Bachman says she doesn't judge gays...she just hates them.

[JohnnyMarzetti]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/44136510#44136510

I guess she's submissive to her husbands insane view of gays as well. Yeah, she has a real chance. :lol

[George Gervin's Afro]

I really hope that she or perry win the nomination..guranteed obama second term

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

:lol every time I've seen one of these radical Republican candidates on Meet the Press David Gregory has torn them to shreds and nailed their remains to the tree of woe

[JoeChalupa]

:lol every time I've seen one of these radical Republican candidates on Meet the Press David Gregory has torn them to shreds and nailed their remains to the tree of woe

Yeah, David Gregory did a fine job but she still danced around the question.

[TeyshaBlue]

I really hope that she or perry win the nomination..guranteed obama second term

I dunno, GGA. Bachman wouldn't stand a chance, but Perry's a credible threat. He, in his current political guise, is connecting with what is arguably, a very strong voter base.

[Spurminator]

I can't believe how many of you are underestimating Perry.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

Yeah, David Gregory did a fine job but she still danced around the question.
And in the process looked like a giant idiot.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

I really hope that she or perry win the nomination..guranteed obama second term
Bachmann yes, Perry not so much.

[ChumpDumper]

lol bondage

[Oh, Gee!!]

as long as perry doesn't do something stupid like ask palin or bachmann to be vp, he has a legitimate chance.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

lol bondage
:lmao wow now we know why Wild Chodebrah likes her so much

[boutons_deux]

"a very strong voter base."

independents and others are fleeing tea bagger support, and people who identify themselves as tea baggers are way down

Most the country won't fall for Jimmy Ricky's "Christian" extemism and pandering to "religious" issues.

I don't see Perry's base, outside of the ignorant bubbas and "Christians", being that broad.

[Oh, Gee!!]

perry's going to run closer to the middle during the general election. he'll have the conservative vote, and we'll see if he can appeal to the moderates.

[101A]

I really hope that she or perry win the nomination..guranteed obama second term


Because the 1st is going so well.......

Yeah TEAM!!!

[Stringer_Bell]

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/06/16/246618/bachmann-craziest-quotes/ - Top 10 Bachmann quotes

http://thinkprogress.org/yglesias/2011/08/15/295427/295427/ - Top 10 Rick Perry Ideas

Let's go Obama!!! Gimme dat free Obama money, honey!

[4>0rings]

lol @ Barny getting a 2nd term



















:lmao

[DMX7]

I watched that interview. She definitely got her ass nailed to the tree of woe.

[Wild Cobra]

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/06/16/246618/bachmann-craziest-quotes/ - Top 10 Bachmann quotes

http://thinkprogress.org/yglesias/2011/08/15/295427/295427/ - Top 10 Rick Perry Ideas

Let's go Obama!!! Gimme dat free Obama money, honey!
Do any of them compare to "My Islamic faith" and "57 states," when there are 57 Islamic states?

[coyotes_geek]

as long as perry doesn't do something stupid like ask palin or bachmann to be vp, he has a legitimate chance.

You can be sure that Perry won't be stupid enough to say he hates gays. I doubt Perry even says the word "gays" at all during the campaign. It will all be about "defending marriage", but not "gays".

[DMX7]

Do any of them compare to "My Islamic faith" and "57 states," when there are 57 Islamic states?

Weak sauce. You know you have no argument when you have to go back to that trivial misspeak. The different between that and Bachman is that Bachman has been asked to clarify her bullshit multiple times and she always stands by it.

She even stands by this:
"The Founding Fathers who wrote the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence worked tirelessly to end slavery."

http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/06/bachmann-stands-by-claims-that-founding-fathers-ended-slavery/

[Wild Cobra]

Weak sauce. You know you have no argument when you have to go back to that trivial misspeak. The different between that and Bachman is that Bachman has been asked to clearify her bullshit multiple times and she always stands by it.

She even stands by this:
"The Founding Fathers who wrote the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence worked tirelessly to end slavery."

http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/06/bachmann-stands-by-claims-that-founding-fathers-ended-slavery/
It all depends on the truth behind it.

Just because our Foundling fathers had slaves doesn't mean they agreed with slavery. I think we can assume they kept slaves knowing they were treated well, than have them sold to someone else who might not treat then so well.

[clambake]

It all depends on the truth behind it.

Just because our Foundling fathers had slaves doesn't mean they agreed with slavery. I think we can assume they kept slaves knowing they were treated well, than have them sold to someone else who might not treat then so well.

lol

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

Just because our Foundling fathers had slaves doesn't mean they agreed with slavery.
:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao :lmao

[DMX7]

It all depends on the truth behind it.

Just because our Foundling fathers had slaves doesn't mean they agreed with slavery. I think we can assume they kept slaves knowing they were treated well, than have them sold to someone else who might not treat then so well.

:rollin

I knew you were going to give me a gem of a response. Thanks for laugh.

[ElNono]

http://www.straferight.com/photopost/data/500/medium/double-facepalm.jpg

[DMX7]

... and seriously. I think you've missed the whole point of slavery. "Treating them well" has nothing to do with the fact that they were slaves (i.e., people who were the property of and wholly subject to another).

[Wild Cobra]

:rollin

I knew you were going to give me a gem of a response. Thanks for laugh.
You're welcome.

Sorry so many people don't understand the concept I present.

[Wild Cobra]

... and seriously. I think you've missed the whole point of slavery. "Treating them well" has nothing to do with the fact that they were slaves (i.e., people who were the property of and wholly subject to another).
Yes, I understand that concept.

Sorry you don't understand my reasoning.

[ElNono]

Everybody understands your idiocy clearly. Lack of understanding has nothing to do with it.

[ChumpDumper]

Just because our Foundling fathers had slaves doesn't mean they agreed with slavery.As surely as the sun rises in the east....

[MaNuMaNiAc]

It all depends on the truth behind it.

Just because our Foundling fathers had slaves doesn't mean they agreed with slavery. I think we can assume they kept slaves knowing they were treated well, than have them sold to someone else who might not treat then so well.

Seriously?

[ElNono]

Interesting profile on Bachman

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/08/15/110815fa_fact_lizza?currentPage=all

[Wild Cobra]

Interesting profile on Bachman

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/08/15/110815fa_fact_lizza?currentPage=all
From the New Yorker?

Why should I waste my time?

[ElNono]

From the New Yorker?
Why should I waste my time?

There's value in having a look through both sides. It's unfortunate you haven't figured it out yet.

[Wild Cobra]

There's value in having a look through both sides. It's unfortunate you haven't figured it out yet.
Aren't you one that has a similar viewpoint to some things I link?

[ElNono]

Aren't you one that has a similar viewpoint to some things I link?

Sure. It never stopped me from reading what you link. I might not agree with it, but that doesn't mean I don't look at it.

[Wild Cobra]

Sure. It never stopped me from reading what you link. I might not agree with it, but that doesn't mean I don't look at it.
Well, I admit to the bias of not wanting to read articles from a partisan magazine that routinely lies.

[ChumpDumper]

Well, I admit to the bias of not wanting to read articles from a partisan magazine that routinely lies.OK, find us something in that article that is a lie.

[ElNono]

Well, I admit to the bias of not wanting to read articles from a partisan magazine that routinely lies.

Of course you think it lies, even though you didn't read it.
That's completely logical

[Blake]

Just because our Foundling fathers had slaves doesn't mean they agreed with slavery.

par for the lol course


I think we can assume they kept slaves knowing they were treated well, than have them sold to someone else who might not treat then so well.

setting them free was apparently not an option in the good ol days

[LnGrrrR]

Guys, just because WC says stupid things on here doesn't mean he's stupid.

In the same vein, just because a person slaps his wife, doesn't mean he supports wife-beating. He just knows that a wife needs a firm hand and strong guidance in order to produce the very best sandwich she's capable of making. A slap is just one of the tools in a husband's toolbox.

[Wild Cobra]

setting them free was apparently not an option in the good ol days
Consider this.

Is it better for a domesticated animal to live with people, or be set free.

Now please... I am not comparing slaves to animals. My point is that other whites, only accept them as slave. Freed in that time means no way to survive.

Where would they live? What would they do?

[ElNono]

Is it better for a domesticated animal to live with people, or be set free.

Now please... I am not comparing slaves to animals.

http://musformation.com/pics/SRSLY.jpg

:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao

[DMX7]

Sorry you don't understand my reasoning.

Please explain your reasoning then, lol. Even if I took seriously your wildly laughable claim that the founding fathers may not have agreed with slavery (even though they used slaves), it still doesn't corroborate Bachman's claim that the founding fathers actually "worked tirelessly to end slavery."

[CuckingFunt]

Consider this.

Is it better for a domesticated animal to live with people, or be set free.

Now please... I am not comparing slaves to animals.

I am not comparing slaves to domesticated animals, merely suggesting they're analogous.

[LnGrrrR]

Now please... I am not comparing slaves to animals. My point is that other whites, only accept them as slave. Freed in that time means no way to survive.

I guess they could have just freed them, and then negotiated some sort of contract whereby the slave was doing whatever they were doing as a slave, and being compensated in the same way.

You know, kinda like a job, but without that whole, "having to do it because you're owned by another person" stipulation.

[LnGrrrR]

Of course, we won't even bring up the fact that there WERE free black people in America (though not numerous), because that would torpedo his "no other choice" strawman.

[Blake]

Consider this.

Is it better for a domesticated animal to live with people, or be set free.

Now please... I am not comparing slaves to animals. My point is that other whites, only accept them as slave. Freed in that time means no way to survive.

Where would they live? What would they do?

cosigned

the Confederacy