Spurs Dangerously Close to Dropping Below .800 Winning Pct.

[Calispursfan11]

Discuss...

[benefactor]

Discuss what?

[Jt.ONE]

lol thread

[Ed Helicopter Jones]

If their winning percentage falls below .800 it will no longer be above .800. But if it happens to go below .800, well, then, we've got something there.



Anyone else care to add to this intense discussion?

[DesignatedT]

lol

[LakerHater]

Discuss what?
:rollin

[Spursone]

WOW, Last thing I heard we were in first place, So WHO CARES!:lmao

[honestfool84]

posters with less than 1,000 posts shouldn't be able to start threads.

/end discussion.

[Calispursfan11]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think they've been below the .800 threshold since the first couple of weeks of the season. Is this a foreshadowing of the future an omen of things to come? Numbers trigger my insecurities as a Spurs fan. I thought I was above this, but alas, I am not.

[Calispursfan11]

posters with less than 1,000 posts shouldn't be able to start threads.

/end discussion.

Thanks :king

[ElNono]

1/10... you can do better than that Carl...

[Rummpd]

Sigma x (X - 2 * 3/square root of phi x infinity - 1 = who really gives a damm?

[Calispursfan11]

It's one of those things Pop will say they don't care about but in the back of their minds they want to finish with more than 80% of their games won. They would have to win 66 games to do this. To me, if the Spurs win less than 66 games they are probably not gangbusters like they need to be. The .800 PCT is important to them as they have not relinquished it practically all season.

:flag:

[Bito Corleone]

posters with less than 1,000 posts shouldn't be able to start threads.
Semi agreed. I think a 6 month limitation before being being able to start thread would be better.

[spurs1990]

posters with less than 1,000 posts shouldn't be able to start threads.

/end discussion.

The OP's threads are as acute as SequSpur's, and the latter litters limitlessly.

Besides, if you want regulation thats what Spursreport is for.

[ElNono]

Correct me if I'm wrong

Corrected.

[Calispursfan11]

Sigma x (X - 2 * 3/square root of phi x infinity - 1 = who really gives a damm?

John Hollinger.

[Sean Cagney]

COME on bruh, who cares? Mavs had one in 07, Pistons around it in 06 I believe, what happened? NOTHING. I would hate to see this team win 65 plus games and lose in the earlier rounds, fuck record just get focused and get some wins and ready for the playoffs (If they drop a few more fine, it's expected). I am more worried about health than .800.

[Calispursfan11]

COME on bruh, who cares? Mavs had one in 07, Pistons around it in 06 I believe, what happened? NOTHING. I would hate to see this team win 65 plus games and lose in the earlier rounds, fuck record just get focused and get some wins and ready for the playoffs (If they drop a few more fine, it's expected). I am more worried about health than .800.

Killer cleavage shot bro. Love it!

[METALMiKE]

:cry

[4>0rings]

How bout them Cavs!

[Solid D]

In the 35 years that the San Antonio Spurs have been in the NBA, they are averaging 6 wins for every 10 games played.

As of this writing, the Spurs record over the 35-year span is 1710-1117 (.605). That equates to roughly 50 wins per 82-games.

[Sean Cagney]

Killer cleavage shot bro. Love it!

Oh yeah them tits make me smile everytime I look at them! Man that pic on that avi makes me forget about bball sometimes lol. I wish they would stay above .800 though and make it easily to the #1, hell I would take .700 the rest of the way or .600 lol, as long as they nab that #1 seed.

[Calispursfan11]

Oh yeah them tits make me smile everytime I look at them! Man that pic on that avi makes me forget about bball sometimes lol. I wish they would stay above .800 though and make it easily to the #1, hell I would take .700 the rest of the way or .600 lol, as long as they nab that #1 seed.

True dat!

[InRareForm]

unacceptable

[crc21209]

:lol Wow.....

[Calispursfan11]

unacceptable

Now that's more like it! Glad somebody in here can take a joke.

Oh, and thanks to the first couple LOLers. I think you guys got it too. Way to go!

[Calispursfan11]

1/10... you can do better than that Carl...

Your potato Darth is hilarious man!

[spurs1990]

In the 35 years that the San Antonio Spurs have been in the NBA, they are averaging 6 wins for every 10 games played.

As of this writing, the Spurs record over the 35-year span is 1710-1117 (.605). That equates to roughly 50 wins per 82-games.

This is really compelling because if you take out the Robinson/Duncan eras, the Spurs were still a winning organization their first 14 seasons.

Makes you wonder if the Spurs will ever be perenial losers over extended amount of seasons like every other franchise save for the Fake Show and Jazz.

[Calispursfan11]

This is really compelling because if you take out the Robinson/Duncan eras, the Spurs were still a winning organization their first 14 seasons.

Makes you wonder if the Spurs will ever be perenial losers over extended amount of seasons like every other franchise save for the Fake Show and Jazz.

As long as the Spurs FO remains the smartest in the business, they are likely to remain contenders regardless of draft position and other factors that would make normal teams rise or fall.

[Sean Cagney]

As long as the Spurs FO remains the smartest in the business, they are likely to remain contenders regardless of draft position and other factors that would make normal teams rise or fall.

yes sir...........

[Brazil]

I love the dangerously

[Calispursfan11]

I love the dangerously

LOL yeah. Most of the NBA champs have been below .800. Only 7 champs in the past 20 years were 66 or more wins. So falling below .800 isn't per se dangerous and in fact might work in your favor if you are the 67 win first round out Mavs.

:flag:

[romain.star]

HCA > .800

There's nothing else to discuss

[Mel_13]

http://www.greenbookblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/DangerWillRobinson.jpg

[Dex]

Oh dear :lol we are really toeing the line now.

V8rZWw9HE7o

[dbreiden83080]

Discuss...

Your an idiot

End discussion..

[bus driver]

Your an idiot

End discussion..

damn it :bang

discussion is over :depressed

[Ed Helicopter Jones]

Your an idiot

End discussion..

You're kidding me, right?

[Spurs and Mavs fan]

The OP makes it sound as if home-court advantage is determined by a .800 threshold, as opposed to comparing one's win-loss record against that of other teams.

[Calispursfan11]

The OP makes it sound as if home-court advantage is determined by a .800 threshold, as opposed to comparing one's win-loss record against that of other teams.

In case there is any confusion, the OP was making a joke about how silly caring about the .800 threshold really is. Its a play on the insecurity of Spurs fans who panic after every loss.

OK?

Cheers buddies!!! GO SPURS GO!

:toast

[Calispursfan11]

Your an idiot

End discussion..

Sense of humor much?

[Calispursfan11]

damn it :bang

discussion is over :depressed

That is the best signature yet, bro. I'm digging it! And no, the discussion isn't over until the fat lady sings. And she's not even warming up yet homey!

:lol

[DieHardSpursFan1537]

We're only the team with the best record in the league!