Will this season be an asterisk? [Archive]

Koolaid_Man

11-26-2011, 08:15 AM

They're not gonna win, but it would be interesting to see laker fan rationalise a shortened season title after years of * talk.

there's nothing interesting about it...Koolaid has already spoken on this topic. 99 was truly as asstrick...I meant asterisk since it was the first lockout and no one was prepared for it. Now I've changed things up a bit. If your team has previously won multiple titles then it won't be considered asterisk. However, if your team has 1 title or less then YES it is an asterisk.

I know...I know Cully....I'm a pussy and an asshole. :lol

Jodelo

11-26-2011, 08:31 AM

I'm a pussy and an asshole.

Yep!

Seventyniner

11-26-2011, 10:07 AM

As long as there's a full-length playoffs, no asterisk.

DeadlyDynasty

11-26-2011, 10:19 AM

As long as there's a full-length playoffs, no asterisk.

That's just retarded

dbreiden83080

11-26-2011, 11:48 AM

Kobe has a bad knee and Phil Jackson is not coaching anymore

The season already doesn't count..

21_Blessings

11-26-2011, 12:27 PM

Any championship during the zone era where you don't repeat should be accompanied with a big fat loser asterisk.

Koolaid_Man

11-26-2011, 12:39 PM

Any championship during the zone era where you don't repeat should be accompanied with a big fat loser asterisk.

works for me :lmao:lmao:lmao

Nathan89

11-26-2011, 12:56 PM

Any championship where you spend 10 mil over the tax should have a asterisk.

Leetonidas

11-26-2011, 12:59 PM

If the Lakers win, yes

Axe Murderer

11-26-2011, 01:01 PM

tbh i think any team that won a title only to get swept in the playoffs a year later, should have the previous title vacated

Koolaid_Man

11-26-2011, 01:03 PM

tbh i think any team that won a title only to get swept in the playoffs a year later, should have the previous title vacated

what if they went back to back :lol

DeadlyDynasty

11-26-2011, 01:13 PM

Any championship where you spend 10 mil over the tax should have a asterisk.

Its not our fault your team is jewish in free agency

Bill_Brasky

11-26-2011, 02:10 PM

Only ringless faggots and jealous pussies push asterisks.

DMC

11-26-2011, 02:26 PM

I believe it will be unless the Lakers win it, then it would be a legit championship imho
LOSERS: Lakers fans

One nice thing about rooting for the Lakers has long been knowing that the team would spend whatever it would take to be competitive. Now that’ll be harder.

DMC

11-26-2011, 02:29 PM

Any championship during the zone era where you don't repeat should be accompanied with a big fat loser asterisk.

lol looking for exclusivity.

What next, any championship that didn't have at least one game in LA?

DMC

11-26-2011, 02:30 PM

That's just retarded
Regular season doesn't matter though, right? Don't y'all have that playoff switch?

pass1st

11-26-2011, 02:54 PM

LOSERS: Lakers fans

One nice thing about rooting for the Lakers has long been knowing that the team would spend whatever it would take to be competitive. Now that’ll be harder.

Other teams like NYK spend in the same way, but what made LAL come on top was simply the best FO in the league.

DMC

11-26-2011, 03:05 PM

Other teams like NYK spend in the same way, but what made LAL come on top was simply the best FO in the league.

Tell these guys:

http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/32302/the-winners-and-losers-of-a-new-cba

LOSERS: Lakers fans

WINNERS: The Knicks

WINNERS: Fans of the Spurs, Heat, Magic and Mavericks

I've been telling you that Laker fans are losers. Now ESPN just confirmed it.

pass1st

11-26-2011, 03:30 PM

So whatever espn says is a fact? What a world we live in.

DMC

11-26-2011, 03:44 PM

so whatever phil jackson says is a fact? What a world we live in.
fify

pass1st

11-26-2011, 03:45 PM

If you support what Phil says, you support the 1999 asterisk

DMC

11-26-2011, 03:49 PM

If you support what Phil says, you support the 1999 asterisk
You started the thread about the asterisk.

You're a shitty troll.

ezau

11-26-2011, 11:44 PM

Swept by the Mavs

Giuseppe

11-26-2011, 11:44 PM

ezau

11-26-2011, 11:51 PM

I smell skunk

Giuseppe

11-26-2011, 11:52 PM

^After The Skunker & 8 it's no damn wonder.

pass1st

11-27-2011, 12:13 AM

You started the thread about the asterisk.

You're a shitty troll.

I wasn't trolling, I was asking an honest opinion. You accepted 1999 to be an asterisk, I'm not sure if I agree with you, but you made that apparent by taking what Jackson says as fact.

I just wanted to have the community to give their educated opinion about whether or not the title this year deserves an asterisk. I don't believe I have ever directly stated something was or was not an asterisk, but left subtle messages for you to interpret however best aids your attempts to troll me.

I'm playing chess, you're playing checkers.

BRHornet45

11-27-2011, 12:16 AM

of course it will. 16 games will be left off the schedule and the players haven't been preparing for the season like they should. there are multiple reasons, but those are the main two.

pass1st

11-27-2011, 12:23 AM

Real talk, BR.

Are you done with Sue Bird?

BRHornet45

11-27-2011, 12:26 AM

Real talk, BR.

Are you done with Sue Bird?

lol is that a joke?

LakerHater

11-27-2011, 12:38 AM

Swept by the Mavs
Yup... 0

mavsfan1000

11-27-2011, 12:42 AM

Almost. 66 is better than 52 which is the only real asterisk.

pass1st

11-27-2011, 12:55 AM

lol is that a joke?

She's not in your sig, I assumed you moved on

BRHornet45

11-27-2011, 12:59 AM

son I got love for Mo Isom too

DMC

11-27-2011, 01:05 AM

I wasn't trolling, I was asking an honest opinion. You accepted 1999 to be an asterisk, I'm not sure if I agree with you, but you made that apparent by taking what Jackson says as fact.

I didn't accept anything of the sort.

You said this:

So whatever espn says is a fact? What a world we live in.

Yet the entire premise of this thread is that a shortened season deserves an asterisk. The only reason you even mention it is because Phil Jackson said it.

You cannot use double standards with me. I will call you on it every time.

And yes, it's a shitty troll.

I just wanted to have the community to give their educated opinion about whether or not the title this year deserves an asterisk. I don't believe I have ever directly stated something was or was not an asterisk, but left subtle messages for you to interpret however best aids your attempts to troll me.
Right, because shortened seasons deserve asterisks.

Shitty troll. You expend a lot of energy to look like someone who just popped in wanting basketball talk.

You already blew your wad with this weak ass shit? lol

I'm playing chess, you're playing checkers.No, I nailed your ass already.

You weren't even a challenge tbh.... flat ass bitch.

DMC

11-27-2011, 01:09 AM

Almost. 66 is better than 52 which is the only real asterisk.
The only real asterisk is that puckered hole between your flabby ass cheeks that gets pounded on a regular basis.

mavsfan1000

11-27-2011, 01:11 AM

The only real asterisk is that puckered hole between your flabby ass cheeks that gets pounded on a regular basis.
lol Can't take a joke.

ezau

11-27-2011, 01:13 AM

^after the skunker & 8 it's no damn wonder.

swept

DMC

11-27-2011, 01:15 AM

lol Can't take a joke.
Yours is the only asterisk Culby would do...

pass1st

11-27-2011, 02:08 AM

I didn't accept anything of the sort.

You said this:

Yet the entire premise of this thread is that a shortened season deserves an asterisk. The only reason you even mention it is because Phil Jackson said it.

You cannot use double standards with me. I will call you on it every time.

And yes, it's a shitty troll.
Right, because shortened seasons deserve asterisks.

Shitty troll. You expend a lot of energy to look like someone who just popped in wanting basketball talk.

You already blew your wad with this weak ass shit? lol
No, I nailed your ass already.

You weren't even a challenge tbh.... flat ass bitch.

I never really mentioned Phil Jackson, I just brought up asterisks to stir the pot. It doesn't take a genius to take in OP and see I was fucking around, but that nuance kind of went over your head.

You decided to try and root out some sort of irrationality in what I was saying, but while doing so you were oblivious to the lack of rational I used in the first place. In essence, you were trying to find a bottle of wine in a winery.

Shortened version: I was fucking with you in a very obvious fashion, but you continued to bite. Not really trolling on my part since you were digging your own hole :wakeup

Giuseppe

11-27-2011, 04:05 AM

Yours is the only asterisk Culby would do...

...no. DoK's is my favorite.

hehateme

11-27-2011, 10:06 AM

...no. DoK's is my favorite.

bet that shit puckers up fast whenever you take him anywhere near a military base...must make for a good time

DUNCANownsKOBE

11-27-2011, 10:11 AM

bet that shit puckers up fast whenever you take him anywhere near a military base...must make for a good time
:lmao talking about me in a thread I haven't posted in
:lmao still butthurt over me speaking da troof about the military

Giuseppe

11-27-2011, 10:17 AM

bet that shit puckers up fast whenever you take him anywhere near a military base...must make for a good time

:lmao:lmao:lmao

Giuseppe

11-27-2011, 10:18 AM

:lmao talking about me in a thread I haven't posted in
:lmao still butthurt over me speaking da troof about the military

Tell him about how the players were going to shove it to the owners.

tee, hee.

DUNCANownsKOBE

11-27-2011, 10:20 AM

I said there'd be no hard salary cap. I was right.

You were however wrong about the 2011 Suns.

Giuseppe

11-27-2011, 10:22 AM

I said there'd be no hard salary cap. I was right.

You were however wrong about the 2011 Suns.

You said the players would win another one over the owners.

2+ billion dollars over a 10 year CBA + a complete restructuring of the system ain't the players winning.

You said it. You're livin' with it.

Let us proceed...

DUNCANownsKOBE

11-27-2011, 10:23 AM

Find where I said that.

All I said was the owners wouldn't get what they wanted (a hard salary cap). I was right.

You said the 2011 Suns were gonna make the finals. You were wrong.

Giuseppe

11-27-2011, 10:30 AM

Find where I said that.

All I said was the owners wouldn't get what they wanted (a hard salary cap). I was right.

You said the 2011 Suns were gonna make the finals. You were wrong.

You said the players would win big time over the owners. You guaranteed it.

I wish you were right, but, now that the players gave away over $2 billion and a restructured system I have your chute/poop style as solace.

Let us proceed...

DUNCANownsKOBE

11-27-2011, 10:32 AM

find the post where I said that

you made me find the post where you said you were picking the 2011 Suns to win the Western Conference, I'm asking the same

Giuseppe

11-27-2011, 10:34 AM

find the post where I said that

you made me find the post where you said you were picking the 2011 Suns to win the Western Conference, I'm asking the same

I don't do that.

You said the players would win big time. You guaranteed it. The players got their ass handed to them. You're livin' with it.

Let us proceed...

DUNCANownsKOBE

11-27-2011, 10:34 AM

You have no proof I said that.

Let us proceed...

Giuseppe

11-27-2011, 10:38 AM

You have no proof I said that.

Let us proceed...

I'm a trend setter.

I set trends.

& daddy, you said it. & sweetheart, you're livin' it.

DUNCANownsKOBE

11-27-2011, 10:39 AM

Innocent until proven guilty.

You have however been proven guilty of picking the 2011 Suns to win the Western Conference.

Giuseppe

11-27-2011, 10:41 AM

Innocent until proven guilty.

You have however been proven guilty of picking the 2011 Suns to win the Western Conference.

I read it. You said it. And that's just the way it's gonna be.

You said the players would beat the owners without a problem.

$2 billion later and a restruturing of the system says you don't know shit from apple butter.

Let us proceed...

DUNCANownsKOBE

11-27-2011, 10:45 AM

I said the players would avoid a hard salary cap no problem.

Giuseppe

11-27-2011, 10:48 AM

I said the players would avoid a hard salary cap no problem.

You said the players would dominate the owners, win the CBA negotiations.

$2 billion & a new structure later you don't know shit from apple butter, lover.

Let us proceed...

DMC

11-27-2011, 12:17 PM

I never really mentioned Phil Jackson, I just brought up asterisks to stir the pot. It doesn't take a genius to take in OP and see I was fucking around, but that nuance kind of went over your head.

You decided to try and root out some sort of irrationality in what I was saying, but while doing so you were oblivious to the lack of rational I used in the first place. In essence, you were trying to find a bottle of wine in a winery.

Shortened version: I was fucking with you in a very obvious fashion, but you continued to bite. Not really trolling on my part since you were digging your own hole :wakeup

Tell me more.