CROFL Samsung: never learn, still copying Apple

[lefty]

:lmao WOW just wow

http://cdn.iphoneincanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Samsung_shop.png

http://cdn.iphoneincanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/samsung_charger1.png


http://www.iphoneincanada.ca/iphone-news/this-samsung-usb-ac-adapter-is-a-carbon-copy-of-the-iphone-pics/

http://www.iphoneincanada.ca/iphone-news/samsung-displays-ios-icons-on-its-wall-at-a-samsung-store/

[Drachen]

what are the arrows pointing to?

[lefty]

what are the arrows pointing to?
Apple icons (app store, Safari)

[resistanze]

lol, Samsung doesn't even have an app store so not sure why that's there. Realistically it probably is leftovers from some other Apple event, doesn't make sense.

End of the day, I really don't give a shit about Apple suing Samsung and vice versa, let the corporations sort that out. I'm the end-user - just gimme the fucking product! This BB storm is killing me.

btw...

In a photo (shown below) of Samsung’s shop-in-a-shop in Italy’s Centro Sicilia
LMAO Italy.

[Creepn]

Yup never getting another BB ever.

[Creepn]

Apple should've kept their shit in America. No sympathy from me.

[DMX7]

Apple isn't the only company Samsung copies. They've been copying Sony products for years.

[lefty]

btw...

LMAO Italy.
:lmao

[Drachen]

Apple isn't the only company Samsung copies. They've been copying Sony products for years.

Lol, Sony uses Samsung LCDs in their TVs

[DMC]

The Koreans and the Chinese are reverse engineering masters. They don't invent a fucking thing. They copy and rebrand it.

That said, I own 2 Samsung LCD/LED televisions and 4 Samsung LED monitors.

I don't own any Sony products.

[Nathan Explosion]

I have a Sony LCD tv. Great picture. But those Samsung LED TVs, wow. Just amazing. As for the Apple v Samsung legal battles, that's overseas and who cares. I like both of their phones and hope to own a Galaxy S II phone in addition to my iPhone.

[Cry Havoc]

kJEHp15Hoo0

Yep. Samsung just copying Apple, 2 years before Apple creates the technology. :lol

[ElNono]

Samsung was building Apple's CPUs not long ago. Not sure what that has to do with the blatant copying of icons on the OP though.

[Drachen]

Samsung was building Apple's CPUs not long ago. Not sure what that has to do with the blatant copying of icons on the OP though.

That was apparently in a store, not Samsung's choice of decoration

[ElNono]

That was apparently in a store, not Samsung's choice of decoration

Not really. It says Samsung's store in a store. If anything, they have to be more careful what they lend their logos and trademark for.

[Viva Las Espuelas]

who cares, really.

[ElNono]

who cares, really.

That too

[Viva Las Espuelas]

i just like shit stirring :D

[lefty]

http://www.blogcdn.com//media/2011/09/voice-samsung-cjr.jpghttp://www.blogcdn.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2011/09/samsung-copying-cjr.jpg

[ElNono]

Samsung Lawyer Fails To Differentiate iPad and Galaxy Tab In Court (http://apple.slashdot.org/story/11/10/14/2051219/samsung-lawyer-fails-to-differentiate-ipad-and-galaxy-tab-in-court)

Several readers sent in a story that's sure to be embarrassing for Samsung. The company has been involved in a drawn-out patent dispute with Apple over similarities between the Galaxy Tab and the iPad. Today, during a court session, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh held up both objects and asked one of Samsung's attorneys whether she could identify which was which. The attorney replied, "Not at this distance, your honor. (http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/14/us-apple-samsung-lawsuit-idUSTRE79C79C20111014)" The distance was roughly 10 feet. The judge then quizzed the rest of Samsung's lawyers. After a brief hesitation, one of them was able to correctly identify the Galaxy Tab.


-----


:lol

[resistanze]

:lol

[resistanze]

All they had to do is look for the Samsung logo, tbh. To be fair, they probably wouldn't be able to differentiate between the Xoom, Sony S Tablet, and Asus Eee Transformer either.

[lefty]

Samsung Lawyer Fails To Differentiate iPad and Galaxy Tab In Court (http://apple.slashdot.org/story/11/10/14/2051219/samsung-lawyer-fails-to-differentiate-ipad-and-galaxy-tab-in-court)

Several readers sent in a story that's sure to be embarrassing for Samsung. The company has been involved in a drawn-out patent dispute with Apple over similarities between the Galaxy Tab and the iPad. Today, during a court session, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh held up both objects and asked one of Samsung's attorneys whether she could identify which was which. The attorney replied, "Not at this distance, your honor. (http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/14/us-apple-samsung-lawsuit-idUSTRE79C79C20111014)" The distance was roughly 10 feet. The judge then quizzed the rest of Samsung's lawyers. After a brief hesitation, one of them was able to correctly identify the Galaxy Tab.


-----


:lol.



:lmao

[TheMACHINE]

Eee pad shits on all other tablets

[TDMVPDPOY]

samsung copying apple when it comes to peripherals for their products, nothing wrong about that

i though they were tryin to make all cables universal for cross over of each product, cause ppl didnt need that many cables for their products and wanted to end waste management

[leemajors]

i wonder if MACHINE still loves that eee pad

lol samsung:

http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/29/itc-document-recommends-samsung-post-88-percent-value-bond/


If you're keeping track of the multiple, and let's face it, tiresome Samsung / Apple patent debacle, a document that just turned up at the ITC might spell more trouble for the Korean manufacturer. It's a publicly redacted version of Judge Pender's recommendations, and pertains to the October ruling that deemed Samsung borrowed four of Cupertino's designs. The most iconic being design patent D618,678 (that which you see above). The others include multi-touch patent 7,479,949 (which was tentatively invalidated) along with two other patents (RE41,922 and 7,912,501) relating to graphic display elements and audio hardware detection. If the recommendations are adopted -- and FOSS Patents suggests this is entirely possible -- Samsung could face a US import ban after a 60 day presidential review, an order prohibiting "significant" sales of infringing products in America along with a posting a bond for 88 percent of the entered value of mobile phones (plus 32.5 percent for media players and 37.6 percent for tablets) that include the breaching design features. Pender has, however, reportedly cleared several Samsung "designarounds" which, if implemented to satisfaction, would mean the tech giant could continue trading. For now though, the recommendations are awaiting the Commission's review.