PDA

View Full Version : Al Sharpton



BRHornet45
08-23-2011, 01:17 AM
vilxHFJfgOc

SnakeBoy
08-23-2011, 02:10 AM
The problem is blacks give their vote away for nothing. The dems know they don't need to do anything to get it and the Republicans know they won't get it no matter what they do.

They need to view their vote like it's pussy. Give it to the Republicans one time and they'll do anything to get more of it. And the dems will do anything to get it back.

DUNCANownsKOBE
08-23-2011, 09:22 AM
They gave their vote to the Republicans in 2008 when they voted for Obama

Al Sharpton
08-23-2011, 10:51 AM
Unless you all are black and have walked in my shoes you can just STFU.

DMX7
08-23-2011, 11:00 AM
I got chills.

Nbadan
08-24-2011, 07:38 PM
Al Sharpton speaks for Al Sharpton....who elected him the black voice of America? .....oh, that's right, the M$M....

LnGrrrR
08-24-2011, 07:43 PM
The problem is blacks give their vote away for nothing. The dems know they don't need to do anything to get it and the Republicans know they won't get it no matter what they do.

They need to view their vote like it's pussy. Give it to the Republicans one time and they'll do anything to get more of it. And the dems will do anything to get it back.

This has a kernel of truth to it, but instead of "blacks", you could just substitute "hardcore liberals". Dems routinely shit all over their base, and get away with it.

Nbadan
08-24-2011, 07:48 PM
Dems ultimately do what's best for the country, while wing-nuts could give a fuck....take the recent budget battle for example....the dems compromised on raising taxes while wing-nuts would have let the government default on its obligations over something that was going to be an inevitability anyway...

DarrinS
08-24-2011, 07:59 PM
I wonder what it is they want Obama to do, specifically, to address the "black agenda"?

DarrinS
08-24-2011, 08:02 PM
This has a kernel of truth to it, but instead of "blacks", you could just substitute "hardcore liberals". Dems routinely shit all over their base, and get away with it.

Kernel of truth? 96% of them vote for anyone with a (D.) after their name. They are the most monolithic voting block in our society.

Nbadan
08-24-2011, 08:04 PM
Kernel of truth? 96% of them vote for anyone with a (D.) after their name. They are the most monolithic voting block in our society.

Next to rural Texans you mean

:lol

DarrinS
08-24-2011, 08:04 PM
Dems ultimately do what's best for the country, while wing-nuts could give a fuck....take the recent budget battle for example....the dems compromised on raising taxes while wing-nuts would have let the government default on its obligations over something that was going to be an inevitability anyway...

Dems could've raised taxes and debt ceiling when they had supermajority. Quit being naive you little twoofer.

DarrinS
08-24-2011, 08:06 PM
Next to rural Texans you mean

:lol

You have data to support that, right?

ChumpDumper
08-24-2011, 09:18 PM
Dems could've raised taxes and debt ceiling when they had supermajority. Quit being naive you little twoofer.They did raise it then. Quit being ignorant, you little birther.

ChuckD
08-24-2011, 10:30 PM
The problem is blacks give their vote away for nothing. The dems know they don't need to do anything to get it and the Republicans know they won't get it no matter what they do.

They need to view their vote like it's pussy. Give it to the Republicans one time and they'll do anything to get more of it. And the dems will do anything to get it back.

They are just the other side of the Religious Fundamentalist voter coin. The RF voters are equally locked in, and equally unrewarded.

Borat Sagyidev
08-25-2011, 08:39 AM
Kernel of truth? 96% of them vote for anyone with a (D.) after their name. They are the most monolithic voting block in our society.


Next to rural Texans you mean

:lol


At the very least you can talk to most black people who vote Democrat and exchange opinions.

exchange opinions with A black conservative? HELL no
A rural Texan...hell no

it's out of the question unless you agree with them and they get all uppity angry

You might as well talk with a dining room table.

DMX7
08-25-2011, 12:28 PM
You have data to support that, right?

lol, from the guy who just pulled that 96% figure right out of his ass.

ElNono
08-25-2011, 12:32 PM
Dems could've raised taxes and debt ceiling when they had supermajority.

When did the Dems had supermajority?

DarrinS
08-25-2011, 03:14 PM
When did the Dems had supermajority?

When they controlled house and senate. Not all that long ago, tbh.

DarrinS
08-25-2011, 03:18 PM
lol, from the guy who just pulled that 96% figure right out of his ass.

My bad.

Only 95%.

http://pewresearch.org/assets/publications/1023-2.gif

Wild Cobra
08-25-2011, 04:53 PM
When they controlled house and senate. Not all that long ago, tbh.
Darrin, it wasn't a supermajority, and we are lucky for that.

A supermajority would be 2/3rds the House and 2/3rds the Senate.

boutons_deux
08-25-2011, 04:57 PM
"When they controlled house and senate"

You Lie. The DINO Blue Dog Senators voted against nearly everything Dem.

DarrinS
08-25-2011, 05:24 PM
Dems got 60 seats in the senate with Al Franken, and subsequently lost it with Scott Brown.

jack sommerset
08-25-2011, 05:28 PM
repugs have zero shot at changing the black percentage vote for barry. all they can do is hope more black voters are busy electon day. regardless, barry is done.

Wild Cobra
08-25-2011, 06:33 PM
all they can do is hope more black voters are busy electon day. regardless, barry is done.
Or stop with their racial bias.

ElNono
08-25-2011, 06:36 PM
http://pewresearch.org/assets/publications/1023-2.gif

Not sure that applies today, tbh.

ElNono
08-25-2011, 06:37 PM
When they controlled house and senate. Not all that long ago, tbh.

That's not a supermajority. A supermajority can override presidential veto.

ElNono
08-25-2011, 06:40 PM
Dems got 60 seats in the senate with Al Franken, and subsequently lost it with Scott Brown.

That only avoided filibusters on the senate.