Obama's Legacy: A Failed Recovery & Double-Dip Recession

[ducks]

http://news.yahoo.com/obamas-legacy-failed-recovery-double-dip-recession-052627528.html
NOPE NOT CNN OR FOXNEWS LINK

[ChumpDumper]

lol a Forbes link

[DMX7]

Oh god, you're a fucking idiot, ducks. Did you even bother to look at the source?

Not that you read financial magazines or have a clue who Steve Forbes is anyway...

[DarrinS]

I cant argue with the content, so I must criticize the source. Lol

[ElNono]

I could argue with the content, but it wouldn't be much different than what we argue around here.

[boutons_deux]

Anybody could see it coming 2 years ago.

Repugs push pro-cyclical strategy (deepen, lengthen the Banksters' Great Depression, cause as much pain to as many millions as possible), limit (eg, stimulus) and block everything, deny any Barry/Dem successes, then blame the entire inherited Repug mess on Barry and the Dems. It's all bad faith, all lies, treasonous anti-Human-Americanism

ducks sucks cocks.

[Spurminator]

lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman lol Krugman

[DarrinS]

Lol Krugman (an individual) is right, because the policies he advocates are epic fails wherever they are implemented (imposed).

[ElNono]

epic fail... reminds me of trickle down

[Spurminator]

Lol Krugman (an individual) is right, because the policies he advocates are epic fails wherever they are implemented (imposed).

Oh, okay, you're totally not a hypocrite then.

[ChumpDumper]

I wouldn't describe myself as skinny tbh.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

wise man once say dett trickle down theory is the equivalent of giving bigzak 100 breakfast tacos and expecting sustenance to trickle down to skinny stnaders by like Jekka and/or Chumpumper
:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao

[RandomGuy]

I cant argue with the content, so I must criticize the source. Lol


DarrinS:
[INDENT]First illogical statement (illogical because it assumes the premise):
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4668799&postcount=58
Second illogical statement (ad hominem)
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4670471&postcount=237
Third illogical statement (ad hominem)
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4671143&postcount=275
Fourth illogical statement (strawman)
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4671237&postcount=278
Fifth illogical statement (appeal to popularity)
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4672034&postcount=286
Sixth illogical statement (strawman)
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4672682&postcount=323
Seventh illogical statement (slippery slope)
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4672707&postcount=332
Eighth illogical statement (ad hominem):
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4673385&postcount=389
Ninth illogical statement (ad hominem)
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4672868&postcount=364
Tenth illogical statement (strawman)
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4810380&postcount=563
Eleventh illogical statement (strawman)
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4820172&postcount=643
Twelfth illogical statement (strawman)
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4822005&postcount=713

[DarrinS]

RG still attached to my sack.

[ElNono]

RG still attached to my sack.


I cant argue with the content, so I must criticize the source. Lol

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

^:lmao

[RandomGuy]

Originally Posted by DarrinS

RG still attached to my sack.


Originally Posted by DarrinS

I cant argue with the content, so I must criticize the source. Lol



If the defintion of "attached to Darrins sack" is anyone who points out his hypocrisy, welcome to the club, fellow sackmate. :toast

:rollin

[RandomGuy]

Darrin, I hate to be busting your balls like this, but why do you so continually and habitually say things without considering their inherent logical consistancy?

I know I have pointed out the logical traps you have fallen into so often, so you must have some idea as to how to improve your thinking to not be quite so flawed. I am just puzzled as to why you haven't seemed to put forth the slightest effort to improve yourself.

[clambake]

you're talking about a guy that spent years telling the same adolescent lie.