Who has more Rings?

[history2b]

Kobe Bryant or the Spurs franchise?

[Gold Tooth Carl]

Michael Jordan

[Fpoonsie]

You're starting to make Dr House's and 21_Dickings' shtick look objective.

Jesus.

[lefty]

Spurs 4
Shaq 4
Gasol 2
Kobe 0

[Ashy Larry]

lol @ 2b .... classic

[z0sa]

Even the worst trolls around here are funny sometimes.

RTB, h2bitch.

[history2b]

The inability to answer questions honestly exposes a massive psychological damage.

Who knew Spurs fans took all this stuff so seriously?

[Fpoonsie]

I'm just surprised you're able to see the computer screen with Kobe's hips in the way...

[history2b]

Even the worst trolls around here are funny sometimes.

RTB, h2bitch.


I thought I already explained to you that I am not here to be "funny" for you moron...

These are important basketball discussions I feel need to addressed openly and honestly.

[history2b]

I'm just surprised you're able to see the computer screen with Kobe's hips in the way...

Another stupid response from a predictably stupid poster.

Total and utter failure by Spurs fans.

[Jose Canseco]

We really don't know how many rings Kobe has because he has to give a ring to Vanessa when he buttfucks a white teenage chick. How many white teenage chicks has he buttfucked since 2000? Kobe may be at about negative 100 rings at this point.

[hater]

history2b making it look easy

[z0sa]

I thought I already explained to you that I am not here to be "funny" for you moron...

These are important basketball discussions I feel need to addressed openly and honestly.

Are you asserting the question of who has more Rings, Kobe Bryant or the Spurs, is an important basketball discussion, a thread worthy one?

[Fpoonsie]

Another stupid response from a predictably stupid poster.

Total and utter failure by Spurs fans.

An idiotic thread deserves responses in kind.

[lefty]

2b, can you make a sandwich?

[history2b]

Think about it...

The Spurs have been apart of the NBA for almost 4 decades, since before Kobe Bryant was even born and they've managed to squeeze out 4 measly titles in all that time.

Conversely the great Kobe Bryant has been able to exceed that level of success in just a fraction of the time.

I would describe this as true greatness, something all true basketball fans would respect and honor.

[z0sa]

Are you asserting the question of who has more Rings, Kobe Bryant or the Spurs, is an important basketball discussion, a thread worthy one?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

[history2b]

2b, can you make a sandwich?

Why is your dad busy right now?

[Fpoonsie]

Go wring your panties out, poon. He gave you nothing but the truth. :lol

C'mon, luva. You're even more creative than the OP.

[z0sa]

Think about it...

The Spurs have been apart of the NBA for almost 4 decades, since before Kobe Bryant was even born and they've managed to squeeze out 4 measly titles in all that time.

Conversely the great Kobe Bryant has been able to exceed that level of success in just a fraction of the time.

I would describe this as true greatness, something all true basketball fans would respect and honor.

Who has more Finals MVPs, Tim Duncan or Kobe Bryant?

Anyone who can quantifiably lead their team to at least 3 respective titles, more than Kobe has been the leader in the same period, must be deserving of respect as well. Which you have not shown in this thread.

Please adhere to your own logic.

[lefty]

Why is your dad busy right now?
Can you or can you not?

[history2b]

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Based on peoples response here clearly we're encountering a subject that doesn't rest well in the minds of certain people. I believe wholeheartedly in facing fears and being honest with ourselves.

If the aforementioned people can do that it would be a step in the right direction.

[history2b]

Can you or can you not?

Go back to fucking your mother invalid.

[z0sa]

Based on peoples response here clearly we're encountering a subject that doesn't rest well in the minds of certain people. I believe wholeheartedly in facing fears and being honest with ourselves.

If the aforementioned people can do that it would be a step in the right direction.

I don't see a yes or no in this response.

Is this an "important basketball discussion", according to you and you alone, or not?

[lefty]

Who has more Finals MVPs, Tim Duncan or Kobe Bryant?

Anyone who can quantifiably lead their team to at least 3 respective titles, more than Kobe has been the leader in the same period, must be deserving of respect as well. Which you have not shown in this thread.

Please adhere to your own logic.
I agree

Shaq led them to 3 titles, and Pau to 2

[history2b]

An idiotic thread deserves responses in kind.


Only an idiot would elect to be dishonest for the sake of protecting their sports team.

[lefty]

Go back to fucking your mother invalid.
I cant, I'm already drilling yours

She is the one requesting a sandwich by the way

[Fpoonsie]

Only an idiot would elect to be dishonest for the sake of protecting their sports team.

No one's being dishonest. I GENUINELY think you do a shit job of trolling.

[history2b]

I don't see a yes or no in this response.

Is this an "important basketball discussion", according to you and you alone, or not?

The answer can be found in the text perhaps you need help with reading comprehension.

Moreover, you ignore my original question in order to troll my thread but demand I answer your question? lol. Go fuck yourself.

[z0sa]

Only an idiot would elect to be dishonest for the sake of protecting their sports team.

Only a huge gaping vagina would have avoided my question twice, going on three times already.

[history2b]

No one's being dishonest. I GENUINELY think you do a shit job of trolling.

Laker fans seem to enjoy it. That would be the targeted audience.

Are you really that stupid that you think I'm posting things here to impress you?

[z0sa]

The answer can be found in the text perhaps you need help with reading comprehension.

So the answer is no, this is not a relevant basketball discussion.

Making people "face their fears" has nothing to do with talking basketball, moron.

Counting rings does not involve a "discussion."

You are an idiot.


Moreover, you ignore my original question in order to troll my thread but demand I answer your question? lol. Go fuck yourself.

lol acting like a humongous pussy

[history2b]

Only a huge gaping vagina would have avoided my question twice, going on three times already.

Like you've avoided my original question for what? 6 posts and counting?

That makes you the Moby Dick of vaginas.

[Fpoonsie]

Laker fans seem to enjoy it. That would be the targeted audience.

Are you really that stupid that you think I'm posting things here to impress you?

Are you really that stupid that you think your contributions are impressive?

[Fpoonsie]

What Law School did you attend?

:lol

[history2b]

So the answer is no, this is not a relevant basketball discussion.

Making people "face their fears" has nothing to do with talking basketball, moron.

Counting rings does not involve a "discussion."

You are an idiot.



lol acting like a humongous pussy


Look at how unnerved you've become just because of a simple quesion. LMAO!

And you think you don't have an issue here with the subject at hand? Lol

No, talking about relative success of an NBA franchise and an NBA player has nothing to do with basketball. Brilliant! You are one smart fucker!

[z0sa]

Like you've avoided my original question for what? 6 posts and counting?

That makes you the Moby Dick of vaginas.

Rhetorical questions do not require an actual answer, as they are self-answering in nature.

Your Moby Dick reference is also quite misused.

[z0sa]

Look at how unnerved you've become just because of a simple quesion. LMAO!

And you think you don't have an issue here with the subject at hand? Lol

No, talking about relative success of an NBA franchise and an NBA player has nothing to do with basketball. Brilliant! You are one smart fucker!

I don't have an issue with the topic. I do quite enjoy making you look incredibly foolish, even for a troll.

[z0sa]

I happen to think this is a great topic. It should put an end to all this Duncan vs Kobe debates, at least for non-retarded folks. I mean, if Kobe has more rings than your entire franchise, then the case is closed. Quite impressive.

Who has more Finals MVPs over the same period?

[history2b]

Are you really that stupid that you think your contributions are impressive?

I clearly stated they weren't intended to impress you. Did that concept fly over your head or do you just feel the need to run your fat mouth at every given chance just to have something to say?

I AM NOT HERE TO IMPRESS YOU.

If you don't like the content of my posts or threads you are welcome to be a sane individual and not reply.

[Phillip]

I happen to think this is a great topic. It should put an end to all this Duncan vs Kobe debates, at least for non-retarded folks. I mean, if Kobe has more rings than your entire franchise, then the case is closed. Quite impressive.

1. Rings is still a stupid argument because it takes a team to win a ring.

2. Kobe is better than Duncan. Anyone who says otherwise is either a Kobe hater or a Duncan lover.

[lefty]

http://cdn0.knowyourmeme.com/i/26021/original/Troll_fail.jpg

[z0sa]

h2bitch, does it hurt having a camel toe up to your navel?

[history2b]

I don't have an issue with the topic. I do quite enjoy making you look incredibly foolish, even for a troll.

By crying and whining incessantly?

I'm dribbling your head around like a basketball and you don't even know it. You called this a "troll thread" but yet you're on the hook and furiously biting on the line like a dumbass fish who thinks he's stronger than the hook lodged in his mouth.

Like I said before BRILLIANT! Just like your assertion that this was not a basketball related discussion.

[z0sa]

These are important basketball discussions

:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao

[history2b]

Rhetorical questions do not require an actual answer, as they are self-answering in nature.

Your Moby Dick reference is also quite misused.

blah blah blah, Moby Dick vagina has to have an answer to everything because he's a bitter little troll on a message board.

Are you still claiming this is not a basketball related topic?

[Fpoonsie]

Did that concept fly over your head or do you just feel the need to run your fat mouth at every given chance just to have something to say?

You start a topic using ONLY tired, ST-cliche' ring smack then accuse MY posts of lacking substance...

Tha fuck?

[history2b]

http://cdn0.knowyourmeme.com/i/26021/original/Troll_fail.jpg


Your presence here proves otherwise...
















but carry on with your clever and original picture postings.

[z0sa]

Like I said before BRILLIANT! Just like your assertion that this was not a basketball related discussion.

You consider facing your fears to be basketball related. You consider counting rings to be a relevant "discussion". I consider you to be a retard.

LOL avoiding my question still and not acknowledging your question was rhetorical. :lol

[history2b]

Name calling?:lol

Yup. That's all he's got. Name calling.

Such a moron of epic proportions that when called upon to answer a simple question he whines, cries, name calls and lies all in order to spam troll a simple basketball related thread.

Severe psychological damage.

[z0sa]

These are important basketball discussions, guys! Purple And Gold Forever!

:lmao This will be a great season for ST.

[lefty]

LOL everybody is shitting on you

And you have calf tats

[history2b]

You consider facing your fears to be basketball related. You consider counting rings to be a relevant "discussion". I consider you to be a retard.

LOL avoiding my question still and not acknowledging your question was rhetorical. :lol

Where did this fallacy of not counting rings emanate?

The Lakers and Celtics are considered the 2 best franchise in NBA history... did anyone explain to them that "ring counting" wasn't permitted??

Dumbass fanboys.

[history2b]

LOL everybody is shitting on you

And you have calf tats

Everyone is "shitting on me" because they can't answer a simple question. More brilliant analysis from a bright, clever individual who posts cute little pictures on message boards.

[hater]

Robert Horry >> Bobe Cryant

/thread

[history2b]

who has more rings kobe or the spurs franchise?

[history2b]

who has more rings kobe or the spurs franchise?

[hater]

LOL meltdown

[history2b]

Robert Horry >> Bobe Cryant

/thread

"Tiago Splitter motherfuckers" LOL!!

What's next? "Matt Bonner motherfuckers!"

[hater]

LOL Tiago smack

[LakasRool4eva]

The inability to answer questions honestly exposes a massive psychological damage.

Who knew Spurs fans took all this stuff so seriously?

if u really think bout it u cant expect Spur fans to no that much bout what it takes to win consestintly like Kobe & da Lakas.............they havent even won a 'ship in 5 years...................they need to get in da gym & work on they game.....................wining like we win takes lot of work ya no..............................

[BUMP]

holy shit, a Lakasrool4eva sighting...

sup playa

[history2b]

You start a topic using ONLY tired, ST-cliche' ring smack then accuse MY posts of lacking substance...

Tha fuck?

Think I give a shit what you consider to be "tired" material?

When are you going to understand 2 things:

1) I AGAIN don't post things to impress you

2) You don't have to respond to a thread you believe to be "tired" "trolling" or anything else you feel doesn't suit the high standards Spurstalk has inevitably set in your mind.

[z0sa]

Where did this fallacy of not counting rings emanate?

The Lakers and Celtics are considered the 2 best franchise in NBA history... did anyone explain to them that "ring counting" wasn't permitted??

Dumbass fanboys.

lol not knowing the meanings of the words "discussion" and "relevant"


who has more rings kobe or the spurs franchise?

This is an important basketball discussion!

[lefty]

Everyone is "shitting on me" because they can't answer a simple question. More brilliant analysis from a bright, clever individual who posts cute little pictures on message boards.
I wasnt talking about you

But judging by your reaction, you too must be shitted on and have calf tats

[history2b]

LOL Tiago smack

Yea, guy who's never played a game in the NBA in his life? Lol.

Please, by all means, give me your critical analysis of his game....

[LakasRool4eva]

holy shit, a Lakasrool4eva sighting...

sup playa

sup brotha.............sux bout our cowboys right now.......................

[z0sa]

Yea, guy who's never played a game in the NBA in his life? Lol.

Please, by all means, give me your critical analysis of his game....

Why would you want to listen to some stat chimp? Remember when you asked us to talk to you as if you are Gregg Popovich?

Let's stick to the important basketball discussions like this thread.

[Fpoonsie]

1) I AGAIN don't post things to impress you

Well, THAT'S obvious.



2) :cry Get out of my thread!!! :cry

[history2b]

lol not knowing the meanings of the words "discussion" and "relevant"

Has a discussion ensued? Failure on your part.

Do YOU deem what is relevant or is it open to interpretation? Failure again. Moreover the fact that you read the title, read the post and decided to post over and over and over again implies what? That you reply incessantly to non relevant subjects? Genius I tell you. Mensa would be proud to call you a member.

[history2b]

Why would you want to listen to some stat chimp? Remember when you asked us to talk to you as if you are Gregg Popovich?

Let's stick to the important basketball discussions like this thread.


who has more rings kobe or the spurs franchise?

[nkdlunch]

who has more rings kobe or the spurs franchise?

Kobe has 2. Spurs Franchise 4.

The Spurs Franchise. Next.

[z0sa]

Has a discussion ensued? Failure on your part.

Do YOU deem what is relevant or is it open to interpretation? Failure again. Moreover the fact that you read the title, read the post and decided to post over and over and over again implies what? That you reply incessantly to non relevant subjects? Genius I tell you. Mensa would be proud to call you a member.

Dude, you're moving the topic away from this important basketball discussion. First with the tiago splitter thing, now this.

Let's keep the important discussing centered on the OP.

[Fpoonsie]

if u really think bout it u cant expect Spur fans to no that much bout what it takes to win consestintlylike Kobe & da Lakas.............they havent even won a 'ship in 5 years...................they need to get in da gym & work on they game.....................wining like we win takes lot of work ya no..............................

Jee. Zuz. Christ.

I get that some a' this is "REAL nigga talk", but goddamn.

[Phillip]

Listen, believe me when I tell you that I sympathize for you being ringless, but rings trumps all! Russell is not even a top 20 player skill wise, but all those gotdamn rings automatically puts him in the top 10 conversation every time.

Only by dumbasses who don't look at the full picture. Anyone who sees how he plays knows that they can name at least 15 players who are superior basketball players to Bill Russell.

It's like saying Robert Horry belongs in the discussion. We all know how dumb that argument is, despite him having a lot of rings, because of the fact that he clearly is an inferior basketball player to a lot of people. Bill Russell was too.

[history2b]

Well, THAT'S obvious.


No no by all means stay in my thread and proceed to bitch and moan like a whiny little girl.

You: "I'm not impressed by you history2b!"

Me: "Uhh, I'm not here to impress you anyway."

You: "Well that's obvious."



Seriously, did you really think that showing up here and talking like a teenaged girl was the right thing to do? Either you can talk about the game or you can't. Remove the tampon before replying again.

[z0sa]

Seriously, did you really think that showing up here and talking like a teenaged girl was the right thing to do? Either you can talk about the game or you can't. Remove the tampon before replying again.


Name calling?:lol

[Phillip]

I must say, it is amusing how easily Laker trolls get under spurfans skins.

[history2b]

Only by dumbasses who don't look at the full picture. Anyone who sees how he plays knows that they can name at least 15 players who are superior basketball players to Bill Russell.

It's like saying Robert Horry belongs in the discussion. We all know how dumb that argument is, despite him having a lot of rings, because of the fact that he clearly is an inferior basketball player to a lot of people. Bill Russell was too.

WTF?

Better than the most dominant defensive presence the game has ever seen? Someone who transcended and forever transformed the way the game was played? The originator of the blueprint for basketball success?

Are all fans here this ignorant?

[history2b]

kobe has 2. Spurs franchise 4.

The spurs franchise. Next.


failure

[Fpoonsie]

Either you can talk about the game or you can't.

Who's talking about the game? You asked a grade school arithmetic question.

[lefty]

Kobe has 2. Spurs Franchise 4.

The Spurs Franchise. Next.
Kobe has 0 because Gasol has 2

[history2b]

I should change my name to "Scabies" with how easily I get under the skin of certain people here.

[history2b]

Kobe has 0 because Gasol has 2

Even dumber than I thought.

Really? This all you guys got? This place is weaker than clock radio speakers. A shame because it was hyped up as some great Mecca of Spurs posting.

One sprinkle of piss and this whole place gets flooded.

[lefty]

I should change my name to "Scabies" with how easily I get under the skin of certain people here.
You should change your name to sidewalk

[Phillip]

WTF?

Better than the most dominant defensive presence the game has ever seen? Someone who transcended and forever transformed the way the game was played? The originator of the blueprint for basketball success?

Are all fans here this ignorant?

Bull-fucking-shit.

Dominating a shitload of 6'2 white dudes who were bottom-feeding athletes compared to the players we have seen over the past 20-30 years isn't all that impressive. It's like a college player playing with a bunch of middle school kids. Dude was good, but well ahead of his time, playing among considerably inferior competition.

If we are talking about his greatness in the history of basketball, sure, hes one of the greatest figures ever. But in terms of individual ability to play basketball, there are a shitload of players who displayed far superior ability to play basketball.

[history2b]

Who's talking about the game? You asked a grade school arithmetic question.

In relation to the game.

Everything essentially comes down to simple grade school arithmetic.

Who won the game? Simple arithmetic.

Who's a better player? Simple arithmetic.

Thanks for pointing out that numbers are involved in the game of basketball.

back to the real question?
who has more rings kobe or the spurs franchise?

[z0sa]

Who's talking about the game? You asked a grade school arithmetic question.

WTF?!? It's an important basketball discussion!

[history2b]

Bull-fucking-shit.

Dominating a shitload of 6'2 white dudes who were bottom-feeding athletes compared to the players we have seen over the past 20-30 years isn't all that impressive. It's like a college player playing with a bunch of middle school kids. Dude was good, but well ahead of his time, playing among considerably inferior competition.

If we are talking about his greatness in the history of basketball, sure, hes one of the greatest figures ever. But in terms of individual ability to play basketball, there are a shitload of players who displayed far superior ability to play basketball.


Blah blah blah. If you aren't familiar with the history of the sport or understand the historical impact of players in relation to their era that's your problem.

As a Mavericks fan and most likely a Dirk fan it's safe to assume that defense is a foreign concept. A player who blocked 8-10 shots a game and pulled down 20+ rebounds has never been matched by any player.

But let me guess, you're focused on offense? Offensive moves, shooting ability etc?

[history2b]

WTF?!? It's an important basketball discussion!


I deemed it important and you all can't seem to get enough.

Relevancy proven.

[z0sa]

I deemed it important and you all get seem to get enough.

Relevancy proven.

Extremely relevant! Extremely important! Purple And Gold Forever!

[history2b]

Extremely relevant! Extremely important! Purple And Gold Forever!

Spam a message board in order to protect the Spurs!

Extremely important!

[z0sa]

Spam a message board in order to protect the Lakers!

Extremely important!

[Phillip]

Blah blah blah. If you aren't familiar with the history of the sport or understand the historical impact of players in relation to their era that's your problem.

As a Mavericks fan and most likely a Dirk fan it's safe to assume that defense is a foreign concept. A player who blocked 8-10 shots a game and pulled down 20+ rebounds has never been matched by any player.

But let me guess, you're focused on offense? Offensive moves, shooting ability etc?

If you actually read my post, you would have seen that I don't deny his greatness in relation to the history of the sport, you idiot.

Yes, being a fan of a guy who has defensive issues means I understand nothing about defense. :cry great fuckin' logic :cry

So you are telling me that if you put someone like Tim Duncan or Kevin Garnett back in that era, that they wouldn't be able to snag 20+ rebounds a game, or block the shit out of all that measly competition, despite being considerably taller and more gifted than Russell was? Kindly shut the fuck up.

[z0sa]

If you actually read my post, you would have seen that I don't deny his greatness in relation to the history of the sport, you idiot.

Yes, being a fan of a guy who has defensive issues means I understand nothing about defense. :cry great fuckin' logic :cry

So you are telling me that if you put someone like Tim Duncan or Kevin Garnett back in that era, that they wouldn't be able to snag 20+ rebounds a game, or block the shit out of all that measly competition, despite being considerably taller and more gifted than Russell was? Kindly shut the fuck up.

lol trolled :downspin:

[Ashy Larry]

Kobe has 2. Spurs Franchise 4.

The Spurs Franchise. Next.

Ask the 2001 Spurs. They would at least say by your logic, Kobe has three. He assraped Anotnio Daniels. Must thought he was a white chick.

[history2b]

If you actually read my post, you would have seen that I don't deny his greatness in relation to the history of the sport, you idiot.

Yes, being a fan of a guy who has defensive issues means I understand nothing about defense. :cry great fuckin' logic :cry

So you are telling me that if you put someone like Tim Duncan or Kevin Garnett back in that era, that they wouldn't be able to snag 20+ rebounds a game, or block the shit out of all that measly competition, despite being considerably taller and more gifted than Russell was? Kindly shut the fuck up.

A true understanding of basketball does not put current players in the past carelessly like that, as it respects how the past players shaped what everyone is today. Is Lebron the greatest player ever because he'd have dominated all the past generations? No. Flawed logic exposed.

And you clearly don't respect the importance of defense if you devalue Bill Russell's defensive superiority. That's the best defensive player the game has ever seen and proved that defense was the catalyst to winning and here you are Mavericks fan claiming he's really not all that great, others were "superior."

Classic Mavs-ism.

[Phillip]

A true understanding of basketball does not put current players in the past carelessly like that, as it respects how the past players shaped what everyone is today. Is Lebron the greatest player ever because he'd have dominated all the past generations? No. Flawed logic exposed.

And you clearly don't respect the importance of defense if you devalue Bill Russell's defensive superiority. That's the best defensive player the game has ever seen and proved that defense was the catalyst to winning and here you are Mavericks fan claiming he's really not all that great, others were "superior."

Classic Mavs-ism.

How many more times do I have to tell you that I have no issue respecting their greatness and value to the game?

There is no question that players today learned from players in the past. But that doesn't mean they cannot become superior basketball players. Typically when you learn from the past, you learn ways to expand and exceed their successes. Just look at science and the way that over time it has expanded and humans keep accomplishing things that in the past were never thought possible. It's a result of past scientists paving the way, no question, but it doesnt change the fact that their ideas have been exceeded.

Basketball players in more modern eras have far exceeded most players from previous eras, just the same way the scientists today have exceeded previous scientists works and accomplishments.

At this point, I really can't tell if you are truly this stupid, or if you are actually pulling of a good troll job. I have a hard time believing the latter theory though, because a good troll job wouldn't consist of dumb shit like "you're a mavs fan so you know nothing about defense!!! LOL!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!1!!!" trolls here have far exceeded that kind of childplay.

[z0sa]

A true understanding of basketball does not put current players in the past carelessly like that, as it respects how the past players shaped what everyone is today. Is Lebron the greatest player ever because he'd have dominated all the past generations? No. Flawed logic exposed.

And you clearly don't respect the importance of defense if you devalue Bill Russell's defensive superiority. That's the best defensive player the game has ever seen and proved that defense was the catalyst to winning and here you are Mavericks fan claiming he's really not all that great, others were "superior."

Classic Mavs-ism.

Over-generalizing: the hallmark of a simple thinker.

[lefty]

Ask the 2001 Spurs. They would at least say by your logic, Kobe has three. He assraped Anotnio Daniels. Must thought he was a white chick.
Assrapred Daniels?

He single-handedly destroyed the whole Spurs team

And then he raped the Silver Dancers

[history2b]

How many more times do I have to tell you that I have no issue respecting their greatness and value to the game?

There is no question that players today learned from players in the past. But that doesn't mean they cannot become superior basketball players. Typically when you learn from the past, you learn ways to expand and exceed their successes. Just look at science and the way that over time it has expanded and humans keep accomplishing things that in the past were never thought possible. It's a result of past scientists paving the way, no question, but it doesnt change the fact that their ideas have been exceeded.

Basketball players in more modern eras have far exceeded most players from previous eras, just the same way the scientists today have exceeded previous scientists works and accomplishments.

At this point, I really can't tell if you are truly this stupid, or if you are actually pulling of a good troll job. I have a hard time believing the latter theory though, because a good troll job wouldn't consist of dumb shit like "you're a mavs fan so you know nothing about defense!!! LOL!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!1!!!" trolls here have far exceeded that kind of childplay.


The defensive comment that eludes you is that since you devalue Russell's impact as a player defensively insomuch that you'll rationalize that a slew of modern players could do what he did, then you don't understand defense.

I understand your position:

All the new players are better than the past players. Derrick Rose is better than Bob Cousy, Dwight better than Russell and Loul Deng must be better than Havlicek too. I just think you're an ignorant Mavericks fan for believing such things. That's not how comparisons or proper evaluations work.

[Fpoonsie]

http://www.wired.com/images/article/full/2008/03/alexander_graham_bell_500px.jpg

>

http://cdn.cbsi.com.au/story_media/339303698/iphone4_1.jpg

[history2b]

Basketball is a competition not an invention. Conceptually separating the differences would help.

[Fpoonsie]

Basketball is a competition not an invention. Conceptually separating the differences would help.

So, too, would comprehending Phillip's point.

[z0sa]

Basketball is a competition not an invention.

So what exactly did the good doctor Naismith do for basketball, then?

[history2b]

So, too, would comprehending Phillip's point.

His point is understood, that does not mean it is accepted. It's flawed logic and disrespectful to the sport.

[history2b]

So what exactly did the good doctor Naismith do for basketball, then?


Concepts z0sa, concepts. Wrap your head around them first, then post.

[z0sa]

Concepts z0sa, concepts. Wrap your head around them first, then post.

You typed these words: "Basketball is a competition not an invention"

What did Naismith do originally in the 1890's involving the sport?

[history2b]

You typed these words: "Basketball is a competition not an invention"

What did Naismith do originally in the 1890's involving the sport?


Concepts z0sa. Try again. Get a dictionary if you like.

I know it is important to you to have something to say at every turn in order to battle "trolls" but you really need to sharpen up if you're going to continue to play.

[z0sa]

We all know avoiding questions is a concept you understand quite clearly.

[history2b]

btw z0sa still waiting....

who has more rings kobe or the spurs franchise?

[z0sa]

You are not familiar with the concept of rhetorical questions, however.

Perhaps you should take your advice and grab a dictionary.

[Phillip]

:sleep

[history2b]

We all know avoiding questions is a concept you understand quite clearly.


Nope, I just don't answer questions that are twisted fallacies derived from a trolls misunderstanding of concepts.

[z0sa]

"Basketball is a competition not an invention" is a very clear statement.

You did type that statement, right?

[history2b]

:sleep


Dirk > Pettit

Chandler > Russell

Terry > Sam Jones


lol

[Fpoonsie]

:sleep

Yeah, I prolly shouldn't have jumped in there, but I felt like posting oversized pics to make a point that wasn't mine.

[history2b]

"Basketball is a competition not an invention" is a very clear statement.

You did type that statement, right?

Sure did.

[history2b]

Still waiting for answers....

who has more rings kobe or the spurs franchise?

[ElNono]

How many rings does Kobe have?
Don't forget to count the big ring he bought his wife after Colorado...

And how many rings does the Spurs franchise owns?

Without answering these questions, your question is basically full of fail...

[z0sa]

Then you think Naismith did not invent the game of basketball.

It seems you are quite unfamiliar with the game.

[history2b]

Then you think Naismith did not invent the game of basketball.

It seems you are quite unfamiliar with the game.


Nope. Never said that.

Connect the dots fail.

[history2b]

still waiting z0sa

who has more rings kobe or the spurs franchise?

[Phillip]

Yeah, I prolly shouldn't have jumped in there, but I felt like posting oversized pics to make a point that wasn't mine.

history2b has quickly became one of the biggest dumbasses on the forum.

[z0sa]

Nope. Never said that.

Connect the dots fail.

If basketball is not invention, then there could never be an inventor.

Therefore, according to these "dots" of yours, Naismith did not create the game of basketball.

Having trouble connecting your own dots?

[z0sa]

still waiting z0sa

who has more rings kobe or the spurs franchise?

Concepts, concepts. Become familiar with the concept of a rhetorical question, then hit the reply button.

[ElNono]

history2b has quickly became one of the biggest dumbasses on the forum.

I don't normally agree with crippled assholes like you, Phillip, but you're spot-on on this one.

[history2b]

history2b has quickly became one of the biggest dumbasses on the forum.

Because you think Dirk and the current Dallas Mavs are better than Russell's Celtics? lol, I take that as a compliment coming from you.

[history2b]

Concepts, concepts. Become familiar with the concept of a rhetorical question, then hit the reply button.


I posed the question and it wasn't rhetorical.

who has more rings kobe or the spurs franchise?

[Phillip]

Because you think Dirk and the current Dallas Mavs are better than Russell's Celtics? lol, I take that as a compliment coming from you.

:toast

[z0sa]

I posed the question and it wasn't rhetorical.

I think you should take your advice and grab that dictionary anytime now.

It's fun watching you lash out in asshurt frustration. Your preoccupation with the Spurs is quite hilarious and will continue spicing up the remainder of the off season here.

[midnightpulp]

I'll just copy and paste my reply to you from another thread (in reference to you telling us Spurs fans the truth):

"Here, let me do the work for you:

Spurs are not contenders (the majority of Spurs fans realize this).
The Lakers have 16 championships to the Spurs' 4 and hold an 8-3 advantage in post-season play.
Kobe has one more ring than Duncan.
The Spurs never repeated.

There you have it. That pretty much covers any potential topic you'll start (and no, these facts will not "put me in my place").

I also find it amusing that you think you're causing any kind of actual grief by resorting to cliched material that everyone on this board has heard over and over and over and over.

We don't derail your threads with "juvenile mud slinging crap" because us "deluded" Spurs fans can't handle your bringing of truth to our unwilling minds, but because you're an unoriginal, unimaginative faggot who is simply another Lakers fan with the franchise's collective cock up his ass.

We (myself especially) also like to fuck with you because you're a walking example of insecurity, and insecurity always leads to butthurt. I can spot an insecure person who needs to vicariously participate in the success of his favorite team because his real life is a laughable failure, from a mile away.

Now I'm sure your stock reply (as well as the Lakers fans who despise me on here) will be something like, "Ur the one who is insecure!!111 Look how obsessed you are with us Lakers fanz!!!11"

True, I do love to troll dumbass Lakers fans, but insecure I am not. The tell tale sign of an insecure fan is the use of ring smack, which I have never, ever used in all my years of posting on message boards.

Ask yourself this: How many times have you reminded everyone about "our" (lol, stupid Laker fans and their retarded belief that they share those titles with the Lakers) 16 championships?

And to my knowledge, the good Lakers fans on here have never used ring smack as a tactic in a discussion."

That's how predictable your faggot ass is. I called this thread before your fatass rolled out of bed and your bratwurst fingers touched the keys to begin typing.

[history2b]

I'll just copy and paste my reply to you from another thread (in reference to you telling us Spurs fans the truth):

"Here, let me do the work for you:

Spurs are not contenders (the majority of Spurs fans realize this).
The Lakers have 16 championships to the Spurs' 4 and hold an 8-3 advantage in post-season play.
Kobe has one more ring than Duncan.
The Spurs never repeated.

There you have it. That pretty much covers any potential topic you'll start (and no, these facts will not "put me in my place").

I also find it amusing that you think you're causing any kind of actual grief by resorting to cliched material that everyone on this board has heard over and over and over and over.

We don't derail your threads with "juvenile mud slinging crap" because us "deluded" Spurs fans can't handle your bringing of truth to our unwilling minds, but because you're an unoriginal, unimaginative faggot who is simply another Lakers fan with the franchise's collective cock up his ass.

We (myself especially) also like to fuck with you because you're a walking example of insecurity, and insecurity always leads to butthurt. I can spot an insecure person who needs to vicariously participate in the success of his favorite team because his real life is a laughable failure, from a mile away.

Now I'm sure your stock reply (as well as the Lakers fans who despise me on here) will be something like, "Ur the one who is insecure!!111 Look how obsessed you are with us Lakers fanz!!!11"

True, I do love to troll dumbass Lakers fans, but insecure I am not. The tell tale sign of an insecure fan is the use of ring smack, which I have never, ever used in all my years of posting on message boards.

Ask yourself this: How many times have you reminded everyone about "our" (lol, stupid Laker fans and their retarded belief that they share those titles with the Lakers) 16 championships?

And to my knowledge, the good Lakers fans on here have never used ring smack as a tactic in a discussion."

That's how predictable your faggot ass is. I called this thread before your fatass rolled out of bed and your bratwurst fingers touched the keys to begin typing.


Didn't ask who had more rings Kobe or Duncan.


who has more rings kobe or the spurs franchise?

[midnightpulp]

Didn't ask who had more rings Kobe or Duncan.


who has more rings kobe or the spurs franchise?

about me:

Life long Laker fan from Los Angeles.
Live in Venice Beach.
I've played and coached basketball for most of my life.
Ron Artest is my current favorite Laker.
Magic is my all time favorite.
My favorite Laker moment of all time is when the Laker won the 'ship in 10 followed closely by Derek Fisher's 0.4 shot.

and I am available to answer any further questions anyone might have.

[Koolaid_Man]

We really don't know how many rings Kobe has because he has to give a ring to Vanessa when he buttfucks a white teenage chick. How many white teenage chicks has he buttfucked since 2000? Kobe may be at about negative 100 rings at this point.


not as many as I have that's for sure....I think since 2000 I've anally ruptured at least...( lemme check my black book hold on...)

[21_Dickings]

I can't believe the insecurity of Spurs fans! Unable to answer a simple question because they can't deal with the uncomfortable reality that the greatest player of all time, Kobe Bryant, has more championships than their insignificant, hicktown franchise.

Spurfan has reached new insecure lows by refusing to answer History's honest question.

[Koolaid_Man]

it says here 97 but I musta lost track I swear in 10 yrs it's been at least 150... or so maybe more

[midnightpulp]

not as many as I have that's for sure....I think since 2000 I've anally ruptured at least...( lemme check my black book hold on...)

No doubt the rectum is your favorite orifice to rupture. Once you felt the tightness of your first gay lover's asshole, pussy wasn't good enough anymore.

Lemme tell you something. Any man who's down with anal has very strong homosexual tendencies.

[midnightpulp]

You see, this is your fucking problem, you a bitch out of pocket. Know your place.

How come you're too much of a pussy to troll the NFL forum?

[TwAnKiEs]

Kobe = 4

Spurs = 1 for each player + staff each year is too many to count :toast

[Booharv]

It doesn't take much to troll people around here. The OP is the most basic average attempt at trolling and here we are at page 6.

[Fpoonsie]

Kobe = 4

Spurs = 1 for each player + staff each year is too many to count :toast

:lol

A little embarrassed it took us this far to come up w/ that, tbh.

[bbarry]

I just counted... Spurs have at least 75 rings. That is at least 30x more than Kome 2nd fiddle Bean Cryant.

So I guess that means the Spurs franchise has more rings.

Next.

[xellos88330]

Spurs franchise has more rings.

Don't forget that all the people in the organization get rings too. So... yeah,... this is a fail.

[Koolaid_Man]

No doubt the rectum is your favorite orifice to rupture. Once you felt the tightness of your first gay lover's asshole, pussy wasn't good enough anymore.

Lemme tell you something. Any man who's down with anal has very strong homosexual tendencies.

:lol... my man...let Kool school ya....girls that like anal have bright futures...don't have to worry bout the condom breaking and getting seeded...:lol but of course you wouldn't know nothing bout condoms breaking now would ya...:lol

sc3DPH5TXFM Cm-vKR56w8M

[Trainwreck2100]

Why does this guy start so many spurs threads in the nba forum

[Daddy_Of_All_Trolls]

21 Rings Faggots!

As a Western conference bandwagon fan for 50 years, that's how many I have!

[history2b]

This thread should not go away until all Spurs fans answer the thread's man question:

who has more rings Kobe Bryant or the Spurs franchise?

[bbarry]

The question is so stupid; probably dumber than you, that it doesn't need to be answered but very few of us decided to answer it anyway. The answer is: the Spurs franchise as they, collectively, have at least 75 rings, to KoMe's 5.

[history2b]

The question is so stupid; probably dumber than you, that it doesn't need to be answered but very few of us decided to answer it anyway. The answer is: the Spurs franchise as they, collectively, have at least 75 rings, to KoMe's 5.


Wrong.

You can't even answer a "[stupid] question" which inevitably makes you pretty damn stupid.

[DisAsTerBot]

true, the inclusion of the word "franchise" makes this question stupid.

[history2b]

true, the inclusion of the word "franchise" makes this question stupid.


Because fans struggle with the concept of acknowledging how many championships their franchise has won?

[DisAsTerBot]

Because fans struggle with the concept of acknowledging how many championships their franchise has won?

it's just crappy wording for the question, even in you responding to me you reword it. Fittingly i might add.

[bbarry]

Wrong.

You can't even answer a "[stupid] question" which inevitably makes you pretty damn stupid.

I answered it you fucking moron.

[bbarry]

Because fans struggle with the concept of acknowledging how many championships their franchise has won?

The threat title was about "rings" not "championships"... idiot troll can't even get his shit straight. Don't try changing your words now, goober.

[history2b]

it's just crappy wording for the question, even in you responding to me you reword it. Fittingly i might add.

That's because you know the answer but you want to find any reason to avoid answering it.

[history2b]

The threat title was about "rings" not "championships"... idiot troll can't even get his shit straight.

They are synonymous in a discussion of this nature.

You don't think I specifically elected to choose the word "rings" exactly to incite this type of fanboy reaction? Lol

Just like on espn I own you boy.

[bbarry]

They are synonymous in a discussion of this nature.

You don't think I specifically elected to choose the word "rings" exactly to incite this type of fanboy reaction? Lol

Just like on espn I own you boy.

Don't try to cover yourself to save face. It's too late now.

[history2b]

Don't try to cover yourself to save face. It's too late now.

Uh huh...

Please re-explain how you're counting all rings handed out to each player in order to "win" a winless argument....

[O.J Mayo]

LMAO hisdildo2b can't start threads.

[Kobe_5_Duncan_4]

5 months later...

Kobe still has more.

[z0sa]

It's also still the same season. :rollin

Only an idiot would bump this thread before the playoffs even start.

:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao

[Muser]

You can't win rings 5 months after the previous final you dumbfuck.

[z0sa]

Hey guys, just in case you're new to the NBA like history2b, between November and May no championships are won.

[Kobe_5_Duncan_4]

Really? I thought I missed the Finals already with all the talk of the Spurs being the best team for months?

They didn't win a 'ship? You guys sure?

[z0sa]

:lmao

[Muser]

Having the best record will usually make people talk about you being the best team. Not hard logic.

[ohmwrecker]

I really don't think it's wise to bump all your old threads (before you lost the priveledge . . . twice lol) unless you wanted everyone to have a refresher course on your rampant stupidity.

[Kobe_5_Duncan_4]

Having the best record will usually make people talk about you being the best team. Not hard logic.

:lmao @ Cavs logic

[Kobe_5_Duncan_4]

I really don't think it's wise to bump all your old threads (before you lost the priveledge . . . twice lol) unless you wanted everyone to have a refresher course on your rampant stupidity.


So the Spurs have more rings in your eyes?

[Muser]

I never said it was right, just that's what happens.

[ohmwrecker]

So the Spurs have more rings in your eyes?

You'll stand on a box when you talk to me.

[Kobe_5_Duncan_4]

I never said it was right, just that's what happens.

Which is why I :lmao

[Budkin]

Think about it...

The Spurs have been apart of the NBA for almost 4 decades, since before Kobe Bryant was even born and they've managed to squeeze out 4 measly titles in all that time.

Conversely the great Kobe Bryant has been able to exceed that level of success in just a fraction of the time.

I would describe this as true greatness, something all true basketball fans would respect and honor.

He needs to bow down to Shaq and Jerry West.

[z0sa]

Which is why I :lmao

so you :lmao over Muse's observation, or over his logic?

Question.

[Kobe_5_Duncan_4]

You'll stand on a box when you talk to me.


I'm not Midget, no need for a box.

Do you think if you do this long enough :bang it'll change the fact that Kobe has more than the Spurs org?

[Kobe_5_Duncan_4]

so you :lmao over Muse's observation, or over his logic?

Question.

I'll ask the questions faggot. You just sit there and speak only when spoken to.

[ohmwrecker]

I'm not Midget, no need for a box.

Do you think if you do this long enough :bang it'll change the fact that Kobe has more than the Spurs org?

I'm speaking metaphysically . . . but, I will entertain your question . . . Kobe has 5 rings. Yes, it's true. Horry has more. Pippen has more . . .

[jjktkk]

I'm speaking metaphysically . . . but, I will entertain your question . . . Kobe has 5 rings. Yes, it's true. Horry has more. Pippen has more . . .

Horry>Kobe. Pippen>Kobe.

[z0sa]

I'll ask the questions faggot. You just sit there and speak only when spoken to.

:lol You're coming apart at the seems.

[Agloco]

Kobe Bryant or the Spurs franchise?

Is Kobe's wife post-Colorado an option here?

[Agloco]

I'm not Midget, no need for a box.

Do you think if you do this long enough :bang it'll change the fact that Kobe has more than the Spurs org?

:jack

[z0sa]

Organization: a group of persons organized for some end or work; association

Kobe has no where close the amount of rings spread throughout the spurs "org."

[Kobe_5_Duncan_4]

Organization: a group of persons organized for some end or work; association

Kobe has no where close the amount of rings spread throughout the spurs "org."


:lol Spurfan will try their darndest.

[Giuseppe]

Kobe: 5

Duncan: 4

[jjktkk]

:lol Spurfan will try their darndest.

Bitter old Laker fan has to on multiple fan sites to whine about his hatred for the Spurs. What a sad life. :lol

[Blake]

I dont need to read all 8 pages to know that this thread delivers the sucks.

[Beau]

Kobe: 5

Duncan: 4

Cully: 0

[Kobe_5_Duncan_4]

These words best sum up this thread:

Think about it...

The Spurs have been apart of the NBA for almost 4 decades, since before Kobe Bryant was even born and they've managed to squeeze out 4 measly titles in all that time.

Conversely the great Kobe Bryant has been able to exceed that level of success in just a fraction of the time.

I would describe this as true greatness, something all true basketball fans would respect and honor.

[Giuseppe]

Cully: 0

Perhaps, but,

Kobe: 5

Duncan: 4

[midnightpulp]

Meh. Steve Kerr has more rings than Spurs franchise as well.

When I became Spurs fan, never thought I'd see one ring, much less four, so from here on out, it's all gravy.

[Kobe_5_Duncan_4]

Meh. Steve Kerr has more rings than Spurs franchise as well.

When I became Spurs fan, never thought I'd see one ring, much less four, so from here on out, it's all gravy.


Kerr's role in those titles is borderline irrelevant.

Fans of the game understand this and those who don't pull the "Robert Horry" "Steve Kerr" card.


Kobe 5

Spurs 4

[midnightpulp]

Kerr's role in those titles is borderline irrelevant.

Fans of the game understand this and those who don't pull the "Robert Horry" "Steve Kerr" card.


Kobe 5

Spurs 4


Meh.

Havlicek 8

Jordan/Bulls 6

[Giuseppe]

Kobe 5

Spurs 4

Yep, yep.

[Kobe_5_Duncan_4]

Meh.

Havlicek 8

Jordan/Bulls 6


Those guys are bad ass mofo's too.

Still...

Kobe 5

Spurs 4

[midnightpulp]

Those guys are bad ass mofo's too.

Still...

Kobe 5

Spurs 4

Cool.

[Kobe_5_Duncan_4]

Cool.


Actually, I think it burns. :lol

[midnightpulp]

Actually, I think it burns. :lol

Nope. I don't see the point in letting events beyond my control aggravate me.

At the end of the day, sports are entertainment, and it's funny that you take them that seriously. But I would expect no less from someone who vicariously lives through his favorite team and player.

[Giuseppe]

Nope. I don't see the point in letting events beyond my control aggravate me.

At the end of the day, sports are entertainment, and it's funny that you take them that seriously. But I would expect no less from someone who vicariously lives through his favorite team and player.

Well, pish posh.

[Kobe_5_Duncan_4]

Nope. I don't see the point in letting events beyond my control aggravate me.

At the end of the day, sports are entertainment, and it's funny that you take them that seriously. But I would expect no less from someone who vicariously lives through his favorite team and player.


Could be worse, I could take Spurstalk and the ensuring conversations seriously. :lmao

[Beau]

Perhaps, but,

Kobe: 5

Duncan: 4

No 'but.'

You conceded you don't have 16 championships. It doesn't bother me how many titles Kobe or Duncan have in relation to one another.

Like Horry, Kerr and a host of others with 5 or more rings, Kobe's got one more piece a jewelry than the best player of this past decade, Duncan.

All good...

[midnightpulp]

Could be worse, I could take Spurstalk and the ensuring conversations seriously. :lmao

You already do that, evidenced by your butthurt in the thread where I owned you. It was mighty comical watching you dance around trying to save face; trying to find that right insult (10+ pages worth) to comeback at me with that would allow you to redeem yourself, when the reality was there was nothing you could say or do (minus leaving the thread, which you were too stupid to do) to escape humiliation.

[Giuseppe]

Kobe's got one more piece a jewelry than the best player of this past decade, Duncan.

Ipso facto:::

Kobe: 5

Duncan: 4

[Giuseppe]

You already do that, evidenced by your butthurt in the thread where I owned you. It was mighty comical watching you dance around trying to save face; trying to find that right insult (10+ pages worth) to comeback at me with that would allow you to redeem yourself, when the reality was there was nothing you could say or do (minus leaving the thread, which you were too stupid to do) to escape humiliation.

Please, you blew out your flip flop and spammed the threads a few days back. Kori had to threaten you with banishment to get you to relent.

[Beau]

Ipso facto:::

Kobe: 5

Duncan: 4

At some point you're going to realize the only person you're trying to convince is yourself.

In-se-curity.

Doth protest too much...

[midnightpulp]

Please, you blew out your flip flop and spammed the threads a few days back. Kori had to threaten you with banishment to get you to relent.

Nah. I did it because it was one of luva's weakest troll attempts. The Lakers destroyed the Spurs, ending their 22 game home winning streak, and all he could come up with was "You can hear a mouse pissing on cotton in this whorehouse." I expected some Tree of Woe shit and he failed to deliver, so I spammed.

[Giuseppe]

Nah. I did it because it was one of luva's weakest troll attempts. The Lakers destroyed the Spurs, ending their 22 game home winning streak, and all he could come up with was "You can hear a mouse pissing on cotton in this whorehouse." I expected some Tree of Woe shit and he failed to deliver, so I spammed.

And then after she threatened you with extinction you ran off for three days.

You puss, you.

[Giuseppe]

At some point you're going to realize the only person you're trying to convince is yourself.

In-se-curity.

Doth protest too much...

Perhaps, but, it's still:::

Kobe: 5

Duncan: 4

[Yorae]

Coattails much?

[Beau]

Perhaps, but, it's still:::

Kobe: 5

Duncan: 4

Thanks for conceding again.

[midnightpulp]

And then after she threatened you with extinction you ran off for three days.

You puss, you.

No I didn't. Posted everyday following the beatdown.

[Giuseppe]

lol!!!!!!!!!

[midnightpulp]

lol!!!!!!!!!

You now owe me an apology for your false accusationPERIOD

[Giuseppe]

You now owe me an apology for your false accusationPERIOD

Turn a slider to a 1/16th inch waitin' on it, Mr. Wiki.

lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[midnightpulp]

Turn a slider to a 1/16th inch waitin' on it, Mr. Wiki.

lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You owe me an apologyPERIOD

[Giuseppe]

Well, you just sit there and wait for it, Mr. Wiki.

[Magic2Kobe]

midget is such a bitch

[Ashy Larry]

Bean Bryant has five total rings. Spurs franchise have four total rings.