PDA

View Full Version : Stats or wins? Duncan’s All-Star spot is at stake



sheriee84
01-31-2011, 09:50 PM
Stats or wins? Duncan’s All-Star spot is at stake
By BRIAN MAHONEY, AP Basketball Writer
8 hours, 31 minutes ago


ShareEmailPrintTim Duncan’s(notes) championship credentials will someday mandate a spot in the Hall of Fame.

“He’s a pillar, one of the few pillars of this league,” Houston’s Shane Battier(notes) said.

One who is having a mediocre season statistically, the kind that would normally warrant a long weekend off next month.

Duncan barely cracks the top 20 in scoring among a stellar class of Western Conference forwards. So as coaches submit their ballots this week for All-Star reserves, they’ll have to look elsewhere if they choose to consider Duncan for a 13th straight appearance.

Perhaps away from Blake Griffin’s(notes) spectacular highlights. Away from Kevin Love’s(notes) point-rebound totals that belong in a video game.

They will have to go directly to San Antonio’s won-loss record.

Because at 40-7, it may be impossible to dismiss how much Duncan means to the Spurs—even in a year when he seems to mean less than ever.

“I haven’t looked at him specifically. … Those guys are 37-4 or something,” Dallas coach Rick Carlisle said last week. “You’ve got to take a strong look at that. That’s meaningful, that Duncan is on a team that’s winning every game. That’s a big deal, and it should be.”

Coaches routinely favor players from winning teams when making their selections, and the Spurs have been even more dominant than in any of their four championship seasons with Duncan. So the West coaches likely believe San Antonio should have multiple All-Stars, just as their East counterparts did in recent years with teams that won so much, sending four Detroit Pistons in 2006 and two Boston reserves to join starter Kevin Garnett(notes) in 2008.

Manu Ginobili(notes) is the Spurs’ best candidate, averaging 18.8 points. Tony Parker(notes) is next at 17.5 on 52 percent shooting, while Duncan’s average of 13.6 points is third on the team and only 20th best among West forwards who have played at least 30 games, according to STATS LLC.

That’s a career low, as are his 9.4 rebounds in only 29 minutes per game while the Spurs monitor the 14-year veteran’s minutes. Still good for most players, those statistics look even punier next to the nightly double-doubles of Griffin and Love, players Duncan has to compete with, along with perhaps players such as Dallas’ Dirk Nowitzki(notes), LaMarcus Aldridge(notes) of Portland, the Lakers’ Pau Gasol(notes), or Zach Randolph(notes) of Memphis.

“It’s an interesting situation, because you’ve got the three young guys, with Aldridge and Love and this kid, Griffin. They’re all having great years,” Houston coach Rick Adelman said. “And then you’ve got the old standbys. Tim Duncan, whose team is the best in the league, but they’ve cut his minutes back. How are the coaches are going to vote? I don’t know. It’s going to be an interesting situation. There’s a lot of young blood and guys who are really playing like they deserve it.”

Duncan has been an All-Star 12 straight seasons, two shy of the all-time record, and made his 11th start last year. The fans went with Kevin Durant(notes) and Carmelo Anthony(notes) this year, but Duncan still has two possible routes to extend those totals.

The coaches must submit their votes to the league office by Tuesday afternoon, voting for two forwards, two guards, a center and two players regardless of position in their conference.

Duncan was listed on the fan ballot as a forward, mostly because of his longtime objection to being considered a center even though he mostly plays that position for the Spurs. But coaches are free to vote for him at either position, helping Duncan’s candidacy.

Should his name not be called when reserves are announced Thursday night, he still could end up in Los Angeles if Commissioner David Stern tabs him as the injury replacement for Yao Ming(notes), who was voted the starting center by fans.

“I think Tim’s got a good shot. There’s a lot of good players out there, in all seriousness,” said Spurs coach Gregg Popovich, who will coach the West.

“We wouldn’t be in the position we’re in, record-wise, if Timmy wasn’t out there doing what he does night after night, and his consistency. So when I look across the board, I would hope he makes the All-Star team.”

Popovich can’t vote for his own players and doesn’t believe in lobbying coaches on behalf of players—not that Duncan would want the help.

“I’m not thinking about that right now,” he said. “I don’t have an opinion on whether I’m making the All-Star team or not.”

A respected veteran, Duncan’s reputation could be a tiebreaker for coaches who can’t decide between individual production or team success. Those weighing stats more heavily would agree with Charles Barkley, who left Duncan off his list of reserves after the starters were announced last Thursday on TNT.

While not talking specifically about Duncan, Barkley said: “This isn’t a lifetime achievement award. The award should go to guys who are having the best first half of the season.”

sheriee84
01-31-2011, 10:00 PM
Next question: Would Tim ACTUALLY CARE if he didn't make the ASG?

duncan228
01-31-2011, 10:20 PM
Next question: Would Tim ACTUALLY CARE if he didn't make the ASG?

Duncan has taken his usual stand with it. Besides the quote in the article from practice yesterday where he says he has no opinion about it, he'll never say he does or doesn't want to go. If he gets in he'll say it's an honor. If he doesn't he'll keep saying this.


I wouldn’t have voted for me, either.

http://blog.mysanantonio.com/spursnation/2011/01/27/duncan%e2%80%99s-all-star-starter-streak-ends/

ffadicted
01-31-2011, 10:37 PM
Well it's a tough one really. If you completely exclude his career and use this season as the sole measure, it's definitely hard to argue against leaving him out.

However, if you think about where the spurs would be without him this season, you realize his impact is much greater then what the stat sheets and results read. Our front court would be awful and we'd be nowhere near the top team in the league we are now as we stand.

So basically, does Duncan deserve an All-Star spot? Yes, he impacts a successful team in a high enough level. Would it be an injustice to leave him out after all he's done in this league? Absolutely. But at the end of the day, there just end up being more deserving players, and that's the tough pill to swallow

TDMVPDPOY
01-31-2011, 10:47 PM
Next question: Would Tim ACTUALLY CARE if he didn't make the ASG?

no, but the oxymorons on here do care...its just a meaningless ASG where some young kent is going to ball hog just to win a meaningless award

TD 21
01-31-2011, 10:55 PM
I continue to be amazed that this is even being debated. All-time great, still good per minute numbers, elite defensive anchor/rebounder, on the best team in the league and plays at a position where there's only two legit candidates in the conference.

How can anyone pick Garnett (which all these idiots have no reservations about doing), but not pick Duncan? If they're going to point to Garnett's defense, intangibles and impact on winning, then how can they not do the same with Duncan? I guess that only applies if you're a puke who plays in a big market.

timtonymanu
01-31-2011, 11:20 PM
I continue to be amazed that this is even being debated. All-time great, still good per minute numbers, elite defensive anchor/rebounder, on the best team in the league and plays at a position where there's only two legit candidates in the conference.

How can anyone pick Garnett (which all these idiots have no reservations about doing), but not pick Duncan? If they're going to point to Garnett's defense, intangibles and impact on winning, then how can they not do the same with Duncan? I guess that only applies if you're a puke who plays in a big market.

I agree. People are putting KG on their list and not Timmy even though Tim has been healthy all season and his team has a better record. It could be that the East has less people deserving of all-stars. However if people are gonna exclude Timmy, then KG should be too.

YODA
01-31-2011, 11:21 PM
I continue to be amazed that this is even being debated. All-time great, still good per minute numbers, elite defensive anchor/rebounder, on the best team in the league and plays at a position where there's only two legit candidates in the conference.

How can anyone pick Garnett (which all these idiots have no reservations about doing), but not pick Duncan? If they're going to point to Garnett's defense, intangibles and impact on winning, then how can they not do the same with Duncan? I guess that only applies if you're a puke who plays in a big market.

+1 Makes a great point. If Garnett gets in for the reasons, so should Tim, but the East really dont have enough all stars to will the roster an dthe west if full of people who should be in.

TD 21
01-31-2011, 11:28 PM
Yeah, but the East is deep at (power) forward. The West isn't deep at center, which is where Duncan plays and what he'll be selected as by the coaches. So once you factor that in, what possible reason could there be to select Garnett but not Duncan? There isn't one.

For the record, I definitely would pick Garnett, I'm just saying it's hypocritical to pick him and not Duncan. If one wanted to base it on stats (which has conveniently become increasingly popular the season the Spurs are running away with the best record in the league), these seven could be selected . . .

East: F- Bosh, Boozer, Pierce, C- Horford, G- Allen, Johnson, Rondo

GSH
01-31-2011, 11:35 PM
I don't know how you can attach any meaning to whether someone gets into the ASG or not. Yao Ming got voted in this year, even though his career is over.

In 06-07, Shaq got voted in, even though he had only averaged around 10 and 6 in the dozen or so games he had played in.

In 2009, Iverson got voted in, even though he played 3 games for the Grizzlies, and then quit. (A month later he signed a pro-rated league minimum deal with the Sixers, and then quit them a couple of months later too.)

The whole thing is too ridiculous to take seriously. If you've been a Spurs fan for more than about a week, you know that they routinely get overlooked. Why all the outrage? If it's really important to him, I'd like to see him go. Otherwise, I'd a lot rather see him get a week of rest.


Edit: I'm still trying to figure out who votes for Garnett... it sure as hell isn't the other players in the league. http://guyism.com/sports/kevin-garnett-really-dislikes-ball-boys.html

TD 21
01-31-2011, 11:45 PM
I don't care about the actual game. It's more what it symbolizes, the respect factor.

The "outrage" is because of the lack of respect Duncan receives and how the instant he took a back seat and had pedestrian (for him) numbers, then all of a sudden the standards changed. Now, what he's done isn't commendable, defense, intangibles and winning are on the back burner and it's all about stats (mainly scoring). It's bullshit.

Chandler, Nene and Okafor, you're seriously going to tell me one of them is more deserving? Because that's what it comes down to, not Griffin, Love, etc. Two centers have to be selected. Only Duncan and Gasol, out of the listed forwards, can be considered centers. So if you're going to claim Duncan shouldn't make it, then give me the case for why one of those centers should.

GSH
01-31-2011, 11:53 PM
I don't care about the actual game. It's more what it symbolizes, the respect factor.




Let 'em respect the LOB. :lobt::lobt::lobt::lobt:....:lobt: