PDA

View Full Version : Favorite Trilogy



CubanSucks
04-08-2011, 04:08 PM
;)

BlackSwordsMan
04-08-2011, 04:13 PM
Can I say the matrix if I only liked part 1 and parts of 2?

BlackSwordsMan
04-08-2011, 04:13 PM
This counts as a trilogy que no? El Mariachi, Desperado, Once Upon a Time In Mexico

CubanSucks
04-08-2011, 04:16 PM
thats some gay ass shit. I was supposed to do a poll but it was only letting me use 2 options! It was gonna be a list with the trilogies The Man With No Name, The Godfather, Star Wars, Mad Max, Toy Story, The Matrix, and of course Lord of the Rings. But somehow there was an epic fail somewhere along the poll creating process :pctoss

BlackSwordsMan
04-08-2011, 04:16 PM
OH NOEZ the man with no name is pretty cool didn't like fistful of dollars, yojimbo is better

CubanSucks
04-08-2011, 04:29 PM
well..my "vote" is for Lord of the Rings..:depressed not that it matters without the poll..:depressed

Sisk
04-08-2011, 04:47 PM
http://www.lordoftheringsjewelry.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Lotr-gold.jpg

stretch
04-08-2011, 04:49 PM
Matrix, by far.

spurs_2108
04-08-2011, 04:50 PM
Harry Potter

Sisk
04-08-2011, 04:50 PM
http://flavorwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/iwm8piq02jtoio9fqmkolehto1_500.jpg

admiralsnackbar
04-08-2011, 04:52 PM
Evil Dead

crc21209
04-08-2011, 04:55 PM
If The Dark Knight Rises can even be half as good as The Dark Knight, I'll go with that triology of Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, and The Dark Knight Rises. Batman Begins was a pretty good movie, but people forget about because of how great The Dark Knight was.

stretch
04-08-2011, 04:57 PM
If The Dark Knight Rises can even be half as good as The Dark Knight, I'll go with that triology of Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, and The Dark Knight Rises. Batman Begins was a pretty good movie, but people forget about because of how great The Dark Knight was.

+1

Batman Begins was really good, and gets overlooked a lot

CubanSucks
04-08-2011, 05:07 PM
http://flavorwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/iwm8piq02jtoio9fqmkolehto1_500.jpg

there's sooo many things fucked up with that chart I don't even know where to start..holy hell..every time I look at it again..just, wow

BlackSwordsMan
04-08-2011, 05:31 PM
BTTF part 3 being on part with 2 is the only flaw I see IMO tbh

Mog
04-08-2011, 05:41 PM
I like those "Trinity" westerns. Do those count?

Strike
04-08-2011, 05:42 PM
http://flavorwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/iwm8piq02jtoio9fqmkolehto1_500.jpg

BTTF and StarTrek have been fixed. The other ones are pretty close.
http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d63/strike019/Fixed.jpg

SourCandy
04-08-2011, 05:45 PM
Lotr :)

ManuBalboa
04-08-2011, 05:59 PM
http://lordofthering.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/TomBombadil.png

Strike
04-08-2011, 06:15 PM
Lotr :)

Star Wars :downspin:

Lotr :vomit:

Thompson
04-08-2011, 06:20 PM
The chart looks pretty good to me, except I thought Back to the Future III was more accurate before the change (I thought it was pretty good), and Indiana Jones III was way better than II. And Spider-Man III is rated higher than it should be (it really sucked).

Strike
04-08-2011, 06:22 PM
The chart looks pretty good to me, except I thought Back to the Future III was more accurate before the change (I thought it was pretty good), and Indiana Jones III was way better than II. And Spider-Man III is rated higher than it should be (it really sucked).



Forgot to change the Indy graph before I posted it. Now I'm too lazy to go back and do it again. I'll agree, though. Last Crusade was much better in terms of quality but, for reasons I can't explain, Temple Of Doom is still my favorite.

And somehow I didn't notice the Spider Man graph. I would have taken all the blue out of each one if I had. Hated the entire trilogy.

Dex
04-08-2011, 06:26 PM
1. Star Wars (will always be THE trilogy)
2. LoTR
3. BTTF

I just realy watched BTTF III all the way through for the first the other day. I used to hate it because I'm not much for westerns in general, but it was better than I thought it would be. I and II are still superior tho imo. Everything in III felt tacked on, and that ending was way too hokey, but I guess it was the 80s.

SA210
04-08-2011, 07:19 PM
Karate Kid, Back to the Future, and I wish Young Guns were a trilogy :lol

CuckingFunt
04-08-2011, 07:26 PM
I may be the only one, but I also thought the third Jurassic Park film was miles better than The Lost World. Considering it was mostly assembled using moments and action sequences from the first book that didn't make it into the first movie, it at least felt a hell of a lot more true to the source material than Jeff Goldblum's black daughter using gymnastics to evade velociraptors.

baseline bum
04-08-2011, 07:35 PM
I like those "Trinity" westerns. Do those count?

LOL. Trinity is Still My Name has to be the most underrated comedy of all time.

IronMexican
04-08-2011, 07:40 PM
How are Rocky 2 and 3 rated the same? 2 is almost as good as 1.

baseline bum
04-08-2011, 07:44 PM
How are Rocky 2 and 3 rated the same? 2 is almost as good as 1.

The robot and the special moments between Rock and Apollo at the beach make 3 an instant classic tbh.

IronMexican
04-08-2011, 07:46 PM
I'll give you the ending. Rocky 3 had the greatest ending ever with that picture portrait of both of them aboot to clip each other.

CubanSucks
04-08-2011, 08:21 PM
The robot and the special moments between Rock and Apollo at the beach make 3 an instant classic tbh.

:lmao I thought the robot was just in the fourth. But no matter, instant classic

CubanSucks
04-08-2011, 08:30 PM
As for the Star Wars vs LotR schism, I wish some Star Wars homers would toss their childhood bias aside. Personally, I LOVE Star Wars but just happen to prefer LotR. I do believe however, that LotR is a better trilogy as a whole than Star Wars. I believe that Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers, Return of the King and then A New Hope, and The Empire Strikes Back are all pretty much perfect, while Return of the Jedi is just a really good movie

DMC
04-08-2011, 08:45 PM
Karate Kid, Back to the Future, and I wish Young Guns were a trilogy :lol

Had Charlie's character not been killed by Buffy and Jody's dad, they could do the 3rd installation now. I would watch it.

LotR. I saw every movie on it's opening night. Those are actually the only movies I've seen on opening night.

IronMexican
04-08-2011, 08:54 PM
I've never watched a Harry Potter movie or LotR. I want to watch LotR, but when each movie is like 3 hours long, hard to give it a chance. Same thing with the Godfather. Come the fuck at me.

jeebus
04-08-2011, 09:02 PM
LOTR, hands down. They were all great. Star Wars would've taken it had it not been for Return of the Jedi.

DMC
04-08-2011, 10:32 PM
I've never watched a Harry Potter movie or LotR. I want to watch LotR, but when each movie is like 3 hours long, hard to give it a chance. Same thing with the Godfather. Come the fuck at me.

You have to watch LotR. It's long, but unlike the Godfather, there's no long drawn out sleepy scenes. It's amazing cinematography and sound. It would make a good full day of viewing if you had a rainy day with nothing (or no one) else to do.

baseline bum
04-08-2011, 10:42 PM
How are Rocky 2 and 3 rated the same? 2 is almost as good as 1.

The job interview was the best part of 2.

resistanze
04-09-2011, 12:01 AM
I've never watched a Harry Potter movie or LotR. I want to watch LotR, but when each movie is like 3 hours long, hard to give it a chance. Same thing with the Godfather. Come the fuck at me.

Well I'm with you for the first two, never watched any Potter or LotR film.

But The Godfather? Fuck outta here, holmes.

IronMexican
04-09-2011, 12:11 AM
I think I did a little look in at the imdb top 250 a few months ago and I don't think I watched over 25 of the movies on the list.

B-Hath
04-09-2011, 12:12 AM
The Jason Bourne trilogy is one of the most solid. I would say that is the best, followed by LotR just because all 3 films in each trilogy were very good to excellent. There was no crap film to sully either trilogy.

TE
04-09-2011, 01:04 AM
Star Wars.

monosylab1k
04-09-2011, 01:15 AM
LOTR fucking blows. All 3 of them.

b0sc-gS9AqM

Sisk
04-09-2011, 01:23 AM
well i'm with you for the first two, never watched lotr film.

tf?

Sisk
04-09-2011, 01:23 AM
LOTR fucking blows. All 3 of them.

b0sc-gS9AqM

You got lakaluva right. You got this post dead wrong. Might have to call in to discuss this tbh.

monosylab1k
04-09-2011, 01:35 AM
You got lakaluva right. You got this post dead wrong. Might have to call in to discuss this tbh.

If I wanted to watch 18 hours of faggy midgets and Orlando Bloom, I'm sure there's some gay sex club in Hollywood that caters to exactly that.

DMC
04-09-2011, 01:54 AM
There are some scenes in LotR that are a bit homoerotic, like Sam and Frodo getting a bit too close, and Elijah Wood does look like he would suck the creme filling from a Twinkie before eating it.

CubanSucks
04-09-2011, 02:18 AM
There are some scenes in LotR that are a bit homoerotic, like Sam and Frodo getting a bit too close, and Elijah Wood does look like he would suck the creme filling from a Twinkie before eating it.

and C3PO doesn't act a little on the homorobotic side? (I'm clever). Not to mention the near incest with Luke and Leia


I know you weren't arguing with the side of Star Wars but that's usually the case

mojorizen7
04-09-2011, 04:48 AM
My favorites:

1)
Alien
Aliens
Alien3(underrated...watch the extended version)
----------------------------------
2)
Fistful of dollars
For a few dollars more
Good bad and the ugly
----------------------------------
3)
Star wars
Empire strikes back
return of the jedi
-----------------------------------
4)
Lord of the rings trilogy

sonic21
04-09-2011, 09:46 AM
The man with no name Trilogy

Spurminator
04-09-2011, 10:26 AM
If there was a 4th more or more, can you really consider it a trilogy? Would the first three Harry Potter movies be a trilogy?

Anyway, 3 Ninjas, for sure.

Wild Cobra
04-09-2011, 10:27 AM
When I think trilogy, I think of books. Not movies.

It's a tossup between The Pendragon Cycle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pendragon_Cycle) and the Dragonlance Chronicles (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Dragonlance_novels#The_Chronicles_Trilogy) .

CubanSucks
04-09-2011, 09:24 PM
If there was a 4th more or more, can you really consider it a trilogy? Would the first three Harry Potter movies be a trilogy?

Anyway, 3 Ninjas, for sure.

:tu I was thinking the same thing. Was the first 3 Bond movies a trilogy? A trilogy is something that ENDS after the third: destroying the ring in Mount Doom, defeating the evil empire, Michael Corleone dieing


Anyway, 3 Ninjas, for sure.

There's 4 '3 Ninjas' movies, but tbh either way it blows The Godfather out of the water and High Noon at Mega Mountain puts Return of the King to shame. The definition of captivating characters, story line, and special effects

kidding of course

LnGrrrR
04-09-2011, 09:30 PM
Double post!

LnGrrrR
04-09-2011, 09:30 PM
Star Wars, on the strength of ESB.

JMarkJohns
04-09-2011, 09:48 PM
No mention of Bourne?

First two are 9/10 or better. Third is a solid 8/10 offering.

resistanze
04-09-2011, 10:09 PM
No mention of Bourne?

First two are 9/10 or better. Third is a solid 8/10 offering.

+1. Only trilogy I own on Blu-Ray thus far.

jman3000
04-09-2011, 10:47 PM
If RoboCop 3 was anywhere near as good as 1 and 2 then I'd go with the RC trilogy... unfortunately it sucks so I'll go with the Mad Max trilogy as my personal favorite.

Same misfortune for the TMNT trilogy. I watched Secret of the Ooze so much as a child that I can probably quote most of the movie word for word to this day. Why did the 3rd one have to be such a piece of shit?

Spurminator
04-09-2011, 11:49 PM
There's 4 '3 Ninjas' movies, but tbh either way it blows The Godfather out of the water and High Noon at Mega Mountain puts Return of the King to shame. The definition of captivating characters, story line, and special effects

kidding of course

Everybody knows the fourth 3 Ninjas isn't canon. Real fans pretend that one never happened.

DMC
04-10-2011, 12:13 AM
No mention of Bourne?

First two are 9/10 or better. Third is a solid 8/10 offering.

I love this trilogy as well. It doesn't seem as much like a trilogy though because there was so much time between the first and 2nd installments.

Isn't Silence of the Lambs a trilogy, of sorts?

Spurminator
04-10-2011, 12:15 AM
The first three Omens might have held up if the third one hadn't been so terrible.

Sisk
04-10-2011, 12:23 AM
No mention of Bourne?

First two are 9/10 or better. Third is a solid 8/10 offering.

:tu

Good one.

CubanSucks
04-10-2011, 12:28 AM
Everybody knows the fourth 3 Ninjas isn't canon. Real fans pretend that one never happened.

I'll beg to differ. High Noon at Mega Mountain could easily be argued as the most iconic film of the 90s and it's influence on modern cinema can easily be seen today and in almost all Academy Best Picture winners

xellos88330
04-10-2011, 01:32 PM
I am torn between, LOTR, and Star Wars.

Wild Cobra
04-10-2011, 02:57 PM
remember that south park where cartman saw something so hilarious he broke his funny bone and lost the ability to laugh?

that just happened to me. thank shiva for emoticons. :lol
Sorry, I don't watch South Park. I stay away from raunchy stuff.

CuckingFunt
04-10-2011, 04:41 PM
Sorry, I don't watch South Park. I stay away from raunchy stuff.

Except for strippers.

Wild Cobra
04-10-2011, 05:14 PM
Except for strippers.
Some are, some aren't. Women can be raunchy without being exotic dancers.

Why do you think beautiful bodies are raunchy?

Do you hate your own body?

ManuBalboa
04-10-2011, 06:46 PM
The first 3 Ninjas was so good I have forever been too afraid to watch any of the ones after that. Rocky 5 almost ruined that series for me, and I always had that same feeling the other 3 Ninjas would do the same.

Kai
04-10-2011, 07:58 PM
Star Mother Fuckin Wars

ynh
04-11-2011, 03:26 AM
Naked Gun trilogy is one of my favs.

TheTruth
04-11-2011, 06:37 AM
The Bourne Trilogy

Muser
04-11-2011, 06:43 AM
Night/Dawn/Day of the dead.

And the Austin Powers trilogy. Goldmember wasn't as good as the first two but it wasn't bad.

leemajors
04-11-2011, 08:09 AM
The first three Omens might have held up if the third one hadn't been so terrible.

Sam Neill's best work imo, and the best ending.

CubanSucks
07-26-2012, 01:17 PM
In light of the new Batman trilogy...

stretch
07-26-2012, 01:25 PM
Batman > Star Wars >>>>>>>> LOTR

redzero
07-26-2012, 01:30 PM
TDK, Bourne, LOTR, Star Wars

The Gemini Method
07-26-2012, 01:33 PM
All the ones aforementioned would be worthy trilogies...but one I like and, well, it isn't a traditional trilogy but only the first 3 movies should be counted is Once Upon a Time in China.

CubanSucks
07-26-2012, 01:34 PM
Batman > Star Wars >>>>>>>> LOTR

So LotR is your third favorite trilogy?

stretch
07-26-2012, 01:36 PM
So LotR is your third favorite trilogy?

fuck no

Godfather

Bourne

Matrix

Indiana Jones

CubanSucks
07-26-2012, 01:37 PM
1. LotR
2. TDK
3. Man With No Name
4. first Star Wars (Return of the Jedi was nearly as goofy and ridiculous as the newer movies)
5. Indiana Jones

stretch
07-26-2012, 01:39 PM
im a jizz mopper

redzero
07-26-2012, 01:50 PM
Dollars Trilogy and Toy Story (lol) are also good choices.

Avante
07-26-2012, 01:55 PM
Ali vs Frazier

da_suns_fan
07-26-2012, 01:57 PM
Batman > Star Wars >>>>>>>> LOTR

:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao :lmao

What a douche.

da_suns_fan
07-26-2012, 02:09 PM
Nolanites are too busy slobbing Nolan's knob to realize his batman came off as a total DOUCHe:


vbgLapRAloQ

SVW6SH2bjYQ

cantthinkofanything
07-26-2012, 02:14 PM
The Bourne movies were pretty damn good.

CuckingFunt
07-26-2012, 02:15 PM
You have to watch LotR. It's long, but unlike the Godfather, there's no long drawn out sleepy scenes.

I missed this bit of comedy gold the first time through.

bus driver
07-26-2012, 02:16 PM
Star Wars


Star Trek is for homos

Reck
07-26-2012, 03:12 PM
The Matrix

Dont give a fukc what any of you think about the second or third film. All solid.

Proxy
07-26-2012, 03:28 PM
The Matrix

Dont give a fukc what any of you think about the second or third film. All solid.

There was a certain mood that the original captured that the other two didn't.

The concept was great for Revolutions and Reloaded... the execution was average. The ending for Neo was satisfying but the quality of directing and writing dropped off too much after the first one. The Matrix alone stands as one of the greatest sci-fi flicks ever but I see the sequels as fan service. The Animatrix was great too.

lefty
07-26-2012, 03:29 PM
Dark Knight trilogy of course

Proxy
07-26-2012, 03:39 PM
LOTR and Star Wars... their consistency is really satisfying. TDK afterwards... I go back and forth with Godfather since it drops in greatness with each sequel, but it's a really high ceiling to fall from with the first one so they usually just get compared to each other.

I haven't seen all of the Bourne movies so I can't say, but another one is coming out so does it become more of a Bond/Indiana Jones type of thing at this point?

1 LOTR
2 Star Wars
3 Godfather
4 TDK
5 ...

Frank Dux
07-26-2012, 03:49 PM
Look Who's Talking

Lincoln
07-26-2012, 04:55 PM
Toy story was the shit

Spursfan092120
07-26-2012, 05:27 PM
Either Rocky or Back to the Future.

Spursfan092120
07-26-2012, 05:27 PM
The Bourne movies were pretty damn good.

Dude..definitely Top 3 in my book. Great trilogy.

HI-FI
07-26-2012, 06:03 PM
I may be the only one, but I also thought the third Jurassic Park film was miles better than The Lost World. Considering it was mostly assembled using moments and action sequences from the first book that didn't make it into the first movie, it at least felt a hell of a lot more true to the source material than Jeff Goldblum's black daughter using gymnastics to evade velociraptors.

this +10000

Lost World was one of the most disappointing sequels. the second book was even better, so not sure how they fucked it up. seeing that black daughter knock down a velociraptor with gymastics was the moment I realized political correctness was the death of us all.

for me, trilogy wise
Star Wars (i've seen them the most)
THe Dark Knight trilogy
Back to the Future (probably the most underrated trilogy imho)
Indiana Jones (part 1 is a classic, part 2 is my favorite and one of the first prequels i recall, part 3 was a decent finish) though i guess it's not technically a trilogy anymore because of crystal skull.

CubanSucks
07-26-2012, 07:19 PM
I haven't seen all of the Bourne movies so I can't say, but another one is coming out so does it become more of a Bond/Indiana Jones type of thing at this point?

I wouldn't put Indiana Jones in that group just cause the fourth came out long after the other 3 and it was pretty much a bad joke in comparison


Either Rocky or Back to the Future.

How is Rocky a trilogy?

stretch
07-26-2012, 09:47 PM
The Matrix

Dont give a fukc what any of you think about the second or third film. All solid.

I agree.

There were flaws, but the depth of the story (which went beyond the movies, into comics and games and anime) is why I liked the Matrix so much.

stretch
07-26-2012, 09:49 PM
:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao :lmao

What a douche.

Shouldn't you be working on your grammar, faggot?

Rick Santorum
07-26-2012, 09:53 PM
Hey DSF-

After you get done capitalizing your O, wanna meet up so I can fuck you in the ass?

Axe Murderer
07-26-2012, 10:02 PM
Hey stretch

what's the difference between a jar of mayonnaise, pickle juice, and 10 feet of rope?

i don't know but i wanna finger your asshole

Girasuck
07-26-2012, 10:06 PM
I'm in the minority here but I'm a huge fan of the Ocean's trilogy. Thought Ocean's Thirteen was the best of the 3.

redzero
07-26-2012, 10:36 PM
The Matrix sequels fucked up by focusing too much on Zion. Nobody gave a fuck about Zion.

Spurtacus
07-26-2012, 10:50 PM
Tough, but this is probably my top 5.

Dark Knight
Man with No Name
LOTR
Toy Story
Back to the Future

mingus
07-26-2012, 11:00 PM
1. Star Wars
2. Nolan's Batman (will probably surpass Star Wars, which for now keeps its spot for nostalgia reasons)
3. Back to the Future
4. The Godfather (if the third one was just good, it would be number one)
5. Toy Story

stretch
07-26-2012, 11:23 PM
The Matrix sequels fucked up by focusing too much on Zion. Nobody gave a fuck about Zion.

Zion was actually such a small part of what really happened, that I don't get this. Do you mean that they showed a lot of the on-goings of Zion, when their efforts were practically for shit?

Basically the entire trilogy was about the Oracle breaking the "cycle" of the Matrix and "The One" by finding a way to manipulate machines, humans, and the matrix in a manner that would lead to a peaceful negotiation.

Texas_Ranger
07-27-2012, 08:47 AM
Star Wars
Dark Knight
LOTR
Evil Dead
Back to the Future
Toy Story

DUNCANownsKOBE
07-27-2012, 10:11 AM
I wouldn't put Indiana Jones in that group just cause the fourth came out long after the other 3 and it was pretty much a bad joke in comparison

Well by that logic Godfather isn't a trilogy since the 3rd one came out like 15 years after the 2nd one and was an abortion compared to the 1st two.

Venti Quattro
07-27-2012, 10:12 AM
:lmao Home Alone :lmao

jeebus
07-27-2012, 10:14 AM
The Scorpion King trilogy

CubanSucks
07-27-2012, 11:30 AM
Well by that logic Godfather isn't a trilogy since the 3rd one came out like 15 years after the 2nd one and was an abortion compared to the 1st two.

except there's 3 Godfather movies. It's not so much the shittyness of the fourth Indy movie as much as it is the fourth movie. If The Last Crusade was never made and the new shitty one was the third then I'd count it as part of a trilogy

da_suns_fan
07-27-2012, 11:43 AM
The idea that Nolan's batman films being mentioned in the same breath as Star Wars and the Godfather just shows how fucking clueless Nolanites were.

redzero
07-27-2012, 12:00 PM
The idea that Nolan's batman films being mentioned in the same breath as Star Wars and the Godfather just shows how fucking clueless Nolanites were.

You don't like Nolan. We get it. You can stop bitching about him now.

cantthinkofanything
07-27-2012, 01:49 PM
except there's 3 Godfather movies. It's not so much the shittyness of the fourth Indy movie as much as it is the fourth movie. If The Last Crusade was never made and the new shitty one was the third then I'd count it as part of a trilogy

How is the Hobbit going to affect the LOTR trilogy status? It'll be the 4th movie. A prequel but still a 4th movie by the same director.

Reck
07-27-2012, 02:03 PM
How is the Hobbit going to affect the LOTR trilogy status? It'll be the 4th movie. A prequel but still a 4th movie by the same director.

It shouldn't.

The Lord of the Rings were a 3 stand alone films.

The Hobbit, while connected to the Lord of the Rings has nothing to do with the actual plot of the said trilogy.

Besides, I've read that Peter Jackson intends to make the Hobbit a trilogy also.

cantthinkofanything
07-27-2012, 02:46 PM
It shouldn't.

The Lord of the Rings were a 3 stand alone films.

The Hobbit, while connected to the Lord of the Rings has nothing to do with the actual plot of the said trilogy.

Besides, I've read that Peter Jackson intends to make the Hobbit a trilogy also.

I think The Hobbit has as much to do with the Fellowship of the Ring as BB does to TDK.

da_suns_fan
07-27-2012, 03:42 PM
You don't like Nolan. We get it. You can stop bitching about him now.

The Sam Raimi Spiderman trilogy was also EXTREMELY successful in the last decade.

I dont see spiderman fans claiming it was the greatest movie trilogy of all time. :lol

You Nolanites are just plain bizzare. I saw Stretch go on and on about Tom Hardy's Baine performance. His use of his eye-brows and eyes and how he "grabbed his vest" in scenes when faced with adversity.

Do you guys know how fucking stupid you sound?

z0sa
07-27-2012, 03:42 PM
The Hobbit shouldn't even be a two part movie IMHO.

redzero
07-27-2012, 03:46 PM
The Sam Raimi Spiderman trilogy was also EXTREMELY successful in the last decade.

I dont see spiderman fans claiming it was the greatest movie trilogy of all time. :lol

You Nolanites are just plain bizzare. I saw Stretch go on and on about Tom Hardy's Baine performance. His use of his eye-brows and eyes and how he "grabbed his vest" in scenes when faced with adversity.

Do you guys know how fucking stupid you sound?

The Sam Raimi movies aren't as well regarded as the Nolan movies. Another stupid point by you.

Greg Oden
07-27-2012, 03:46 PM
da_suns_fan, goin against the grain, VC 2000 Dunk Contest reverse 360 windmill, you can't win a title with a PG as your best player goods per par etc.

da_suns_fan
07-27-2012, 03:47 PM
1) Star Wars Trilogy -- It changed film making.

2) LOTR - Single story over three films. Jackson is probably the best ever at blending CGI with real world special effects.

3) Godfather trilogy - Would be number one except the third film was terrible. The first two are two of the top five films of all time. Its like saying "whos the best trio in the NBA?" For a while, it was "Shaq, Kobe and whoever".

da_suns_fan
07-27-2012, 03:49 PM
The Sam Raimi movies aren't as well regarded as the Nolan movies. Another stupid point by you.

Rotten-Tomatoes:

Spiderman: 89%

Spiderman 2: 93%

Spiderman 3: 63%


Batman Begins:85 %

Dark Knight: 94%

Dark Knight Rises: 87%

redzero
07-27-2012, 03:54 PM
:lol Rotten Tomatoes as some definitive source of the public's perception of movies

Texas_Ranger
07-27-2012, 03:57 PM
I liked Spider-man 1 and 2, but comparing that trilogy to Dark Knight is just funny.

da_suns_fan
07-27-2012, 04:03 PM
:lol Rotten Tomatoes as some definitive source of the public's perception of movies

Its an aggregator of both professional critics and users so YES!

redzero
07-27-2012, 04:06 PM
It merely states whether people liked a movie or not. It doesn't show how much critics or fans like movies. If you want to see that, go to IMDB.

da_suns_fan
07-27-2012, 04:15 PM
It merely states whether people liked a movie or not. It doesn't show how much critics or fans like movies. If you want to see that, go to IMDB.

:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao :lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao :lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao

You didnt really just say that did you?

Thats EXACTLY what it shows. An aggregate of both FILM CRITICS and general users. You can view results by "Top critics", just regular viewers etc.


Youre not doing a good job, here. You just seriously embarrassed the shit out of yourself.

redzero
07-27-2012, 04:18 PM
:lmao I said the numbers didn't show HOW MUCH people enjoyed the movies, not that they didn't show whether people enjoyed the movies or not.

Why don't you post the IMDB ratings?

da_suns_fan
07-27-2012, 04:21 PM
:lmao I said the numbers didn't show HOW MUCH people enjoyed the movies, not that they didn't show whether people enjoyed the movies or not.

Why don't you post the IMDB ratings?

IMDB isnt deterministic. You wont understand what that is, but I'll tell you anyway.

redzero
07-27-2012, 04:25 PM
:lol Toy Story is better than Taxi Driver, because it has a better Rotten Tomatoes score.
:lol IMDB doesn't count because it doesn't help your argument.

da_suns_fan
07-27-2012, 04:30 PM
:lol Toy Story is better than Taxi Driver, because it has a better Rotten Tomatoes score.
:lol IMDB doesn't count because it doesn't help your argument.

IMDB doesnt count because its not deterministic.

I can vote one film an 8 and another and 8. Do I think one is better than the other?

I was a computer science major, so I dont expect you to understand. "The Social Network" briefly touched on this subject and whether a site is "Turing Complete" when Zuckerburg first made his website rating girls "hotness".

"Right or Left". Which one is hotter?

NOT rate a girl "1 to 10" like amihotornot.com. Thats not deterministic.

You should thank me for educating you.

redzero
07-27-2012, 04:33 PM
Do the majority of people think Toy Story is better than Taxi Driver?

da_suns_fan
07-27-2012, 04:36 PM
Do the majority of people think Toy Story is better than Taxi Driver?

I have no clue. Most people have never seen taxi driver.

redzero
07-27-2012, 04:38 PM
Do critics think Toy Story is better than Taxi Driver?

da_suns_fan
07-27-2012, 04:39 PM
Do critics think Toy Story is better than Taxi Driver?

Probably.

redzero
07-27-2012, 04:42 PM
:lmao taking stock in Rotten Tomatoes' fresh or rotten rating

CitizenDwayne
07-27-2012, 04:42 PM
As for imdb, there are 3 Nolan films now in the top 15. Above acknowledged classics like: Goodfellas, Star Wars: A New Hope, Seven Samurai, Once Upon a Time in the West, Psycho, Apocalypse Now, etc etc.

Both must be taken with a grain of salt, but RottenTomatoes is a better indicator of a film's overall reception, without the overwhelming influence of fanboys.

Saw The Dark Knight Rises the other day, and it was a hell of a movie, but the Nolan cult is just insane.

da_suns_fan
07-27-2012, 04:45 PM
As for imdb, there are 3 Nolan films now in the top 15. Above acknowledged classics like: Goodfellas, Star Wars: A New Hope, Seven Samurai, Once Upon a Time in the West, Psycho, Apocalypse Now, etc etc.

Both must be taken with a grain of salt, but RottenTomatoes is a better indicator of a film's overall reception, without the overwhelming influence of fanboys.

Saw The Dark Knight Rises the other day, and it was a hell of a movie, but the Nolan cult is just insane.

Very true.

Reck
07-27-2012, 04:59 PM
I think The Hobbit has as much to do with the Fellowship of the Ring as BB does to TDK.

Dont compare the Batman trilogy with the connection of The Hobbit to the Lord of the Rings trilogy. It doesn't make sense to.

The Batman movies are a continuous Trilogy that follow where the last one left off, while The Hobbit does not.

Reck
07-27-2012, 05:08 PM
The Hobbit shouldn't even be a two part movie IMHO.

Why not?

Plot wouldn't fit in just one movie.

Much like The Lord of the Rings, the story is too long.

I agree though that making The Hobbit into a trilogy is just milking it. But as long as it is well done, I see no problem with it being made into a 3 part movie.

CubanSucks
07-27-2012, 05:52 PM
How is the Hobbit going to affect the LOTR trilogy status? It'll be the 4th movie. A prequel but still a 4th movie by the same director.

It's a completely different book with a completely different protagonist



The Hobbit shouldn't even be a two part movie IMHO.

Why? Jackson is using other Tolkien material not from The Hobbit, he's not just stretching out stuff from one book into two movies. There's enough history and material that Tolkien made of Middle Earth to make plenty more than what Jackson's using. Tolkien pretty much made up his own world with its own complete history. It's actually pretty insane. Plus, even though making two movies will obviously make more money than one, Jackson's a legit fan. I completely trust him to stick to what Tolkien made


Why not?

Plot wouldn't fit in just one movie.

Much like The Lord of the Rings, the story is too long.

I agree though that making The Hobbit into a trilogy is just milking it. But as long as it is well done, I see no problem with it being made into a 3 part movie.

It's gonna be a 2 parter, not a trilogy. An Unexpected Journey and There and Back Again

Reck
07-27-2012, 06:05 PM
It's gonna be a 2 parter, not a trilogy. An Unexpected Journey and There and Back Again

For now.

Jackson has said he would like to make it a trilogy per Wiki.


The two parts, titled The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey and The Hobbit: There and Back Again,[5] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hobbit_%282012_film%29#cite_note-titles-4) were filmed back-to-back (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_to_back_film_production) in New Zealand (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Zealand) and are currently in post-production; principal photography (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_photography) began on 21 March 2011 and completed on 6 July 2012.[6] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hobbit_%282012_film%29#cite_note-filming-5) They are scheduled to be released on 14 December 2012 and 13 December 2013, respectively. Jackson appeared at Comic-Con (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Diego_Comic-Con_International), where he unveiled more information about the films.[5] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hobbit_%282012_film%29#cite_note-titles-4) He recently announced that he wishes to turn The Hobbit into a trilogy of films and that the possible third film is close to entering production

leemajors
07-27-2012, 06:21 PM
It's a completely different book with a completely different protagonist




Why? Jackson is using other Tolkien material not from The Hobbit, he's not just stretching out stuff from one book into two movies. There's enough history and material that Tolkien made of Middle Earth to make plenty more than what Jackson's using. Tolkien pretty much made up his own world with its own complete history. It's actually pretty insane. Plus, even though making two movies will obviously make more money than one, Jackson's a legit fan. I completely trust him to stick to what Tolkien made



It's gonna be a 2 parter, not a trilogy. An Unexpected Journey and There and Back Again

Not so fast:

http://www.iwatchstuff.com/2012/07/peter-jackson-probably-stretching-the-ho.php


Though The Hobbit's production was plagued with issues like director drop-outs, hobbit racism, union demands, and ulcer perforations, sources say an undeterred Jackson wants to devote even more of his life to shooting sweeping, dwarf-filled vistas. He reportedly wants to spend another couple months in New Zealand next summer to extend his two-part Hobbit adaptation into a full trilogy, turning his full Tolkien epic into a six-part series that is going to take all day to watch if you keep insisting on the director's cuts.

CubanSucks
07-27-2012, 07:01 PM
For now.

Jackson has said he would like to make it a trilogy per Wiki.


Not so fast:

http://www.iwatchstuff.com/2012/07/peter-jackson-probably-stretching-the-ho.php

:wow What. The. Fuck!!

I say wtf very enthusiastically! I don't know how I haven't heard about this. Like I just said, there's PLENTY of Tolkien material to work with. He could make more movies than there are Bond movies and still never drift away from Tolkien's material. This is also why I don't believe that Jackson will pull a George Lucas and start making mockeries of his previous films, because he doesn't have to come up with his own material. Plenty has been written, he just has to adapt it to the screen and he's obviously got that skill

btw, what's with the "hobbit racism" part?

Reck
07-27-2012, 07:18 PM
Something to do with the midget population maybe?

Otherwise I dont get it.

Dr. Gonzo
07-27-2012, 07:39 PM
Karate Kid

Dr. Gonzo
07-27-2012, 07:39 PM
The Danielsan Trilogy

Proxy
07-27-2012, 11:06 PM
Why not?

Plot wouldn't fit in just one movie.

Much like The Lord of the Rings, the story is too long.

I agree though that making The Hobbit into a trilogy is just milking it. But as long as it is well done, I see no problem with it being made into a 3 part movie.

It sucks that a great movie gets penalized in people's eyes because they lack the attention span to follow something that doesn't have a quick pace with one event following another in unrealistic fashion.

As an adaptation to the book, the story has every right to be split into several movies. This way we get as close as possible to the full effect of actually reading the book.

I can translate your argument to this: "Books are long and boring. Movies shouldn't be like that."

leemajors
07-28-2012, 12:23 AM
:wow What. The. Fuck!!

I say wtf very enthusiastically! I don't know how I haven't heard about this. Like I just said, there's PLENTY of Tolkien material to work with. He could make more movies than there are Bond movies and still never drift away from Tolkien's material. This is also why I don't believe that Jackson will pull a George Lucas and start making mockeries of his previous films, because he doesn't have to come up with his own material. Plenty has been written, he just has to adapt it to the screen and he's obviously got that skill

btw, what's with the "hobbit racism" part?

Not being diverse in their hobbit actor hiring

CubanSucks
07-28-2012, 01:11 AM
Not being diverse in their hobbit actor hiring

yeah, that was kind of rhetorical. I just roll my eyes to shit like that, especially considering Tolkien based Middle Earth on a sort of fantasy pre-history of Great Britain.

I read an article about how nobody really gave a shit about the all white casting for LotR because no one was certain it would even be a success, it was such a gamble of a movie. But now that everyone knows how profitable a Jackson/Tolkien movie will be everyone suddenly seems to care

da_suns_fan
09-04-2012, 11:28 PM
Grantland (Bill simmons) just did a "Best sequel ever" bracket.

Lots of LOTRans were upset by seedings but Empire Strikes back beat Godfather part II for best sequel of all time.

Im just glad Nolan fan boys didnt fuck it up.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=345858248835358&set=a.140352056052646.36610.102307106523808&type=3&theater

TimDunkem
09-05-2012, 02:06 AM
My favorites:

1)
Alien
Aliens
Alien3(underrated...watch the extended version)
----------------------------------
2)
Fistful of dollars
For a few dollars more
Good bad and the ugly
----------------------------------
3)
Star wars
Empire strikes back
return of the jedi
-----------------------------------
4)
Lord of the rings trilogy
Put the "Dollars" trilogy at the top and stick Star Wars at the bottom, and that would be my list.

Spurminator
09-05-2012, 10:10 AM
Godfather would be top of my list. Godfather III wasn't great, but I don't think it's terribly unwatchable either.

I also think Terminator 3 is better than it gets credit for.

redzero
09-05-2012, 10:31 AM
Terminator 3 is a disgrace.

stretch
09-05-2012, 10:44 AM
Grantland (Bill simmons) just did a "Best sequel ever" bracket.

Lots of LOTRans were upset by seedings but Empire Strikes back beat Godfather part II for best sequel of all time.

Im just glad Nolan fan boys didnt fuck it up.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=345858248835358&set=a.140352056052646.36610.102307106523808&type=3&theater

Which apparently is just more proof of the greatness of the Batman Trilogy... fanboys did not influence this poll as you suggest, yet TDK and TDKR both went far and only lost to the two movies in the finals, Empire Strikes Back and Godfather II. Further, these two Batman movies both came out in the last 4 years, while Empire and Godfather have been around for 30 years or so.

It would be interesting to do this poll in another 10-20 years, after the greatness of the Batman trilogy sets in a little more and gains the type of nostalgia that Empire and Godfather have gained.

CubanSucks
09-05-2012, 12:08 PM
get ready for a new challenger; The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, The Desolation of Smaug, and There and Back Again



Grantland (Bill simmons) just did a "Best sequel ever" bracket.

Lots of LOTRans were upset by seedings but Empire Strikes back beat Godfather part II for best sequel of all time.

how the fuck are the 2 LOTR sequels 6 and 8 seeds? Return of the King as an 8 seed is a fucking joke. hurrrrrrrr the ending was too long!! Ok, true, but the 3 1/2 hours before that is the most action packed, intricate, character filled movie of all time. I'm ok with it losing to movies like Empire Strikes Back and Godfather 2 because at some point you get into that God-tier territory and the differences are trivial, but the seedings are fucking retarded


Terminator 3 is a disgrace.

:lmao love the sig, except Walt should be Finn and Jesse should be Jake