Michael Jordan vs. Kobe Bryant

[Gutter92]

In their primes, who ya got.


:lmao

[TheMACHINE]

you're trying too hard to be like History2B

[Stephen]

shut the fuck up

[DeadlyDynasty]

Jordan, hands down. thread fail.

[tbonewalker]

Thread fail. Me and History2b have this guy on a thick piece of fishing line.

[lefty]

Darell Walker FTW

[DAF86]

Oscar Robertson vs Kobe Bryant, in their primes. Who you pick? I choose Oscar.

[Gutter92]

Oscar Robertson vs Kobe Bryant, in their primes. Who you pick? I choose Oscar.


You're right, I see where you're going with this.

MJ vs. Kobe is a no contest. MJ wins 100% of the time.


Oscar Robertson vs. Kobe is much more fair.

I'd take Oscar as well, though I'd have to think about it.

[DAF86]

Not really that close tbh.

Robertson- 25.7 ppg, 9.5 assts, 7.5 rbds, 485 FG%

Bryant- 25.3 ppg, 4.7 assts, 5.3 rbds, 455 FG%

Pretty clear who the better player is.

[history2b]

Not really that close tbh.

Robertson- 25.7 ppg, 9.5 assts, 7.5 rbds, 485 FG%

Bryant- 25.3 ppg, 4.7 assts, 5.3 rbds, 455 FG%

Pretty clear who the better player is.



If you look at the game strictly from a stat boy's perspective. Some fans aren't strictly stat chimps but admittedly this is probably 1% of the general NBA fan base.

[Gutter92]

I saw the error in my ways of making this topic once I saw the new 2k11 commercial where Kobe is all giddy inside at MJ's return, basically sucking his dick in that commercial.

[z0sa]

In their primes, who ya got.


:lmao

Shouldn't you be writing an essay?

:downspin:

[IronMexican]

What is with this grey spurfan getting so butthurt over?

[AussieFanKurt]

The machine !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sasha ftw

[namlook]

Not really that close tbh.

Robertson- 25.7 ppg, 9.5 assts, 7.5 rbds, 485 FG%

Bryant- 25.3 ppg, 4.7 assts, 5.3 rbds, 455 FG%

Pretty clear who the better player is.

I suggest you study the history of the game and the pace it was played at then vs now. You can't compare stats across eras. Different game back then and also much different competition. It's like saying Wilt was twice as good as Duncan because he was pulling down twice as many boards. Or that Wilt was a lot better than Jordan because he scored 50 a game which Jordan was never able to approach.

[DAF86]

I suggest you study the history of the game and the pace it was played at then vs now. You can't compare stats across eras. Different game back then and also much different competition. It's like saying Wilt was twice as good as Duncan because he was pulling down twice as many boards. Or that Wilt was a lot better than Jordan because he scored 50 a game which Jordan was never able to approach.

I can provide some advanced stats (adjusted for pace) but I thought Lakers fan hated those kind of stats. Besides Robertson shot 485 FG% in an era where the average was something around the low 400/ high 300's.

[namlook]

I can provide some advanced stats (adjusted for pace) but I thought Lakers fan hated those kind of stats. Besides Robertson shot 485 FG% in an era where the average was something around the low 400/ high 300's.

Different pace, different competition and different rules. You can't compare stats across eras.

What you can compare is winning and losing.

Robertson only won one ring in his career with Kareem. Who gives a shit about stats if you aren't winning?

9t-r2HASo5M

"Stats are for losers. Final scores are for winners."

[IronMexican]

Barnes showing how bad he is. Hopefully he only gets garbage time minutes by ASB

[Giuseppe]

All I see now is Jordan being used like a crash test dummy those two years in D.C.

Just sad.