PDA

View Full Version : Former Teacher Leads Guilty to Downloading "Simpsons" Porn



Spurminator
10-17-2010, 03:24 PM
http://www.katu.com/news/weird/104900009.html

BOISE, Idaho - A former middle school teacher in Meridian has pleaded guilty to possession of visual representations of child sex abuse.

The U.S. Attorney's office said Steven Kutzner, 33, had downloaded more than 70 animated cartoon pornographic images on his computer. Many of them depicted child characters from The Simpsons.

Kutzner was a former middle school teacher at Lake Hazel Middle School in Meridian. He resigned immediately after the search warrant was served at his home.

Kutzner will be sentenced Jan. 5, 2011. He faces a maximum sentence of 10 years in federal prison and a fine up to $250,000.

Spurminator
10-17-2010, 03:26 PM
Okay, it's a little fucked up to have pornographic pictures of Lisa Simpson, but criminal? Discuss.

DMX7
10-17-2010, 03:27 PM
Who the hell would even make that?

Winehole23
10-17-2010, 04:04 PM
Viewing the porn was questionable judgment for a teacher, downloading it, abysmally moronic.

I'm none too sure about the legalities, so I'll cede to anyone who actually knows something about this. Sounds to me like the dude got caught with kiddie porn. The law's not ambiguous about that, is it?

Spurminator
10-17-2010, 04:43 PM
An Australian court ruling found that owning depictions of children (specifically Simpsons... wtf is with Simpsons porn??) in pornography is as illegal as owning actual child pornography. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7770781.stm Not sure there are any US cases regarding it...

jack sommerset
10-17-2010, 04:43 PM
There has to be more to this.

Oh, Gee!!
10-17-2010, 04:47 PM
But in calendar years Lisa Simpson must be pushing 30 by now. Even Maggie would be old enough to buy beer if Matt Groening would let them age accurately.

FromWayDowntown
10-17-2010, 05:09 PM
Prosecuting someone for looking at pornographic images of fictional characters seems a bit of a stretch of law and policy.

By that standard, I'm not sure how those of us who've read Lolita can avoid prosecution.

Trainwreck2100
10-17-2010, 06:33 PM
i would have said there's no way to prove what age that cartoon represented, as it's na damn cartoon

MiamiHeat
10-17-2010, 06:33 PM
Uh.... isn't there a scene in the Simpsons Movie where Bart Simpson is skateboarding and they focus on his penis?


so I guess every person affiliated with creating the Simpsons movie, every person who watched it in the theaters, the theaters for showing the movie, anyone who owns the DVD at home..

can be arrested for child pornography.

Get the fuck out of here.

fraga
10-17-2010, 07:05 PM
Uh.... isn't there a scene in the Simpsons Movie where Bart Simpson is skateboarding and they focus on his penis?


so I guess every person affiliated with creating the Simpsons movie, every person who watched it in the theaters, the theaters for showing the movie, anyone who owns the DVD at home..

can be arrested for child pornography.

Get the fuck out of here.

Mahahahaha...oh yeah...they do show that...we're all going to jail....FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU ..

jack sommerset
10-17-2010, 08:08 PM
LnwWxIWdIus

ElNono
10-17-2010, 08:30 PM
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_K998pLH9sls/Ssxg4Rehf2I/AAAAAAAAADo/XWteakg4N6w/s400/think_of_the_children.jpg

Fabbs
10-17-2010, 08:31 PM
Uh.... isn't there a scene in the Simpsons Movie where Bart Simpson is skateboarding and they focus on his penis?
Thru his clothes vs the porn Simpsons which shows him (i assume) naked in who knows how many shots.

What a lame comparison.

greyforest
10-18-2010, 01:58 AM
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_K998pLH9sls/Ssxg4Rehf2I/AAAAAAAAADo/XWteakg4N6w/s400/think_of_the_children.jpg

-----------------------------------8< thread-----------------------------------

Winehole23
10-18-2010, 03:41 AM
Prosecuting someone for looking at pornographic images of fictional characters seems a bit of a stretch of law and policy.

By that standard, I'm not sure how those of us who've read Lolita can avoid prosecution.He downloaded the images; he selected them for recording.

Doesn't that make a difference? In essence, he intended to own and did in fact own, kiddie porn.

He got caught with it anyway.

Winehole23
10-18-2010, 03:54 AM
(i'm not doing the research on this. not link one.)