View Full Version : Santorum: Birth control ‘harmful to women’
elbamba
02-15-2012, 03:34 PM
Yesterday I speculated on some of the reasons Rick Santorum has problems with women voters. This interview from 2006 sure isn’t going to help.
Video
For starters, does he realize that married women (men too!) use birth control? The impression that Santorum finds the prevalent practice of birth control “harmful to women” is, frankly, mind-numbing. If he meant to focus on teen sexual promiscuity, he surely could have, and thereby might have sounded less out of touch.
Now, he qualifies his religious views by saying he doesn’t vote against contraception “because it’s not the taking of a human life” (in other contexts he has emphasized that as a legal matter he has no problem with contraception). But how does that square with his professed belief that a candidate’s values are essential to understanding and predicting his behavior? Perhaps that’s an abortion-only rule. (And really, where are George Stephanopoulos’s questions on this topic when you need them?)
In any event, this sort of thing undermines Santorum’s electability argument. (Current polling match-ups between President Obama and each of the two frontrunners, before the GOP has a nominee and before Santorum’s record is out there, are virtually useless.) This is how, in part, he lost Pennsylvania — by appearing extreme and schoolmarmish, too far to the right of average voters in a purple state. If he is the nominee in 2012, he might get some blue-collar fellows, but what about those women in Ohio, Pennsylvania, etc.? And what about more secularized suburban communities? Fuggedaboutit.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/santorum-birth-control-harms-women/2012/02/15/gIQASRukFR_blog.html
elbamba
02-15-2012, 03:36 PM
I don't see how this guy will get women to vote for him. Its the same issue with Newt. If Republicans want to have a chance, they will need single women to vote R in November. I'm not so sure Romney can get their vote either. But he seems to have less controvertial positions on birth control.
DarrinS
02-15-2012, 03:50 PM
The pill IS bad for women, especially if they smoke too.
DarrinS
02-15-2012, 03:51 PM
Are women afraid he is going to outlaw birth control?
:lmao
Wild Cobra
02-15-2012, 04:13 PM
The pill IS bad for women, especially if they smoke too.
It's especially bad for a fetus when it doesn't work right.
ElNono
02-15-2012, 04:15 PM
Are women afraid he is going to outlaw birth control?
:lmao
Do you think it's out of the realm of possibilities he would propose something like that?
I don't think it would pass Congress though. The deeper question is how much time are we going to waste on contraceptive policies should he be at the helm?
Viva Las Espuelas
02-15-2012, 04:22 PM
Do you think it's out of the realm of possibilities he would propose something like that?
Uh, yes.
Viva Las Espuelas
02-15-2012, 04:24 PM
I don't understand why he's being labeled someone that "hates" or has "problems" with women.
Wild Cobra
02-15-2012, 04:26 PM
I don't understand why he's being labeled someone that "hates" or has "problems" with women.
Playing the sexist card. That's all it is. Liberals have numerous bigot cards stacked in their decks. You should know that by now.
leemajors
02-15-2012, 04:36 PM
Playing the sexist card. That's all it is. Liberals have numerous bigot cards stacked in their decks. You should know that by now.
His position on same sex marriage easily lands him in the bigot bin.
Wild Cobra
02-15-2012, 04:37 PM
His position on same sex marriage easily lands him in the bigot bin.
Depends on why. I am one who believes marriage should remain traditional. Is tradition bigotry?
leemajors
02-15-2012, 04:42 PM
Depends on why. I am one who believes marriage should remain traditional. Is tradition bigotry?
It doesn't depend on why. If the tradition is to exclude people from a silly, legally binding agreement simply based on their sexual orientation, then it is bigotry.
TDMVPDPOY
02-15-2012, 04:44 PM
the problem with birth control, will the govt take care of the child if the parents cant take care of them?
TeyshaBlue
02-15-2012, 04:44 PM
Depends on why. I am one who believes marriage should remain traditional. Is tradition bigotry?
Slave owners held a similar view....just sayin'.
DarrinS
02-15-2012, 04:51 PM
His position on same sex marriage easily lands him in the bigot bin.
You mean, the same position held by the majority in California?
Wild Cobra
02-15-2012, 04:54 PM
Slave owners held a similar view....just sayin'.
Some did. Most actually believed them inferior.
If slavery were around today, how many people might own slaves just to give some slaves a better life than they would have under a different master? Not all slave owners were bad, or bigots. Would you agree?
TeyshaBlue
02-15-2012, 04:56 PM
Certainly not all. Only fools paint in absolutes.
leemajors
02-15-2012, 04:58 PM
Why would a "good" person want to own and control another?
ElNono
02-15-2012, 04:59 PM
Uh, yes.
I don't. That said, I don't think it would necessarily fly.
ElNono
02-15-2012, 04:59 PM
Why would a "good" person want to own and control another?
duh, to give them a better life!
DarrinS
02-15-2012, 04:59 PM
LOL @ slavery comparison.
Viva Las Espuelas
02-15-2012, 05:01 PM
His position on same sex marriage easily lands him in the bigot bin.
Its the same general stance our President has............
boutons_deux
02-15-2012, 05:04 PM
InSaneTorum is against all forms of birth control, exactly like the hard-core Catholic Church position, chemical and mechanical, which is guaranteed to cause 100Ks more unwanted births and abortions.
TX's Repug war on contraception means TX's annual 80K abortions will probably jump to 100K.
DarrinS
02-15-2012, 05:05 PM
Its the same general stance our President has............
Doh!
Viva Las Espuelas
02-15-2012, 05:06 PM
I don't. That said, I don't think it would necessarily fly.
Ha. Your second sentence pretty much is laughing at your first sentence, but as long as you think he would. Pfffff
TeyshaBlue
02-15-2012, 05:07 PM
LOL @ slavery comparison.
When dealing with issues of bigotry or predjudice, you have a better text?
Thought so.:rolleyes
Viva Las Espuelas
02-15-2012, 05:07 PM
Doh!
I can see the Google smoking from here.
ElNono
02-15-2012, 05:10 PM
Ha. Your second sentence pretty much is laughing at your first sentence, but as long as you think he would. Pfffff
If I take the man at his word, banning pills like Plan B is a priority.
It's no different than Barry asking Congress to send him a variety of bills to sign (despite that Congress would never agree or pass them).
baseline bum
02-15-2012, 05:29 PM
Depends on why. I am one who believes marriage should remain traditional. Is tradition bigotry?
Never figured you as a mormon.
Blake
02-15-2012, 05:43 PM
Depends on why. I am one who believes marriage should remain traditional. Is tradition bigotry?
At least this time you are coming right out with your Appeal to Tradition fallacy.
baseline bum
02-15-2012, 05:45 PM
I think we should nail Christians to the cross for tradition's sake.
Blake
02-15-2012, 05:47 PM
:lol
DarrinS
02-15-2012, 05:48 PM
I think we should nail Christians to the cross for tradition's sake.
:dramaquee
baseline bum
02-15-2012, 06:00 PM
We could shoot Indians and hang the ######s too.
We could shoot Indians and hang the ######s too.
:tu
baseline bum
02-15-2012, 06:04 PM
Good to see another person with good traditional Christian morals here. :tu
JoeChalupa
02-15-2012, 06:09 PM
Santorum is a little too far to the right but you gotta admire his convictions. Don't see much flip-flopping coming from him. This could be to his advantage and get him the GOP nomination. I hope so.
Spurminator
02-15-2012, 06:26 PM
Santorum is a little too far to the right but you gotta admire his convictions. Don't see much flip-flopping coming from him. This could be to his advantage and get him the GOP nomination. I hope so.
Consistent holding of deplorable convictions is a false virtue.
JoeChalupa
02-15-2012, 06:30 PM
Consistent holding of deplorable convictions is a false virtue.
Not all are deplorable, IMHO. I don't agree with them but I wouldn't consider them deplorable.
LnGrrrR
02-15-2012, 08:48 PM
Depends on why. I am one who believes marriage should remain traditional. Is tradition bigotry?
How much dowry do you think a man should have to provide his future father-in-law?
resistanze
02-15-2012, 09:41 PM
If slavery were around today, how many people might own slaves just to give some slaves a better life than they would have under a different master? Not all slave owners were bad, or bigots. Would you agree?
:lmao Another WC classic.
Nbadan
02-15-2012, 10:53 PM
Doesn't take a genius to figure out what a radical Santorum is on abortion
"The reason Social Security is in big trouble is we don't have enough workers to support the retirees. A third of all the young people in America are not in America today because of abortion, because one in three pregnancies end in abortion."
- Rick Santorum, 3/29/11
Nbadan
02-15-2012, 10:55 PM
“I don’t think it works. I think it’s harmful to women, I think it’s harmful to our society to have a society that says that sex outside of marriage is something that should be encouraged or tolerated, particularly among the young. I think it has, as we’ve seen, very harmful long-term consequences for society. So birth control to me enables that and I don’t think it’s a healthy thing for our country.”
–Saying that birth control is harmful to women, society and our country. CN8′s “Nitebeat with Barry Nolan”, July 28, 2005
Nbadan
02-15-2012, 10:59 PM
“And if the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything. Does that undermine the fabric of our society? I would argue yes, it does. It all comes from, I would argue, this right to privacy that doesn’t exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution, this right that was created, it was created in Griswold — Griswold was the contraceptive case — and abortion. And now we’re just extending it out. And the further you extend it out, the more you — this freedom actually intervenes and affects the family.”
–On his belief that there is no right to privacy in the U.S. Constitution. In the Griswold case, the U.S. Supreme Court found that married couples had the right to use birth control.
baseline bum
02-15-2012, 11:07 PM
–On his belief that there is no right to privacy in the U.S. Constitution. In the Griswold case, the U.S. Supreme Court found that married couples had the right to use birth control.
Wow, I didn't think he could possibly be any worse of a candidate. What a hate-filled piece of dogshit. So the guy wants to throw gays in jail? :rollin
Wild Cobra
02-16-2012, 03:30 AM
How much dowry do you think a man should have to provide his future father-in-law?
LOL...
If we were in those times, as much money as the beauty of the woman can fetch. Supply and demand still rule however.
Wild Cobra
02-16-2012, 03:54 AM
:lmao Another WC classic.
Glad to assist.
FuzzyLumpkins
02-16-2012, 05:34 AM
Some did. Most actually believed them inferior.
If slavery were around today, how many people might own slaves just to give some slaves a better life than they would have under a different master? Not all slave owners were bad, or bigots. Would you agree?
i would hope the ideal would be buying them to set them free not keep them for yourself. I am not going to guess if you didn't figure that because you are one of the most racist people i have encountered or if its because you are one of the dumbest people i have ever encountered.
Blake
02-16-2012, 10:18 AM
Glad to assist.
Doubtful
baseline bum
02-16-2012, 12:34 PM
Hilarious that Santorum thinks a law making buttfucking illegal (which is what his quote in nbadan's last post is in reference to) is somehow constitutional. He really is a piece of fecal matter lube.
boutons_deux
02-16-2012, 01:26 PM
InSaneTorum: kill to protect free speech
http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/tea-party-militia.jpg
“the Second Amendment is there to protect the First Amendment!”
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/02/16/426851/santorum-the-second-amendment-is-there-to-protect-the-first-amendment/
bubbas gonna vote for this guy way ahead of Yankee Willard Gecko
boutons_deux
02-16-2012, 02:06 PM
"On this contraceptive thing, my gosh, it’s so inexpensive. You know, back in my days, they used Baer Aspirin for contraceptives. The gals put it between their knees and it wasn’t that costly."
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/02/16/427233/foster-friess-contraception/
Repug medical science, as perfect as their climate science !! what's not to love? :lol
ChumpDumper
02-16-2012, 02:25 PM
Hilarious that Santorum thinks a law making buttfucking illegal (which is what his quote in nbadan's last post is in reference to) is somehow constitutional. He really is a piece of fecal matter lube.That would be a weird case to try.
LnGrrrR
02-16-2012, 02:42 PM
LOL...
If we were in those times, as much money as the beauty of the woman can fetch. Supply and demand still rule however.
So what you're saying is, that tradition of dowry no longer applies?
ChumpDumper
02-16-2012, 02:46 PM
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/407439_10150561800384639_8934429638_9081693_208881 6182_n.jpg
What is missing from this picture of witnesses for a congressional hearing regarding women's health?
Blake
02-16-2012, 02:58 PM
I see the Catholic priests.....are there Protestant preachers on that panel?
clambake
02-16-2012, 03:00 PM
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/407439_10150561800384639_8934429638_9081693_208881 6182_n.jpg
What is missing from this picture of witnesses for a congressional hearing regarding women's health?
women?
Blake
02-16-2012, 03:00 PM
....and what a happy looking group of women on that 2nd(3rd) row.
:lol
clambake
02-16-2012, 03:02 PM
also, is it possible that the guy on the end is a black surgeon?
ChumpDumper
02-16-2012, 03:07 PM
also, is it possible that the guy on the end is a black surgeon?I guess there are no peremptory challenges in these things.
boutons_deux
02-16-2012, 05:51 PM
Republicans Who Oppose Obama’s Contraception Regulation Have No Problem With Romney’s
On Wednesday over two dozen Republican House and Senate members held a press conference in support of the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act, which would allow any and all insurers and employers to deny their employees health benefits and services required by federal law based on their personal religious or moral objections.
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/02/16/427328/republicans-who-oppose-obamas-contraception-regulation-have-no-problem-with-romneys/
eg "I, almighty employer and wannabe-God, hold the firm belief in my conscience that cancer chemo is against God's law, so I won't pay for your chemo"
TheSullyMonster
02-17-2012, 03:16 AM
Some did. Most actually believed them inferior.
If slavery were around today, how many people might own slaves just to give some slaves a better life than they would have under a different master? Not all slave owners were bad, or bigots. Would you agree?
How did this slip by?
No, I'm fairly certain that ALL slave owners were bigots to some degree.:lol
Wild Cobra
02-17-2012, 03:25 AM
How did this slip by?
No, I'm fairly certain that ALL slave owners were bigots to some degree.:lol
Yes, it was an acquired trait. I didn't say that now, did I? That doesn't mean that some slave owners weren't sympathetic.
TDMVPDPOY
02-17-2012, 03:29 AM
looks like those woman on the stand, dont know fkn english
Blake
02-17-2012, 09:25 AM
Yes, it was an acquired trait. I didn't say that now, did I? That doesn't mean that some slave owners weren't sympathetic.
Sympathetic slave owner is an oxymoron, you fucking idiot.
Wild Cobra
02-17-2012, 11:02 AM
Sympathetic slave owner is an oxymoron, you fucking idiot.
What were the options back then? Break the law?
clambake
02-17-2012, 11:31 AM
slave chains were the first bling!
lol sympathetic slave owner
LnGrrrR
02-17-2012, 11:34 AM
What were the options back then? Break the law?
It was against the law to free slaves? Or are you under the assumption that any free black person could be rounded up and sold like a stray pet?
:lol this dumbass probably doesn't know that there were an equal amount of free states in the Union
Wild Cobra
02-17-2012, 11:41 AM
It was against the law to free slaves? Or are you under the assumption that any free black person could be rounded up and sold like a stray pet?
I think that varied by state, and then if they lost or had their their freedom papers stolen, they were slaves again. Unless they made it North, they pretty much were slaves. I wasn't arguing this aspect of it. only that some slave owners treated the slaves like workers rather than property.
Is someone going to contend that all slave owners were the same?
clambake
02-17-2012, 11:44 AM
you have to pay for them to be workers. so much stupid.
Wild Cobra
02-17-2012, 11:45 AM
you have to pay for them to be workers. so much stupid.
No, stupidity is someone like you. Not seeing the shades of gray.
clambake
02-17-2012, 11:47 AM
fucking idiot thinks being a slave is like being a worker. lol
Blake
02-17-2012, 11:47 AM
What were the options back then? Break the law?
Rofl what law?
Blake
02-17-2012, 11:51 AM
I think that varied by state, and then if they lost or had their their freedom papers stolen, they were slaves again. Unless they made it North, they pretty much were slaves. I wasn't arguing this aspect of it. only that some slave owners treated the slaves like workers rather than property.
Is someone going to contend that all slave owners were the same?
What law would an owner break by releasing a slave, idiot?
clambake
02-17-2012, 11:54 AM
imagine, if you dare, what kind of woman this clown would attract.
only that some slave owners treated the slaves like workers rather than property.
what. the. fuck.
the philanthropist slave owner. only on spurstalk.
and before boutons pipes up, you're scarcely better calling people subhuman.
Blake
02-17-2012, 01:12 PM
imagine, if you dare, what kind of woman this clown would attract.
The kind that would understand that he's only stalking her for her own good
Wild Cobra
02-17-2012, 01:16 PM
I think that varied by state, and then if they lost or had their their freedom papers stolen, they were slaves again. Unless they made it North, they pretty much were slaves. I wasn't arguing this aspect of it. only that some slave owners treated the slaves like workers rather than property.
Is someone going to contend that all slave owners were the same?
Idiots.
I'm not saying it was right by our standards today. If you cant try to think like they probably did in the past, that's your problem
clambake
02-17-2012, 01:22 PM
Idiots.
I'm not saying it was right by our standards today. If you cant try to think like they probably did in the past, that's your problem
dumbass. they treated them like animals for personal gain.
Blake
02-17-2012, 01:57 PM
Idiots.
I'm not saying it was right by our standards today. If you cant try to think like they probably did in the past, that's your problem
When was slavery ever right? Year and civilization please.
Fucking idiot.
Blake
02-17-2012, 01:57 PM
What law would an owner break by releasing a slave, idiot?
TeyshaBlue
02-17-2012, 02:01 PM
Idiots.
I'm not saying it was right by our standards today. If you cant try to think like they probably did in the past, that's your problem
If it was ok at one time, it could be again! South's gonna rise again, baby!
Fuck....I made my self stupider just by typing that.:depressed
If it was ok at one time, it could be again! South's gonna rise again, baby!
Fuck....I made my self stupider just by typing that.:depressed
:rollin
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.