's bad to beat the Lakers, Cavs, Magic and Celtics?

[Fpoonsie]

Thought Parker's interview w/ what's-her-black-face was unusual.

Wouldn't at all surprise me if TP's startin to get nervous.

[Whisky Dog]

Regular season.

[jag]

hmm. so it's bad to beat the Lakers, Cavs, Magic and Celtics?

When nkdlunch agrees with you, it's safe to assume you're not on the right side of an argument.

[DAF86]

hmm. so it's bad to beat the Lakers, Cavs, Magic and Celtics?

Hmm. So it's bad to have an all-star PG that's able to put 20 ppg and 6 assts while shooting 50% from the field?

[djohn2oo8]

When nkdlunch agrees with you, it's safe to assume you're not on the right side of an argument.

:lmao

[DPG21920]

This is so bad.

[Johnny RIngo]

hmm. so it's bad to beat the Lakers, Cavs, Magic and Celtics?

The recent surge has more to do with Ginobili being 100% again(first time in two years) and playing some of the best ball of his career.

[Borosai]

The Spurs want TP.

[poop]

if we could get a star young big for him i think they should do it.

[jag]

if we could get a star young big for him i think they should do it.

Good point. There are so many star young bigs on the trading block...and george hill has proven he can run the offense. I don't see any reason not to do it. Well, the Spurs would have to try to find a young star PG, but other than that i can't see any reason not to do it.

Maybe they can trade the star young big they get for a star young PG. That would be ideal.

[Sisk]

hmm. so it's bad to beat the Lakers, Cavs, Magic and Celtics?

you're a fucking idiot

[peskypesky]

Hmm. So it's bad to have an all-star PG that's able to put 20 ppg and 6 assts while shooting 50% from the field?

it is if his presence makes your team worse. just ask teams that have had Allan Iverson the past few years.

[peskypesky]

you're a fucking idiot

and you must not be a Spurs fan.

[Whisky Dog]

Iverson never shot anywhere near 50%. Parker doesn't make the team worse, his game just doesn't mesh well with Jeff.

[urunobili]

Worst thread of the year candidate... good job... you may win it all after the nominations! :tu

[ElNono]

we'll take ginobli.

:nope

[sonic21]

this thread sucks.
Just retarded pure hate by some spoiled ungrateful fans.

[ChickHearnMic]

Spurs don't need him. :flag:

Tony Parker in a Laker jersey would be a DREAM!!!!!


:downspin:

[jag]

and you must not be a Spurs fan.

Logic at its finest

[DesignatedT]

This thread is retarded.

[baseline bum]

http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/1824/thread_sucks.jpg

[mavsfan1000]

I'll take Parker. You can have Terry. ;)

[FkLA]

Good point. There are so many star young bigs on the trading block...and george hill has proven he can run the offense. I don't see any reason not to do it. Well, the Spurs would have to try to find a young star PG, but other than that i can't see any reason not to do it.

Maybe they can trade the star young big they get for a star young PG. That would be ideal.

People act like Hill would be replacing Steve Nash, Jason Kidd, or some type of pure point guard. Parker is a better PG than Hill sure but he isnt a guy that runs the offense masterfully or anything like that...he's a scoring PG and Hill although not as explosive as Tony has proven capable of putting up points. He also brings better defense and range to the table as well as not needing the ball in his hands all the time.

Im not saying Hill > Tony or that I think we're better without Tony, but I do think the addition of a star big man (easier said than done) would outweight the drop off we'd have at PG.


Tony Parker in a Laker jersey would be a DREAM!!!!!


:downspin:

Parker for Bynum.

[ezau]

what the hell is this this thread? George Hill can run the offense, but there's no way he's better than Parker. Ginobili is the reason why we're winning against top teams. In fact, he's been playing out of his mind lately that he'll hit a mini-slump sometime. Hill and Parker in the backcourt would be a nightmare for teams with backcourt problems.

[vander]

we need him yet this year, but I'd trade him this off-season. maybe a team with cap room who doesn't land any of the big name free agents will give us a lottery pick for him

[silverblk mystix]

worst thread of the year---

idiot poster of the year

[Cry Havoc]

hmm. so it's bad to beat the Lakers, Cavs, Magic and Celtics?

It's bad to be you. Honest.

[Ditty]

i would trade aldridge or bosh for parker

[spursfan09]

lol people claim tony Parker to be shit and want him off the team, but then they expect to get these great players in return for him. Tell me, when he scores a point for the Spurs, does it kill you a lil inside?

[BlackSwordsMan]

lol people claim tony Parker to be shit and want him off the team, but then they expect to get these great players in return for him. Tell me, when he scores a point for the Spurs, does it kill you a lil inside?

yes

[spursfan09]

yes

Must suck to be a Spurs fan then.

[ezau]

fuck this thread

[Budkin]

Horrible thread. To think we don't need Tony is pure delusion.