PDA

View Full Version : Ultra Small Ball



007nites
11-14-2010, 09:27 PM
PG Parker
SG: Hill
SF: Neal
PF: Ginobili
C: RJ

LOL

HarlemHeat37
11-14-2010, 09:28 PM
One of the 3 things Pop enjoys most in life:

1- Wine
2- Michael Finley
3- When the opposing coach goes to a small-ball lineup, so he can match it

TD 21
11-14-2010, 09:33 PM
One of the 3 things Pop enjoys most in life:

1- Wine
2- Michael Finley
3- When the opposing coach goes to a small-ball lineup, so he can match it

Damn. You beat me to it. I was going to make the snide remark about the ultra small ball.

Obstructed_View
11-14-2010, 09:35 PM
Nanoball.

jestersmash
11-14-2010, 09:39 PM
Yoctoball (10^(-24))

DAF86
11-14-2010, 09:52 PM
I'd love to see Pop reacting by going big when the other team goes small, just one time.

Manufan909
11-14-2010, 10:04 PM
Didn't they outscore OKC when that lineup was out there?

EricB
11-14-2010, 10:06 PM
Didn't they outscore OKC when that lineup was out there?

Yup.

kace
11-14-2010, 10:07 PM
I'd love to see Pop reacting by going big when the other team goes small, just one time.

well, and that wouldn't be so crazy. i would have liked to see a Tim-Sefolosha matchup by example. i guess Sefolosha would have suffered more than Tim on defense.

Manufan909
11-14-2010, 10:10 PM
Thought so. Not saying I liked that lineup, I had the same reaction as most of us did, I just find it hilarious that it worked, and against OKC no less.

Cane
11-14-2010, 10:10 PM
In the post game interview, Durant was saying that the Spurs small ball lineup was a key part of winning the game and that the Thunder "need to go back to the drawing board" :flag: :downspin:

Guess it shouldn't be too much of a surprise considering Blair's dominant game last season.

100%duncan
11-15-2010, 09:24 PM
hahha. lets go Pop

Solid D
11-15-2010, 09:46 PM
PG Parker
SG: Hill
SF: Neal
PF: Ginobili
C: RJ

LOL

I rest my case. "The Pop Prerogative".

anonoftheinternets
11-15-2010, 09:53 PM
maybe we should wait for an example of where this did not work before piling it on ... u wont have to wait long, but ur ruining ur own argument by bringing this up when it works ...im jus sayin ...

celldweller
11-15-2010, 10:04 PM
"SequSpur (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=38)" ball! (100^(-240))