PDA

View Full Version : Horribly reffed game



DazedAndConfused
03-10-2011, 09:42 PM
Seriously. What a joke.

SAtown
03-10-2011, 09:44 PM
:cry:cry:cry:cry:cry:cry:cry:cry:cry:cry:cry:cry

TE
03-10-2011, 09:44 PM
:lol

kamikazi_player
03-10-2011, 09:44 PM
:lmao

LnGrrrR
03-10-2011, 09:45 PM
Seriously. What a joke.

:lol

Do the Lakers ever lose because it was their fault? Everytime they lose, you post about the refs, the other team cheating, the sun was in their eyes, their shoes were untied...

NRHector
03-10-2011, 09:45 PM
laker fan bitching about the refs :lol

Ghazi
03-10-2011, 09:46 PM
:cry :cry :cry :cry :cry

Muser
03-10-2011, 09:46 PM
:lol

Do the Lakers ever lose because it was their fault? Everytime they lose, you post about the refs, the other team cheating, the sun was in their eyes, their shoes were untied...

:lol

ElNono
03-10-2011, 09:47 PM
http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/49/cry_girl.gif

TE
03-10-2011, 09:47 PM
Too bad. Don't get to worked up on a regular season game.

4>0rings
03-10-2011, 09:48 PM
:lmao FT's favoring the Lakers...

26 - Lakers
18 - Heat

lol@laker ref complaining threads

GoodOdor
03-10-2011, 09:49 PM
OP = bitch.

Muser
03-10-2011, 09:49 PM
Tbh the refs made kobe go 0-7 in the 2nd/3rd or whatever he was.

NRHector
03-10-2011, 09:50 PM
:lol

do the lakers ever lose because it was their fault? Everytime they lose, you post about the refs, the other team cheating, the sun was in their eyes, their shoes were untied...+ 10000000

Muser
03-10-2011, 09:50 PM
And the refs made the Heat bigs (rofl) skullfuck the lakers on offensive boards in the first half too.

Cry Havoc
03-10-2011, 09:50 PM
A Lakers fan's idea of a poorly officiated game? When the Lakers shoot more jump shots than their opponents and only shoot 8 more free throws. While they're away.

:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 09:50 PM
We got beat in all facets of the gamePERIOD

Reck
03-10-2011, 09:50 PM
GTFO!

Blame the refs..

You guys cant seriously take a loss like gents can you?

midnightpulp
03-10-2011, 09:50 PM
This game convinces me that the Lakers win over SA was nothing more than a fluke, or a result of SA not giving a shit. Miami was practically the worst team in the league over the last 5 games and the Lakers couldn't get a win.

SA vs. Dallas will be an epic Western Conference Finals.

NRHector
03-10-2011, 09:51 PM
http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/49/cry_girl.gif:lol

Kyle Orton
03-10-2011, 09:51 PM
Heat just made some shots

jjktkk
03-10-2011, 09:52 PM
Op is such a vagina. I would of bet dazed would be the 1st bitch to cry about the refs. :lol

http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/8592/46804083.jpg

The Gemini Method
03-10-2011, 09:52 PM
Cant blame the refs for losing the game. The D in the paint was horrid at the end and the Heat did what they should've been doing all year--let Wade dictate the offense. There is only one call I thought was an error and that was the Z off. goaltending.

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 09:53 PM
This game convinces me that the Lakers win over SA was nothing more than a fluke, or a result of SA not giving a shit.

I'll just bet it does.

tee, hee.

jjktkk
03-10-2011, 09:53 PM
We got beat in all facets of the gamePERIOD

Cully, you need to loan a pair to the op.

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 09:54 PM
Cully, you need to loan a pair to the op.

Your people ain't no better. You got no room.

4>0rings
03-10-2011, 09:55 PM
I'll just bet it does.

tee, hee.
Beat it you fucking old coot before I put pics of you on telephone poles around your neighborhood w/ your molestation charges.

Sisk
03-10-2011, 09:55 PM
:cry:cry:cry:cry:cry:cry:cry:cry:cry:cry

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 09:56 PM
Beat it you fucking old coot before I put pics of you on telephone poles around your neighborhood w/ your molestation charges.

Keep it up and I'll tell you things about you & mother in bed together nude that you'll never forget.

BoricuaCJA
03-10-2011, 09:56 PM
Stop being a bitch and say that Miami was just the better team today.

LnGrrrR
03-10-2011, 09:57 PM
Your people ain't no better. You got no room.

Pretty hyopcritical Giuseppe. You expect Spurfan to call out their own, when you bless anything under the sun that Lakerfan says, self-admittedly.

kamikazi_player
03-10-2011, 09:57 PM
Giuseppe

Banzai
03-10-2011, 09:58 PM
Miami was motivated to win..had to snap the 5 game losing streak..also..good luck in Miami next week.

hater
03-10-2011, 09:58 PM
http://benjismith.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/crying-monkey.jpg

BoricuaCJA
03-10-2011, 09:58 PM
We got beat in all facets of the gamePERIOD
I respect that you admit that. It was the offensive rebounding aspect that made the Lakers lose most. Bynum is the xfactor of that team imo. His height and length is incredible to have.

Hemotivo
03-10-2011, 09:59 PM
:rollin :downspin: :lol

jjktkk
03-10-2011, 10:00 PM
Your people ain't no better. You got no room.

Bullshit cully, You'll never see me whine about the refs. Look up my posts last Sunday when the Lakers spanked the Spurs. I gave out props. You lose you lose. Op is a sore loser that likes to shittalk when the Lakers win, but needs to learn to crawl and man up when the Lakers lose.

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 10:00 PM
Pretty hyopcritical Giuseppe. You expect Spurfan to call out their own, when you bless anything under the sun that Lakerfan says, self-admittedly.

You got no room, Ln. You didn't even show up after we rang at 16.

jjktkk
03-10-2011, 10:00 PM
Miami was motivated to win..had to snap the 5 game losing streak..also..good luck in Miami next week.

This.

kamikazi_player
03-10-2011, 10:00 PM
Miami was motivated to win..had to snap the 5 game losing streak..also..good luck in Miami next week.
I expect the heat to win the next game against us. No way we shoot 18 or so 3's again and see Matt Bonner almost perfect from 3.

midnightpulp
03-10-2011, 10:01 PM
You got no room, Ln. You didn't even show up after we rang at 16.

Yes, yes he did.

Oh, just to let you know. History2b has done bled out hanging on that Tree of Woe.

You and Luva are next.

moisaenz
03-10-2011, 10:02 PM
Well if we could count all the 3 second violations for Bynum that werent called????

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 10:03 PM
Yes, yes he did.

Oh, just to let you know. History2b has done bled out hanging on that Tree of Woe.

You and Luva are next.

No, he didn't.

Please. You already tried running me off.

The Gemini Method
03-10-2011, 10:03 PM
Went away from the Gasol/Bynum tandem and cannot discredit Bibvy's contribution. Good win, Heat.

Axe Murderer
03-10-2011, 10:03 PM
The Gemini Method

IronMaxipad
03-10-2011, 10:05 PM
LOL blaming the refs

Kobe didn't show up the second half and they didn't close out the 3rd quarter.

midnightpulp
03-10-2011, 10:06 PM
No, he didn't.

Please. You already tried running me off.

He started a thread congratulating all you fucksticks after Gasol got done bailing 6-24 out. If that ain't showing up, I don't know what is.

And you'll be hanging on that Tree, alongside Luva. In the nude of course.

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 10:08 PM
He started a thread congratulating all you fucksticks after Gasol got done bailing 6-24 out. If that ain't showing up, I don't know what is.

And you'll be hanging on that Tree, alongside Luva. In the nude of course.

No, Ln pussyed out.

& you already tried running me off. Uh, uh.

midnightpulp
03-10-2011, 10:10 PM
No, Ln pussyed out.

& you already tried running me off. Uh, uh.

If I link the thread where he offered his congrats, will you recant your statement of him being a puss?

And I wouldn't dream of running you off. I missed ya when you took your ELE exile. The Tree comes in many different forms beside banishment.

Beau
03-10-2011, 10:11 PM
Your people ain't no better. You got no room.

Ball room - if I made 75K a year I'd buy some custom pants...

kamikazi_player
03-10-2011, 10:11 PM
No, Ln pussyed out.

& you already tried running me off. Uh, uh.
He did show up

LnGrrrR
03-10-2011, 10:14 PM
You got no room, Ln. You didn't even show up after we rang at 16.

I showed up. I just didn't stick around. There's a difference.

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 10:15 PM
If I link the thread where he offered his congrats, will you recant your statement of him being a puss?

And I wouldn't dream of running you off. I missed ya when you took your ELE exile. The Tree comes in many different forms beside banishment.

Ln pussied outPERIOD

4>0rings
03-10-2011, 10:15 PM
Ln pussied outPERIOD
Better to be a pussy than a welcher, welcher

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 10:15 PM
I showed up. I just didn't stick around. There's a difference.

There's no difference. That BS, and you know it.

You fled the side door like a woman.

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 10:16 PM
Better to be a pussy than a welcher, welcher

That's ok above as well.

You & your mom are safe.

Let us proceed...

baseline bum
03-10-2011, 10:16 PM
A Lakers fan's idea of a poorly officiated game? When the Lakers shoot more jump shots than their opponents and only shoot 8 more free throws. While they're away.

:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao

:lol

midnightpulp
03-10-2011, 10:17 PM
Ln pussied outPERIOD

Nope:

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=156647

If that ain't him giving you all an opportunity to break your collective nut, I don't know what is.

You owe that man an apology.

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 10:17 PM
Nope:

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=156647

If that ain't him giving you all an opportunity to break your collective nut, I don't what is.

You owe that man an apology.

Ln pussied outPERIOD

midnightpulp
03-10-2011, 10:20 PM
Ln pussied outPERIOD

You're a liar, Cul.

Never thought I'd see the day when a proud American Veteran is stooping to the level of a gotdamn prevaricator, telling tall tales whilst crawling on his belly.

You owe that man an apologyPERIOD.

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 10:23 PM
You're a liar, Cul.

Never thought I'd see the day when a proud American Veteran is stooping to the level of a gotdamn prevaricator, telling tall tales whilst crawling on his belly.

You owe that man an apologyPERIOD.

Ln pussied outPERIOD

cobbler
03-10-2011, 10:24 PM
This game convinces me that the Lakers win over SA was nothing more than a fluke, or a result of SA not giving a shit. Miami was practically the worst team in the league over the last 5 games and the Lakers couldn't get a win.

SA vs. Dallas will be an epic Western Conference Finals.

Its about matchups and motivation at this point. I'd be more concerned over your first round opponents than what the Lakers might or might not do. You know...what with coming off the Suns skunker and all.

cobbler
03-10-2011, 10:25 PM
... and blaming the refs is and always will be a bitch move.

Championship teams don't allow bad calls to effect the outcome.

midnightpulp
03-10-2011, 10:25 PM
Its about matchups and motivation at this point. I'd be more concerned over your first round opponents than what the Lakers might or might not do. You know...what with coming off the Suns skunker and all.

The guy telling people to get new material should take a look at himself in the mirror.

HarlemHeat37
03-10-2011, 10:25 PM
:lol Cobbler leaving his tire marks all over ST during this win streak..

midnightpulp
03-10-2011, 10:27 PM
Ln pussied outPERIOD

You owe that man an apologyPERIOD

And I ain't letting yas forget.

John Basedow
03-10-2011, 10:27 PM
:lol Cobbler leaving his tire marks all over ST during this win streak..

Welcome back, scrah.

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 10:27 PM
You owe that man an apologyPERIOD

And I ain't letting yas forget.

Ln pussied outPERIOD

cobbler
03-10-2011, 10:27 PM
I respect that you admit that. It was the offensive rebounding aspect that made the Lakers lose most. Bynum is the xfactor of that team imo. His height and length is incredible to have.

:toast

Completely different team from 1st to second half on D. All dependent on Drews activity. He and Odom are the 2 X factors.

cobbler
03-10-2011, 10:28 PM
I expect the heat to win the next game against us. No way we shoot 18 or so 3's again and see Matt Bonner almost perfect from 3.

Both your teams rely a lot on the 3.

midnightpulp
03-10-2011, 10:30 PM
Ln pussied outPERIOD

By the skin of your teeth and by the shine of the sun, you owe that man an apologyPERIOD

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 10:31 PM
By the skin of your teeth and by the shine of the sun, you owe that man an apologyPERIOD

Ln pussied outPERIOD

kamikazi_player
03-10-2011, 10:32 PM
Both your teams rely a lot on the 3.
so do the lakers u moron. hobbler with another stupid basketball take.

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 10:34 PM
Both your teams

tee, hee.

LnGrrrR
03-10-2011, 10:34 PM
There's no difference. That BS, and you know it.

You fled the side door like a woman.

Sure there's a difference. One involves showing up and congratulating the other team. The other involves pussying out and hiding after a loss, or what's known around here as "pulling a Luva".

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 10:35 PM
Sure there's a difference. One involves showing up and congratulating the other team. The other involves pussying out and hiding after a loss, or what's known around here as "pulling a Luva".

You pussied out, LNPERIOD

kamikazi_player
03-10-2011, 10:35 PM
tee, hee.
:lol i didn't catch that.

TheChillFactor
03-10-2011, 10:36 PM
http://www.skiddiecentral.us/img/butthurt.jpg

midnightpulp
03-10-2011, 10:36 PM
You pussied out, LNPERIOD

No. No he didn't.

You owe that man an apologyPERIOD

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 10:37 PM
:lol i didn't catch that.

Here, here it is:::

Suns: 4

Spurs: O

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 10:37 PM
No. No he didn't.

You owe that man an apologyPERIOD

Ln pussied outPERIOD

LnGrrrR
03-10-2011, 10:38 PM
To be honest though, I don't expect an apology out of Culby. The man barely can remember how to dress himself in the morning after all, needing help from ol' Katiegirl. I forgive him his transgressions.

cobbler
03-10-2011, 10:39 PM
:lol Cobbler leaving his tire marks all over ST during this win streak..

I don't post any more or any less regardless of winning or losing streaks. I don't post under any other name. I don't get the whole I changed my name, created an argument (often with myself on another account), and got someone to reply, as being any kind of personel accomplishment. Just not my thing. I'm just a Laker homer. That's all.

I'll leave the whole trolling and dissappearing/appearing during streaks to the guys who actually put the effort in to do so thinking it matters in any way at all.

Still under your skin I see.. :toast

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 10:39 PM
To be honest though, I don't expect an apology out of Culby. The man barely can remember how to dress himself in the morning after all, needing help from ol' Katiegirl. I forgive him his transgressions.

You pussied out, LnPERIOD

cobbler
03-10-2011, 10:56 PM
so do the lakers u moron. hobbler with another stupid basketball take.

uhhh the Lakers are 14th in 3 point attempts and also 14th in %.

The Spurs are 8th in attempts and 1st in %.

Which team do you think relies more on the 3?

Cannot wait to hear your BRILLIANT basketball take on this. :lol

LakasRool4eva
03-10-2011, 11:00 PM
refs win some 4 you & lose some 4 you..............................it happens sometimes but if u really think about this aint 4 the 'ship so i aint even worried bout it right now.....................

LnGrrrR
03-10-2011, 11:48 PM
You pussied out, LnPERIOD

Your logic is damn near as retarded as your trends.

Tell me, how long does one have to be on the site after a loss to have not pussied out? A day? A week? A month?

Probably longer than the .2 seconds Kool stuck around after this loss. But I don't see you calling him out, are you, you old fucking coot?

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 11:49 PM
Your logic is damn near as retarded as your trends.

Tell me, how long does one have to be on the site after a loss to have not pussied out? A day? A week? A month?

Probably longer than the .2 seconds Kool stuck around after this loss. But I don't see you calling him out, are you, you old fucking coot?

You pussied out, LnPERIOD

midnightpulp
03-10-2011, 11:52 PM
You pussied out, LnPERIOD

You owe that man an apologyPERIOD

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 11:53 PM
You owe that man an apologyPERIOD

Ln pussied outPERIOD

NRHector
03-10-2011, 11:56 PM
Ln pussied outPERIODyou owe that man an apologyPERIOD

Giuseppe
03-10-2011, 11:56 PM
you owe that man an apologyPERIOD

Nope. Ln pussied outPERIOD

midnightpulp
03-10-2011, 11:58 PM
Nope. Ln pussied outPERIOD

No. No he didn't.

You owe that man an apologyPERIOD

NRHector
03-10-2011, 11:59 PM
Nope. Ln pussied outPERIODyou owe that man an apologyPERIOD

Greg Oden
03-11-2011, 12:01 AM
Lngrrr is a classy guy who has resided in the fine state of MS once before.

Cully, apologize to the man or I'm giving it extra hard to katie tonight.

midnightpulp
03-11-2011, 12:02 AM
Lngrrr is a classy guy who has resided in the fine state of MS once before.

Cully, apologize to the man or I'm giving it extra hard to katie tonight.

He owes that man an apologyPERIOD

Bill_Brasky
03-11-2011, 12:07 AM
Nope. Ln pussied outPERIOD
you owe that man an apologyPERIOD

TheSpursFNRule
03-11-2011, 12:09 AM
Lol a Laker fan complaining about the refs.

cherylsteele
03-11-2011, 12:11 AM
Both your teams rely a lot on the 3.
Lakers shot 16 3's tonight, Spurs just make more of them.

cobbler
03-11-2011, 12:11 AM
Lol a Laker fan complaining about the refs.

Creative... I have never heard that line before. Awesome! :toast

Giuseppe
03-11-2011, 12:14 AM
you owe that man an apologyPERIOD

Nope. Ln pussied outPERIOD

NRHector
03-11-2011, 12:15 AM
Nope. Ln pussied outPERIODyou owe that man an apologyPERIOD

cobbler
03-11-2011, 12:15 AM
Lakers shot 16 3's tonight, Spurs just make more of them.

And thus my comment that your team relies on the 3 more. duh

midnightpulp
03-11-2011, 12:16 AM
Nope. Ln pussied outPERIOD

Ain't getting off that easy, bub.

You owe that man an apologyPERIOD

Giuseppe
03-11-2011, 12:17 AM
Ain't getting off that easy, bub.

You owe that man an apologyPERIOD

Ln pussied outPERIOD

midnightpulp
03-11-2011, 12:18 AM
And thus my comment that your team relies on the 3 more. duh

The reliance on the 3 ball won't be what does the Spurs in if they should meet the Lakers. It's the fact that the Spurs won't be able to keep the Laker frontline off the offensive glass.

cherylsteele
03-11-2011, 12:26 AM
And thus my comment that your team relies on the 3 more. duh
On sunday the Lakers shot more 3's than the Spurs, made about the same %,
over the season the Spurs avg 20 attempts per game, Laker avg 18, not much difference really, the Spurs don't rely on the much more the Lakers do, the Spurs percentage is higher 40% to 35%. They don't rely on them anymore than the Laker really, the perception is different because the Spurs are better at it. It doesn't hurt their overall fg%, they nearly identical as the Lakers, 47.5% Spurs-46.7% Lakers

cobbler
03-11-2011, 12:31 AM
The reliance on the 3 ball won't be what does the Spurs in if they should meet the Lakers. It's the fact that the Spurs won't be able to keep the Laker frontline off the offensive glass.

Wasnt my point. I dont know whats up cheese's ass but the comment was that both Miami and Spurs rely a lot on the 3 and nothing more. And that of course brought in the Laker comments. The Spurs rely on the 3 more than the Lakers and you comment only validates that. The Lakers rely more on the frontline. Nothing huge about it... just my opinion. I would think that with 2 more attempts and a much better 3pt % that would be obvious... I guess not.

ezau
03-11-2011, 12:33 AM
The Lakers rely more on the frontline.

Tell that to Kobe:lol:lol

Mike D
03-11-2011, 12:49 AM
The TNT crew seems to feel there were a lot of "fortunate for Miami calls down the stretch."

BlackSwordsMan
03-11-2011, 12:50 AM
lakers coasting

LnGrrrR
03-11-2011, 12:52 AM
Typical Culby, must be having hisPERIOD

midnightpulp
03-11-2011, 12:55 AM
Wasnt my point. I dont know whats up cheese's ass but the comment was that both Miami and Spurs rely a lot on the 3 and nothing more. And that of course brought in the Laker comments. The Spurs rely on the 3 more than the Lakers and you comment only validates that. The Lakers rely more on the frontline. Nothing huge about it... just my opinion. I would think that with 2 more attempts and a much better 3pt % that would be obvious... I guess not.

Fair enough. It's just you seemed to imply that the Spurs' 3 point shooting tendencies were some kind of weakness, like say, the D'Antoni era Phoenix Suns, who can be described as a team that "lived and died by the 3."

cobbler
03-11-2011, 12:57 AM
Fair enough. It's just you seemed to imply that the Spurs' 3 point shooting tendencies were some kind of weakness, like say, the D'Antoni era Phoenix Suns, who can be described as a team that "lived and died by the 3."

noooo.... just saying they rely on it more than Lakers and I think they do.

cobbler
03-11-2011, 12:59 AM
Tell that to Kobe:lol:lol

Im not at all worried about Kobe. And since you feel he is so awful, I don't understand why you bring him up daily.

You talk way more about the Lakers than you do your own team and your world revolves aroung HCA. :lol

I know it personally hurts you E that your guys have this amazing record this season and yet nobody, and I mean nobody with any sense, predicts them winning the ship. It's going to hurt to have that Mav season... but hey... you can always pull out the we won the HCA banner card. :lmao

LnGrrrR
03-11-2011, 01:01 AM
Hm Giuseppe left the thread. Guess that means he pussied outPERIOD

mavsfan1000
03-11-2011, 01:49 AM
Laker fans should never complain about the refs. They are used to the refs being too biased in favor of them. In rare cases where it is close to even, they freak out about it. Where's are ref advantage? It's sick really.

cobbler
03-11-2011, 01:53 AM
Laker fans should never complain about the refs. They are used to the refs being too biased in favor of them. In rare cases where it is close to even, they freak out about it. Where's are ref advantage? It's sick really.

Win something... then ask.

Chawaman
03-11-2011, 02:02 AM
Win something... then ask.

Mavsfan as all of us didnt know cobbler is in the lakers rotation. He was in the 2009 finals rotation. Hes looking to repeat.
Spurs wont mind doing them justice at their homecourt denying the repeat a la 2003 :toast

Cry Havoc
03-11-2011, 02:05 AM
18 three pointers per game: Acceptable.

20 three pointers per game: ZOMG UR TEAM RELIES ON THE THREE.

Perhaps you guys would shoot a better % from downtown if you didn't see shit like this in the post-game:

http://i.imgur.com/r4CyB.jpg

cobbler
03-11-2011, 02:05 AM
Mavsfan as all of us didnt know cobbler is in the lakers rotation. He was in the 2009 finals rotation. Hes looking to repeat.
Spurs wont mind doing them justice at their homecourt denying the repeat a la 2003 :toast

Correction.... 3 peat. You know... that next step you take after your REPEAT. Oh wait... nevermind. My bad, sorry.:toast

cobbler
03-11-2011, 02:09 AM
18 three pointers per game: Acceptable.

20 three pointers per game: ZOMG UR TEAM RELIES ON THE THREE.

So are you saying 2 shots a game don't make a difference?

So tell me, of the three teams... Lakers, Spurs, Heat... number them in order who you think rely on the 3 more.

I have it at:

1- spurs
2- heat
3- lakers

Cry Havoc
03-11-2011, 02:12 AM
So are you saying 2 shots a game don't make a difference?

So tell me, of the three teams... Lakers, Spurs, Heat... number them in order who you think rely on the 3 more.

I have it at:

1- spurs
2- heat
3- lakers

2 shots a game doesn't make the difference between "fine", and "complete reliance to the extent that we would average 5 points per game if it wasn't for the 3 point arc" which Laker fans are clinging to.

The Spurs are better shooters than LA. Why wouldn't they use that weapon?

cobbler
03-11-2011, 02:16 AM
2 shots a game doesn't make the difference between "fine", and "complete reliance to the extent that we would average 5 points per game if it wasn't for the 3 point arc" which Laker fans are clinging to.

The Spurs are better shooters than LA. Why wouldn't they use that weapon?

Nevermind...

My comments stand and it's my opinion the spurs and heat rely more on the 3. I didnt say it wasnt because they shoot better its a fact they do and of course you would use that advantage. Thus my post that they rely on it. Not quite seeing the argument here.

Let me ask it this way. If you took the 3 pt line away. Which team would benefit most?

Chawaman
03-11-2011, 02:22 AM
Correction.... 3 peat. You know... that next step you take after your REPEAT. Oh wait... nevermind. My bad, sorry.:toast

I never know how a repeat felt tbqh, could be the fact that the spurs like other teams (although successfully) have beaten the lakers before playing 5 on 8.
FYI 8 is the extra three counting the refs

It could be argued that its 5 on 9 counting stern.

But hey important thing is lakers are going for their threepeat and the regular season doesnt matter and that kobe is still the black mamba/ 30% shooter. :sleep

cobbler
03-11-2011, 02:27 AM
I never know how a repeat felt tbqh, could be the fact that the spurs like other teams (although successfully) have beaten the lakers before playing 5 on 8.

FYI 8 is the extra three counting the refs
It could be argued that its 5 on 9 counting stern.

But hey important thing is lakers are going for their threepeat and the regular season doesnt matter and that kobe is still the black mamba/ 30% shooter. :sleep

I'm shocked!!!! Please explain. I don't really get what you are alluding to but am open to any enlightment you could possibly send my way.

Chawaman
03-11-2011, 02:34 AM
I'm shocked!!!! Please explain. I don't really get what you are alluding to but am open to any enlightment you could possibly send my way.

Basically saying that they get helped. Geez are you that illiterate to not understand what im saying? or would you like me to tell it to you plain and simple?
Here you go brah, Lakers get helped.
Hope that doesnt stain the Lakers image for you.

Harlem Preach
03-11-2011, 03:04 AM
i thought the refs were more than fair. more biased towards the lakers

cobbler
03-11-2011, 03:24 AM
Basically saying that they get helped. Geez are you that illiterate to not understand what im saying? or would you like me to tell it to you plain and simple?
Here you go brah, Lakers get helped.
Hope that doesnt stain the Lakers image for you.

But, and please excuse my lack of knowledge, I really don't get what you mean by "they get helped". I'd very much appreciate anything you can add that might expand on your comments for my poor sake. So far, you have clarified your "they get helped" with the much more plain and simple "Lakers get helped" and I appreciate that and all you know, stain included... but would love to hear more of your wisdom. Take your time...

z0sa
03-11-2011, 04:52 AM
I'm a joke and a bitch. Seriously

Damn, even worse than the Lakers.

baseline bum
03-11-2011, 06:42 AM
Laker fan only thinks officiating is fair when they shoot 30 more FTs than the other team.

cobbler
03-11-2011, 06:56 AM
Laker fan only thinks officiating is fair when they shoot 30 more FTs than the other team.

Nope. Lakerfan, just like any other real fan I imagine, just wishes for them to get it right and for the contest to be decided on the court by the players. Certainly there were a few questionable calls down the stretch that hurt the Lakers but its not why they lost. Had they played their game properly, as with any champion, they wouldnt be at risk should a ref get a call wrong in the waning moments.

By the way... you do know that the Lakers had one of the all time negative +/- differental for fouls and FT's during last years playoff run no?

LnGrrrR
03-11-2011, 07:46 AM
By the way... you do know that the Lakers had one of the all time negative +/- differental for fouls and FT's during last years playoff run no?

Except in the Finals. :lol

Koolaid_Man
03-11-2011, 08:16 AM
Seriously. What a joke.

we lost fair n square dazed... ( cough cough)


The refs not calling the obvious hack fouls by Wade on Kobe's arm is par for the course but I won't use that an an excuse...

The problem Miami has is that after losing to Chicago, the Heat will "witness" the Lakers beat Chicago for the 2011 title...:lol

stretch
03-11-2011, 11:26 AM
By the way... you do know that the Lakers had one of the all time negative +/- differental for fouls and FT's during last years playoff run no?

Maybe it had something to do with the fact that in every series they played one of the 10 best teams at getting to the FT line, in OKC (3rd), Utah (2nd), Phoenix (9th), and Boston (10th), while the Lakers were a team in the bottom half of the league at getting to the line?

Muser
03-11-2011, 11:27 AM
Maybe it had something to do with the fact that in every series they played one of the 10 best teams at getting to the FT line, in OKC (3rd), Utah (2nd), Phoenix (9th), and Boston (10th), while the Lakers were a team in the bottom half of the league at getting to the line?

Don't give lakerfan solid facts, that would be silly.

Michael Jackson...
03-11-2011, 11:30 AM
Nope. Lakerfan, just like any other real fan I imagine, just wishes for them to get it right and for the contest to be decided on the court by the players. Certainly there were a few questionable calls down the stretch that hurt the Lakers but its not why they lost. Had they played their game properly, as with any champion, they wouldnt be at risk should a ref get a call wrong in the waning moments.

By the way... you do know that the Lakers had one of the all time negative +/- differental for fouls and FT's during last years playoff run no?

Laker fan lives by the universal code of being delusional. It is the brotherhood way

Cry Havoc
03-11-2011, 11:30 AM
Maybe it had something to do with the fact that in every series they played one of the 10 best teams at getting to the FT line, in OKC (3rd), Utah (2nd), Phoenix (9th), and Boston (10th), while the Lakers were a team in the bottom half of the league at getting to the line?

:lmao Jumpshooting team tbh.

Giuseppe
03-11-2011, 11:32 AM
Laker fan lives by the universal code of being delusional. It is the brotherhood way

Three Back-to-Backs since the Century turned ain't delusional, daddy-O.

& you know what else? You know that.

tee, hee.

Chawaman
03-11-2011, 11:43 AM
But, and please excuse my lack of knowledge, I really don't get what you mean by "they get helped". I'd very much appreciate anything you can add that might expand on your comments for my poor sake. So far, you have clarified your "they get helped" with the much more plain and simple "Lakers get helped" and I appreciate that and all you know, stain included... but would love to hear more of your wisdom. Take your time...

Your dragging it out longer than what it should be.
Let it soak in. What would you like me to expand on? Simply put they get helped in winning the game. Fouls, trips to the free throw line. Etc.

Ashy Larry
03-11-2011, 11:54 AM
guess it was the refs who let a team who has no inside presence grab 18 offensive rebounds as well. Those damn refs gotta learn to box out. Refs didn't cost the Lakers that game. Poor, late execution and being out-rebounded was the key. Lamar Odom and Pau Gasol each had five rebounds. Mike Miller had seven with three of the offensive end. There's your ball game.

midnightpulp
03-11-2011, 12:12 PM
guess it was the refs who let a team who has no inside presence grab 18 offensive rebounds as well. Those damn refs gotta learn to box out. Refs didn't cost the Lakers that game. Poor, late execution and being out-rebounded was the key. Lamar Odom and Pau Gasol each had five rebounds. Mike Miller and seven with three of the offensive end. There's your ball game.

This is a man who stands on his own two feet.

Take notes, Culburn.

Giuseppe
03-11-2011, 12:16 PM
This is a man who stands on his own two feet.

Take notes, Culburn.

Please.

I stood first last night.

TampaDude
03-11-2011, 12:17 PM
Anyone who watched the 4th quarter of Game 7 of the Finals last year knows that Lakers fans have no room...NO FUCKING ROOM AT ALL...to whine about NBA officiating. :nope

Giuseppe
03-11-2011, 12:18 PM
Anyone who watched the 4th quarter of Game 7 of the Finals last year knows that Lakers fans have no room...NO FUCKING ROOM AT ALL...to whine about NBA officiating. :nope

Stung, didn't it?

tee, hee.

TampaDude
03-11-2011, 12:19 PM
Three Back-to-Backs since the Century turned ain't delusional, daddy-O.

& you know what else? You know that.

tee, hee.

Actually, it's only two. 2000 was the last year of the 20th Century. ;)

NRHector
03-11-2011, 12:21 PM
Please.

I stood first last night.that's true but you owe that man an apologyPERIOD

Giuseppe
03-11-2011, 12:21 PM
Actually, it's only two. 2000 was the last year of the 20th Century. ;)

We already had this conversation years ago.

It's 3 Back-to-Backs since the turn of the Century.

Giuseppe
03-11-2011, 12:21 PM
Nope. Ln pussied outPERIOD

TampaDude
03-11-2011, 12:23 PM
Stung, didn't it?

tee, hee.

Nope...the skunker did, though. :lol

TampaDude
03-11-2011, 12:23 PM
We already had this conversation years ago.

It's 3 Back-to-Backs since the turn of the Century.

2001-2002 and 2009-2010...that's two, not three. You fail at math. :lol

NRHector
03-11-2011, 12:25 PM
Nope. Ln pussied outPERIODyou owe that man an apologyPERIOD

cobbler
03-11-2011, 12:31 PM
2001-2002 and 2009-2010...that's two, not three. You fail at math. :lol

Ill take this for ya Cully...

1999- 2000 was the first
2000- 2001 is a back to back.
2001- 2002 is the 2nd of the back to backs that constute the 3peat

2009 - 2010 is a back to back.


That would be 3 times the Lakers have won back to back titles math genius!


edit: Ohhhh my bad, I didn't realize you were hanging your hat on the tried and true lame start of the decade or century argument.

TampaDude
03-11-2011, 12:38 PM
Ill take this for ya Cully...

1999- 2000 was the first
2000- 2001 is a back to back.
2002- 2003 is the 2nd of the back to backs that constute the 3peat

2009 - 2010 is a back to back.


That would be 3 times the Lakers have won back to back titles math genius!

It is a common misconception that the year 2000 is part of the 21st Century. It is not. 2000 is the last year of the 20th Century. So, if you're talking about back-to-backs "since the Century turned", the Lakers have TWO, not three. The 1999-2000 one doesn't count, because it occurred BEFORE the turn of the Century, which occurred at midnight on January 1, 2001.

Hmmm...this also means that the Lakers (and Kobe by inclusion) don't really have a threepeat in this century. :lol

Giuseppe
03-11-2011, 12:49 PM
We already had this conversation years ago.

It's 3 Back-to-Backs since the turn of the Century.

cobbler
03-11-2011, 12:50 PM
It is a common misconception that the year 2000 is part of the 21st Century. It is not. 2000 is the last year of the 20th Century. So, if you're talking about back-to-backs "since the Century turned", the Lakers have TWO, not three. The 1999-2000 one doesn't count, because it occurred BEFORE the turn of the Century, which occurred at midnight on January 1, 2001.

Hmmm...this also means that the Lakers (and Kobe by inclusion) don't really have a threepeat in this century. :lol

ohhh that so soils all the championships. I'm crushed. Kinda like when you think of never repeating.... in any century.

Ashy Larry
03-11-2011, 12:52 PM
ohhh that so soils all the championships. I'm crushed. Kinda like when you think of never repeating.... in any century.


San Antonio Heat 2005-2007 .... three-peat