PDA

View Full Version : Andrew Breitbart, dead



DarrinS
03-01-2012, 10:08 AM
Rip

DarrinS
03-01-2012, 10:09 AM
Damn, my same age too.

JoeChalupa
03-01-2012, 10:12 AM
Been seeing this news all over twitter.

fraga
03-01-2012, 10:12 AM
Was he sick...or is this all of a sudden...

DarrinS
03-01-2012, 10:14 AM
Was he sick...or is this all of a sudden...

Natural causes is what I've read

boutons_deux
03-01-2012, 10:25 AM
Fox Repug Propaganda network will wear black armbands for a year.

TimmehC
03-01-2012, 11:20 AM
Wonder what happened. That's freaky young to die from natural causes.

clambake
03-01-2012, 11:22 AM
brentwood huh? is oj still in jail?

greyforest
03-01-2012, 11:22 AM
"natural causes" oookay

DarrinS
03-01-2012, 11:37 AM
"natural causes" oookay

because?...

Oh, Gee!!
03-01-2012, 11:42 AM
because?...

cocaine is a natural cause

hitmanyr2k
03-01-2012, 01:40 PM
"natural causes" oookay

Maybe Obama is putting those drones to work a little early this year.

baseline bum
03-01-2012, 01:56 PM
43 and not a heart attack? I bet it's prescription downers.

ashbeeigh
03-01-2012, 01:58 PM
ha. /donebeingabitch

ChumpDumper
03-01-2012, 02:11 PM
Maybe Obama is putting those drones to work a little early this year.I can't wait for the blogs suggesting this.

Winehole23
03-01-2012, 02:26 PM
2009 thread:


Andrew Breitbart, a Washington Times columnist who oversees Breitbart.com and BigHollywood.com, tapped into the anti-Kennedy vein in the hours after the senator’s death was announced, posting a series of Twitter messages in which he called Kennedy a “villain,” a “duplicitous bastard” and a “prick.”

"I'm more than willing to go off decorum to ensure THIS MAN is not beatified,” Breitbart wrote. “Sorry, he destroyed lives. And he knew it."
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26475.html

ChumpDumper
03-01-2012, 02:28 PM
2009 thread:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26475.htmlSo Brietbart was all those.

Good epitaph.

JayTheClown
03-01-2012, 03:08 PM
RIP

This is very shocking and sad at the same time. My heart goes out to family. I didn't agree with his politics but it is still sad to see him die so young tbh

redzero
03-01-2012, 03:16 PM
2009 thread:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26475.html

Well, that guy was right about one thing.

CubanSucks
03-01-2012, 03:25 PM
ha. /donebeingabitch

shut your ugly c u n t

jack sommerset
03-01-2012, 03:30 PM
A prayer for the dead is one of the greatest acts of charity we can perform. Let's all take time today/tonight and kneel before God to help Andrew move from purgatory to heaven as quickly as he can.

RIP Andrew, a great American, husband, father and son. God bless for your brief But important stint on earth.

ChumpDumper
03-01-2012, 03:46 PM
He was an asshole and a liar.

Trainwreck2100
03-01-2012, 05:16 PM
he made that money so good for him. I'd be an asshole and a liar, if it meant i'd make that money.

boutons_deux
03-01-2012, 05:23 PM
Breitbart deserves the same sentiments he trashed Ted Kennedy with.

This piece of shit was a hero to the Repugs and conservatives, proving their "values".

z0sa
03-01-2012, 05:23 PM
Dude was a prick but definitely made some waves. I wonder what he actually died from, 43 and natural causes doesn't go hand in hand.

baseline bum
03-01-2012, 05:23 PM
he made that money so good for him. I'd be an asshole and a liar, if it meant i'd make that money.

I think I'd rather live to 44.

Trainwreck2100
03-01-2012, 05:59 PM
I think I'd rather live to 44.

being an asshole and a liar didn't kill him, so non issue

redzero
03-01-2012, 06:21 PM
Breitbart deserves the same sentiments he trashed Ted Kennedy with.

This piece of shit was a hero to the Repugs and conservatives, proving their "values".

Since he didn't cause anybody's death (that I'm aware of), he'll always be slightly better than Ted Kennedy.

Nbadan
03-01-2012, 11:05 PM
:lol Breitbart hero to the right

R4od4QQVK1o

Nbadan
03-01-2012, 11:20 PM
OKeefe could be next...


Involving a woman they were using to smear the Occupy movement. The story goes like this: Conservative blogger http://twitter.com/#!/NadiaNaffe agreed to O'Keefe to make up claims of being raped at an Occupy event. O'Keefe picked her up, purchased alcohol, and took her back to his parents house to get prepped, and then when she changed her mind O'Keefe locked her in a barn on his parents property and threatened her, allegedly with another man present as well. She threatened to call police and before letting her out he offered her $$$ to stay silent about what happened and she was on the verge of exposing Breitbart and O'Keefe for making up false rape stories.

You can read one of her tweets here: http://twitter.com/#!/NadiaNaffe/status/174195663205171201

OR click her name to see her complete page.

Current TV's David Shuster broke this story open http://twitter.com/#!/DavidShuster

It was also Tweeted by Anonymous here: http://twitter.com/#!/AnonyOps/status/175097038415990784

Winehole23
03-01-2012, 11:26 PM
http://www.northjersey.com/news/Okeefe.html

Winehole23
03-01-2012, 11:28 PM
(never knew before reading this article that O'Keefe's Acorn stunt was the main dish at Big Government's premiere)

Nbadan
03-01-2012, 11:32 PM
Precious...

25 People Who Think President Obama Killed Andrew Breitbart

http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/people-who-think-president-obama-killed-andrew-bre

ElNono
03-02-2012, 12:59 AM
Who?

Winehole23
03-02-2012, 01:39 AM
the guy who deep-sixed the old media. allegedly.

Capt Bringdown
03-02-2012, 02:20 AM
Love this as an antidote to the "don't speak ill of the dead" false pieties:

Mark Ames 1, Andrew Breitbart 0: Exiled Editor Does Dirty Chicken Dance On Breitbart’s Grave (http://exiledonline.com/mark-ames-1-andrew-breitbart-0-exiled-editor-does-dirty-chicken-dance-on-breitbart’s-grave/)


Let’s be honest: Even when it comes to right-wing hit-men, Breitbart was never that good. Or even interesting. He was a desperate self-pitying hack, a second-rate McCarthyite, his spite fueled by thwarted celebrity ambition. Like Dennis Miller, another failure who found a second life as a Murdoch monkey after getting run out of the Monday Night Football booth as the worst failure in sports announcing history.
- more - (http://exiledonline.com/mark-ames-1-andrew-breitbart-0-exiled-editor-does-dirty-chicken-dance-on-breitbart’s-grave/)

Viva Las Espuelas
03-02-2012, 10:48 AM
shut your ugly c u n t

I wouldn't expect anything less from her tbh

DarrinS
03-02-2012, 11:12 AM
Precious...

25 People Who Think President Obama Killed Andrew Breitbart

http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/people-who-think-president-obama-killed-andrew-bre



Precious...

Resident 9/11 twoofer, Nbadan, calling out fellow tinfoil-hat-wearing conspiracy nutters

clambake
03-02-2012, 11:14 AM
careful darrin, you're a birther.

Winehole23
03-02-2012, 12:30 PM
not a birther to hear him tell it, but by his own admission Darrin remains fearlesssly open to "valid questions," very much like the truthers and twoofers he makes fun of.

ElNono
03-02-2012, 01:24 PM
Never heard of him

Winehole23
03-02-2012, 01:31 PM
do you remember the artfully edited Shirley Sherrod vid? Or the O'Keefe Acorn stunt?

ElNono
03-02-2012, 01:35 PM
do you remember the artfully edited Shirley Sherrod vid? Or the O'Keefe Acorn stunt?

Nope. I mean, I think the O'Keefe stuff has been discussed here, so that name rings a bell.

Winehole23
03-02-2012, 01:44 PM
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=159389

ElNono
03-02-2012, 02:25 PM
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=159389

Don't recall the story, but thanks for the link...

Winehole23
03-02-2012, 02:32 PM
Fired within a day by a cowardly and cringing Obama Administration.

ElNono
03-02-2012, 02:35 PM
Fired within a day by a cowardly and cringing Obama Administration.

No surprises there.

Winehole23
03-02-2012, 02:58 PM
it surprised me that they fired her without viewing the decontextualized interview...

apparently no effort to gather or assess relevant facts was undertaken; any official actions that day only hastened the decision to terminate Sherrod with utmost expedience. it's still pretty shocking to me tbh. I was proud of Sherrod for refusing re-assignment.

TeyshaBlue
03-02-2012, 03:27 PM
it surprised me that they fired her without viewing the decontextualized interview...

apparently no effort to gather or assess relevant facts was undertaken; any official actions that day only hastened the decision to terminate Sherrod with utmost expedience. it's still pretty shocking to me tbh. I was proud of Sherrod for refusing re-assignment.

Again...President Obama has got to have the most inept handlers of any recent administration. It's just hard to believe sometimes.

boutons_deux
03-02-2012, 03:28 PM
Andrew Breitbart: Death of a Douche

By Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone

02 March 12


http://assets.rollingstone.com/assets/images/blog_entry/1000x600/78345435764361364b5c28334c63b8b5be685abb.jpg


o Andrew Breitbart is dead. Here's what I have to say to that, and I'm sure Breitbart himself would have respected this reaction: Good! Fuck him. I couldn't be happier that he's dead.

I say this in the nicest possible way. I actually kind of liked Andrew Breitbart. Not in the sense that I would ever have wanted to hang out with him, or even be caught within a hundred yards of him without a Haz-Mat suit on, but I respected the shamelessness. Breitbart didn't do anything by halves, and even his most ardent detractors had to admit that he had a highly developed, if not always funny, sense of humor.

For instance, it would be dishonest not to tip a hat to him for that famous scene when he hijacked Anthony Weiner's own self-immolating "apology" press conferences priceless attemp, and held up the entire event by standing at the lectern and congratulating himself at length, before Weiner could let the humiliating healing begin.

For that one, brief, shining moment - still one of the most painful-to-watch YouTube spectacles of all time, right there with Mitt Romney's priceless attempt at singing "Who Let the Dogs Out?" with a group of black voters in Florida in 2008 - Breitbart could legitimately claim to have the biggest, hairiest balls on earth.

Watching Weiner apologize to Breitbart later in that same event was certainly chilling for a number of reasons (if I were Weiner, I wouldn't have apologized to that fucker even under torture) but it was hard not to appreciate the deliciousness of the scene from Breitbart's point of view. Watching Weiner pause, swallow hard, and make the extraordinary decision to plant his lips squarely on the loathsome Breitbart's ass on national television, that was like the ultimate Mona Lisa masterpiece of right-wing media provocations. That the outrageous Breitbart was standing right there, looking gorgeously gassy in his unbuttoned shirt, bloated Joey Buttafuoco cheeks and splendiforous silver half-mullet, made the humiliation of the trim and neatly-groomed Weiner even more abject.

Furthermore, the ACORN videos made by Breitbart and his two young acolytes, Hannah Giles and James O'Keefe - it's hard not to see the inspired humor behind their elaborate stunt. And anyone who's heard their proposals before ACORN staffers to bring underage girls over the border as part of a white-(or nonwhite-) slaving startup firm, and doesn't think the ACORN responses (or non-responses, as it were) were shocking, they're deluding themselves. In the Baltimore office, they ran the whole underage hooker-den spiel past an ACORN staffer, and got the following response: "You are gonna use three of them - they are gonna be under 16, so you is eligible to get child tax credit and additional child tax credit."

That is seriously messed up material. Did they edit the videos heavily? Hell yes. Did they make ACORN's behavior out to be a lot worse than it was? Absolutely. But there's no way to watch the raw footage and not grasp how totally nuts some of this ACORN "counseling" was. We have to give Breitbart that.

Breitbart has written some nasty things about me personally, once contrived to publish my private emails online, and even teamed up with Rush Limbaugh to humorously mis-identify me as a behind-the-scenes marionettist of the "media-Democrat industrial complex" (Breitbart thought I was improperly advising Occupy leaders), but all that's okay. I think today, it's safe to stand back and simply recognize that while many people go through their lives without leaving distinguishing marks, Andrew Breitbart definitely had his moments.

But he also had enough of a sense of humor to appreciate why someone like me shouldn't bother to pretend I'm sad he's dead. He wouldn't, in my place. So to use one of his favorite words: Good riddance, cocksucker.* Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

* See the following Breitbart quote: "I like to call someone a raving Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Lu ck_The_Fakers_ every now and then, when it's appropriate, for effect... 'You cocksucker.' I love that kind of language."

UPDATE: Well done, Breitbart fans, well done! In less than 24 hours you've hacked into my Wiki page, published my telephone number on Twitter, called the Rolling Stone offices pretending to be outraged "advertisers" (anonymous ones, who hung up before we could figure out which "ads" to pull), and then spent all night calling and texting my phone with various threats and insults, many of them directed at my family. "Better grow eyes in the back of your head," was one; "I'm going to take a shit on your mother's grave," was another; a third called my wife a "piece of shit like you," and many others called me a "pile of human excrement."

Those last ones to me were the most interesting because that quote is lifted directly from Breitbart's own obit of Ted Kennedy, which like me Breitbart ran just hours after his subject died. So that means the writers of these letters knew that what I did was exactly the same as what Breitbart had done, and yet they still found a way to be unironically outraged on Breitbart's behalf. I thought: "These people don't even get their own jokes."

The really crazy thing is that I was sort of trying to be nice to Breitbart - the obit was at least half an homage. Not that I liked the guy, but he did have a few attractive qualities, one of which being the fact that he got a kick out of the nasty things people said about him. He even once had a plan to set up a website encouraging anti-Breitbart abuse, and was going to let it ride for a while, even spending six figures to hire an Obama p.r. flack to make anti-Breitbart posters, until finally revealing that he'd sponsored the whole thing. Would a person like that really expect someone like me to send flowers when he croaked? No way: he'd be insulted if I didn't give him one last kick in the balls on the way out the door.

But I guess no homage is complete without a celebration of the whole man, and the whole man in this case was not just a guy who once said, "It's all about a good laugh," but also someone who liked to publish peoples' personal information on the internet, hack into private web sites, tell lies in an attempt to get his enemies fired, and incite readers to threats against his targets and their families, including death threats. I left all of that stuff out of my obit, but now, thanks to you readers, that's all in there as well, leaving, for posterity, a much more complete picture of the man.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/andrew-breitbart-death-of-a-douche-20120301

Wild Cobra Kai
03-02-2012, 10:03 PM
Amen. No hearts and roses at death for someone who gave none.

spursncowboys
03-02-2012, 10:32 PM
2009 thread:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26475.html

Breitbart was a murderer who got away with it because of his political ties and family name????
No connection.

Winehole23
03-03-2012, 02:43 AM
decorum on the death day. as ye sow, so shall ye reap.

Winehole23
03-03-2012, 02:52 AM
Personally, I was not as proud of the haughty manifestations I saw against Breitbart as various of my friends seemed to be. There is a -- how shall we say? -- somewhat disagreeable (but entirely human and thus, routinely predictable and foreseeable) element of macabre relish at play...

boutons_deux
03-03-2012, 07:38 AM
From his local paper:

http://www.latimes.com/news/obituaries/la-me-andrew-breitbart-20120302,0,4090917.story

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-andrew-breitbart-political-influence-20120301,0,5954547.story

http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-breitbart-and-me-20120301,0,1634973.story

sincere? sincerely a douchey asshole. Fraudulent stunts like taking down ACORN and Sherrod caused real damage.

Wild Cobra Kai
03-03-2012, 10:28 AM
Breitbart was a murderer who got away with it because of his political ties and family name????
No connection.

I think he means the whole "lack of respect for the recently deceased" thing, but go ahead and be obtuse by intentionally missing the point if you want.

boutons_deux
03-03-2012, 10:50 AM
dying doesn't automatically confer sainthood on an asshole, doesn't automatically absolve him of his dirty, fraudulent political tricks. His infamy will outlive him, for sure.

Winehole23
03-04-2012, 05:29 AM
http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2012/03/02/coming-attractions-breitbarts-videos-of-obamas-college-years/

spursncowboys
03-04-2012, 02:17 PM
I think he means the whole "lack of respect for the recently deceased" thing, but go ahead and be obtuse by intentionally missing the point if you want.

WH missed the point when he tried to correlate the two.

Winehole23
03-05-2012, 01:11 AM
surely it is fair to make reference to Breitbart's behavior on the day of Ted Kennedy's death, on the day of his own death. and to quote him.

if not, why not?

Winehole23
03-05-2012, 11:35 AM
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/04/obama-alinsky-love-song

Winehole23
03-08-2012, 12:31 PM
http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2012/03/02/coming-attractions-breitbarts-videos-of-obamas-college-years/PBS posts the video (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/government-elections-politics/the-story-behind-the-obama-law-school-speech-video/).

baseline bum
03-08-2012, 01:56 PM
Scandalous... introducing a professor who thinks there should be more black professors is radical pipe-bomb in Baby Jesus' manger kind of shit.

Winehole23
03-08-2012, 02:02 PM
lol the new media paradigm


real journalists don't publicize their scoops beforehand.

ChumpDumper
03-08-2012, 02:16 PM
Scandalous... introducing a professor who thinks there should be more black professors is radical pipe-bomb in Baby Jesus' manger kind of shit.Did you see Obama hug Bell?

Clear evidence he's gay!

Winehole23
03-08-2012, 03:43 PM
But there’s nothing new about the clip or Obama’s role in the controversy at Harvard Law School. In 2008, as a part of our quadrennial election special The Choice 2008 (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/choice2008/), FRONTLINE ran the same footage of the speech as a part of an exploration of Obama’s time at Harvard Law School, where he graduated in 1991. It’s been online at our site and on YouTube since then. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/government-elections-politics/the-story-behind-the-obama-law-school-speech-video/

apparently Breitbart's Ghost is an aggregator too. some scoop.

ChumpDumper
03-08-2012, 03:54 PM
Breitbart is failing from beyond the grave.

Yonivore
03-08-2012, 09:25 PM
Scandalous... introducing a professor who thinks there should be more black professors is radical pipe-bomb in Baby Jesus' manger kind of shit.
As Thomas Sowell will explain to you (http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/03/07/Sowell%20On%20Bell), back in 1992, it's not just that Derrick Bell wanted more black professors; he wanted more black professors that ascribed to his bat-shit racist and crazy idea on "critical race theory."

But, also, it's more than that, even...

Why, if Bell was such a benign figure, did Harvard Law School’s Professor Charles Ogletree gloat about hiding the most explosive portion of the video released by Breitbart? Why did Buzzfeed feel it necessary to attempt a pre-emptive release of a version of the video with, again, that portion edited out? Why did Soledad Obrien [boy, she got her panties in a wad] feel it necessary to argue with Breitbart's Joel Pollack over the definition of "critical race theory."

Incidentally, it appears the wikipedia definition may have been fed to Ms. O'Brien, during the broadcast because it closely matched what can NOW be found there. And, another interesting development is there appears to be a wiki-war over the definition taking place...

In the version dated January 31, 2012 (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Critical_race_theory&diff=474146737&oldid=454585067), the words "white supremacy" and "racial power" appear.


Although no set of canonical doctrines or methodologies defines CRT, the movement is loosely unified by two common areas of inquiry. First, CRT has analyzed the way in which white supremacy and racial power are reproduced over time, and in particular, the role that law plays in this process.
However, the current version states the following:


Although no set of canonical doctrines or methodologies defines CRT, the movement is loosely unified by two common areas of inquiry. First, CRT has analyzed the way in which racial hierarchies are reproduced over time, and in particular, the role that law plays in this process.
You can see both versions on this page (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Critical_race_theory&diff=480904326&oldid=474146737). If you go to the revision page (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Critical_race_theory&action=history), it looks like a little war broke out today, with edits and re-edits. One participant commented that it had obviously been changed to match "Soledad Obrien's empty-headed explanation on television last night."

What was the rally about at which your President asked everyone to open their hearts and minds to what Professor Bell was saying? It was a send off for Professor Bell who was taking a paid leave of absence in an effort to extort Harvard into giving tenure to an African-American female professor that believed in "critical race theory" as he did.

But, wait! There's more...

From a letter to the editor in the Harvard Crimson (http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1990/4/30/bells-message-is-repugnant-pbto-the/) in 1990.


To the Editors of The Crimson:

I felt an obligation to attend Weld Professor of Law Derrick A. Bell's speech last week. A respected scholar and teacher, Bell was about to cross a personal Rubicon, and what he had to say deserved to be heard. Unfortunately, what he said shocked me, for it was utterly repugnant to the very ideals he purports to believe: diversity and equality.

At one point in his speech, Bell said that it was not enough for the University to hire somebody who looked Black, but who thought white. Will Bell tell us how white people think? Will he tell us how Black people think? Will Bell be the arbiter of who thinks like a white and who thinks like a Black? Will he be satisfied if the Law School hires someone who "looks white" but "thinks Black?"...
And, guess what Michelle was doing during all this?

Yep, being a good Bell acolyte...occupying the Law School Dean's office to help achieve the ends Bells sought.

Also, when Obama was teaching at Harvard, he required students to use at least three of Bell's books in his class.

Face it, you've elected a radical racist as President.

Ironically, a dead Breitbart is going to vet him better than the live mainstream media ever dared to.

Drachen
03-08-2012, 09:29 PM
Soledad can get her panties in a wad all she wants.

Blake
03-08-2012, 09:47 PM
Breitbart is failing from beyond the grave.

:lol

Pelicans78
03-08-2012, 10:31 PM
No such thing as a natural death. People die of something no matter how old.

ChumpDumper
03-09-2012, 04:36 AM
As Thomas Sowell will explain to you (http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/03/07/Sowell%20On%20Bell), back in 1992, it's not just that Derrick Bell wanted more black professors; he wanted more black professors that ascribed to his bat-shit racist and crazy idea on "critical race theory."

But, also, it's more than that, even...

Why, if Bell was such a benign figure, did Harvard Law School’s Professor Charles Ogletree gloat about hiding the most explosive portion of the video released by Breitbart? Why did Buzzfeed feel it necessary to attempt a pre-emptive release of a version of the video with, again, that portion edited out? Why did Soledad Obrien [boy, she got her panties in a wad] feel it necessary to argue with Breitbart's Joel Pollack over the definition of "critical race theory."

Incidentally, it appears the wikipedia definition may have been fed to Ms. O'Brien, during the broadcast because it closely matched what can NOW be found there. And, another interesting development is there appears to be a wiki-war over the definition taking place...

In the version dated January 31, 2012 (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Critical_race_theory&diff=474146737&oldid=454585067), the words "white supremacy" and "racial power" appear.


However, the current version states the following:


You can see both versions on this page (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Critical_race_theory&diff=480904326&oldid=474146737). If you go to the revision page (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Critical_race_theory&action=history), it looks like a little war broke out today, with edits and re-edits. One participant commented that it had obviously been changed to match "Soledad Obrien's empty-headed explanation on television last night."

What was the rally about at which your President asked everyone to open their hearts and minds to what Professor Bell was saying? It was a send off for Professor Bell who was taking a paid leave of absence in an effort to extort Harvard into giving tenure to an African-American female professor that believed in "critical race theory" as he did.

But, wait! There's more...

From a letter to the editor in the Harvard Crimson (http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1990/4/30/bells-message-is-repugnant-pbto-the/) in 1990.


And, guess what Michelle was doing during all this?

Yep, being a good Bell acolyte...occupying the Law School Dean's office to help achieve the ends Bells sought.

Also, when Obama was teaching at Harvard, he required students to use at least three of Bell's books in his class.

Face it, you've elected a radical racist as President.

Ironically, a dead Breitbart is going to vet him better than the live mainstream media ever dared to.Obama never taught at Harvard.

lol regurgitation fail

Winehole23
03-09-2012, 04:49 AM
has Obama espoused CRT in public, or is it more of an esoteric cult, like Freemasonry?

http://secretsun.blogspot.com/2009/01/barack-obama-and-masonic-martyr.html

Winehole23
03-09-2012, 04:52 AM
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_YKPd1gUPBrw/SP6pZE1zCDI/AAAAAAAABmc/tcXXTjY3tOk/s200/Obama-logo-712332.jpg (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_YKPd1gUPBrw/SP6pZE1zCDI/AAAAAAAABmc/tcXXTjY3tOk/s1600-h/Obama-logo-712332.jpg)

Winehole23
03-09-2012, 04:52 AM
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_YKPd1gUPBrw/SUmMsDGxD5I/AAAAAAAAB5k/9WLn6z790fA/s400/Apollo_1+.png (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_YKPd1gUPBrw/SUmMsDGxD5I/AAAAAAAAB5k/9WLn6z790fA/s1600-h/Apollo_1+.png)

Wild Cobra
03-09-2012, 05:43 AM
No such thing as a natural death. People die of something no matter how old.
And none of it's natural? Please explain.

ChumpDumper
03-09-2012, 05:47 AM
Obama knew a guy -- who had a theory! A black guy!

Winehole23
03-09-2012, 04:42 PM
My reading of Barack Obama’s political biography is pretty simple: He’s not so much a liberal radical as a member of the liberal mainstream of whatever community he inhabits. In that video, he was doing no more and no less than what most politically engaged leftist law students were doing — supporting the radical race and gender politics that dominated campus. When he went to Chicago and met Bill Ayers, he was fitting within a second, and slightly different, liberal culture. He shifted again in Washington and then again in the White House. But radical, “conviction” politicians don’t decry Gitmo then keep it open, promise to end the wars then reinforce the troops, express outrage at Bush war tactics then maintain rendition and triple the number of drone strikes.


Obama’s biography is essentially the same as many of the liberal mainstream-media journalists who cover him. They’ve made the same migration — from leading campus protests, to building families in urban liberal communities, to participating in a national political culture. At the risk of engaging in dime-store pop psychology, they like Obama in part because they identify with him so thoroughly and see much of themselves in him. They call him “pragmatic” or “moderate” or “technocratic” because they’re fully aware of legions of leftists who never made the transition from the purer form of activist politics. The pure activist is still leading campus protests or camped out in various parks across the country or writing radical tracts for minuscule readerships. The more moderate Left is running the country.


I would imagine that law school Barack Obama would never imagine ordering drone strikes on American citizens on foreign soil or Navy SEAL raids deep into Pakistan. Law school Barack Obama would likely think Obamacare was a thoroughly unsatisfactory half-measure and oppose it bitterly. Law school Obama is not our president, and I’m not sure that the videos tell us much at all about the man who sits in the oval office.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/292994/obama-critical-race-theory-and-harvard-law-school-david-french

ChumpDumper
03-09-2012, 04:57 PM
Right. Obama's had three years to start the race war.

Hasn't happened.

Won't happen.

Nbadan
03-09-2012, 10:05 PM
Other "secret pictures'

PrbU1xc9_5I

Agitator
03-09-2012, 11:22 PM
brietbart died? shit how did he go? fapping to some new documentary by that asshat who did the ACORN doumentary?

Winehole23
03-12-2012, 03:06 AM
From Drudge, he went on to help launch the Huffington Post (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/) http://reason.com/archives/2012/03/10/how-andrew-breitbart-changed-the-news