PDA

View Full Version : Czaban: "Stupid A. Smith"



Bandit2981
05-27-2005, 01:02 PM
http://www.woai.com/spurs/story.aspx?content_id=18AA2DA8-28F9-4AB5-B213-114B548B273D (link)

By Steve Czaban
The Ticket 760AM
Weekdays, 5-6am

I think - without a doubt - the most loathed player in the playoffs right now is one Manu Ginobili.

Why? Well, because it’s easy to just “hate the foreigner.” And unlike Darko (who sucks and never plays) it’s easy to hate a guy who has mad game like Manu. He shouldn’t be so hard to cover. He shouldn’t be able to slash the lane and throw down like he does. He shouldn’t be such a clutch shooter. He shouldn’t flop as much as he does. He should get a haircut.

There are lots of things that drive American hoop fans nuts, but I sense most of it comes from pure envy. He’s a damn good player. Period. That’s hard to accept for some. He’s like Drazen Petrovic who can take it to the hole.

Count me as one of the few Manu fans. I know he flails like a soccer player on contact, but be honest: so does every smart NBA veteran (note Horry throwing himself airborne when Stoudamire just LET GO of the ball the other night. Please!) NBA refs are so utterly reactionary, it’s amazing. They issue potential game changing technicals FIRST, and then try to sort out what REALLY happened afterward – at which time you can’t pull the T back off the table. We saw it with Paul Pierce earlier in the playoffs. We’ll see it again.

But back to Ginobili for a second. American hoop supremacists should view a Ginobili with pride. He’s a product of this uniquely American game that is taking root all over the globe.

Don’t hate. Appreciate.

Stupid A. Smith

I was dumbfounded when I heard the comments come blabbering across my TV screen, but since it was ‘Screamin’ A. Smith, I guess I didn’t think twice. Here was Screamin’ Idiot, yelling about how San Antonio needs to “keep Big Dog on the bench tonight” because he’s “terrible.” (Idiot A’s favorite word).

Well, the sheer incompetence of that statement didn’t hit home for me until I was reminded by the announcers that Glenn Robinson had been absent – at coach Popovich’s request! – to attend to his mother’s funeral.

Now, I ask you who saw this…

A) Was I missing something, or did Steven A. really say what I think he said?

B) If he did, then his colossal gaffe was either because he was blissfully ignorant of Robinson’s situation (an ignorance that should have earned him an instant pink slip as one of the “World Wide Leader’s” so called “NBA experts”), or a pre-meditated punking that totally disrespected Robinson’s personal situation. (another just cause you would think, for firing him).

It amazes me that not only does Screamin’ A. have a job with ESPN, but that the network is actually PUSHING him by increasing his exposure across various day parts.

BronxCowboy
05-27-2005, 01:10 PM
Don't know what to say that hasn't already been demonstrated a million times. SAS is POS.

myhc
05-27-2005, 01:21 PM
What can you say, Screamin A brings in ratings and that's the bottom line, no matter how much of a nonsenical, blabbering fool he can sound like.

dcole50
05-27-2005, 01:44 PM
i still can't believe aldridge was let go so this jackass could get more air time. it's astounding.

when watching him rant about glenn, i was waiting for someone on that set to point out big dog's situation. it's just absurd.

FromWayDowntown
05-27-2005, 01:46 PM
What can you say, Screamin A brings in ratings and that's the bottom line, no matter how much of a nonsenical, blabbering fool he can sound like.

It's curious to me how anyone can presume that Stephen A. is responsible for any sort of increase in ratings. If you put him on the pre-game and halftime of the only NBA games going on a particular night, the network is going to get ratings. If you relate it to an increase in ratings this season, I'd argue that people have been more interested in the NBA now that the assumption of Laker supremacy has been done away with. Where there's a chance for drama, people will watch. But I've never heard any fan, anywhere claim to watch NBA on ESPN just to catch Stephen A.'s tried act.

I mean, even this dude gets it: LakerFraud's take on SAS (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=284554&postcount=1)

myhc
05-27-2005, 02:08 PM
It's curious to me how anyone can presume that Stephen A. is responsible for any sort of increase in ratings. If you put him on the pre-game and halftime of the only NBA games going on a particular night, the network is going to get ratings. If you relate it to an increase in ratings this season, I'd argue that people have been more interested in the NBA now that the assumption of Laker supremacy has been done away with. Where there's a chance for drama, people will watch. But I've never heard any fan, anywhere claim to watch NBA on ESPN just to catch Stephen A.'s tried act.

I mean, even this dude gets it: LakerFraud's take on SAS (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=284554&postcount=1)

Television personalities bring in ratings. I thought that's how it always worked. Works in the NFL, works in the NBA. Even if he's working the only game on TV that night, you as a viewer can choose to turn into the pre-game or post game if you think a Charles Barkley type will entertain you with their "colorful" takes. And if the viewer digs him, then maybe there's a chance they tune into other programs he's on. Seriously, all this guy does is scream his head off and act like a surly jackass. Why would any network in their right mind keep this jerk unless he brings something outrageous to the table to entice viewers? This is ESPN's substandard version of Charles Barkley, only less entertaining and more of a pinhole blowing smoke up everybodys ass.

ChumpDumper
05-27-2005, 03:45 PM
SAS didn't seem to know GRob's mom had died until someone emailed him about it the next day -- if he actually sent that email, it was pretty contrite.

FromWayDowntown
05-27-2005, 03:52 PM
Television personalities bring in ratings. I thought that's how it always worked. Works in the NFL, works in the NBA. Even if he's working the only game on TV that night, you as a viewer can choose to turn into the pre-game or post game if you think a Charles Barkley type will entertain you with their "colorful" takes. And if the viewer digs him, then maybe there's a chance they tune into other programs he's on. Seriously, all this guy does is scream his head off and act like a surly jackass. Why would any network in their right mind keep this jerk unless he brings something outrageous to the table to entice viewers? This is ESPN's substandard version of Charles Barkley, only less entertaining and more of a pinhole blowing smoke up everybodys ass.

Right. My point is that I can't see any direct correlation to putting Smith on any NBA program and an increase in ratings. If someone can show me a market survey where viewers indicated that they tune in more readily to ESPN now than in the past because SAS is waxing asinine, I'll back off.

Until then, my sense is that people are watching ESPN's NBA programming because the league has become more interesting, regardless of whether SAS is on the telecast or not.

Catharsis
05-27-2005, 04:02 PM
Big Dog is a defensive liability, imo.

FromWayDowntown
05-27-2005, 04:07 PM
Big Dog is a defensive liability, imo.

So is Brent Barry -- this series, in the main run, isn't really about defense, which I think has helped to explain Barry's resurgence. Play the very best defense you can against Phoenix and they'll still score 100 points on most nights. You have to play offensive basketball against the Suns if you want to win -- it's where I think both the Mavs and Grizzlies went wrong. Robinson may be a defensive liability -- though I think that his defense has steadily improved with the knowledge and trust that he has good rim protectors behind him -- but he's still got that ability to be an offensive stud.

I said before Game 1 that the Spurs needed to average around 115 in wins to win this series. You can't have too many offensive "guests" on the floor and put up numbers like that.

Xolotl
05-27-2005, 04:10 PM
He makes me laugh when he rips on Rasho....b/c its true

Catharsis
05-27-2005, 04:10 PM
So is Brent Barry -- this series, in the main run, isn't really about defense, which I think has helped to explain Barry's resurgence. Play the very best defense you can against Phoenix and they'll still score 100 points on most nights. You have to play offensive basketball against the Suns if you want to win -- it's where I think both the Mavs and Grizzlies went wrong. Robinson may be a defensive liability -- though I think that his defense has steadily improved with the knowledge and trust that he has good rim protectors behind him -- but he's still got that ability to be an offensive stud.

I said before Game 1 that the Spurs needed to average around 115 in wins to win this series. You can't have too many offensive "guests" on the floor and put up numbers like that.
Barry scored, what, 15 pts in the 4th quarter of game 1 and was virtually a no show in game 2. He's also a 3pt specialist--unlike Robinson. A lot of Barry's game 1 pts were scored off of kickouts with him wide open.

FromWayDowntown
05-27-2005, 04:12 PM
Barry scored, what, 15 pts in the 4th quarter of game 1 and was virtually a no show in game 2. He's also a 3pt specialist--unlike Robinson. A lot of Barry's game 1 pts were scored off of kickouts with him wide open.

And Robinson, in his limited time with the Spurs, has shown an ability to take that same kickout and create and hit a mid-range shot, even in traffic. I'm not arguing that the dude is the greatest thing since sliced bread, but in a series where offense is decidedly the premium, he's certainly a nice option.

ShoogarBear
05-27-2005, 04:15 PM
Steve Czaban has absolutely no grounds to be calling anybody else an idiot.

Guy is as big an asshole as there possibly can be.