duncan228
04-24-2010, 01:05 AM
Mavericks had better find some defense (http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/spt/basketball/mavs/stories/042410dnspotaylor.455056f.html)
by Jean-Jacques Taylor / The Dallas Morning News
For one five-minute stretch in the third quarter, the Mavericks actually played playoff-worthy defense.
But when it mattered most, the Mavs' defense disappeared. We probably shouldn't be surprised.
These Mavs, just like every one of their predecessors, have never been good enough to win anything that mattered without playing defense.
Nothing changed Friday night at the AT&T Center as San Antonio beat Dallas, 94-90, to take a 2-1 lead in this Western Conference quarterfinal.
Now the Mavs have a big problem. They'd better win Sunday or this series is over.
Don't kid yourselves; the Mavs ain't beating the Spurs three consecutive times.
Maybe, just maybe, we'll get some of the defensive urgency and intensity Dallas displayed in the third quarter throughout the entire game.
Otherwise, there's a good chance the Mavs as we know them get blown up in the off-season, as they should if they can't figure out a way to get out of the first round.
You can't win 55 games, earn the coveted second seed in the West and lose in the first round, no matter how much respect we have for the seventh-seeded Spurs.
The Mavs have talked about playing better defense since training camp, and they did it early in the season. Actually, they emphasized defense so much, their offense suffered.
Imagine that.
But as the season has progressed, their offense improved and their defensive mind-set slowly evolved into the same, old defensive indifference we've become accustomed to seeing over the years.
The Mavs, as currently constructed, are only going to play so much defense.
They played hard defensively in Game 1, a lifetime ago, and played poorly defensively in Game 2. The Spurs shot better than 50 percent in each game, and they shot 48.7 percent in Game 3.
The Mavs' inconsistent defense also leads to stagnant offense.
This team is at its best when it's running. It's pretty hard to run the break when you're taking the ball out of the basket all of the time.
The Mavs totaled just 14 fast-break points.
Four times, they committed shot-clock violations. You almost never see that, but that's what happens when the offense has no flow.
"Teams become familiar with one another as the series progresses," said Carlisle, "and it becomes more difficult as the series goes on to score in the half-court. You have to fight for everything."
The Mavs finally played defense the way they're capable – with passion, urgency and a little trickery in the second half.
Coach Rick Carlisle used a 2-3 zone in the third quarter, and it befuddled the Spurs. They stopped attacking the basket, which they had done with regularity in the first half, and settled for jumpers when they weren't turning the ball over.
The Mavs chart three-possession stops because it's an indication of sustained defensive intensity.
During their 17-0 run, the Mavs stopped the Spurs on eight of 10 possessions and took a 68-59 lead. They did it by contesting shots and deflecting passes. They did it because they played with a desperation that's too often lacking.
Midway through the fourth quarter, the Mavs put together another good defensive stretch, stopping the Spurs on six of seven possessions, turning a 78-73 deficit into an 81-80 lead.
But with the game – perhaps the series – in doubt during the final three minutes of the fourth quarter, the Mavs' defense didn't do a thing.
Tony Parker hit a jumper just inside the 3-point line for an 82-81 lead with 2:28 left. After the Spurs forced a traveling call against J.J. Barea, Parker hit another jumper from the left baseline as the Spurs took an 84-81 lead.
Parker drilled another jumper from the left baseline for an 86-81 lead with 51.6 seconds left.
Ballgame.
by Jean-Jacques Taylor / The Dallas Morning News
For one five-minute stretch in the third quarter, the Mavericks actually played playoff-worthy defense.
But when it mattered most, the Mavs' defense disappeared. We probably shouldn't be surprised.
These Mavs, just like every one of their predecessors, have never been good enough to win anything that mattered without playing defense.
Nothing changed Friday night at the AT&T Center as San Antonio beat Dallas, 94-90, to take a 2-1 lead in this Western Conference quarterfinal.
Now the Mavs have a big problem. They'd better win Sunday or this series is over.
Don't kid yourselves; the Mavs ain't beating the Spurs three consecutive times.
Maybe, just maybe, we'll get some of the defensive urgency and intensity Dallas displayed in the third quarter throughout the entire game.
Otherwise, there's a good chance the Mavs as we know them get blown up in the off-season, as they should if they can't figure out a way to get out of the first round.
You can't win 55 games, earn the coveted second seed in the West and lose in the first round, no matter how much respect we have for the seventh-seeded Spurs.
The Mavs have talked about playing better defense since training camp, and they did it early in the season. Actually, they emphasized defense so much, their offense suffered.
Imagine that.
But as the season has progressed, their offense improved and their defensive mind-set slowly evolved into the same, old defensive indifference we've become accustomed to seeing over the years.
The Mavs, as currently constructed, are only going to play so much defense.
They played hard defensively in Game 1, a lifetime ago, and played poorly defensively in Game 2. The Spurs shot better than 50 percent in each game, and they shot 48.7 percent in Game 3.
The Mavs' inconsistent defense also leads to stagnant offense.
This team is at its best when it's running. It's pretty hard to run the break when you're taking the ball out of the basket all of the time.
The Mavs totaled just 14 fast-break points.
Four times, they committed shot-clock violations. You almost never see that, but that's what happens when the offense has no flow.
"Teams become familiar with one another as the series progresses," said Carlisle, "and it becomes more difficult as the series goes on to score in the half-court. You have to fight for everything."
The Mavs finally played defense the way they're capable – with passion, urgency and a little trickery in the second half.
Coach Rick Carlisle used a 2-3 zone in the third quarter, and it befuddled the Spurs. They stopped attacking the basket, which they had done with regularity in the first half, and settled for jumpers when they weren't turning the ball over.
The Mavs chart three-possession stops because it's an indication of sustained defensive intensity.
During their 17-0 run, the Mavs stopped the Spurs on eight of 10 possessions and took a 68-59 lead. They did it by contesting shots and deflecting passes. They did it because they played with a desperation that's too often lacking.
Midway through the fourth quarter, the Mavs put together another good defensive stretch, stopping the Spurs on six of seven possessions, turning a 78-73 deficit into an 81-80 lead.
But with the game – perhaps the series – in doubt during the final three minutes of the fourth quarter, the Mavs' defense didn't do a thing.
Tony Parker hit a jumper just inside the 3-point line for an 82-81 lead with 2:28 left. After the Spurs forced a traveling call against J.J. Barea, Parker hit another jumper from the left baseline as the Spurs took an 84-81 lead.
Parker drilled another jumper from the left baseline for an 86-81 lead with 51.6 seconds left.
Ballgame.