PDA

View Full Version : Ground Zero Islamic center’s funding leads to CFR?



Parker2112
08-31-2010, 04:34 PM
Words worth hearing...even if it is b/s.


Ground Zero Islamic center’s funding leads to CFR
By Jerry Mazza
Online Journal Associate Editor


My first whiff of the news was an unsettling email from a reader of my article, ‘Ground Zero Mosque’ inflating Islamophobia (http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_6249.shtml), indicating The Council on Foreign Relations, i.e. the Rockefeller Globalist cabal, had a hand in this. The writer was annoyed at my not considering it.

I hadn’t considered it since my focus had been on the fact that the destruction of 9/11 was not perpetrated by Muslim nations as stated categorically by the New York Post, ignoring the very possible involvement of Israel, which has a history of false-flag attacks.

I received a second email from the Corbett Report, a video report whose Sunday stories were the Ground Zero Mosque Distraction, Israel Lobby, Apple and Orwell (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yV56P159egU), the first with some fascinating information about Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf, who heads up the Cordoba Initiative, i.e., the building of the Ground Zero Islamic center. Eureka!

The Cordoba Initiative, and Imam Rauf, Corbett went on to say, were affiliated with the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations and support for that came from fellow Council on Foreign Relations’ members. Imam Rauf himself was on the Council on Foreign Relations’ Religious Advisory Committee. The Cordoba initiative’s website cited “Christian support for the Cordoba House” from a Christian publication, “Sojourners,” which is owned by evangelical Christian writer and political activist Jim Wallis, also a sitting member of the CFR’s Religious Advisory Committee. Wow!

At some point, the American Society for Muslim Advancement (asma.org) was shown on the screen along with: “Our Supporters: U.S. Foundations.” After wincing, I froze the frame and downloaded the list, which included the Carnegie Corporations of New York, Rockefeller Brothers, Rockefeller Philanthropy, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Henry Luce Foundation, and Hunt Alternatives, to mention a few of the globalist pack.

There was also a clip of David Rockefeller speechifying at the CFR and welcoming back Dick Cheney to a meeting. Of course, Cheney remarked that he was happy to be there, was once “director” of the organization though he didn’t mention it when he was running for Congress from his native Wyoming. This drew a big laugh from the elite insiders present.
Next Corbett referred to Nancy Pelosi, who had recently questioned who was funding the Cordoba Initiative given how it was being politicized (at Democratic expense given Obama’s “for it but not where” statements). We cut to a call from Pelosi for an investigation. We cut back to Corbett who pointed out that it was rather embarrassing for her and others when the information above was revealed; that this money was not coming from Muslims or Middle Eastern nations.

This despite a scene, in which a Cordoba employee claimed to an inquiring reporter that the money came from Muslims, corporations, and interested groups, and that it wasn’t really necessary for everyone to know who contributed.

Corbett, having discredited the claim of Muslim funding rather thoroughly, moved on to several related stories, including Israel’s spending some $35 million dollars to control articles favorable to it in the US press and to tamp down the negative press on Dimona and Palestine.

He also mentioned the $50,000 given to the Atlantic monthly to write an attack piece on Iran, because it was the “greatest threat to Israel since Hitler.” Parenthetically, the writer was a former member of the Israel Defense Force, which might account for the hyperbole, seeing how it is Israel that has hundreds of nuclear warheads at their nuclear facility at Dimona in the Negev desert.

Corbett’s last piece focused on ideas for coming advancements in Apple i-Pods and i-Phones that seemed to be straight out of Orwell’s 1984, forecasting coming police-friendly improvements/intrusions on every conceivable form of personal privacy from Apple.

I also took a step back to corroborate Rauf’s deep ties to the CFR, seeing how the NY Post had painted him more as a co-conspirator with al-Qaeda, writing, “Clearly, though this is a complicated issue. The 9/11 mass murder, after all, was committed in the name of Islam.”

That explosive statement was followed by a quote from a letter by Dan Senor of the Council on Foreign Relations in the Wall Street Journal (also owned by Rupert Murdoch, owner of the New York Post) that whatever the stated goals of the Islamic center and Rauf, “in the minds of many who are swayed by the most radical interpretations of Islam . . . it will be celebrated as a Muslim monument erected on the site of a great Muslim ‘military victory.’” And . . .”that’s why the question of who precisely will pay to build the $100 million project is so compelling.” Amazing!

Here is a CFR member, whose organization is bankrolling the Islamic center with one hat on, switches hats and demands to know precisely who will pay to cough up the $100 million. Well, Dan, it’s your very own CFR sponsors who are picking up the tab. And if you think Corbett and I are the only ones who caught you with your two hats on, and your pants down, let me go to writer Steve Watson of PrisonPlanet.com, who wrote pretty much the same thing in Ground Zero Mosque Imam is Globalist Stooge (http://www.infowars.com/ground-zero-mosque-imam-is-globalist-stooge/).

“The Imam of the now infamous “ground zero mosque” is a member of the ultra elitist Council On Foreign Relations and receives financial backing from powerful globalist sources including the Rockefellers, the Carnegie Corporation and the Ford Foundation.

“This information provides a compelling backdrop to the theory that the move to establish the mosque is a deliberate attempt to further stoke religious tensions and and divert attention away from the real enemy of free humanity, the corporate globalist elite who continue to profit from global war and division.”

Meanwhile, Americans all over the country, especially in lower New York City, are out in droves screaming at each other in fear over Muslim appropriation of the building site, feeling as if Muslims were at their doors with scimitars, when, in fact, it’s our own Council on Foreign Relations whipping up the synthetic terror. Doesn’t that point, too, to CFR involvement in the 9/11 event, producing the same feelings?

As to the “Globalist stooge” Rauf, I’m sure there’s a special place in hell for him, betraying his Muslim community to the danger of angry Americans to the synthetic terror threat, and frightening the latter to even more debilitating scare tactics. Let’s hope this doesn’t spill into the 9/11 commemoration ceremonies or the coinciding 9/11 As Inside Job rally that parallels them. Perhaps, if Rauf and the CFR are sufficiently exposed, that claim will have more meaning for more people than ever.

ChumpDumper
08-31-2010, 04:37 PM
I think it's worth reading because it is bs.

Entertaining.

Parker2112
08-31-2010, 04:40 PM
Hey, if it stops the senseless political debate and shifts a focus to the real problems, thats worth the price of admission.

ChumpDumper
08-31-2010, 04:41 PM
What are the real problems?

Parker2112
08-31-2010, 04:43 PM
economy, endless war, occupation abroad, govt corruption, bank/wall street control of the economy, etc

Parker2112
08-31-2010, 04:43 PM
you know, all the shit that never finds it way into political debate :lol

ChumpDumper
08-31-2010, 04:44 PM
I don't think this particular article will convert anyone.

Parker2112
08-31-2010, 04:48 PM
the point is to expose the public to the rumblings, so that citizens can be on the lookout for further developments

Parker2112
08-31-2010, 04:49 PM
Chump: what do you think about the CFR?

ChumpDumper
08-31-2010, 04:56 PM
I think it is an influential foreign policy think tank.

Parker2112
08-31-2010, 05:00 PM
I think it is an influential foreign policy think tank.

is it pushing the NWO agenda?

ChumpDumper
08-31-2010, 05:01 PM
is it pushing the NWO agenda?You are assuming there is an NWO agenda.

Parker2112
08-31-2010, 05:49 PM
You are assuming there is an NWO agenda.

are you assuming there is not?

ChumpDumper
08-31-2010, 05:52 PM
are you assuming there is not?I assume that the assumption of the existence of the kind of NWO suspected in articles like these is itself suspect.

SnakeBoy
08-31-2010, 06:02 PM
Hey, if it stops the senseless political debate and shifts a focus to the real problems, thats worth the price of admission.

Are you aware of what country you're livng in?

Parker2112
08-31-2010, 06:07 PM
I assume that the assumption of the existence of the kind of NWO suspected in articles like these is itself suspect.

I think that underlying the assumptions like the ones here sound more ridiculous if you dont listen to the "proof" they present in favor of the views. and that "proof" is not presented here, but there is an entire movement that has heard the case and come back with a verdict. this article is aimed at that movement.

As for the evidence that NWO exists, I dont think the "proof" is indisputable proof, but I do think there are some events that are occurring that are far too "coincidental" to be coincidental.

Parker2112
08-31-2010, 06:07 PM
Are you aware of what country you're livng in?

yeah...we're unfuckable I know

Winehole23
09-01-2010, 03:01 AM
the point is to expose the public to the rumblings, so that citizens can be on the lookout for further developmentsIf you consider that a public service, fuck it.

I couldn't really give a shit if your bs post awakened somebody's mind. You chose without respect to truth or resemblance to reality and your style is, ah, not entirely prepossessing in your favor.

cordially yours,


WH23

Winehole23
09-01-2010, 03:04 AM
We've already got a Dale Gribble. A pretty good one. You can still see him on TV.

Winehole23
09-01-2010, 03:11 AM
Not that you uttered bs, but that your bs was weak, caused me to lose confidence.

(Pace, FN, -Ed.)

Winehole23
09-01-2010, 03:59 AM
Not that you lied but that I no longer believe you....