Log in

View Full Version : Nationally televised Heat guessing game!



xellos88330
07-18-2010, 07:46 AM
I wonder how many there will be next season. I am guessing probably around half of their games will be on national tv.

My guess. 42

I hate the media trying to forcefeed me some bullshit.

FTL, FTH, FUCK LARGE MARKETS! :ihit :flag:

So...









how many Heat games do you all think will be spoonfed to us next season?

timtonymanu
07-18-2010, 08:34 AM
Hmm..

both Laker matchups will be televised. All the Cavs, Raptors, Magic, Celtics games as well. at least 2 Bulls games. At least one game - Jazz, Spurs, Mavs, Thunder, Blazers, Nuggets. Maybe one game against New York.

They have at least 27 games televised.

Chieflion
07-18-2010, 08:43 AM
The highest record last season was 29 for the Magic, if I remember correctly. I doubt it gets higher than 32.

Darrin
07-18-2010, 10:13 AM
I think 37 is the maximum, guys.

Darrin
07-18-2010, 10:15 AM
The highest record last season was 29 for the Magic, if I remember correctly. I doubt it gets higher than 32.

The Phoenix Suns have eclipsed that in three-straight years. You couldn't go a week during the NBA season without a Suns game, sometimes two. It was annoying. No, 37 is the max.

xellos88330
07-18-2010, 10:39 AM
Don't forget about the NBA Fan Choice for NBATVpeople! I am expecting quite a few from just that alone unless NBATV is told to not make them a choice.

Muser
07-18-2010, 10:41 AM
I just want to see the Cavs game in Cleveland. Imagine last years christmas game but way more crazy.

Banzai
07-18-2010, 10:44 AM
http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/4814/effmiamifinal.gif

lurker
07-18-2010, 11:50 AM
The Phoenix Suns have eclipsed that in three-straight years. You couldn't go a week during the NBA season without a Suns game, sometimes two. It was annoying. No, 37 is the max.
The Suns only had 18 last season.

TheKingOfMIA6
07-18-2010, 12:04 PM
As much as possible

MavDynasty
07-18-2010, 12:15 PM
tbh listening to reggie miller, mark jackson etc is fucking annoying imho

Basketballgirl25
07-18-2010, 02:40 PM
Heat on tv, hahaha who cares about that shit. Better shows are on during basketball season, if they played during the summer I'd watch

alchemist
07-18-2010, 02:52 PM
Max easily.

Now, how many nationally televised games will Cleveland get? :elephant

sribb43
07-18-2010, 02:54 PM
thank the Lord for NBA League Pass. Ill watch the marque games but not garbage games that TNT/ESPN show against the Hawks, Clippers, Sixers.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-18-2010, 03:13 PM
The Phoenix Suns have eclipsed that in three-straight years. You couldn't go a week during the NBA season without a Suns game, sometimes two. It was annoying. No, 37 is the max.


Yeah I didn't get that either. The Pistons should have gotten a lot more air time than the Suns. Who doesn't find Ben Gordon and Charlie Villanueva running pick and rolls appealing?

DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-18-2010, 03:14 PM
Fortunately TNT games will be a lot better with Steve Kerr commentating instead of Doug Collins.

sribb43
07-18-2010, 03:17 PM
Yeah I didn't get that either. The Pistons should have gotten a lot more air time than the Suns. Who doesn't find Ben Gordon and Charlie Villanueva running pick and rolls appealing?

Too bad the pistons couldnt play offense with 2 basketballs

sribb43
07-18-2010, 03:18 PM
Fortunately TNT games will be a lot better with Steve Kerr commentating instead of Doug Collins.

:tu

daslicer
07-18-2010, 03:19 PM
They will definitely get the max coverage of games. As much as people hate them I think they are going to get insane ratings due to all the star power they have. Even the haters will be watching their games hoping to see them lose.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-18-2010, 03:22 PM
Too bad the pistons couldnt play offense with 2 basketballs

I really shouldn't be making fun of the Pistons since the Suns are having an equally disastrous offseason like Detroit had last year where they use cap flexibility to sign mediocre players with no real purpose other than the fact they seem to think they should use it if it's there.

Darrin
07-18-2010, 03:24 PM
The Suns only had 18 last season.

Last year wasn't one of their trifecta max seasons. Still, a 48-win team that didn't make the playoffs the season before, that lost Shaquille O'Neal is on TV 18 times?

Darrin
07-18-2010, 03:25 PM
Yeah I didn't get that either. The Pistons should have gotten a lot more air time than the Suns. Who doesn't find Ben Gordon and Charlie Villanueva running pick and rolls appealing?

It's not. But 36-year-old Grant Hill and 37-year-old Steve Nash running the floor? Why does that need as much air-time?

DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-18-2010, 03:29 PM
Still, a 48-win team that didn't make the playoffs the season before, that lost Shaquille O'Neal is on TV 18 times?

Seeing that they made the conference finals I'd say the networks knew what they were doing. The Miami Heat were a 43 win team and they got 15 nationally televised games. Why are you butthurt over such meaningless shit?

Darrin
07-18-2010, 03:30 PM
Seeing that they made the conference finals I'd say the networks knew what they were doing. The Miami Heat were a 43 win team and they got 15 nationally televised games. Why are you butthurt over such meaningless shit?

Because I watch the televised games and I don't have League Pass. I'm tired of watching a bunch of has-beens that have no shot at winning anything, but everyone seems to suck up to. They suck.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-18-2010, 03:32 PM
It's not. But 36-year-old Grant Hill and 37-year-old Steve Nash running the floor? Why does that need as much air-time?


Because Villanueva and Gordon's team won half as many games as Nash and Hill's team. Sorry, I know this might be hard to come to grips with, but people would rather watch Steve Nash in a barn burner than watch Ben Gordon shoot his team out of games.

Darrin
07-18-2010, 03:34 PM
Because Villanueva and Gordon's team won half as many games as Nash and Hill's team. Sorry, I know this might be hard to come to grips with, but people would rather watch Steve Nash in a barn burner than watch Ben Gordon shoot his team out of games.

I don't think the Pistons should've had any games last season. No one deserves to watch that shit. This isn't about the Pistons. It's about maxing out the games for 3 seasons, and not letting them fall off the radar when they didn't make the postseason last year. It's about the Suns.

See the "it's not" as in, "It's not worth watching." I was hope you were being sarcastic.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-18-2010, 03:37 PM
Because I watch the televised games and I don't have League Pass. I'm tired of watching a bunch of has-beens that have no shot at winning anything, but everyone seems to suck up to. They suck.


While Nash and Hill are both has beens, Ben Gordon is a never was and never will be.

The Suns made the conference finals. The two teams that made the finals both had 25 nationally televised games (7 more than Phoenix). The other team that made the conference finals had 24 nationally televised games (6 more than Phoenix. There were 3 teams (Cleveland, Denver and San Antonio) that got eliminated earlier than Phoenix and got more air time. Why is the Suns getting 18 nationally televised games such a disgraceful tragedy?

Darrin
07-18-2010, 03:42 PM
While Nash and Hill are both has beens, Ben Gordon is a never was and never will be.

The Suns made the conference finals. The two teams that made the finals both had 25 nationally televised games (7 more than Phoenix). The other team that made the conference finals had 24 nationally televised games (6 more than Phoenix. There were 3 teams (Cleveland, Denver and San Antonio) that got eliminated earlier than Phoenix and got more air time. Why is the Suns getting 18 nationally televised games such a disgraceful tragedy?

I never said I wanted to see the Pistons on National Television. You need to read what is said and not look at my profile. If I took cheap shots like you I'd just ask how Amar'e Stoudemire was doing? I mean, look at who he dumped you for.

Darrin
07-18-2010, 03:43 PM
The Suns made the conference finals. The two teams that made the finals both had 25 nationally televised games (7 more than Phoenix). The other team that made the conference finals had 24 nationally televised games (6 more than Phoenix. There were 3 teams (Cleveland, Denver and San Antonio) that got eliminated earlier than Phoenix and got more air time. Why is the Suns getting 18 nationally televised games such a disgraceful tragedy?

The three seasons of 37 in addition to the 18 they got last season.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-18-2010, 03:44 PM
I never said I wanted to see the Pistons on National Television. You need to read what is said and not look at my profile. If I took cheap shots like you I'd just ask how Amar'e Stoudemire was doing? I mean, look at who he dumped you for.


Who should have had more national air time than Phoenix last year that didn't already? The Cavs, Celtics, Lakers, Nuggets, Magic, and Spurs already had more national air time. I'm curious about which teams were cheated in national air time and should have had more than the Suns.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-18-2010, 03:48 PM
The three seasons of 37


Can you provide a link to this 37 thing? I don't remember any season where nearly half of Phoenix's games were on national TV.

Darrin
07-18-2010, 03:49 PM
Who should have had more national air time than Phoenix last year that didn't already? The Cavs, Celtics, Lakers, Nuggets, Magic, and Spurs already had more national air time. I'm curious about which teams were cheated in national air time and should have had more than the Suns.

Hello--they MISSED THE PLAYOFFS THE YEAR BEFORE AND THEY WERE HEALTHY! DID THE 2006 TIMBERWOLVES GET TREATED THAT WAY?!

Bucks, Thunder to name two off the top-of-my-head. Charlotte also is another good case. These teams should be rewarded later in the season for overachieving in the first half.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-18-2010, 03:58 PM
Hello--they MISSED THE PLAYOFFS THE YEAR BEFORE AND THEY WERE HEALTHY! DID THE 2006 TIMBERWOLVES GET TREATED THAT WAY?!
The 2006 Timberwolves won 33 games and missed the playoffs for two consecutive years. You're comparing them to a team that won 46 games and prior to that had always been a write in for a 50+ win season? Makes tons of sense.


, Thunder to name two off the top-of-my-head. Charlotte also is another good case. These teams should be rewarded later in the season for overachieving in the first half.
This is priceless. You're claiming the Suns shouldn't have gotten 18 games because they missed the playoffs in 2009, and then you say three teams should have gotten more games when not only did those 3 teams miss the playoffs in 2009 they didn't even sniff the playoffs :lmao

So just to clarify, a 54 win team that made the conference finals shoulda gotten less national airtime than a 46 win team that lost in the 1st round, a 50 win team that lost in the 1st round, and a 44 win team that lost in the 1st round. Is that what you're saying?

Darrin
07-18-2010, 04:04 PM
Can you provide a link to this 37 thing? I don't remember any season where nearly half of Phoenix's games were on national TV.

It's counting NBA TV as well. 25 is the maximum for the ESPN/TURNER games.

Check this out:


The 2009-10 NBA national TV schedule features 25 appearances by the Lakers, Celtics and Cavaliers, 24 by the Magic, and 15 or more appearances by the Nuggets (22), Spurs (20), Suns (18) and Blazers (17).

Some oddities on the schedule: the Suns, who missed the playoffs last year, will have the 7th-most national television appearances of any NBA team, topping playoff teams like the Blazers, Mavericks, Hornets and Jazz. The Warriors and Wizards, neither of whom made the playoffs last year, have more appearances than the Hawks, who made the second round.

http://www.sportsmediawatch.net/2009/08/2009-10-nba-national-tv-schedule.html


The NBA released it's national television schedule, filled with most of the usual suspects.
As expected, the Boston Celtics and Los Angeles Lakers will be on the maximum number of times (25), including a Christmas afternoon showdown in LA. Joining last season's NBA finalist, the Cleveland Cavaliers and Phoenix Suns are also slotted in for 25 games.

The Cavs make sense for obvious reasons, or reason, but Phoenix is a little surprising. I guess is will serve as a farewell, impending retirement tour for Shaq and Steve Nash.
http://www.faniq.com/blog/NBA-200809-National-Television-Schedule-Celtics-Lakers-Cavaliers-and-Suns-Get-Max-Games-Blog-10816

DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-18-2010, 04:07 PM
I still don't see anything about 37 nationally televised games.

Darrin
07-18-2010, 04:09 PM
The 2006 Timberwolves won 33 games and missed the playoffs for two consecutive years. You're comparing them to a team that won 46 games and prior to that had always been a write in for a 50+ win season? Makes tons of sense.


This is priceless. You're claiming the Suns shouldn't have gotten 18 games because they missed the playoffs in 2009, and then you say three teams should have gotten more games when not only did those 3 teams miss the playoffs in 2009 they didn't even sniff the playoffs :lmao

So just to clarify, a 54 win team that made the conference finals shoulda gotten less national airtime than a 46 win team that lost in the 1st round, a 50 win team that lost in the 1st round, and a 44 win team that lost in the 1st round. Is that what you're saying?

I am saying that the schedulers (unless the time-travel or the games are fixed) didn't know that the Suns would contend this year. They should've been left off the schedule, and added back on like a Milwaukee or Oklahoma City as they started to do well. Those teams deserve to be recognized for overachieving. The Suns WERE ALREADY ON THE SCHEDULE!!:lmao:lmao

florige
07-18-2010, 04:10 PM
I just want to see the Cavs game in Cleveland. Imagine last years christmas game but way more crazy.

I am almost wiliing to record that game if fr whatever reason I can't watch it. But I wouldn't put it past Lebron to miss that game due to his mysterious elbow injury.

Darrin
07-18-2010, 04:10 PM
I still don't see anything about 37 nationally televised games.



Can you provide a link to this 37 thing? I don't remember any season where nearly half of Phoenix's games were on national TV.

It's counting NBA TV as well. 25 is the maximum for the ESPN/TURNER games.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-18-2010, 04:16 PM
I am saying that the schedulers (unless the time-travel or the games are fixed) didn't know that the Suns would contend this year. They should've been left off the schedule, and added back on like a Milwaukee or Oklahoma City as they started to do well. Those teams deserve to be recognized for overachieving. The Suns WERE ALREADY ON THE SCHEDULE!!:lmao:lmao
OK, so at first you were whining about how many national TV games Phoenix got all together. Now you're whining about the manner in which they were given nationally televised games. Which one is it?

DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-18-2010, 04:18 PM
I asked for a link to confirm your claim that Phoenix had 3 consecutive seasons of 37 nationally televised games. What the fuck is so hard about providing that link if it's true?

Red Hawk #21
07-18-2010, 04:21 PM
While Nash and Hill are both has beens, Ben Gordon is a never was and never will be.

lotr1trekkie
07-18-2010, 04:32 PM
I assume the other [non-Lebron] owners will have some input. Lakers yes, Cleveland[at Cleveland] yes. Toronto- no one cares.
After the infatuation wears off, the 95% of the fans who don't root for the Heat will want to see their home teams. I'm sure the league will over-televise Heat games. If the games are rollovers,viewers will lose interest. Do I really want to spend time watching as the Magi rest in the 4th quarter? If the Heat aren't that good viewers will watch to see them lose. Pat Riley has gotten what he prayed for! Enough said.

Jacob1983
07-18-2010, 11:33 PM
I would think that the Heat will be on national tv at least once a week during the regular season.

dbreiden83080
07-19-2010, 12:13 AM
like 30