PDA

View Full Version : RC Buford Press Conference


timvp
03-15-2012, 07:07 PM
Is Spurs.com going to have streaming video?

Thanks :)
Uriel
03-15-2012, 07:47 PM
Yes, please.
Bill_Brasky
03-15-2012, 08:02 PM
I'm interested in this as well.
Robz4000
03-15-2012, 08:08 PM
Anything?
TimmehC
03-15-2012, 08:09 PM
They'll have video after. No stream, though.
VBM
03-15-2012, 08:10 PM
Link please
spursdotcom
03-15-2012, 08:38 PM
Video is processing now, no Jack, RC discussing the trade. Be up in a few. Will be here - http://www.nba.com/spurs/news/120315_jackson

:toast
timvp
03-15-2012, 08:39 PM
Awesome. Thanks :tu
Drachen
03-15-2012, 08:43 PM
Video is processing now, no Jack, RC discussing the trade. Be up in a few. Will be here - http://www.nba.com/spurs/news/120315_jackson

:toast

thanks spursdotcom
Das Texan
03-15-2012, 08:44 PM
All RC needed to do was walk into the room, burn the #24 Jefferson jersey and then immediately display the #3 Jackson jersey.

And leave the room.

:smokin
spursdotcom
03-15-2012, 08:53 PM
It's live now - http://www.nba.com/spurs/news/120315_jackson

:tu
NASpurs
03-15-2012, 08:53 PM
Fuck yo team clown

Video is up
ace3g
03-15-2012, 08:59 PM
"this trade was built around roster management and flexibility" - RC
timvp
03-15-2012, 09:06 PM
Good video. Pop and TD have already talked to Jack. RC of course is as vague and non-committal as humanly possible but listening between the words, it sounds like everyone is excited.
VBM
03-15-2012, 09:10 PM
:lmao

Reporter: "How much has [Jackson] grown since he was last here?"

RC: "We'll find out in the physical"
Mr.Bottomtooth
03-15-2012, 09:10 PM
"this trade was built around roster management and flexibility" - RC

Looking at how Jackson makes the team more flexible is only if they both played out their contracts, Jackson would be a year closer to being an expiring contract and asset. Does that mean they no longer intended to use the amnesty on RJ?
GSH
03-15-2012, 09:16 PM
"this trade was built around roster management and flexibility" - RC


"Roster management" meaning making sure that RJ isn't on the roster. "Flexibility" meaning playing both offense and defense.
FuzzyLumpkins
03-15-2012, 09:25 PM
How in the world could those dimwits not at least ask where RC saw him playing ie at 2 or 3 etc especially with Dick gone? I understand he is likely to give nothing but they tried on the maturity question which is even less likely to get a decent answer.
Robz4000
03-15-2012, 09:28 PM
I'm getting more and more excited about this trade. I know it doesn't make the Spurs significantly better, but just the changes in attitude can be enough to take this team far.
GSH
03-15-2012, 09:45 PM
I'm getting more and more excited about this trade. I know it doesn't make the Spurs significantly better, but just the changes in attitude can be enough to take this team far.

As long as he doesn't start his bullshit of demanding more shots, pouting, etc. then he makes the team significantly better. He can create his own shot. He can suck in the defense, and get other guys open shots. He runs the fast break very well. He actually defends.

And I'll offer one more thing to the people who point out that RJ shoots the 3 better than Jackson. IF Jax sat out on the perimeter and took nothing but wide open shots, I bet he could/would shoot a much higher percentage - similar to RJ. That's a big IF, because I don't see Jackson settling for that. But the rumors of his decay are greatly exaggerated.

To me the ONLY potential risk to this move is if he decides he should be the one to carry the team, and starts his usual demands and problem-child routine. Like maybe getting crosswise with Pop, because he thinks the team should run more? He's more than capable of that kind of stuff. But if he can just come in and do what he's told, he's so much better that it's potentially game-changing.
Robz4000
03-15-2012, 09:45 PM
Depends on the situation. 4th Q they go to Tony, Duncan is the defensive anchor always and forever, then there's Neal, Manu, and SJax. If they need a 3, go with Neal. Manu and SJax can handle any other shot.
Mr.Bottomtooth
03-15-2012, 09:52 PM
who gets the ball at end of games?

parker, ginobili, duncan, neal, SJax?

That's a great problem to have.
GB20
03-15-2012, 10:01 PM
[QUOTE=hemann82;5702128]who gets the ball at end of games?

parker, ginobili, duncan, neal, SJax?[/


the red rocket
Libri
03-15-2012, 10:04 PM
We haven't seen much of RC since the incident. lol
Libri
03-15-2012, 10:26 PM
I think this is the second time the Spurs have made a trade for a former player. The first one was Sean.
Chase_the_Bass
03-15-2012, 11:53 PM
who gets the ball at end of games?

parker, ginobili, duncan, neal, SJax?

Good problem to have especially if we have Pop.
gospursgojas
03-16-2012, 12:51 AM
I think this is the second time the Spurs have made a trade for a former player. The first one was Sean.

Steve Kerr