PDA

View Full Version : Rj coming back



Pages : 1 [2] 3

pressurez
07-01-2010, 08:45 AM
Seems like everyone's saying they're ok with this if RJ comes back at $24M/3 yrs. Why would he do that? He was scheduled to make $15.2M this year, meaning he opted out because he didn't think next summer he could get a 2 year deal for $9M?

This is all speculation, and difficult speculation at that because nobody knows what will happen next year with the CBA, but here's my take:

First, you have to consider what RJ would earn if he hadn't opted out. Reasonable guess is he'd put together a decent season with more experience in Pop's system and garner at least a 3 year deal for the MLE. That's less than Marion, and roughly what McDyess pulled in. Add his $15.2M to roughly $17M and you get $32.2M over 4 years.

So opting out means he thinks he can find a better contract that $32.2M/4 yrs, or more than $8M a year. Let's say he's willing to take $8M a year because it's guaranteed this week as opposed to having to see how things play out next summer.

If RJ plays next season (and the three following) for $8M, he saves the Spurs $7.2M in salary and $7.2M in tax = $14.4M total this year. How does this savings factor into an equation that commits $32M over 4 years?

If the Spurs can get an average starting SF for $5M/yr they'd be paying market rate. For the 4 year life of his contract, in the first year the Spurs come out ahead $14.4M, and in the three remaining years, they'd be paying $3M over the market rate of $5M, or down a total of $9M. This means they would still be ahead $14.4M - $9M = $5.4M.

Two questions remain:

Will RJ be an average SF? Likely, though hopefully better.

Will the Spurs be willing to settle for an average SF that saves them $5.4M over market rate? Likely, as their other options are very limited. Trading RJ with a full contract is much harder than expiring. The only kind of trade that makes sense would be for someone like Turkoglu: RJ gets enough money to make opting out sensible; Toronto's willing to take him on with full contract because of a need to dump Turkoglu; the Spurs hope Turk fits better as an outside threat and ball-handler, unfortunately committed to his long-term deal.

tuncaboylu
07-01-2010, 09:00 AM
Jefferson wouldn't opt-out if Spurs didn't promise him a 4 years and 32 million contract. I think it's a fair deal for both. He takes the big pay cut and we're giving him a chance.
I wouldn't mind a 4 years 32 M contract for him.

Cheddz
07-01-2010, 09:06 AM
if rj comes back i will not watch a spurs game until after the trade deadline real muthafucking talk i been a spurs fan since berth no bandwagon shit if he signs back to us i will stop being a fan until he is gone

SpursTillTheEnd?

Apparently not.

jiggy_55
07-01-2010, 09:09 AM
Seems like everyone's saying they're ok with this if RJ comes back at $24M/3 yrs. Why would he do that? He was scheduled to make $15.2M this year, meaning he opted out because he didn't think next summer he could get a 2 year deal for $9M?

I think he'll probably sign a 4 year deal with the Spurs, if not elsewhere. This guarantees him for the future. I'd like to think he will sign a 4 year at around 30million or a bit more and guarantee his future.
He won't have to worry about a contract next season, or any possible injury that could hurt his future. You never know with injuries or what could happen to you.

wildbill2u
07-01-2010, 09:23 AM
My guess is that RJ realizes his market value is no where near $15 million or more right now so he may be interested in a longer term contract with the Spurs for less money.

We could probably see a little bit better play from him this coming year since he knows our system and the coaches know better how to use him. He's not totally useless and what other SF options are out there that are any better.?

A case of "better the devil you know" for both sides. So this could be a true story.

Johnny RIngo
07-01-2010, 09:39 AM
Drew Gooden just signed for 5 yrs 32 million. i hope this prices Jefferson out of Spurs black and silver. hoping to God.

Gooden's a 28 yr old big that had a solid season(considering what was expected of him).

RJ's a 30 year old wing that just had ther worst season of his career.

montgod
07-01-2010, 09:44 AM
I posted this in the other RJ thread, but it seems appropriate for some of the responses here. Richard Jefferson's response/mindset on opting out:

Coming off such a disappointing season, Jefferson likely won't be able to earn all of the money he left on the table back in a single season, but as he told FanHouse's Chris Tomasson in April, he hopes a temporary pay cut will result in long-term security. "I probably wouldn't make 15 [million dollars] some place, but you could somehow recoup some of that over a multi-year deal and get some guaranteed money for the next few years," he said. "So you figure it out. If you're able to get four years and 40 [million dollars by opting out] from someone, it's like, 'OK, I did lose out on 15 [million dollars]. But I'm going to get basically a $25 million extension.' Those are things that you think of at the end of the season.'' FanHouse.com

Johnny RIngo
07-01-2010, 09:50 AM
RJ for 40 million over 4 years? God no. Way too much for a guy that can't shoot or play defense.

Mel_13
07-01-2010, 10:01 AM
RJ for 40 million over 4 years? God no. Way too much for a guy that can't shoot or play defense.

That was his asking price in a public interview in April. If he has a prearranged deal with the Spurs, it will be for less than that.

vander
07-01-2010, 10:05 AM
If the Spurs re-sign him, need to make it a declining contract, pay more now, since we're over the cap anyways.

4 year deal: 9-8-7-6 mil

Agloco
07-01-2010, 10:07 AM
Seems like everyone's saying they're ok with this if RJ comes back at $24M/3 yrs. Why would he do that? He was scheduled to make $15.2M this year, meaning he opted out because he didn't think next summer he could get a 2 year deal for $9M?

This is all speculation, and difficult speculation at that because nobody knows what will happen next year with the CBA, but here's my take:



Exactly. His generally poor statistics would make anyone hesitant to make him such an offer next summer especially with a max contract rumored to be in the 8 million dollar range.

He might command somewhere between 2-3 million per under the new scale (assuming another season roughly similar to this one).

galvatron3000
07-01-2010, 10:11 AM
I rather let RJ go than re-signing him to a big contract. Letting RJ go will hurt Spurs next year, signing him to a 4 or 5 years contract with a salary above $8M per year will hurt Spurs for a long time. S&T is the best outcome for Spurs.

I'm guessing this will be a sign and trade scenario anyway. I hope so. It would benefit both sides in my view but someone has to be willing to take Rj for the price and the Spurs need to get back a good Sf hopefully with length who can defend and shoot the 3

jiggy_55
07-01-2010, 10:32 AM
I'm guessing this will be a sign and trade scenario anyway. I hope so. It would benefit both sides in my view but someone has to be willing to take Rj for the price and the Spurs need to get back a good Sf hopefully with length who can defend and shoot the 3

You guys seem to be missing the part where multiple sources confirmed RJ and Pop have been working out together in SA. That's a clear sign the Spurs want him back if true.

Seventyniner
07-01-2010, 11:45 AM
You guys seem to be missing the part where multiple sources confirmed RJ and Pop have been working out together in SA. That's a clear sign the Spurs want him back if true.

But what if RJ insists on 4 yrs/$40M and the Spurs aren't willing to budge from, say, 4 yrs/$30M? Sure, the Spurs know that RJ is a better SF than any FA in the Spurs' price range, but they won't pay him anything he asks for.

If the Spurs are willing to do, say, a 4 yr/$31M contract (7, 7.5, 8, 8.5), I'd like to see the Spurs add a 5th fully non-guaranteed year on the end (for 9) like the Mavs did with Dampier; that would be a great asset for trading in 4 years.

timvp
07-01-2010, 12:46 PM
Salmons just got a $40 million deal. The chances of getting RJ on the cheap are sinking.

Vic Petro
07-01-2010, 12:51 PM
You guys seem to be missing the part where multiple sources confirmed RJ and Pop have been working out together in SA. That's a clear sign the Spurs want him back if true.

That's a clear sign that the Spurs thought for sure that he'd be back in this upcoming season, for a last run at a championship. Pop's working with him is no evidence they wanted him long term.

Seventyniner
07-01-2010, 12:52 PM
Salmons just got a $40 million deal. The chances of getting RJ on the cheap are sinking.

From which team?

Kori Ellis
07-01-2010, 12:53 PM
One small (maybe not) thing that is a factor too is that RJ is his agent's only NBA player - so he's going to want to bank as much as he can off RJ. His agent is Todd Eley, who is not a top tier agent, and only has RJ and a bunch of DLeague/Euro/fringe players (like my friend).

Mel_13
07-01-2010, 12:54 PM
Salmons just got a $40 million deal. The chances of getting RJ on the cheap are sinking.

To get a deal like that elsewhere, RJ will have to find a team with cap space that wants him. Spurs can then negotiate an S&T that brings back a huge TE.

TimmehC
07-01-2010, 12:56 PM
Salmons just got a $40 million deal. The chances of getting RJ on the cheap are sinking.

Wow... seller's market.

ffadicted
07-01-2010, 12:59 PM
Dumb question here, since RJ opted out, we don't have bird rights, do we? Or do we? lol

Kindergarten Cop
07-01-2010, 01:07 PM
Dumb question here, since RJ opted out, we don't have bird rights, do we? Or do we? lol

We do, but RJ would have to agree to any sign-and-trades. Sadly, he holds all the power right now.

DPG21920
07-01-2010, 01:09 PM
That team also inked Gooden to a big contract. Use the crazy argument again spurs!

ace3g
07-01-2010, 01:13 PM
Bucks

clubalien
07-01-2010, 01:14 PM
:lol I said I couldn't tell but I can guarantee its not Shaq.

dirk at the LLE would be surprising.

Don't worry about confirming i don't want you to lose your source

Creation88
07-01-2010, 01:15 PM
dont' worry in 3 years the Spurs will trade 3 aging stars for Salmons or Gooden.......

SpursTillTheEnd
07-01-2010, 01:31 PM
so is rj coming back if he does i say fuck the spurs until he is off this team

ohmwrecker
07-01-2010, 01:45 PM
so is rj coming back if he does i say fuck the spurs until he is off this team

How about you just stop posting until RJ is gone for good.

anakha
07-01-2010, 01:50 PM
so is rj coming back if he does i say fuck the spurs until he is off this team

Great username/post combo.

Fabbs
07-01-2010, 01:59 PM
I sure am glad Bruce Bowen for a million a year is off the team.
Spending money on RJ, :toast seeing CIA Pop work with RJ both last year and the next 2-3 years at a total of 30+ million is so much more worth it.
Spurs should be much more loyal by giving more money to RJ then that Bruce guy.


I wanna party with Pop, RJ and the PopApologists! :toast

Interrohater
07-01-2010, 02:12 PM
Great username/post combo.

Haha, I was thinking the same thing :lol

angelbelow
07-01-2010, 02:26 PM
No updates yet.. this is driving me crazy.. If his contract is too big (8mil+) for multiple years then that could be bad news. but if its a fair long term contract I wouldnt be against it since we wont find anyone else with his talent level... Im still not convinced that he will NEVER fit..

Vic Petro
07-01-2010, 02:34 PM
No updates yet.. this is driving me crazy.. If his contract is too big (8mil+) for multiple years then that could be bad news. but if its a fair long term contract I wouldnt be against it since we wont find anyone else with his talent level... Im still not convinced that he will NEVER fit..

But was there any evidence whatsoever that he might fit one day in the future? $8m/year is nothing to sneeze at. It'd be one thing if there was a point late in the year where it clicked for him. But he was worse in the playoffs than he was in the regular season.

I guess my point is that I'm not willing to compromise the three years after 2011 just for a (very slightly) better shot at winning it all in 2011 (still a long shot even with RJ). Not that RJ would be a complete albatross, but he'd just be eating cap room and it would be a chore to move him.

romsho
07-01-2010, 02:37 PM
Salmons just got a $40 million deal. The chances of getting RJ on the cheap are sinking.

Salmons is better.

K-State Spur
07-01-2010, 02:39 PM
I guess my point is that I'm not willing to compromise the three years after 2011 just for a (very slightly) better shot at winning it all in 2011 (still a long shot even with RJ). Not that RJ would be a complete albatross, but he'd just be eating cap room and it would be a chore to move him.

Compromise WHAT from 2012-2014? You're talking about Duncan and Manu in decline at that point (if not already). We might have Parker - but maybe not.

Beyond that a team built around Hill, Blair, and Splitter might be solid - possibly playoff worthy, but they won't be just some cap room away from a championship.

The rebuild is coming, it happens to everyone eventually. We're very lucky as fans that we've gone roughly 20 years without a real one. If, during that time, the biggest of our concerns is RJ eating up some cap room - then we'll have it pretty good.

Vic Petro
07-01-2010, 02:42 PM
Compromise WHAT from 2012-2014? You're talking about Duncan and Manu in decline at that point (if not already). We might have Parker - but maybe not.

Beyond that a team built around Hill, Blair, and Splitter might be solid - possibly playoff worthy, but they won't be just some cap room away from a championship.

The rebuild is coming, it happens to everyone eventually. We're very lucky as fans that we've gone roughly 20 years without a real one. If, during that time, the biggest of our concerns is RJ eating up some cap room - then we'll have it pretty good.

But why have that concern if you don't need to. This team has been pretty good at rebuilding on the fly. No, we wouldn't be championship contenders in 2012-2014, but why create one more hurdle to overcome to get there? I just don't think 2011 Richard Jefferson is worth it.

angelbelow
07-01-2010, 02:44 PM
But was there any evidence whatsoever that he might fit one day in the future? $8m/year is nothing to sneeze at. It'd be one thing if there was a point late in the year where it clicked for him. But he was worse in the playoffs than he was in the regular season.

I guess my point is that I'm not willing to compromise the three years after 2011 just for a (very slightly) better shot at winning it all in 2011 (still a long shot even with RJ). Not that RJ would be a complete albatross, but he'd just be eating cap room and it would be a chore to move him.

Well im certainly not going to argue with you, as of right now I still dont know how I feel about him possibly resigning with us, even on the cheap.

Spurs Brazil
07-01-2010, 02:47 PM
John Hollinger: I suspect that there's something pre-arranged here fro the Spurs to re-sign him for slightly more money over a much longer time period, which limits their 2011 luxury tax exposure. If there isn't then he's a fool for opting out.

Mitch Cumsteen
07-01-2010, 03:45 PM
You guys aren't going to like this, but I heard $45 million over 5 years, starting at $7 million. This saves the Spurs about $20 million in salary / luxury tax this year including what they get back for being under the tax. That's a ton of cabbage. I hope to God this info is wrong, but based on the crazy numbers that scrubs like Gooden and Darko are getting, this might actually be accurate.

2010 $7M
2011 $8M
2012 $9M
2013 $10M
2014 $11M

5 years / $45 million

ElNono
07-01-2010, 03:49 PM
You guys aren't going to like this, but I heard $45 million over 5 years, starting at $7 million. This saves the Spurs about $20 million in salary / luxury tax this year including what they get back for being under the tax. That's a ton of cabbage. I hope to God this info is wrong, but based on the crazy numbers that scrubs like Gooden and Darko are getting, this might actually be accurate.

2010 $7M
2011 $8M
2012 $9M
2013 $10M
2014 $11M

5 years / $45 million

http://www.elganso.es/blog/wp-includes/images/yahoo/loco.gif

Creation88
07-01-2010, 03:50 PM
Richard Jefferson doesn’t have a deal with the San Antonio Spurs and would prefer to return to the New York area to play for the Knicks or Nets, league sources told Y! Sports.

Jefferson is seeking a multiyear contract that averages in the range of $8 million-$10 million, sources said. He opted out of the $15 million final season of his contract with the Spurs on Tuesday.

Jefferson has built a good relationship with Spurs coach Gregg Popovich, but doesn’t think the team’s system best fits his skills.

The Spurs could still try to sign Jefferson to a contract that lowers their luxury-tax hit, depending on what other options they find in free agency.

Seventyniner
07-01-2010, 03:50 PM
You guys aren't going to like this, but I heard $45 million over 5 years, starting at $7 million. This saves the Spurs about $20 million in salary / luxury tax this year including what they get back for being under the tax. That's a ton of cabbage. I hope to God this info is wrong, but based on the crazy numbers that scrubs like Gooden and Darko are getting, this might actually be accurate.

2010 $7M
2011 $8M
2012 $9M
2013 $10M
2014 $11M

5 years / $45 million

I don't think this can happen; I thought FAs could only get 10.5% raises at the most (based on only the first year; they don't compound), so the most the salary could rise each year would be $735K given a first-year salary of $7M. And that's only when they re-sign with their current team; other FAs can only get 8% raises.

So let's tweak it to:
2010: $7M
2011: $7.7M
2012: $8.4M
2013: $9.1M
2014: $9.8M

That's still $42M, but this contract wouldn't bother me much if the last year was fully non-guaranteed, allowing the Spurs to trade him easily in that last year; it would essentially be a 4 year/$32.2M deal, which isn't great, but isn't that bad.

The best thing would be if we can sign-and-trade him to a team with cap room for a big trade exception.

AnthonyM
07-01-2010, 03:51 PM
According to Woj, RJ wants to go back to the NY metro area and play for the Nets or the Knicks...

Is a sign and trade possible?

ElNono
07-01-2010, 03:51 PM
lol sources

DesignatedT
07-01-2010, 03:54 PM
According to Woj, RJ wants to go back to the NY metro area and play for the Nets or the Knicks...

Is a sign and trade possible?

I sure hope so.

SenorSpur
07-01-2010, 03:56 PM
richard jefferson doesn’t have a deal with the san antonio spurs and would prefer to return to the new york area to play for the knicks or nets, league sources told y! Sports.

Jefferson is seeking a multiyear contract that averages in the range of $8 million-$10 million, sources said. He opted out of the $15 million final season of his contract with the spurs on tuesday.

Jefferson has built a good relationship with spurs coach gregg popovich, but doesn’t think the team’s system best fits his skills.

The spurs could still try to sign jefferson to a contract that lowers their luxury-tax hit, depending on what other options they find in free agency.

s&t^

DPG21920
07-01-2010, 03:56 PM
Please be a report of a sign and trade. Also if the nets being the front runners for lebron reports are true, it makes it even less likely for rj to the nets.

Vic Petro
07-01-2010, 03:57 PM
Richard Jefferson doesn’t have a deal with the San Antonio Spurs and would prefer to return to the New York area to play for the Knicks or Nets, league sources told Y! Sports.

Jefferson is seeking a multiyear contract that averages in the range of $8 million-$10 million, sources said. He opted out of the $15 million final season of his contract with the Spurs on Tuesday.

Jefferson has built a good relationship with Spurs coach Gregg Popovich, but doesn’t think the team’s system best fits his skills.

The Spurs could still try to sign Jefferson to a contract that lowers their luxury-tax hit, depending on what other options they find in free agency.

Please let this be true. I want a trade exception and bench player.

RiverwalkParade
07-01-2010, 03:58 PM
According to Woj, RJ wants to go back to the NY metro area and play for the Nets or the Knicks...

Is a sign and trade possible?

RJ and Dice for Curry and Gallinari?

benefactor
07-01-2010, 03:59 PM
lol sources
He must be using Texas 2 Step's source.

lefty
07-01-2010, 04:01 PM
at a better contract.


According to Wojnarowski Pop has been personally working out RJ privately the last few weeks.


:) Suck it RJ haters.
Shit



This could be n epic fail in the making

scottspurs
07-01-2010, 04:06 PM
Shit



This could be n epic fail in the making

Yeah those are two very conflicting reports that don't make much sense. From he is personally working out with pop to he wants to return to Metroland. Somethings got to give.

anonoftheinternets
07-01-2010, 04:10 PM
jordan farmar for LLE ...

MannyIsGod
07-01-2010, 05:00 PM
Sources.

:lol

GL getting anyone to believe you again Eric if this thread turns out to be wrong.

Buddy Holly
07-01-2010, 05:04 PM
Sources.

:lol

GL getting anyone to believe you again Eric if this thread turns out to be wrong.

I think we all know his sources.

http://blogs.rockymountainnews.com/bridget/Ronald%20McDonald.jpg

EricB
07-01-2010, 05:05 PM
Sources.

:lol

GL getting anyone to believe you again Eric if this thread turns out to be wrong.


The person works in the east side of town, so he/she is pretty close to the situation.

angelbelow
07-01-2010, 05:06 PM
assuming RJ signs to a 4/5 year deal worth 40-50, that would be VERY very bad but not a complete disaster. I used to think those large contracts like Maggette's are untradable but I guess there are always stupid GMs out there.

EricB
07-01-2010, 05:06 PM
I think we all know his sources.

http://blogs.rockymountainnews.com/bridget/Ronald%20McDonald.jpg



Had I said the source was Justin Timberlake you would've clapped and squealed excitedly I suppose.

SpursTillTheEnd
07-01-2010, 05:07 PM
my sources tell me that tim duncan will be in this team next year along with manu, blair, hill,

lmao but on the real eric b has no sources, i already told yall he gets his info from his mama

Creation88
07-01-2010, 05:08 PM
The person works in the east side of town, so he/she is pretty close to the situation.

lolololol :lmao

DPG21920
07-01-2010, 05:10 PM
I just love how Eric gives Ric crap about his sources, and gives himself an out about "players changing their minds". Why can't Ric use the same excuse?

EricB
07-01-2010, 05:12 PM
I just love how Eric gives Ric crap about his sources, and gives himself an out about "players changing their minds". Why can't Ric use the same excuse?


You mean like when he is asked "what changed"

and he says whats changed?

DPG21920
07-01-2010, 05:14 PM
Things happen. You have no right to scoff anyone when it comes to sources. Just putting some perspective on things.

I for one am happy you have a source. I certainly hope he is wrong about RJ.

Buddy Holly
07-01-2010, 05:14 PM
Had I said the source was Justin Timberlake you would've clapped and squealed excitedly I suppose.

I might have but you would still be a useless dickhead. :toast

MannyIsGod
07-01-2010, 05:15 PM
So what you're saying is that your bad sources are better than other people's bad sources?

Creation88
07-01-2010, 05:16 PM
UPDATE: earlier i reported that my Sources said i'd get a Whataburger #1 for lunch. Well i want to correct. The user changed his mind. I had leftover pizza. :(

EricB
07-01-2010, 05:17 PM
So what you're saying is that your bad sources are better than other people's bad sources?


Im saying you don't have to read and be a dickhead about it.

Sorry you feel this way.

Buddy Holly
07-01-2010, 05:17 PM
The person works in the east side of town, so he/she is pretty close to the situation.

I guess I was wrong about your source.

A newly attained picture shows EricB getting his information from his "source" on the east side.

http://www.fulloma.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/prostitute-negotiating-with-possible-customer.jpg

EricB
07-01-2010, 05:17 PM
I might have but you would still be a useless dickhead. :toast


MMM, and you'd still be a worthless stalker.

Buddy Holly
07-01-2010, 05:19 PM
Im saying you don't have to read and be a dickhead about it.

Sorry you feel this way.

http://rlv.zcache.com/dont_get_all_butt_hurt_t_shirt-p235675480278924898trlf_400.jpg

Whisky Dog
07-01-2010, 05:20 PM
My source says this motha fucking window is closed so it doesn't matter what Jefferson does.

Buddy Holly
07-01-2010, 05:20 PM
MMM, and you'd still be a worthless stalker.

Stalker of whom?

Overweight jersey collecting know-it-all wannabe's who are overly senstive and the first to talk shit and insult people but get majorly butt hurt when its thrown back at them? Nah, not my type.

objective
07-01-2010, 05:21 PM
I guess I was wrong about your source.

A newly attained picture shows EricB getting his information from his "source" on the east side.

http://www.fulloma.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/prostitute-negotiating-with-possible-customer.jpg

way too slender for the east side

Creation88
07-01-2010, 05:21 PM
Stalker of whom?

Overweight jersey collecting know-it-all wannabe's who are overly offensive and the first to talk shit and insult people but get majorly butt hurt when its thrown back at them? Nah, not my type.

how do i put that in my sig? :lmao

DPG21920
07-01-2010, 05:22 PM
Eric, people only give you crap because you react so crazy to it and tell them to drink drain-o, then tell them not to be jerks. Then you tell them their sources suck and yours are only wrong because players change their minds.

Its simple.

Buddy Holly
07-01-2010, 05:23 PM
Eric, people only give you crap because you react so crazy to it and tell them to drink drain-o, then tell them not to be jerks. Then you tell them their sources suck and yours are only wrong because players change their minds.

Its simple.

So he's an asshole who probably had a shitty childhood who likes to dish it but can't for the sake of humanity reciprocate it. :wow

celldweller
07-01-2010, 05:24 PM
way too slender for the east side

More like......
http://images.chickencrap.com/images/2725.jpg

Kori Ellis
07-01-2010, 05:24 PM
Okay the famous TPark vs Buddy Holly Dumb Insult Fest can stop now.

Move along.

MannyIsGod
07-01-2010, 05:24 PM
Im saying you don't have to read and be a dickhead about it.

Sorry you feel this way.

:lol

Don't get upset. Take your ribbings like a man.

MannyIsGod
07-01-2010, 05:25 PM
My source says this motha fucking window is closed so it doesn't matter what Jefferson does.

:(

Buddy Holly
07-01-2010, 05:25 PM
Okay the famous TPark vs Buddy Holly Dumb Insult Fest can stop now.

Move along.

No problem. I'll stop messing with ol' boy. :toast

Das Texan
07-01-2010, 05:33 PM
Im saying you don't have to read and be a dickhead about it.

Sorry you feel this way.



dont pound your chest like you are special or something in the process.


isnt it about time for you to quit this board again anyway?

SpursTillTheEnd
07-01-2010, 05:37 PM
if eric b keeps lying about his sources im gonna clown his ass off of spurs talk

jiggy_55
07-01-2010, 05:43 PM
McDonald:

http://twitter.com/JMcDonald_SAEN/status/17525528799

Just posted to mysa.com. No deal yet, but Jefferson's return to #spurs looking imminent. http://bit.ly/agdsAq

benefactor
07-01-2010, 05:44 PM
lol McDonald. He's just making shit up.

Das Texan
07-01-2010, 05:47 PM
McDonald:

http://twitter.com/JMcDonald_SAEN/status/17525528799

Just posted to mysa.com. No deal yet, but Jefferson's return to #spurs looking imminent. http://bit.ly/agdsAq




If McDonald said the sky was blue and the grass was green I wouldnt believe him.

DesignatedT
07-01-2010, 05:49 PM
:lol

rayray2k8
07-01-2010, 05:52 PM
lol McDonald. He's just making shit up.

My sources tell me that both McDonald and the thread opener are making stuff up..

lawl

mike20spurs
07-03-2010, 01:20 AM
http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/07/spurs-fans-just-when-you-thought-you-were-rid-of-richard-jefferson.php

looks like he justs wants a future with the spurs

Borat Sagyidev
07-03-2010, 01:23 AM
......not..

AFBlue
07-03-2010, 01:30 AM
http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/07/spurs-fans-just-when-you-thought-you-were-rid-of-richard-jefferson.php

looks like he justs wants a future with the spurs

This is regurgitation of previous speculation.

Kindergarten Cop
07-03-2010, 01:33 AM
......not..

Borat, you know you spelled your name incorrectly, right? :lol:toast

ldhl89
07-03-2010, 02:15 AM
q3zmUQbdiJk

howbouthemspurs
07-03-2010, 09:56 AM
The spurs didnt work RJ right .... but in the thend of the season he started to explode.. I think if he stays with the spurs he can be an amazing addition.

sexinthatsx
07-03-2010, 09:27 PM
Many of you people fail to realize that RJ will be our X factor, especially with Tiago Splitter coming (most likely, anyway). If you have a lineup of Splitter, Duncan, Parker, and Ginobili, RJ would be the last person an opposing team would guard. This leaves him with a lot of room for improvement on scoring, while not having to shoulder a big load in terms of defense since there's an additional post presence.

Blackjack
07-03-2010, 09:47 PM
This is regurgitation of previous speculation.

One might say: specualtin' on the specualtin'.

ElNono
07-03-2010, 09:57 PM
'sources' tell me it's imminent... oh, wait a sec

EricB
07-03-2010, 09:58 PM
No one forces u to read. Scroll by if it's such a pain for you.

Ice009
07-03-2010, 09:59 PM
Hey Eric what is your source saying now? I mean can you still ask him stuff if anything has changed?

My Fault
07-03-2010, 10:18 PM
My source says Ducks will soon come out the closet and admit his crush on Tony.

Ice009
07-03-2010, 10:43 PM
I was actually asking a legit question. Can you talk to this guy again Eric and ask if he has anymore info? or doesn't it work like that?

lefty
07-04-2010, 12:21 AM
My nasal source just told me that I farted

team-work
07-04-2010, 01:10 AM
Will lowering his salary make RJ a better fit for the Spurs? Obviously it helps lower the expectation and pressure on him, but does not change the fact that he is not a spot-up shooter and needs a pass-first PG. Another potential benefit for Pop and RC is if he plays better than in his first year, probably the RJ trade won't become the one of worst trades in franchise history.

Ditty
07-04-2010, 02:27 AM
if Rj signs for 3 years under 30 million i will take it

Spurs Brazil
07-04-2010, 07:55 AM
It seems Nets is not an option for RJ


Nets may target Boozer, Lee next

If the New Jersey Nets strike out on LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh, they will likely turn their attention to acquiring a marquee big man like Amar’e Stoudemire, Carlos Boozer or David Lee, a league source said. With Stoudemire expected to sign with the New York Knicks, Boozer and Lee could be more likely targets. On top of that, the Nets also want to acquire a talented guard as well.

One key reason why the Nets would turn their focus to a big man without James, Wade or Bosh is to keep from putting too much pressure on 19-year-old rookie power forward Derrick Favors(notes), league sources said. Favors will debut for the Nets in the Orlando Summer League on Monday against the Philadelphia 76ers and their heralded rookie, Evan Turner(notes). Moreover, the Nets are still confident that they have a legitimate shot at James.


– Marc J. Spears, 10:15 p.m. ET, July 3

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=Akyz2jJn8puqcUeZGjnY0re8vLYF?slug=ys-freeagentbuzz070310

jiggy_55
07-04-2010, 08:20 AM
It seems Nets is not an option for RJ

No where does that article mention Jefferson, or them acquiring a small forward. It says their looking for a big man and a guard.

EDIT: MY bad, did NOT notice the "not" loool

wut
07-04-2010, 09:25 AM
I think people forget, RJ was pretty solid for us in the playoffs at times. He would only grow into the system if he sticks around.

The Spurs defense took a while to come around, it would come quicker this year with both Blair and RJ knowing the system...add Splitter to the lineup and all of a sudden it's a big improvement over last season.

I really do think the team is pretty solid, however still lacks a key 3 point shooter like Morrow; but with no way to get him without trading Parker.

HarlemHeat37
07-04-2010, 10:23 AM
Wait, what?..

Jefferson was playing solid basketball in the 2nd half of the season, but he was far from solid during the playoffs..

Bruno
07-04-2010, 05:02 PM
It seems Nets is not an option for RJ

Nets needs a SF. They can decide to tank one more year and keep their capspace for 2011 but if they don't, I think they will sign a SF.

What is really strange is that there hasn't been a single rumor about a team interested in Jefferson.

Mel_13
07-04-2010, 05:18 PM
What is really strange is that there hasn't been a single rumor about a team interested in Jefferson.

I know I'm in the minority on this, but I don't find that strange at all. RJ has to be looking for a contract offer above the MLE to begin with. I just don't see much chance that any one of the teams with cap space will make him such an offer.

His best chance might be if Miami loses Wade and none of the big FAs want to go there and they're forced to sign 30-35M in contracts just to meet minimum salary requirements.

On the FA SF pecking order, RJ is probably behind Childress, Outlaw, Mike Miller, and perhaps Korver.

There's a good chance he'll be looking for MLE offers before too long.

HarlemHeat37
07-04-2010, 06:09 PM
You aren't in the minority at all..

Jefferson is an extremely tough player to fit in right now, on any team..

He was typically a high-usage player on the teams he was playing for, especially in the 2 seasons prior to joining the Spurs, where he posted a 26% and 24% usage rate..he needs the ball a high amount to be effective at all..

Teams that have Jefferson posting up those types of usage %s will likely be very bad teams, especially with his declining skills..when you're signing him, you expect him to be a #3 option at best right now, and even that is risky..if you're paying him to be a role player, like the Spurs are, you're out of luck..he doesn't defend, nor does he shoot well..

Jefferson is best suited as a 6th man right now, and how will a 6th man of his caliber receive the money he seems to want?..it won't happen, unless a team is extremely incompetent IMO..

lurker23
07-04-2010, 06:24 PM
I'm not surprised that there haven't been any Jefferson rumors, but I have different reasons:

a.) Teams with a lot of cap space are focusing on LeBron, Wade, and the like, so they aren't going to admit to being interested in RJ until those names are gone.

b.) RJ was a surprise addition to the FA class, so teams who knew they'd have to be focusing on second tier players didn't have him on their radar.

After the big names make their decisions, I expect the market for RJ to heat up, and honestly I'll be surprised if it doesn't.

AFBlue
07-04-2010, 10:21 PM
I'm not surprised that there haven't been any Jefferson rumors, but I have different reasons:

a.) Teams with a lot of cap space are focusing on LeBron, Wade, and the like, so they aren't going to admit to being interested in RJ until those names are gone.

b.) RJ was a surprise addition to the FA class, so teams who knew they'd have to be focusing on second tier players didn't have him on their radar.

After the big names make their decisions, I expect the market for RJ to heat up, and honestly I'll be surprised if it doesn't.

Agreed on all points. I think we're in for a long summer as it relates to the RJ situation.

Blackjack
07-05-2010, 10:34 PM
FWIW, Don Harris also reported that a league source of his has confirmed that the Nets are indeed interested in bringing back RJ should they miss out in free-agency (and I hope that means a trade exception is in order).

lurker23
07-05-2010, 10:39 PM
FWIW, Don Harris also reported that a league source of his has confirmed that the Nets are indeed interested in bringing back RJ should they miss out in free-agency (and I hope that means a trade exception is in order).

Thanks for the updates! I hope so too. BTW, where are you getting these reports?

Blackjack
07-05-2010, 10:43 PM
Thanks for the updates! I hope so too. BTW, where are you getting these reports?

Local telecast. Don Harris said it in his sportscast.

benefactor
07-05-2010, 10:49 PM
FWIW, Don Harris also reported that a league source of his has confirmed that the Nets are indeed interested in bringing back RJ should they miss out in free-agency (and I hope that means a trade exception is in order).
Thanks for the update. :tu

lurker23
07-05-2010, 11:11 PM
Local telecast. Don Harris said it in his sportscast.

Thanks, figured as much; just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing out on some tell-all website. :)

Kindergarten Cop
07-05-2010, 11:14 PM
FWIW, Don Harris also reported that a league source of his has confirmed that the Nets are indeed interested in bringing back RJ should they miss out in free-agency (and I hope that means a trade exception is in order).


Thanks for the updates! I hope so too. BTW, where are you getting these reports?

I agree. Thanks Blackjack for the updates!:toast

Cane
07-05-2010, 11:57 PM
Local telecast. Don Harris said it in his sportscast.

Sorry if its old but I checked to see if had a twitter account and here's what he said July 1st that could be related:




DonHarris4WOAI

Spurs, Jefferson "not close" according to sources.

http://twitter.com/DonHarris4WOAI

Blackjack
07-06-2010, 12:06 AM
Sorry if its old but I checked to see if had a twitter account and here's what he said July 1st that could be related:

Yeah, I saw that. This was new. I'm sure it'll show up on the WOAI page or some such sooner or later.

Budkin
07-06-2010, 12:07 AM
Please GTFO. One of the biggest free agent busts ever.

Manufan909
07-06-2010, 05:06 PM
So the official word right now is RJ opted out, and there has been nothing conclusive since? Just the smoke and mirrors of the Nets wanting him back and Pop working out a longer, cheaper-per-year contract, am I right?

Someone who has timvp's ear should mention that the 2 or so big RJ threads need to be merged.

Blackjack
07-06-2010, 05:11 PM
So the official word right now is RJ opted out, and there has been nothing conclusive since? Just the smoke and mirrors of the Nets wanting him back and Pop working out a longer, cheaper-per-year contract, am I right?

RJ opted out and we're not going to know what happens with him until the big-time free-agents make their commitments -- he's a bottom-feeder looking for scraps (which could turn out to be a good-sized meal in this market).

Don Harris confirmed through an NBA source that the Nets would have interest if they were unable to land a big-time free-agent or still had a spot for RJ when the dust cleared. So, as a Spurs fan, you've just got to hope the Nets have a spot open for RJ when it's all said and done and that the Spurs can get themselves a a good-sized trade exception via sign-and-trade.

KaiRMD1
07-06-2010, 09:03 PM
I truly hope he can improve.

montgod
07-07-2010, 07:58 AM
FWIW, Don Harris also reported that a league source of his has confirmed that the Nets are indeed interested in bringing back RJ should they miss out in free-agency (and I hope that means a trade exception is in order).

I wonder why when they have a pretty nice SF in T Williams?

wut
07-07-2010, 08:05 AM
Please GTFO. One of the biggest free agent busts ever.

While that may be true, it still doesn't fill our starting SF spot by letting him leave.

Obstructed_View
07-07-2010, 09:07 AM
The simple fact that there's not already a deal in place is sign enough that RJ's willing to leave the Spurs to follow the money. That's just the reality. If there's some advantage to the Spurs doing a sign-and-trade, and if it's likely the Spurs can do it then that's what I'm hoping for. I don't see RJ as a good fit and another several years of having him here isn't going to change that IMO.

polandprzem
07-07-2010, 09:46 AM
What's the date of him coming back?


:)

anakha
07-07-2010, 11:46 AM
What's the date of him coming back?


:)

TPark's source should know.

E-RockWill
07-07-2010, 11:50 AM
TPark's source should know.

Zing!

da_suns_fan
07-07-2010, 01:17 PM
New York might make him a stupid offer if their Plans A, B and C fall through.


Theyre desperate.

TJastal
07-07-2010, 01:21 PM
The simple fact that there's not already a deal in place is sign enough that RJ's willing to leave the Spurs to follow the money. That's just the reality. If there's some advantage to the Spurs doing a sign-and-trade, and if it's likely the Spurs can do it then that's what I'm hoping for. I don't see RJ as a good fit and another several years of having him here isn't going to change that IMO.

But according to Pop's logic he'll eventually fit as long as Pop keeps hammering away .. even if he's a mangled bloody pulp by god he'll fit and it will because of all the bone crushing, flesh emancipating blows before it :)

ceperez
07-07-2010, 01:27 PM
But according to Pop's logic he'll eventually fit as long as Pop keeps hammering away .. even if he's a mangled bloody pulp by god he'll fit and it will because of all the bone crushing, flesh emancipating blows before it :)


Agree 100%! If he stays, he'll fit whether he likes it or not!

EricB
07-07-2010, 01:27 PM
TPark's source should know.


The stalker returns.

anakha
07-07-2010, 05:42 PM
The stalker returns.

Haven't checked this thread in a while, actually. Don't flatter yourself. :lol

So what's the latest from your source?

Spurs Brazil
07-08-2010, 08:41 PM
JMcDonald_SAEN
Now starting at forward for your San Antonio Spurs ... @varner48MoH sign and trade market for Richard Jefferson is shrinking fast....ugh

objective
07-08-2010, 08:44 PM
Spurs should let him twist a little. Offer him 2 years, 8 million total.

rayray2k8
07-08-2010, 08:46 PM
Is he back yet?

coyotes_geek
07-08-2010, 08:49 PM
not yet, but it's getting closer.

Bruno
07-08-2010, 09:29 PM
Time to S&T RJ to Cavs:
Spurs get Mike Miller(S&T) and Jamario Moon(S&T) for RJ
Cavs get RJ (S&T) for Jamario Moon and Delonte West
Wizards get Delonte West for Mike Miller (S&T)

That's the basis of the trade, some tweaks need to be done:
- Some incentives (cash + picks) coming from Spurs and/or Cavs should also go to Wizards. They will waive West whose contract is only $500K guaranteed.
- Moon can be substitute by Shaq (S&T) if Spurs wants it.
- Spurs could also trade some of their players with a non-guaranteed contract to match salaries.

Go it RC. :smokin

Vic Petro
07-08-2010, 09:29 PM
Suns just got a major TE for Amare. Perhaps they'd be willing to part with some of it for RJ.

DesignatedT
07-08-2010, 09:31 PM
Time to S&T RJ to Cavs:
Spurs get Mike Miller(S&T) and Jamario Moon(S&T) for RJ
Cavs get RJ (S&T) for Jamario Moon and Delonte West
Wizards get Delonte West for Mike Miller (S&T)

That's the basis of the trade, some tweaks need to be done:
- Some incentives (cash + picks) coming from Spurs and/or Cavs should also go to Wizards. They will waive West whose contract is only $500K guaranteed.
- Moon can be substitute by Shaq (S&T) if Spurs wants it.
- Spurs could also trade some of their players with a non-guaranteed contract to match salaries.

Go it RC. :smokin

this would be legit.

coyotes_geek
07-08-2010, 09:32 PM
The knicks are going to screw up any Mike Miller scenarios for us.

http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/67989/20100708/knicks_will_go_after_mike_miller_if_lebron_goes_el sewhere/

Blackjack
07-08-2010, 10:22 PM
Time to S&T RJ to Cavs:
Spurs get Mike Miller(S&T) and Jamario Moon(S&T) for RJ
Cavs get RJ (S&T) for Jamario Moon and Delonte West
Wizards get Delonte West for Mike Miller (S&T)

That's the basis of the trade, some tweaks need to be done:
- Some incentives (cash + picks) coming from Spurs and/or Cavs should also go to Wizards. They will waive West whose contract is only $500K guaranteed.
- Moon can be substitute by Shaq (S&T) if Spurs wants it.
- Spurs could also trade some of their players with a non-guaranteed contract to match salaries.

Go it RC. :smokin

First thing that came to mind after learning of that dude's decision. Not for Miller but for the hope of a trade exception.


When Cavs renounce LeBron, which I assume is very soon, they'll have $9 million in cap space. Can get to 13M by releasing D. West.

Get 'er done, RC (and, Bruno, find me a way to get Martell Webster :downspin:).

EricB
07-09-2010, 06:09 PM
Bump

slick'81
07-09-2010, 06:09 PM
Bump


nice one EB

EricB
07-09-2010, 06:17 PM
Anahka?

Nothing?

anakha
07-09-2010, 09:16 PM
Anahka?

Nothing?

Congrats for finally getting one turd to stick against the wall? :lol

montgod
07-09-2010, 11:03 PM
So just curious EricB... who are the Spurs interested in for the LLE? Or has that player already been signed by someone else?

ElNono
07-09-2010, 11:07 PM
Congrats Wojnarowski...

AFBlue
07-09-2010, 11:14 PM
So what are the terms of the deal? How many years?

Mark in Austin
07-09-2010, 11:18 PM
Time to S&T RJ to Cavs:
Spurs get Mike Miller(S&T) and Jamario Moon(S&T) for RJ
Cavs get RJ (S&T) for Jamario Moon and Delonte West
Wizards get Delonte West for Mike Miller (S&T)

That's the basis of the trade, some tweaks need to be done:
- Some incentives (cash + picks) coming from Spurs and/or Cavs should also go to Wizards. They will waive West whose contract is only $500K guaranteed.
- Moon can be substitute by Shaq (S&T) if Spurs wants it.
- Spurs could also trade some of their players with a non-guaranteed contract to match salaries.

Go it RC. :smokin

How do we get this under his nose? Send it to Ludden? Local media (shudder)? email [email protected]?

benefactor
07-10-2010, 12:10 AM
Congrats Wojnarowski...
:tu

EricB
07-10-2010, 12:14 AM
Congrats Wojnarowski...


:lol

Another one butthurt

ohmwrecker
07-10-2010, 12:14 AM
Why is Mike Miller better than Jefferson again?

DPG21920
07-10-2010, 12:15 AM
:lol

Another one butthurt

You started it.

DPG21920
07-10-2010, 12:15 AM
Why is Mike Miller better than Jefferson again?

Because he can dribble, pass and shoot.

ElNono
07-10-2010, 12:16 AM
:lol
Another one butthurt

Meanwhile, in the OP:


According to Wojnarowski Pop has been personally working out RJ privately the last few weeks.

I'm glad you had a laugh with it though... :lol

benefactor
07-10-2010, 12:18 AM
You started it.

at a better contract.


According to Wojnarowski Pop has been personally working out RJ privately the last few weeks.


:) Suck it RJ haters.
He sure did...and named his source right there in the OP. Well played, TPark.

benefactor
07-10-2010, 12:18 AM
Meanwhile, in the OP:

Great minds. :)

ElNono
07-10-2010, 12:19 AM
Great minds. :)

lol

ohmwrecker
07-10-2010, 12:22 AM
Because he can dribble, pass and shoot.

I will concede that Miller is a better ball handler and 3pt shooter, but RJ is a better rebounder, finisher at the rim and I don't think I've ever seen Miller block a shot.

DPG21920
07-10-2010, 12:24 AM
I don't think RJ is a better rebounder or passer or ball handler or shooter. He does finish better though.

ohmwrecker
07-10-2010, 12:31 AM
I don't think RJ is a better rebounder or passer or ball handler or shooter. He does finish better though.

I said RJ can rebound, block and finish better than Miller. Or, are you making some kind of vague gay joke?

DPG21920
07-10-2010, 12:33 AM
I said RJ does not rebound better.

RJ's PER 36 minute blocks: .4 per game

Mike Miller: .3 per game

DPG21920
07-10-2010, 12:33 AM
Only thing he does better is finish. Other than that, Miller does everything as good or significantly better.

ohmwrecker
07-10-2010, 12:39 AM
Only thing he does better is finish. Other than that, Miller does everything as good or significantly better.

Significantly? I don't know . . . maybe. Mike Miller isn't going to play for the Spurs this year and he will make more $ than RJ from whoever signs him. It's a pointless argument.

DPG21920
07-10-2010, 12:40 AM
I know, you just asked a question and I answered it is all.

ohmwrecker
07-10-2010, 12:42 AM
I know, you just asked a question and I answered it is all.

:hat

MannyIsGod
07-10-2010, 01:19 AM
Bump

Oh give me a fucking break. You luck out because no one else ends up offering him money and you have the nerve to bump this?

:lmao

You really don't get why you get so much shit on this forum, do you?

EricB
07-10-2010, 05:20 PM
Don't really care. It's a personah online thing and nothing else..

But the info i had was legit. Luck whatever, it was legit and I appreciated having and thought it would be cool to share.

Whisky Dog
07-10-2010, 06:10 PM
Lmao, this wasn't from some source a week and a half ago, this shit just got decided because the FA money is drying up.

Spurs Brazil
07-12-2010, 03:41 PM
Don Harris
Richard Jefferson will hit town Monday, and the Spurs could have him locked up to a new longterm deal by Tuesday.
http://www.woai.com/news/local/story/Soon-to-be-Spur-Tiago-Splitter-house-hunting-in-SA/25xyiNfeh0O_rAWaEaBCDA.cspx

Spurs Brazil
07-13-2010, 06:25 PM
JMcDonald_SAEN
Nothing much brewing on RJ front today, although sources maintain his return to #spurs a matter of time.

024
07-13-2010, 06:27 PM
i hope he gets a splitter-type amazing deal. anything more than 3yrs/$20 million would be pushing it.

DAF86
07-14-2010, 07:53 AM
I can deal with RJ coming back, but they need to work with him on his three point shooting.

TDMVPDPOY
07-14-2010, 07:57 AM
i hope he gets a splitter-type amazing deal. anything more than 3yrs/$20 million would be pushing it.

fail

he gave up 15m to sign 3/20m? drop the crack pipe

polandprzem
07-14-2010, 08:43 AM
Don't really care. It's a personah online thing and nothing else..

But the info i had was legit. Luck whatever, it was legit and I appreciated having and thought it would be cool to share.

We believe you

No worries















blue

ElNono
07-14-2010, 08:21 PM
Don Harris
Richard Jefferson will hit town Monday, and the Spurs could have him locked up to a new longterm deal by Tuesday.

Well, Don... that didn't work out.

What's up with this guy?

Are the Spurs waiting to see who else they sign with the rest of the MLE to work out a contract that doesn't put them over the tax?
Are they lowballing him now that no other team seem interested?

Anybody have any updates?

slick'81
07-14-2010, 08:24 PM
yeah its been real quiet when it comes to dick jefferson

HarlemHeat37
07-14-2010, 08:24 PM
He's probably in shock that nobody wants him..he's still taking it in that his stock has fallen so much..

Holt and the front office are probably in tears, since they pretty much have to sign him to a multi-year deal, which will be a failure either way, but I guess there is no better option..

Both sides are saddened..give them time..

ElNono
07-14-2010, 08:26 PM
Any news from the sources? :lol

ElNono
07-14-2010, 08:27 PM
BTW, it would be Bonzi Wells-esque if he gets a contract for about $15m

slick'81
07-14-2010, 08:27 PM
He's probably in shock that nobody wants him..he's still taking it in that his stock has fallen so much..

Holt and the front office are probably in tears, since they pretty much have to sign him to a multi-year deal, which will be a failure either way, but I guess there is no better option..

Both sides are saddened..give them time..


for shoo spurs are just delaying the inevitable what a shame

Brazil
07-14-2010, 08:34 PM
we can say whatever we want, RJ is the best option spurs have right now. I really hope they find an agreement quickly

Spursmania
07-14-2010, 10:30 PM
I agree with Brazil. Sign him and do it now. There aren't a lot of options that are better out there. They need to get this done.

DesignatedT
07-14-2010, 10:39 PM
Spurs will definitely be worse off without RJ. They need to sign him up quickly and hopefully they can do it for 3 years. I was impressed with RJ's improvements on the defensive side of the ball as the season progressed. He rebounded well and is still a big strong athletic body. Offensively they're definitely problems but it won't get any worse, everyone knows players significantly improve after there 1st season with the Spurs. He might not be the best fit, but he is by far the best player available at that position.

ElNono
07-14-2010, 10:41 PM
I'm not saying they don't need to do it, I'm wondering what's the delay... I'm also wondering if they're lowballing him now that nobody wants to have him.

I mean, if the Spurs asked him to opt out, then I can see a pre-arranged deal, but I haven't read anywhere that they did.

ducks
07-14-2010, 10:42 PM
spurs have a low offer on him
why offer more no one wants him

DesignatedT
07-14-2010, 10:44 PM
I'm not saying they don't need to do it, I'm wondering what's the delay... I'm also wondering if they're lowballing him now that nobody wants to have him.

I mean, if the Spurs asked him to opt out, then I can see a pre-arranged deal, but I haven't read anywhere that they did.

Could be a lot of things. I definitely could see the Spurs trying to low ball him a little on years or I could see RJ wanting to wait it out for that offer from new jersey to somehow appear.

ElNono
07-14-2010, 10:45 PM
spurs have a low offer on him
why offer more no one wants him

Well, if they had something pre-arranged, then you honor that.
The question is wether they did have something, or RJ simply thought he would fetch good value out there and it backfired.

DesignatedT
07-14-2010, 10:46 PM
I don't think the Spurs and RJ had anything pre arranged. I don't think the Spurs objected to RJ opting out and then told him they would like to have him back. IMO it's RJ who is trying to delay this thing. Spurs need to re-sign them and they know this.

ducks
07-14-2010, 10:47 PM
Well, if they had something pre-arranged, then you honor that.
The question is wether they did have something, or RJ simply thought he would fetch good value out there and it backfired.

they did not atleast publically they acted surprise


if they had a prearranged deal they would have already got it done

barbacoataco
07-14-2010, 10:56 PM
Since when did we all decide to pretend that we forgot RJ doesn't fit into the Spurs system and basically sucks. Even at his best last year he wasn't anything special. Crap defense. He quit shooting 3ptrs completely even though he was supposedly a 40% 3ptr. I just don't see why everyone on this board wants him back. I know the Spurs don't have another proven SF but anyone would be better than limpy dicky. IMO the Spurs FO should be doing cartwheels that he opted out. The fact that no other team wants him proves that he really isn't that good.

DesignatedT
07-14-2010, 11:00 PM
Since when did we all decide to pretend that we forgot RJ doesn't fit into the Spurs system and basically sucks. Even at his best last year he wasn't anything special. Crap defense. He quit shooting 3ptrs completely even though he was supposedly a 40% 3ptr. I just don't see why everyone on this board wants him back. I know the Spurs don't have another proven SF but anyone would be better than limpy dicky. IMO the Spurs FO should be doing cartwheels that he opted out. The fact that no other team wants him proves that he really isn't that good.

link?

barbacoataco
07-14-2010, 11:03 PM
link?

Ok, maybe it's not a fact. But if another team outbids the Spurs and snatches RJ from our clutches I won't be crying.

ElNono
07-14-2010, 11:08 PM
Ok, maybe it's not a fact. But if another team outbids the Spurs and snatches RJ from our clutches I won't be crying.

Neither will the Spurs if they can snatch a big fat trade exception...

MaNu4Tres
07-14-2010, 11:10 PM
Neither will the Spurs if they can snatch a big fat trade exception...

And get who?

MannyIsGod
07-14-2010, 11:12 PM
And get who?

From who is the better question.

MaNu4Tres
07-14-2010, 11:13 PM
From who is the better question.

My point exactly.

Jefferson is the best option clearly.

ElNono
07-14-2010, 11:13 PM
And get who?

Wait for February and see who is available...

In the meantime you go along with the current plan, get Jones or Butler or whoever, and play Hairston in the wing...

ElNono
07-14-2010, 11:15 PM
Jefferson is the best option clearly.

Rj is the best option if you don't have to sign him up on a 5 year deal, or if he wants more than what the Spurs are willing to pay for him (ie: puts them over the tax line).

barbacoataco
07-14-2010, 11:18 PM
My point exactly.

Jefferson is the best option clearly.

Jefferson's defense is too weak to be the player the Spurs need him to be. If the Spurs are in the WC finals against the Lakers next year do you really want RJ defending Kobe?

ElNono
07-14-2010, 11:18 PM
And BTW the argument here was 'if somebody outbids the Spurs' for him...

AFBlue
07-14-2010, 11:18 PM
Rj is the best option if you don't have to sing him up on a 5 year deal, or if he wants more than what the Spurs are willing to pay for him (ie: puts them over the tax line).

Agreed...but based on the lack of interest, it appears the Spurs will be able to limit the number of years and the overall salary on the contract. I don't see anyone offering a 5yr contract at this point.

Let's hope that remains the case.

ElNono
07-14-2010, 11:19 PM
Agreed...but based on the lack of interest, it appears the Spurs will be able to limit the number of years and the overall salary on the contract. I don't see anyone offering a 5yr contract at this point.

Let's hope that remains the case.

Right

My Fault
07-14-2010, 11:23 PM
Wait for February and see who is available...

In the meantime you go along with the current plan, get Jones or Butler or whoever, and play Hairston in the wing...

By then half the season is done.

MaNu4Tres
07-14-2010, 11:23 PM
Rj is the best option if you don't have to sing him up on a 5 year deal, or if he wants more than what the Spurs are willing to pay for him (ie: puts them over the tax line).

6-7 million a year is great value for Jefferson, especially with his capable ceiling being an all around versatile player, who has the ability to stretch the floor like he's done for several years outside the last 4 months of last season.

If Jefferson gets a 5th year it will be a team option, which is essentially a 4 year deal. Worse case scenario, his 6-7 million dollar salary is very tradeable compared to what other SF's with similar (not identical) skills are being paid (Deng, Igoudala, Butler).

Jefferson needs to be resigned.

ElNono
07-14-2010, 11:32 PM
6-7 million a year is great value for Jefferson, especially with his capable ceiling being an all around versatile player, who has the ability to stretch the floor like he's done for several years outside the last 4 months of last season.

If Jefferson gets a 5th year it will be a team option, which is essentially a 4 year deal. Worse case scenario, his 6-7 million dollar salary is very tradeable compared to what other SF's with similar (not identical) skills are being paid (Deng, Igoudala, Butler).

Jefferson needs to be resigned.

I wouldn't be surprised if the Spurs are offering 3 years at $6m each, with a 4th being a team option. Again, if nobody really wants him, they're not going to outbid themselves. Which would explain the delay too, since he opted out of $15m to be offered $18m guaranteed.

And really, in an offseason when you have a lot of teams with cap room and they don't even want to look at him, what trade value are you exactly talking about?

I really have no problem with him coming back. But, in the scenario that was being talked about,, some other team outbids the Spurs, I'm sure they'll be happy to take a TE and look ahead.

MaNu4Tres
07-14-2010, 11:33 PM
Jefferson's defense is too weak to be the player the Spurs need him to be.

The horrible defensive notion on Jefferson is vastly over exaggerated by the masses of yes men on this site. Jefferson by no means is an all-NBA defender(he lacks the Bowen-like foot speed and lateral quickness; but his defense off the ball and on the ball defense vs. bigger wings (Pierce, Melo, ect. is better than average). He is not a horrible defender and he showed significant progress after the All-Star break especially.



If the Spurs are in the WC finals against the Lakers next year do you really want RJ defending Kobe?

Please name me all the available players able to defend Kobe. (Realistically) Heck name me 3 players in the whole league that are able to guard Kobe one on one?

I swear half of the masses act like Bowen is available. Bowen isn't walking through that door. Stopping Kobe is going to have to be because of team defense, like the Celtics for instance. (Just in case you to throw out your Tony Allen card; the guy only played 14 minutes out of 48 per game in the Finals)...Meaning....

Team defense will have to and can win the battle vs. Kobe and it will have to be the case again whether Jefferson is here or not.

buttsR4rebounding
07-14-2010, 11:34 PM
Since when did we all decide to pretend that we forgot RJ doesn't fit into the Spurs system and basically sucks. Even at his best last year he wasn't anything special. Crap defense. He quit shooting 3ptrs completely even though he was supposedly a 40% 3ptr. I just don't see why everyone on this board wants him back. I know the Spurs don't have another proven SF but anyone would be better than limpy dicky. IMO the Spurs FO should be doing cartwheels that he opted out. The fact that no other team wants him proves that he really isn't that good.

Ah, ignorance is bliss. RJ was the best #4 option the Spurs have had in the Tim Duncan era in terms of scoring average. He also rebounded better than any small forward in the Duncan era besides Hedo Turkolu. His defense improved during the last part of the season and he has worked with Pop during the off season, not to mention the "whole year in the Spurs system" under his belt. He shot his career average from the field and was 3% below his career average from 3 point distance. Would I rather have Bowen in his prime-sure. But to jump on this "RJ didn't fit with the Spurs" mantra is simply ignoring the facts. Even though the Spurs might not have played the best type of offense for RJ he managed to adjust adequately for a #4 OPTION! Geez, what do you people expect from a #4 option, 20 points a game? Guess what. Then he's a #1 or #2 option!!!!

ElNono
07-14-2010, 11:35 PM
By then half the season is done.

Yes

buttsR4rebounding
07-14-2010, 11:37 PM
I wouldn't be surprised if the Spurs are offering 3 years at $6m each, with a 4th being a team option. Again, if nobody really wants him, they're not going to outbid themselves. Which would explain the delay too, since he opted out of $15m to be offered $18m guaranteed.

And really, in an offseason when you have a lot of teams with cap room and they don't even want to look at him, what trade value are you exactly talking about?

I really have no problem with him coming back. But, in the scenario that was being talked about,, some other team outbids the Spurs, I'm sure they'll be happy to take a TE and look ahead.

If another team outbids the Spurs we likely don't get the TE. Then we are screwed. Geez...:bang

ElNono
07-14-2010, 11:40 PM
If another team outbids the Spurs we likely don't get the TE. Then we are screwed. Geez...:bang

Well, I said IF they get a trade exception, not that it's guaranteed that they will...

Sausage
07-14-2010, 11:45 PM
ChrisMannixSI

Contrary to some reports, Richard Jefferson does not have any kind of deal in place with Spurs to return for more years at lesser salary

ChrisMannixSI

I'm told Jefferson is open to returning to SA but his first priority is a long term deal at the best annual salary he can get.

ElNono
07-14-2010, 11:49 PM
I guess the 'Congrats Woj' was a bit premature...

silverblk mystix
07-15-2010, 12:09 AM
Jefferson's defense is too weak to be the player the Spurs need him to be. If the Spurs are in the WC finals against the Lakers next year do you really want RJ defending Kobe?


If you look at the last time the spurs/lakers played---it was in LA and the spurs pulled off a convincing one-sided win...it appeared that Pop had figured out a few things that worked really well;

#1) believe it or not (re-watch the game) ---Bonner was put on Artest and he more than held his own---in fact he pretty much took Artest out of the game...

#2) RJ guarded Odumb and he dominated Odumb on defense and on offense

#3) Kobe was bothered by Bogans and Manu---but more by the team defense

this was a game the lakers really wanted and the spurs had a 20 point lead at one time and looked like they were going to --at least---give the lakers a good run in the playoffs....

until Phoenix proved to be a matchup nighmare and G.Hill wet the bed against Nash...

ElNono
07-15-2010, 12:11 AM
If you look at the last time the spurs/lakers played---it was in LA and the spurs pulled off a convincing one-sided win...it appeared that Pop had figured out a few things that worked really well;

#1) believe it or not (re-watch the game) ---Bonner was put on Artest and he more than held his own---in fact he pretty much took Artest out of the game...

#2) RJ guarded Odumb and he dominated Odumb on defense and on offense

#3) Kobe was bothered by Bogans and Manu---but more by the team defense

this was a game the lakers really wanted and the spurs had a 20 point lead at one time and looked like they were going to --at least---give the lakers a good run in the playoffs....

until Phoenix proved to be a matchup nighmare and G.Hill wet the bed against Nash...

Bynum missed that game...

silverblk mystix
07-15-2010, 12:13 AM
Bynum missed that game...


Even though Bynum did not play---the spurs had a 20 point lead and the spurs had earlier lost to a lakers team minus kobe---so it was still a great win and a convincing one...

ElNono
07-15-2010, 12:19 AM
Even though Bynum did not play---the spurs had a 20 point lead and the spurs had earlier lost to a lakers team minus kobe---so it was still a great win and a convincing one...

It was a great win and this was while Manu was peaking... but you can't pretend this would have played out the same in the playoffs, especially with one of their 7 footers missing...

In the two games be beat the Lakers last season they were missing either Gasol or Bynum.

RuffnReadyOzStyle
07-15-2010, 12:20 AM
Told ya. I knew this all along. Everyone just assumed RJ was coming back, but to me it made no sense given that he was mostly a poor fit for us. A decent stretch run in the regular season, and a couple of nice playoff games does not erase the fact he's a poor fit.

He could still return, but if he does i suspect it will be yet another "how the fuck did they do that?" contract like Splitter's. Personally, I hope he doesn't come back, we sign Butler, and let the youth play.

barbacoataco
07-15-2010, 01:00 AM
Told ya. I knew this all along. Everyone just assumed RJ was coming back, but to me it made no sense given that he was mostly a poor fit for us. A decent stretch run in the regular season, and a couple of nice playoff games does not erase the fact he's a poor fit.

He could still return, but if he does i suspect it will be yet another "how the fuck did they do that?" contract like Splitter's. Personally, I hope he doesn't come back, we sign Butler, and let the youth play.

I posted some similar takes and they jumped on me like a dumbass newbie who doesn't realize how great Jefferson is.

MaNu4Tres
07-15-2010, 01:08 AM
I posted some similar takes and they jumped on me like a dumbass newbie who doesn't realize how great Jefferson is.

:lol

Please let me know where I tried to get you to realize the "greatness" of Jefferson in this post...


The horrible defensive notion on Jefferson is vastly over exaggerated by the masses of yes men on this site. Jefferson by no means is an all-NBA defender(he lacks the Bowen-like foot speed and lateral quickness; but his defense off the ball and on the ball defense vs. bigger wings (Pierce, Melo, ect. is better than average). He is not a horrible defender and he showed significant progress after the All-Star break especially.



Please name me all the available players able to defend Kobe. (Realistically) Heck name me 3 players in the whole league that are able to guard Kobe one on one?

I swear half of the masses act like Bowen is available. Bowen isn't walking through that door. Stopping Kobe is going to have to be because of team defense, like the Celtics for instance. (Just in case you to throw out your Tony Allen card; the guy only played 14 minutes out of 48 per game in the Finals)...Meaning....

Team defense will have to and can win the battle vs. Kobe and it will have to be the case again whether Jefferson is here or not.

Obstructed_View
07-15-2010, 01:16 AM
I posted some similar takes and they jumped on me like a dumbass newbie who doesn't realize how great Jefferson is.

Actually you said that Jefferson blows and nobody argued.

barbacoataco
07-15-2010, 01:18 AM
:lol

Please let me know where I tried to get you to realize the "greatness" of Jefferson in this post...

I think a little time has passed and you have forgotten what it is like watching RJ. Do you really want another 3-4 years of that? Come on. I would rather watch Hairston or Anderson or some other young player try and fail than watch RJ and his crap. He is just such a soft player with no heart. The way he quit even trying to shoot 3 ptrs, and this is a guy who has shot quite a few over the years, as the season went on. It was like he just got too scared. You don't want a player like that on the Spurs. The Spurs!!!

Obstructed_View
07-15-2010, 01:19 AM
Told ya. I knew this all along. Everyone just assumed RJ was coming back, but to me it made no sense given that he was mostly a poor fit for us. A decent stretch run in the regular season, and a couple of nice playoff games does not erase the fact he's a poor fit.

He could still return, but if he does i suspect it will be yet another "how the fuck did they do that?" contract like Splitter's. Personally, I hope he doesn't come back, we sign Butler, and let the youth play.

That pretty much sums it up. Eating that one year of his contract was a decent enough gamble, and if they walk away from it without having to pay him it's probably not the end of the world. Maybe you take a chance on him at a reduced rate like you suggest above and take the same sort of gamble that he'll improve as his comfort level rises. A little more consistency from RJ at a pretty cheap contract makes him an attractive option for the vet everyone seems to think the Spurs need.

RuffnReadyOzStyle
07-15-2010, 01:39 AM
That pretty much sums it up. Eating that one year of his contract was a decent enough gamble, and if they walk away from it without having to pay him it's probably not the end of the world. Maybe you take a chance on him at a reduced rate like you suggest above and take the same sort of gamble that he'll improve as his comfort level rises. A little more consistency from RJ at a pretty cheap contract makes him an attractive option for the vet everyone seems to think the Spurs need.

It's nice when you've grown up and can see through the hype to the way the world really works, isn't it? ;)

I enjoy ST a lot more now that I ignore the chaff and concentrate on the wheat. There is so much bullshit flying around the internet in general (and ST is no exception) that it is far better to do your own research and trust your own analysis/instincts, and the analysis/instincts of those you respect (like some of the good posters here) than to believe what the masses trot out in their often unfounded hopefulness and 'faith' that things will happen they way they want them to. :lol

The moment RJ opted out the entire Spurs franchise high-fived each other. He was worth a shot last year, but it didn't work out, and he clearly doesn't fit the team or the system, so the opt-out was an easy solution to the Spurs' problem of what to do with him. If he re-signs for cheap, great, if he can be S&Ted, great, if he leaves with no compensation it's no great issue... as long as we sign Butler!

BG_Spurs_Fan
07-15-2010, 02:08 AM
It's nice when you've grown up and can see through the hype to the way the world really works, isn't it? ;)

I enjoy ST a lot more now that I ignore the chaff and concentrate on the wheat. There is so much bullshit flying around the internet in general (and ST is no exception) that it is far better to do your own research and trust your own analysis/instincts, and the analysis/instincts of those you respect (like some of the good posters here) than to believe what the masses trot out in their often unfounded hopefulness and 'faith' that things will happen they way they want them to. :lol

The moment RJ opted out the entire Spurs franchise high-fived each other. He was worth a shot last year, but it didn't work out, and he clearly doesn't fit the team or the system, so the opt-out was an easy solution to the Spurs' problem of what to do with him. If he re-signs for cheap, great, if he can be S&Ted, great, if he leaves with no compensation it's no great issue... as long as we sign Butler!

I agree with most of what you've said, but how does signing Butler make the Spurs a better team than signing RJ or signing RJ AND Butler for that matter?

Man In Black
07-15-2010, 02:42 AM
I agree with most of what you've said, but how does signing Butler make the Spurs a better team than signing RJ or signing RJ AND Butler for that matter?

I'm a bit leery of just going in with Butler. The Spurs need someone who guards opposing scorers with a bit of tenacity and I don't see that in Butler yet, then again I didn't see that in RJ as well. Perhaps having them fight like dogs in practice will instill that needed tenacity. I hope HAT(Hairston, Anderson, Temple) are up to the task of killer bench mob. :hat

BG_Spurs_Fan
07-15-2010, 03:08 AM
I'm a bit leery of just going in with Butler. The Spurs need someone who guards opposing scorers with a bit of tenacity and I don't see that in Butler yet, then again I didn't see that in RJ as well. Perhaps having them fight like dogs in practice will instill that needed tenacity. I hope HAT(Hairston, Anderson, Temple) are up to the task of killer bench mob. :hat

True, I think the best case scenario would be the Spurs re-signing RJ to a more suitable contract and signing Butler, James Jones or whoever else Pop thinks might help. Neither RJ, nor any of these free agents are going to provide Bowen-esque defense, people have been too spoiled and expect that we'd get a defensive stopper similar to Bowen.

I think RJ's defense is greatly underestimated and Hairston's or eventually Butler's or JJ's is highly overestimated. It's true that RJ wasn't very good on D last year, certainly not for that contract,but to expect that a LLE wing would provide much better defense or would be a better overall player in the Spurs system is a bit naive IMO.

Obstructed_View
07-15-2010, 03:23 AM
It's looking like Butler's gonna go to the Celtics. Do the Spurs even have enough to pay him? He's coming off a pretty good season.

Streakyshooter08
07-15-2010, 04:24 AM
It's looking like Butler's gonna go to the Celtics. Do the Spurs even have enough to pay him? He's coming off a pretty good season.

I wonder how the Celtics pay him?I thought they used their MLE for O'Neal!? Maybe I got that confused...

jiggy_55
07-15-2010, 04:34 AM
McDonald on twitter:

JMcDonald_SAEN

FWIW, source close to the process sets odds of Jefferson returning to SA at 95 percent. #spurs

http://twitter.com/JMcDonald_SAEN/status/18589795030

angelbelow
07-15-2010, 04:35 AM
I wonder how the Celtics pay him?I thought they used their MLE for O'Neal!? Maybe I got that confused...

He could be taking their LLE like Maquies Daniels did last year..

Streakyshooter08
07-15-2010, 04:45 AM
He could be taking their LLE like Maquies Daniels did last year..

Yeah, but the Spurs could give him a better contract with the remainder of the MLE, so if he goes to the Celtics it won't be about the money. I also hope the Spurs could land Butler/ Barnes or Jones.

I wonder if Jefferson really wants to play here. It will be interesting to see what happens.

Mel_13
07-15-2010, 04:56 AM
I wonder how the Celtics pay him?I thought they used their MLE for O'Neal!? Maybe I got that confused...


He could be taking their LLE like Maquies Daniels did last year..


Yeah, but the Spurs could give him a better contract with the remainder of the MLE, so if he goes to the Celtics it won't be about the money. I also hope the Spurs could land Butler/ Barnes or Jones.

I wonder if Jefferson really wants to play here. It will be interesting to see what happens.

Celts don't have the LLE this year because they used it last year on Daniels. The only way for the Celts to offer more than the vet min to Butler would be to work out a S&T with the Clippers.

SanAntonioSpurs23
07-15-2010, 05:13 AM
McDonald on twitter:

JMcDonald_SAEN

FWIW, source close to the process sets odds of Jefferson returning to SA at 95 percent. #spurs

http://twitter.com/JMcDonald_SAEN/status/18589795030

Awesome!!! I know I am in the minority when it comes
to Jefferson coming back, but I truly believe if he does (at a resonable price) he will be better than he was last year. I'm not sold on Hairston and IMO Dickie J is the best possible starter caliber SF on the market right now.

If RJ comes back I think he will have a better understanding of his role and the pressure of being "the missing piece" will be lifted. RJ+ James Jones>>>>>>> James Jones+ Hairston.

Chieflion
07-15-2010, 06:02 AM
I think it is less likely each passing day that Jefferson returns. The Spurs actually pulled Malik Hairston out of the summer league, saying that they like what they see out of him. We got reports saying Spurs are interested in James Jones. I just hope the Spurs can wing a deal using a Jefferson sign and trade, because we are already over the cap so might as well get a trade exception. If the Spurs are lucky, we might get a marginal SF prospect in return.

tuncaboylu
07-15-2010, 06:04 AM
Celts don't have the LLE this year because they used it last year on Daniels. The only way for the Celts to offer more than the vet min to Butler would be to work out a S&T with the Clippers.


Can't you use LLE every year like MLE?

Chieflion
07-15-2010, 06:05 AM
Can't you use LLE every year like MLE?

No. The LLE is also known as the BAE (Bi-Annual Exception). It is given once every 2 years.

objective
07-15-2010, 06:25 AM
I hope HAT(Hairston, Anderson, Temple) are up to the task of killer bench mob. :hat

Lots of posters on this board are always so frightened or nervous about what would happen if in-experienced guys like the HAT trio are trusted.

But wouldn't it be fair to say the for the most part whenever the Spurs have relent and give time and trust to the young players those guys have produced?

Parker delivered. Manu delivered. Jackson delivered when he was freed to play by injuries to Steve Smith and Manu early that season. Blair delivered this past year. Hill delivered when he was finally allowed to play starting after the 09 Dallas series was pretty much over. Hell, Devin Brown had taken the 6th man spot from Barry in 05 until his back injury. Even Beno had a nice rookie season until the pressure finally got to be too much for him.

In contrast, the biggest failures or at least 'failure to deliver' in the playoffs have been the experienced players, the vets brought in because the Spurs supposedly couldn't afford to groom players through their rough spots.

Turkoglu, experienced and failed in 04. Bonner failing. Mason failing. Steve Smith failing. Udoka failing. Elson failing. Charlie Ward failing. Anthony Carter. Ron Mercer. Rasho failing his way into a trade for a starter to replace him. Van Exel's colossal failure. Damon Stoudamire. Kurt Thomas turned into a trade chip. Most of Finley's 2nd contract. Drew Gooden. Keith Bogans even though he was a vet-min guy. And of course . . . Richard Jefferson.

TJastal
07-15-2010, 06:42 AM
So let's just assume for a second RJ bolts to NY or NJ. The spurs depth chart right now looks like:

Duncan/McDyess
Splitter/Blair/Bonner
Ginobili/Hairston
Hill/Anderson/Gee
Parker/Temple

Hairston, Anderson, Gee, & Temple are the biggest question marks but from what I've been seeing and hearing I think could be very solid rotation players in this league. Especially Malik. If Hairston is given regular minutes I think he will surprise the shit out of people, not only producing good numbers to start, but also getting better and better, both as a scorer and an outside shooter.

http://www.nba.com/dleague/playerfile/index.jsp?player=malik_hairston

The biggest knock on this kid is his 3pt shooting. But just last year, he shot 41% from long range in the dev league. Hairston can flat out score and could be a future star IMO. It is a fucking travesty IMO that Popovich thought Bogans would be a better player to invest in last year. :(

Texas_Ranger
07-15-2010, 07:11 AM
So let's just assume for a second RJ bolts to NY or NJ. The spurs depth chart right now looks like:

Duncan/McDyess
Splitter/Blair/Bonner
Ginobili/Hairston
Hill/Anderson/Gee
Parker/Temple

Hairston, Anderson, Gee, & Temple are the biggest question marks but from what I've been seeing and hearing I think could be very solid rotation players in this league. Especially Malik. If Hairston is given regular minutes I think he will surprise the shit out of people, not only producing good numbers to start, but also getting better and better, both as a scorer and an outside shooter.

http://www.nba.com/dleague/playerfile/index.jsp?player=malik_hairston

The biggest knock on this kid is his 3pt shooting. But just last year, he shot 41% from long range in the dev league. Hairston can flat out score and could be a future star IMO. It is a fucking travesty IMO that Popovich thought Bogans would be a better player to invest in last year. :(

Manu can't play SF. Malik is also more like SG than a SF. So RJ signing or not we do need a SF. Right now Butler or Barnes would be good. James Jones would be a good choice, but I'd rather see him play from the bench. I also think RJ will be back, so we just need one more SF and we are ready.

MannyIsGod
07-15-2010, 09:03 AM
If the Spurs can get a 3 year deal at the MLE level or lower then I see no reason not to resign Jefferson. Having him come off the bench with Manu would allow him a lot of touches and I really like having a lineup with him and Blair both playing with Manu. This would provide a good amount of bench punch while allowing Tony to play more with the ball in his hands.

I'm not opposed to a four year deal because once the Duncan era is over someone is going to have to be paid on this team and its not going to really matter who it is because we're going to struggle to reach mediocrity but I would prefer a 3 year deal (a four year with a team option is basically a 3 year deal, IMO)

Aggie Hoopsfan
07-15-2010, 09:33 AM
So let's just assume for a second RJ bolts to NY or NJ. The spurs depth chart right now looks like:

Duncan/McDyess
Splitter/Blair/Bonner
Ginobili/Hairston
Hill/Anderson/Gee
Parker/Temple

Hairston, Anderson, Gee, & Temple are the biggest question marks but from what I've been seeing and hearing I think could be very solid rotation players in this league. Especially Malik. If Hairston is given regular minutes I think he will surprise the shit out of people, not only producing good numbers to start, but also getting better and better, both as a scorer and an outside shooter.

http://www.nba.com/dleague/playerfile/index.jsp?player=malik_hairston

The biggest knock on this kid is his 3pt shooting. But just last year, he shot 41% from long range in the dev league. Hairston can flat out score and could be a future star IMO. It is a fucking travesty IMO that Popovich thought Bogans would be a better player to invest in last year. :(

Manu is not a starting small forward*




* if you care about winning anything this year

urunobili
07-15-2010, 10:54 AM
I don't see on this thread any props to RJ for being the stud on our road win on the first round of the playoffs last year... :wakeup

If he comes back; he should be way more solid for us. Therefore a good shot to beat better teams with him.

MaNu4Tres
07-15-2010, 11:30 AM
4 years 30 million get it done

Ditty
07-15-2010, 11:47 AM
Manu is not a starting small forward*




* if you care about winning anything this year

:lmao imagine ginobili at small foward he would get dominated defensivly

DPG21920
07-15-2010, 11:51 AM
No. It is also known as the Bi-Annual exception.