View Full Version : UK teen banned from US for life over Obama email
DarrinS
09-13-2010, 10:26 AM
http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/offbeat/uk-teenager-banned-from-america-for-life-over-obscene-obama-email-091310
A British teenager who sent an email to the White House calling President Obama an obscenity was banned from America for life, The Sun reported Monday.
The FBI asked local cops to tell college student Luke Angel, 17, his drunken insult was "unacceptable."
Angel said he fired off a single email criticizing the U.S. government after seeing a TV program about the 9/11 attacks.
He said, "I don't remember exactly what I wrote as I was drunk. But I think I called Barack Obama a p***k. It was silly -- the sort of thing you do when you're a teenager and have had a few."
Angel, of Bedford, in central England, said it was "a bit extreme" for the FBI to act. "The police came and took my picture and told me I was banned from America forever. I don't really care but my parents aren't very happy."
A Bedford Police spokesman confirmed they had spoken to Angel about the email. Officers will take no criminal action.
Joanne Ferreira, of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, said there are about 60 reasons a person can be barred from visiting America.
She said, "We are prohibited from discussing specific cases."
clambake
09-13-2010, 10:31 AM
are you sure he's not from texas?
coyotes_geek
09-13-2010, 10:35 AM
Uh, okay.
Winehole23
09-13-2010, 10:37 AM
Is there some reason we should care about this, Darrin? Why did you post it?
4>0rings
09-13-2010, 10:46 AM
CC told on him and had Kori ban him from the US.
Blake
09-13-2010, 10:50 AM
He said, "I don't remember exactly what I wrote as I was drunk.
Thanks for playing.
Oh, Gee!!
09-13-2010, 10:52 AM
I assume he sent the email from a computer in England.
I bet this kid has calf tatts.
TeyshaBlue
09-13-2010, 11:04 AM
:lol
I bet this kid has calf tatts.
DarrinS
09-13-2010, 11:08 AM
I bet this kid has calf tatts.
huh?
boutons_deux
09-13-2010, 11:13 AM
"why do they hate us?"
balli
09-13-2010, 11:15 AM
huh?
Of course...
DarrinS, ladies and gents, he'll be here all week.
Kermit
09-13-2010, 11:30 AM
Hey Ducks, Roy Oswalt.
:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol
You stupid fuck.
hater
09-13-2010, 11:32 AM
how is that a punishment??
a real punishment: make the kid visit Detroit, Atlanta and Cleveland
Cry Havoc
09-13-2010, 12:14 PM
huh?
Why are you even on SpursTalk? You (obviously) never even post outside of the political forum. Why join a sports site to debate politics ad nauseam?
George Gervin's Afro
09-13-2010, 12:16 PM
was this guy a tea pottier?
Typical Republican, they don't like to leave their little "safety zone".
ChumpDumper
09-13-2010, 12:52 PM
Why are you even on SpursTalk? You (obviously) never even post outside of the political forum. Why join a sports site to debate politics ad nauseam?Debate? :lol
Debate? :lol
lol, good point. More like get rolled.
Wild Cobra
09-13-2010, 01:33 PM
That's a fucked up reason to ban someone from traveling here.
Fucking White House pussies.
ChumpDumper
09-13-2010, 01:35 PM
You don't even know what he wrote.
And lol if you think the White House ordered that.
Winehole23
09-13-2010, 01:36 PM
@WC:
If you sent the Queen of England an email calling her a b!tch, the result might be much the same.
You must be very butthurt to find this so gripeworthy, but I thank you for giving us such a good hint as to why DarrinS posted it in the first place. :tu
TeyshaBlue
09-13-2010, 01:37 PM
Of course...
DarrinS, ladies and gents, he'll be here all week.
What...no rimshot?:lol
Wild Cobra
09-13-2010, 01:42 PM
@WC:
If you sent the Queen of England an email calling her a b!tch, the result might be much the same.
You must be very butthurt to find this so gripeworthy, but I thank you for giving us such a good hint as to why DarrinS posted it in the first place. :tu
Does England have the same freedom of speech that we do? Now if he threatened the president, that would be different. He said what's on his mind. If we ever got to thought crimes, how many people would be banned?
For the leader of the free world, this is absolutely unforgivable.
The Reckoning
09-13-2010, 01:42 PM
he called him a prick?
how is that an obscenity?
Blake
09-13-2010, 01:42 PM
You don't even know what he wrote.
The kid says he deosn't even know what he wrote...
I guess his "sent" box got deleted somehow.
ChumpDumper
09-13-2010, 01:42 PM
Does England have the same freedom of speech that we do? Now if he threatened the president, that would be different. He said what's on his mind. If we ever got to thought crimes, how many people would be banned?
For the leader of the free world, this is absolutely unforgivable.Do you have a quote of what he said?
Please post it now.
Blake
09-13-2010, 01:44 PM
For the leader of the free world, this is absolutely unforgivable.
Do you really think the FBI would care about an email calling the President a prick?
I would think the President gets a ton of those type of emails on a daily basis.
I'm going to wager there was more to the email than that.
BlackSwordsMan
09-13-2010, 01:44 PM
America asserting itself in another country. Nothing to see here.
TeyshaBlue
09-13-2010, 01:51 PM
Do you really think the FBI would care about an email calling the President a prick?
I would think the President gets a ton of those type of emails on a daily basis.
I'm going to wager there was more to the email than that.
The wager is a safe bet...but I remain extremely skeptical of Homeland Security's ability to assess a threat. Forget the FBI, it's HSA that ought to ring yer bell.
jack sommerset
09-13-2010, 02:28 PM
White House needs to be more tolerant.
LnGrrrR
09-13-2010, 02:54 PM
Conservative thought process:
Locking up suspected terrorists for years with no access to the legal system, while torturing them = A-OK, saving the free world
Banning a kid from going to the US because he sent a letter profaning our President = Completely unconstitutional, something only a commie would do
hater
09-13-2010, 04:04 PM
Conservative thought process:
Locking up suspected terrorists for years with no access to the legal system, while torturing them = A-OK, saving the free world
Banning a kid from going to the US because he sent a letter profaning our President = Completely unconstitutional, something only a commie would do
had this happened during Bush years, they would be demanding the kid be taken to Guantanamo Bay for waterboarding sessions
DarrinS
09-13-2010, 04:48 PM
had this happened during Bush years, they would be demanding the kid be taken to Guantanamo Bay for waterboarding sessions
Good thing Obama shut it down, right?
RoddyBukkake
09-13-2010, 05:06 PM
Does England have the same freedom of speech that we do? Now if he threatened the president, that would be different. He said what's on his mind. If we ever got to thought crimes, how many people would be banned?
For the leader of the free world, this is absolutely unforgivable.
they don't, I know if you deny the Holohoax over there you go to jail
Wild Cobra
09-13-2010, 05:12 PM
they don't, I know if you deny the Holohoax over there you go to jail
My question was rhetorical. I know that they don't have the same freedoms. I am simply amazed this administration actually punished someone for speech. I already thew they have no regard for us little people's rights, but talk about not being politically correct. They usually do things like this shrouded in secrecy.
SnakeBoy
09-13-2010, 05:40 PM
Is there some reason we should care about this, Darrin? Why did you post it?
Isn't it obvious? If he was mexican not only would he not be banned, he would be offered citizenship.
clambake
09-13-2010, 05:41 PM
Isn't it obvious? If he was mexican not only would he not be banned, he would be offered citizenship.
how do you know he's not a mexican?
his name is angel.
jack sommerset
09-13-2010, 05:52 PM
how do you know he's not a mexican?
his name is angel.
Only Mexicans can be angels. That's fucking racist!!
Only Mexicans can be angels. That's fucking racist!!
Clambake only implied he COULD be Mexican. You're the one who said, "Only Mexicans can be angels"... You Racist.
jack sommerset
09-13-2010, 11:26 PM
Clambake only implied he COULD be Mexican. You're the one who said, "Only Mexicans can be angels"... You Racist.
You dirty son of a bitch. They are coming for you!
ElNono
09-13-2010, 11:44 PM
My question was rhetorical. I know that they don't have the same freedoms. I am simply amazed this administration actually punished someone for speech. I already thew they have no regard for us little people's rights, but talk about not being politically correct. They usually do things like this shrouded in secrecy.
So the problem is that this received publicity?
Maybe they should have they kidnapped the kid, sent him to some secret prison in Morocco, tortured him, then released him back in the UK in complete secrecy to make this whole thing A-OK... :rolleyes
Stringer_Bell
09-14-2010, 12:25 AM
Does England have the same freedom of speech that we do? Now if he threatened the president, that would be different. He said what's on his mind. If we ever got to thought crimes, how many people would be banned?
For the leader of the free world, this is absolutely unforgivable.
Do you realize you're playing into the stereotype that other posters shit on you for? You rush to judgement about Obama over this without having a transcript of the email or knowledge of who actually ordered this.
Were you equally as outraged at the Northern Alliance rounding up Arab men and selling them to the US as "military combatants?" Cuz that's some real unforgivable shit, but I doubt Bush had a hand in that - not sure he was smart enough to be that devious.
Cry Havoc
09-14-2010, 09:20 AM
My question was rhetorical. I know that they don't have the same freedoms. I am simply amazed this administration actually punished someone for speech. I already thew they have no regard for us little people's rights, but talk about not being politically correct. They usually do things like this shrouded in secrecy.
So even though you don't know what he said, you think it's okay that he said it?
Oh, Gee!!
09-14-2010, 09:48 AM
My question was rhetorical. I know that they don't have the same freedoms. I am simply amazed this administration actually punished someone for speech. I already thew they have no regard for us little people's rights, but talk about not being politically correct. They usually do things like this shrouded in secrecy.
this kid was not residing in the US, nor is he a citizen of the US, so his speech is not protected by our constitution. Furthermore, his only "punishment" was a "not welcome on US soil" stamp on the old UK passport.
Wild Cobra
09-14-2010, 11:14 AM
So even though you don't know what he said, you think it's okay that he said it?
Isn't it pretty obvious he said "prick" or an english slang that is "pr**k?"
Various articles had just "p****" or "pr***" or "p***k."
Tell me. What could he have said?
Wild Cobra
09-14-2010, 11:15 AM
this kid was not residing in the US, nor is he a citizen of the US, so his speech is not protected by our constitution. Furthermore, his only "punishment" was a "not welcome on US soil" stamp on the old UK passport.
I still find it very offensive that our nation would do that to somone.
Oh, Gee!!
09-14-2010, 11:53 AM
I still find it very offensive that our nation would do that to somone.
tell a non-resident, non-citizen that they're not allowed to enter? maybe if he was brown, you'd feel okay about it? j/k, I couldn't resist.
Blake
09-14-2010, 12:02 PM
Isn't it pretty obvious he said "prick" or an english slang that is "pr**k?"
Various articles had just "p****" or "pr***" or "p***k."
Tell me. What could he have said?
He doesnt even remember what he said.
RIF
Wild Cobra
09-14-2010, 12:15 PM
He doesnt even remember what he said.
RIF
But others do know. I assume the media outlets do know his specific language.
clambake
09-14-2010, 12:26 PM
poor guy. he probably feels like he's being stalked. tell us how he feels, wc.
Wild Cobra
09-14-2010, 12:46 PM
poor guy. he probably feels like he's being stalked. tell us how he feels, wc.
Yes, it's very disturbing how you stalk me.
LnGrrrR
09-14-2010, 12:55 PM
WC, there is a chance that he said things in the email that were nationally sensitive. (Or at least, given Obama's propensity to hide stuff, he could've claimed the contents were nationally sensitive.) It's not like the kid is going to tell the media that he threatened the President.
jack sommerset
09-14-2010, 01:01 PM
It's a national security matter. The White House cannot tell us what the child wrote.
George Gervin's Afro
09-14-2010, 01:10 PM
It's a national security matter. The White House cannot tell us what the child wrote.
he's 17 dumbass.. old enough to be charged as an adult..
Blake
09-14-2010, 01:12 PM
But others do know. I assume the media outlets do know his specific language.
Poor assumption.
jack sommerset
09-14-2010, 01:18 PM
he's 17 dumbass.. old enough to be charged as an adult..
For writting a note...bwhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaha
Oh, Gee!!
09-14-2010, 01:22 PM
when palin is president she can rescind whatever order is in place.
Blake
09-14-2010, 01:22 PM
It's a national security matter. The White House cannot tell us what the child wrote.
Nor can Homeland Security
George Gervin's Afro
09-14-2010, 01:30 PM
For writting a note...bwhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaha
so he's not a child.. as you just claimed..
Wild Cobra
09-14-2010, 01:51 PM
It's a national security matter. The White House cannot tell us what the child wrote.
Did he disclose weather the president wore boxers or briefs by chance?
jack sommerset
09-14-2010, 01:59 PM
so he's not a child.. as you just claimed..
bwhahahahahahahahhahahaha
You said he could be tried as an adult admitting he is a child.
ChumpDumper
09-14-2010, 03:23 PM
But others do know. I assume the media outlets do know his specific language.Wrong.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.