So, I'm curious

[Cry Havoc]

When two refs confer with each other because neither one had a good look at the play with under a minute left, and then decide not to look at the replay... what does that mean, exactly?

[ShoogarBear]

Eh, I think they got the call right.

[DawgMilkX]

That means your playing the Lakers!

[Cry Havoc]

Eh, I think they got the call right.

They can't even look at the replay? If they had to confer, that means it was close, right?

[Manu-of-steel]

We're in LA. But you're right. The best thing the refs should have done is to check the replay just to be sure of the call. Fuck LA!

[concken]

basically what youre trying to say is that it was COMPLETE BULLSHIT they didnt check the replay!!! no one even made a call until they conferred. absolutely nothing to off of. im honestly convinced basketball is the second most corrupt (behind steroids in baseball), and MOST political sport in america.

[Thompson]

Eh, I think they got the call right.

I don't think that's the point. They happened to get it right by coincidence; it was clear neither one had a clue, and they didn't bother to look at the replay, they just gave it to L.A.

That and the fact that they missed/ignored Artest's elbow to Ginobili's face really annoyed me.

[thekingrobert]

I thought the same thing but then I noticed the Spurs were playing so they don't and didn't care

[TDMVPDPOY]

they missed that call, the elbow to gino face and the double dribble

[Spur|n|Austin]

It was irritating to see that both the refs had no idea who to give possession to. It looked like one went with his gut and gave it to the Lakers. No worries, we got the W, let's just Neal with it.

[Spurs Brazil]

That means your playing the Lakers!

this