PDA

View Full Version : Oldie but still a goodie: Something Smells Foul in Cleveland



LkrFan
11-01-2010, 04:28 AM
LeBron James’ statistics are amazing. He’s putting up 30 points, 7 boards, and 8 assists per for essentially the sixth season in a row, and there are exactly zero players who can get close to that trio of numbers for even one season. But he’s doing something else, just as consistently, that no one else of consequence is able to do: not get called for fouls.

Look at the personal fouls column for the top-10 scorers in the league. Nine of them collectively average 2.7 fouls per, falling within the range of 2.3 – 3.4. These nine include some of the NBA’s biggest names who obviously have “earned some calls,” guys who can easily score 10 from the charity stripe in a night while getting the refs’ attention for only their two most obvious hacks.

And the tenth player? That would be James, who averages 1.8–and that’s rounded up. Many people suspect the league helps protect the Wades, Kobes, Anthonys, and other marquee players who keep those turnstiles turning, but how in God’s green earth does LeBron absolutely smoke them all in not getting whistled for defensive misdeeds?

And this isn’t the first time he’s been in the referee’s good graces to this degree. Last year, James averaged 1.7 fouls per. Going backwards from there, you have 2.2, then 2.2, then 2.3, then 1.8, then 1.9… then he was at his high-school prom. Not only is 2.3 fouls per the worst of LeBron’s career, it actually marks the best in the careers of both Wade and Bryant.

Is James, who happens to be the most marketable guy in the league, just that much superior to everyone at not fouling players? We’ve all seen him play, and he’s obviously a very good defender, but he’s no Shane Battier, Ron Artest, Gary Payton, Dennis Rodman, or Bill Russell. James, however, has done a much, much better job than any of them at not being whistled.
Breaking down in great detail LeBron James’ “amazing” fouls rate after the break…

Basic Statistical Comparisons

For starters, we should know how often fouls are being called around the league so we can see if there really is a big difference with LeBron. Through January 22, James played 1702 minutes and committed 77 fouls, good for one foul every 22.1 minutes of court time.

Everyone else in the NBA logged 298,868 minutes and committed 26,473 fouls, good for one every 11.3 minutes. Comparatively, James is half as likely to be called for a foul than the other 300-odd players as a whole. Without even picking up a calculator, it looks like most NBAers who would play 38.7 minutes a game, like James does, would accrue about 3.5 fouls per (remember that his 1.8 is rounded up).

But The Chosen One is no regular professional baller. He just happens to be supremely talented, score a bunch of points, and play on one of the best teams in the league. On top of that, James is the biggest marketing tool the NBA has as it expands its revenue base all over the world in China.
(Eastern Europe and South America have produced far more NBA players, but don’t vote for the All-Star team, aren’t having arenas built in their countries by the league, and don’t host preseason games.)

But the league has had other uber-marketable superstars over the past 30 years. Didn’t they get all the calls as well? Here are three players whose fame and status were similar to LeBron’s, and how their foul counts looked in their first seven seasons:

- As a Laker teamed up with Shaq, Kobe Bryant was a big deal from early on. He guards roughly the same players that LeBron does, and his defensive reputation has been better for most of his career. In Bryant’s first seven full seasons (following two as a reserve), his fouls per game ranged from 2.6 to 3.3, with an average of 2.9.

- Magic Johnson’s smile, collegiate exploits, and style of play made him an instant hit, which the NBA rode up to and beyond his untimely retirement. Magic’s foul counts in his first seven seasons ranged from 1.8 to 2.9, with an average of 2.5 fouls per.

- Michael Jordan was already well known when he entered the league in 1984. He was the NCAA’s consensus Player of the Year, and he had won a national championship at North Carolina. Not only that, I think it’s safe to say that Jordan’s defensive abilities and reputation far trump those of James (Jordan won the Defensive Player of the Year award in 1987-88). His first seven seasons (not counting 1985-86, when he was injured) ranged from 2.5 to 3.5, with an average of 3 fouls per.

Although these three had better foul counts than an average player, LeBron still registers far fewer. On top of that, Jordan and Bryant carried better defensive reputations during their careers, and James often guards big men inside, which almost always results in higher-than-usual foul counts.
LINK (http://http://www.emptythebench.com/2010/01/26/lebron-james-fouls/)

Defend this shit LeHype fans. If you dare...

Halberto
11-01-2010, 05:09 AM
http://i262.photobucket.com/albums/ii94/TheWalkingDude/1223474252057.jpg

dbestpro
11-01-2010, 12:36 PM
This is really where the NBA flirts with financial disaster. People will not keep paying money to a team that has no chance of winning it all because of superstar calls. Basketball is a team sport and it is beyond logic that a team of solid players do not win it all over the team with a marketing driven superstar. The team with the least tainted championships beyond question are the Pistons, as they played as a team, and played hard defense the offcials be damned.

Giuseppe
11-01-2010, 12:42 PM
The team with the least tainted championships beyond question are the Pistons

Well according to Spurs fans taint meter, if the team ain't 100% healthy a taint is lodged. And the Lakers weren't 100% healthy in '89.

I ain't sidin' it, I'm just checkin' assholes.

Daddy_Of_All_Trolls
11-01-2010, 10:08 PM
Ok, I'll defend LeBron here. If you were to name one active player in the NBA that has a chance to arguably be the GOAT, who would it be?

The answer is LeBron James.

Here's a fact. Another player who is in the GOAT discussion, and before Jordan was pretty much the consensus GOAT, averaged 2 fouls per game and never fouled out of a game. they didn't record blocked shots in his time, but he had plenty, meaning lots of risked fouls. He is the all time rebound king, meaning he crashed the boards, often. So, he played physically. That man is Wilt Chamberlain and he knew how to play so he didn't foul. Isn't it possible that LeBron James knows how to play without fouling as well? Something to remember if that holds up and he earns his way into a Jordan discussion. Link LeBron to Wilt, and back him up!

HarlemHeat37
11-01-2010, 10:11 PM
Defend what?:lol..

All they did was point out that Lebron has registered fewer fouls on average than all of those guys..how do you know that he just doesn't foul? :lol..what's your proof?..