PDA

View Full Version : Lakers at Celtics Game Three Previews



duncan228
06-07-2010, 02:31 PM
NBA finals are Boston bound tied at a game apiece (http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=ap-nbafinals)

Los Angeles at Boston (http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/preview?gid=2010060802)
Game info: 9:00 pm EDT Tue Jun 8, 2010
TV: ABC, TSN
By Brian Mahoney

Chin resting in his hand, mouth barely moving as he spoke, Kobe Bryant had the look of someone who would have rather been anywhere but Staples Center.

The next few nights might make him long to be back home.

The NBA’s best rivalry is returning to its East Coast headquarters, site of perhaps the most miserable moment of Bryant’s career last time he and the Los Angeles Lakers were here for the finals.

And the Boston Celtics and their green-clad fans can’t wait to welcome him back.

“I feel good going back to the jungle,” Celtics forward Kevin Garnett said Sunday.

Those familiar “Beat L.A! Beat L.A!” chants that have echoed through the Garden during so many springtimes will be booming again, and the Celtics can lock up an 18th NBA title if they can do just that three times.

Game 2 is Tuesday night, followed by games Thursday and Sunday in Boston.

The Celtics evened the series at a game apiece with their 103-94 victory in Game 2, with guards Rajon Rondo and Ray Allen taking turns punishing the Lakers, and Bryant often powerless to stop them because of foul trouble.

A fuming Bryant had little to say afterward, offering terse responses as he looked back on that game and ahead to the next one.

“It’s the most important game. Game 1 was the most important, Game 2 was the most important, now it’s Game 3,” Bryant said. “It’s just the next game, simple as that.”

The finals are deadlocked after two games for the first time since 2004, when the Detroit Pistons split a pair in Los Angeles before coming home and winning three straight to take the series. That was Bryant’s first loss in the championship round.

His other one came two years ago, on a night the Lakers will never forget.

The Celtics pummeled them 131-92 in a Game 6 rout that was decided after mere minutes. While Garnett, Allen and Pierce celebrated their long-awaited first NBA title, the humiliated Lakers sat trapped in their team bus as Boston fans taunted them from the street.

“Obviously there’s feelings involved and there’s memories that are in there, which should help us, should help us to push through and to battle even harder,” Lakers forward Pau Gasol said of that night.

Both teams were off Monday following the cross country flight from Los Angeles. The 2-3-2 format in the NBA finals was instituted in the mid-1980s, when Lakers-Celtics matchups were as common in June as graduation parties, to limit the amount of coast to coast trips. But a return to California won’t be needed if either team can win three straight.

“We took home court, so we’ve got a chance to play three games (at home),” Celtics forward Paul Pierce said Sunday. “But I told you all yesterday that doesn’t guarantee we’re going to win the games because we’re at home. We’ve got to go out there and play the game. They’re going to be coming into our house and we can’t assume anything. We can’t take it for granted.”

The Celtics turned things around following their 102-89 loss in their opener by toughening up their defense, limiting the Lakers to 41 percent shooting. Rondo tracked down the long rebounds of many missed shots to ignite Boston’s fast break, and Allen capitalized on the open looks that created by making an NBA finals-record eight 3-pointers while scoring 32 points.

The Lakers were frustrated by the foul trouble for Bryant and top reserve Lamar Odom, who has been ineffective in both games. Bryant was more annoyed with his team’s defense against Boston’s guards, wasting strong efforts from Gasol and center Andrew Bynum.

“It has nothing to do with scoring. Nothing. It’s all defensively,” Bryant said. “We gave them too many easy baskets and blew too many defensive assignments. That’s it.”

Now they’ll have to play better on the road than they have in some previous series, having lost twice at both Oklahoma City and Phoenix earlier in the postseason.

Just like in those series, they’re searching for ways to slow down a dynamic point guard. Rondo had 19 points, 12 rebounds and 10 assists in his fifth career triple-double, repeatedly beating the Lakers to loose balls and then beating them down the court.

“In a sequence like this, there’s no doubt it’s a blow to us to lose the home court, but we anticipated this might happen, and we’re just going to have to go pick it up,” coach Phil Jackson said.

Los Angeles dropped all three road games during the 2008 finals, but the Celtics aren’t as dominant on the parquet now as they were back then. The Lakers haven’t lost in Boston since that night that ended their season two years ago, posting a pair of regular-season victories.

“Game 3 is the biggest game of the series so far. These two games are behind us,” Rondo said. “You know, they’re not in a bad situation at all. They’re a good road team, and we’re a good home team. It’s going to be a good game.”

*********************

Team Stat Leaders

Points
Kobe Bryant LAL 27.0
Paul Pierce Bos 18.3

Rebounds
Pau Gasol LAL 11.3
Kendrick Perkins Bos 7.6

Assists
Kobe Bryant LAL 5.0
Rajon Rondo Bos 9.8

*********************

Series Breakdown (http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/playoffs/2010/lalbos;_ylt=AoGDDJHz3JQtufJlPSZycbiPvLYF)

Giuseppe
06-07-2010, 02:35 PM
Finish it.

tdunk21
06-07-2010, 02:39 PM
i love if the lakers lose....but i guess phil will comeback with some adjustments and if rondo plays the way he did in game 2...then god help the lakers....

Giuseppe
06-07-2010, 02:41 PM
i love if the lakers lose....but i guess phil will comeback with some adjustments and if rondo plays the way he did in game 2...then god help the lakers....

Well, hells/bells, yer covered no matter how it ends up.

:rolleyes

duncan228
06-07-2010, 10:33 PM
Lakers-Celtics Through 2: Star Power Vs. Strength In Numbers (http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=tsn-lakerscelticsthrough)
SportingNews

With two games of Celtics-Lakers drama in the books, there seems to be a narrative emerging in these Finals, and it’s one that is significantly different than the "Who’s gonna be tougher?" story line that dominated the ’08 series and cropped up again after the Lakers flexed some muscle in winning Game 1. Both teams are, evidently, tough. Neither is going to be pushed around. We can put those questions to bed.

This series is shaping up to be one of numbers, a battle between quantity and quality. If the rosters of the Lakers and Celtics were to be plucked apart, it is obvious that L.A. would have a serious advantage in terms of individual talent and Boston’s edge would come in all-around depth. The Celtics have team balance. The Lakers have individual brilliance. That’s the essence of the series.

Lakers star Kobe Bryant is the best player on the floor by a long shot, and Pau Gasol is easily the best big man. Center Andrew Bynum has become, surprisingly, Mr. Reliable inside. It’s a little like when the Lakers had Bryant and Shaquille O’Neal a decade ago, with the thinking being that it didn’t matter how the rest of the roster was constructed. The top-of-the-roster talent was just too much to overcome.

But the Celtics have numbers on their side. They have options, and those options allow them to withstand bum games and foul trouble from players they normally count on. Kevin Garnett has been a virtual no-show through the first two games, and Paul Pierce was just 2-for-11 in Game 2. The Celtics won, though, because Rajon Rondo and Ray Allen picked up the slack.

"That’s how we’re capable of playing," Garnett said. "We have to be a team that picks each other up. That’s our best chance of winning games at this point in the season."

The Celtics have four legit scoring options in the starting five, but they’ve also done well when coach Doc Rivers has had to dip into the bench—which has been the case in both games because of foul trouble. Already, Rivers has given 11 players minutes at important spots, and though the Lakers’ reserve guards (Shannon Brown and Jordan Farmar) have been a pleasant surprise, forward Lamar Odom has been in constant foul trouble, giving the Celtics a big edge when it comes to bench depth.

Glen Davis was sprawling all over the floor in Game 2, and his energy helped offset his penchant for having his shots blocked in the paint. Rasheed Wallace, battling a bad back, gave Rivers seven points and seven rebounds in 18 minutes.

But even bigger than Wallace and Davis were the six minutes the Celtics got from little guy Nate Robinson, who gave Rondo a much-needed breather and tallied seven points. That projects to 56 points if Robinson played the whole game, which is an admittedly absurd stat, but it goes to show just how productive he was in his limited time. "I was just trying to stay ready," Robinson said. "When it looked like Rajon was getting tired, I knew it was going to be my chance and I tried to make the most of it."

Game 2 didn’t shake out quite the way Rivers had drawn it up—not with the bulk of the front line in foul trouble—but the Celtics had the resources to set things right. "The bench was huge, all of them," Rivers said. "We were in foul trouble two games in a row now, and our bigs—Kevin, really he only played six minutes in the first half, and the fact that we had a lead was huge for us. The rhythm for us offensively is tough when all your bigs are in foul trouble. We have a certain rotation that we want our bigs to play, and obviously it was blown up within four minutes of the game because of fouls."

Despite the fact that Boston wrested away home-court advantage, the Lakers can’t feel too bad about where they are. They had a lead in the fourth quarter of Game 2 despite the foul trouble of Bryant and Odom, and despite an awful performance from Ron Artest (whose 1-for-10 shooting only begins to explain how poorly he played offensively). They’ve shown that the Celtics, for all their depth, can’t stop Gasol and Bynum, and if those two keep up their current pace in the paint, all the Lakers will need is the usual strong showing from Bryant to get one, or maybe more than one, win in Boston.

The Lakers’ stars have been tough for the Celtics to handle. But the Celtics’ depth has been an issue for L.A. So it will go as this series plays out.

NBA Fanatic
06-08-2010, 08:22 AM
Here is one that thinks we will see the aggressive Kobe in Game 3.

"With the next three games at the TD Garden the pressure is now squarely on the Lakers' shoulders. Look for the Lakers' leaders, Kobe Bryant (http://www.associatedcontent.com/topic/6161/kobe_bryant.html) and Derek Fisher, to set the tone early in Game 3. After being plagued with foul trouble throughout Game 2 expect Kobe to open Game 3 aggressively. Kobe will look for scoring opportunities and force the Celtics to adjust their defense. Do not be surprised if Bryant scores 10 or more points in the first quarter."

It goes on to suggest that both Derek Fisher and Lamar Odom will play better tonight than they did in Games 1 and 2.

Here is the link if interested: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/5465602/2010_nba_finals_lakers_vs_celtics_game.html?cat=9

ChrisRichards
06-08-2010, 08:25 AM
Jeez, LA has the best scorer, the best rebounder and a healthier team. They really have no reason to lose this series at all. This would put a huge dent on Phil Jackson's career.


Imagine being outcoached by DOC RIVERS, not once but TWICE! A total of 8 times in a playoff series? That's horrible.

shelshor
06-08-2010, 08:28 AM
Referee Assignments
Tue. Jun 8
L.A. Lakers @ Boston: Dan Crawford; Bill Kennedy; Bennett Salvatore

FromWayDowntown
06-08-2010, 08:39 AM
Ooooh, Bill Kennedy with his first-ever Finals game in Boston?

http://www.celticstown.com/2010/05/18/bill-kennedy-known-doc-hater-to-ref-game-two/

Amuseddaysleeper
06-08-2010, 10:56 AM
Referee Assignments
Tue. Jun 8
L.A. Lakers @ Boston: Dan Crawford; Bill Kennedy; Bennett Salvatore

So do these refs favor the Lakers or Celtics?

Giuseppe
06-08-2010, 11:06 AM
So do these refs favor the Lakers or Celtics?

"So do these refs favor the Lakers or Celtics?" (in a whiny female voice)

Hey, dummy, you lost. You got skunked.

FromWayDowntown
06-08-2010, 11:25 AM
So do these refs favor the Lakers or Celtics?

See above. Kennedy is reviled in Boston after he ejected Doc a couple of years ago. In fact, a couple of weeks ago, Tim Donaghy went on a podcast run by a couple of Celtics homers and, when asked about Bill Kennedy (an odd question if you're going to ask about controversial officials), Donaghy played up to the disdain of the Celtics homers by saying that Kennedy is a closeted homosexual (though that "fact" is allegedly well-known among the officials). It was an odd exchange.

Salvatore and Phil had a blowup back in April when Phil thought Bennett's crew was hard on the Lakers in a game that the Spurs won in LA.

In the 2010 Playoffs, the Celtics are:


2-0 in games that Danny Crawford has called (won Game 2 in Cleveland and Game 1 at Orlando);

2-1 in games that Bennett Salvatore has called (won Game 3 at Miami, lost Game 3 vs. Cleveland, won Game 3 vs. Orlando);

1-1 in games that Bill Kennedy has called (lost Game 4 at Miami, won Game 2 at Orlando)


In the 2010 Playoffs, the Lakers are:


2-1 in games that Danny Crawford has called (won Game 5 vs. OKC, won Game 4 at Utah, lost Game 4 at Phoenix);

1-0 in games that Bennett Salvatore has called (they won Game 5 against Phoenix);

3-0 in games that Bill Kennedy has called (they won Game 6 at OKC, won Game 4 at Utah, won Game 6 vs. Phoenix)

LnGrrrR
06-08-2010, 12:02 PM
Referee Assignments
Tue. Jun 8
L.A. Lakers @ Boston: Dan Crawford; Bill Kennedy; Bennett Salvatore

Yeesh, Salvatore...

ace3g
06-08-2010, 02:13 PM
I expect Pierce to have a big game tonight

DazedAndConfused
06-08-2010, 02:44 PM
If Ray Allen continues to shoot 50% from 3pt land it's going to be tough to win in Boston. The Lakers need to play better defense on him.