Nbadan
06-16-2005, 02:31 AM
Why the tough talk from the WH? Why, it can't be because the GOP is looking for a honorable exit strategy from Karl Rove over W's proposed Social Security privatization plan, now can it?
Exit Strategy on Social Security Is Sought
GOP Leaders Cite an Impasse With Democrats on Proposed Private Accounts
By Jonathan Weisman and Jim VandeHei
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, June 16, 2005; Page A09
With the Senate Finance Committee at an impasse on Social Security and House leaders anxious about moving forward, Republican congressional leaders have told the White House in recent days that it is time to look for an escape route.
Hey W, here's an exit strategy...
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/gen/resources/watergate/nixon.farewell.jpg
Senate GOP leaders, in discussions with White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove and political officials, have made it clear they are stuck in a deep rut and suggested it is time for an exit strategy, according to a senior Senate Republican official and Finance Committee aides.
Democrats are united in their opposition, and the Finance Committee does not have the Republican votes to approve a Social Security plan that would divert some payroll taxes to private investment accounts. But the committee, which has jurisdiction over the issue, also does not have the votes to pass a plan that would preserve Social Security's solvency without the personal accounts because too many GOP conservatives want them.
President Bush has responded by dispensing his cautious calls for bipartisanship in favor of far tougher rhetoric that blames the Democrats for the stalemate. "On issue after issue, they stand for nothing except obstruction," Bush said at a GOP fundraiser Tuesday night. "And this is not leadership. It is the philosophy of the stop sign, the agenda of the roadblock."
Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/15/AR2005061502300.html)
Now that's funny, when the GOP wanted to vote in its extremists Judges and pass its corporate-friendly prescription drug plan they could care less about bi-partisanship and playing nice, but now that W doesn't have the party votes to push along his partial privatization plan its all about the Democratic obstructionists.
Exit Strategy on Social Security Is Sought
GOP Leaders Cite an Impasse With Democrats on Proposed Private Accounts
By Jonathan Weisman and Jim VandeHei
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, June 16, 2005; Page A09
With the Senate Finance Committee at an impasse on Social Security and House leaders anxious about moving forward, Republican congressional leaders have told the White House in recent days that it is time to look for an escape route.
Hey W, here's an exit strategy...
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/gen/resources/watergate/nixon.farewell.jpg
Senate GOP leaders, in discussions with White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove and political officials, have made it clear they are stuck in a deep rut and suggested it is time for an exit strategy, according to a senior Senate Republican official and Finance Committee aides.
Democrats are united in their opposition, and the Finance Committee does not have the Republican votes to approve a Social Security plan that would divert some payroll taxes to private investment accounts. But the committee, which has jurisdiction over the issue, also does not have the votes to pass a plan that would preserve Social Security's solvency without the personal accounts because too many GOP conservatives want them.
President Bush has responded by dispensing his cautious calls for bipartisanship in favor of far tougher rhetoric that blames the Democrats for the stalemate. "On issue after issue, they stand for nothing except obstruction," Bush said at a GOP fundraiser Tuesday night. "And this is not leadership. It is the philosophy of the stop sign, the agenda of the roadblock."
Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/15/AR2005061502300.html)
Now that's funny, when the GOP wanted to vote in its extremists Judges and pass its corporate-friendly prescription drug plan they could care less about bi-partisanship and playing nice, but now that W doesn't have the party votes to push along his partial privatization plan its all about the Democratic obstructionists.