Nbadan
04-15-2011, 01:42 AM
Why isn't the M$M perusing the Sarah Palin non-birther issue with the same vigor that it reports the Obama Birther issue? there is a academic paper by a professor that seems to confirm that Sarah Palin is Trigs grandmother and that Palin pulled a 9 month pregnancy hoax on the M$M...
Professor Bradford Scharlott of Northern Kentucky University has looked into this story in detail and written a long academic article about it. He concludes two things:
First, that the "conspiracy theory" is likely true--Sarah Palin staged a huge hoax, and, second,
The American media is pathetic for not pursuing the story more aggressively
Scharlott's article walks through all the evidence supporting the theory, including the photos of Palin in what is said to have been a late-stage pregnancy, the leisurely 20-hour trip home that Palin took after she supposedly went into labor in Texas, the refusal of the hospital where Trig was supposedly born to even confirm that he was born there (let alone who was the mother), strange statements from Palin's doctor and the McCain campaign, and so on.
And Scharlott concludes that, given that this hoax would be a massive fraud perpetrated on the entire country by a vice-presidential candidate, the media absolutely should have pursued the story more aggressively.
Because the mainstream media did not--and has not--pursued the story at all (let alone aggressively), Professor Scharlott has done some of the work himself. He has also attempted to explain why the media was so wimpy and gullible during the campaign.
business Insider (http://www.businessinsider.com/sarah-palin-baby-hoax-2011-4#ixzz1JVCo59kq)
Story has legs....Bristol was out of school for 3-5 months with 'mono'
Let's take a look a Palin's pregnancy decision road map
http://i378.photobucket.com/albums/oo225/tanyev/Photos/sarahpalinla4.png
Sarah! Show us the birth certificate!!
Professor Bradford Scharlott of Northern Kentucky University has looked into this story in detail and written a long academic article about it. He concludes two things:
First, that the "conspiracy theory" is likely true--Sarah Palin staged a huge hoax, and, second,
The American media is pathetic for not pursuing the story more aggressively
Scharlott's article walks through all the evidence supporting the theory, including the photos of Palin in what is said to have been a late-stage pregnancy, the leisurely 20-hour trip home that Palin took after she supposedly went into labor in Texas, the refusal of the hospital where Trig was supposedly born to even confirm that he was born there (let alone who was the mother), strange statements from Palin's doctor and the McCain campaign, and so on.
And Scharlott concludes that, given that this hoax would be a massive fraud perpetrated on the entire country by a vice-presidential candidate, the media absolutely should have pursued the story more aggressively.
Because the mainstream media did not--and has not--pursued the story at all (let alone aggressively), Professor Scharlott has done some of the work himself. He has also attempted to explain why the media was so wimpy and gullible during the campaign.
business Insider (http://www.businessinsider.com/sarah-palin-baby-hoax-2011-4#ixzz1JVCo59kq)
Story has legs....Bristol was out of school for 3-5 months with 'mono'
Let's take a look a Palin's pregnancy decision road map
http://i378.photobucket.com/albums/oo225/tanyev/Photos/sarahpalinla4.png
Sarah! Show us the birth certificate!!