PDA

View Full Version : Spurs Have Legit Shot w/This Ginobili



roycrikside
03-30-2012, 05:13 PM
Not sure how many are aware, but Manu has now played 20 games and he's still shooting 52%. Obviously he's not playing as many minutes as normal (only 23 and change) and not taking as many shots as in some past seasons, but 20 games is not a tiny sample size.

If you look at his career, there have only been six or seven months where he played 10+ games and shot 50% or better, so this is a fairly rare stretch for him. When you extend it to 20 games, I think the only comparable shooting stretch of his career is the 2005 playoffs.

Ginobili is leading the entire league in points-per-100 possessions while he's on the floor and is averaging the highest true shooting percentage (65.5%) of his career, as well as the best assist rate (29%). In other words, he hasn't played much, but has been incredible when he has played.

If he can stay healthy during the playoffs and maintain this level of play offensively at 27-30 mpg, the Spurs will be extremely tough to beat.

smeagol
03-30-2012, 05:21 PM
ducks told me we should trade him so I'm not sure who to believe . . .

timvp
03-30-2012, 05:47 PM
Yeah, Ginobili has been quietly great this season. I've seen people try to attribute Ginobili's amazing numbers to his hot start to the season, but even if you just look at his numbers since his latest return from injury (a span of 276 minutes), his PER is still a very impressive 22.5.

I've said it a lot but he should be repeated: I've never seen Ginobili play this well offensively in terms of seeing the floor, decision-making and just overall efficiency. The percentage of possessions he uses that end well has to be astronomically high.

Like with every player, I do have some concerns.

1. Ginobili's defense has been bad this year. The only players who have defended worse for the Spurs this year are probably Blair and Neal. He had a stretch following his latest return from injury where he was actually by far the worst defender on the team. The good news (well, great news) is that his defense has been much better lately. In the last three or four games, I'd say he's back to about 80-85% of his normal defensive level. As he gets healthier and more in shape, I'm pretty confident he'll become an asset on that end of the floor again.

2. He's relying more than ever on three-pointers. It's working now because he's shooting 44% on three-pointers. With opponents forced to defend him close, that has opened all types of lanes to drive and pass. What will happen if his three-point percentage falls back down to his career 37% mark? I think he'll be fine but it could change the equation.

3. His free throw attempts per minute are down more than half from last season. A lot of Manu's value in the playoffs has been due to his ability to get to the line. Will his free throw rate improve as he gets healthy? That's the hope.






If healthy, I expect Ginobili to be great in the playoffs. He's been in a zone all year ... even through all the injuries. Just gotta hope he stays healthy.

roycrikside
03-30-2012, 05:59 PM
Yeah, Ginobili has been quietly great this season. I've seen people try to attribute Ginobili's amazing numbers to his hot start to the season, but even if you just look at his numbers since his latest return from injury (a span of 276 minutes), his PER is still a very impressive 22.5.

I've said it a lot but he should be repeated: I've never seen Ginobili play this well offensively in terms of seeing the floor, decision-making and just overall efficiency. The percentage of possessions he uses that end well has to be astronomically high.

Like with every player, I do have some concerns.

1. Ginobili's defense has been bad this year. The only players who have defended worse for the Spurs this year are probably Blair and Neal. He had a stretch following his latest return from injury where he was actually by far the worst defender on the team. The good news (well, great news) is that his defense has been much better lately. In the last three or four games, I'd say he's back to about 80-85% of his normal defensive level. As he gets healthier and more in shape, I'm pretty confident he'll become an asset on that end of the floor again.

2. He's relying more than ever on three-pointers. It's working now because he's shooting 44% on three-pointers. With opponents forced to defend him close, that has opened all types of lanes to drive and pass. What will happen if his three-point percentage falls back down to his career 37% mark? I think he'll be fine but it could change the equation.

3. His free throw attempts per minute are down more than half from last season. A lot of Manu's value in the playoffs has been due to his ability to get to the line. Will his free throw rate improve as he gets healthy? That's the hope.






If healthy, I expect Ginobili to be great in the playoffs. He's been in a zone all year ... even through all the injuries. Just gotta hope he stays healthy.

The last two games, he started mixing in some mid-range jumpers, which he hadn't done previously. It had been pretty much all lay-ups or 3s until the Phoenix game, so I think he's getting his game back slowly but surely.

The FT attempts I don't quite get. He's driving to the basket at the same rate he has the last few years, as far as ratio of FG attempts, but either he's getting uncontested attempts or just not getting calls.

One area where he racked up a bunch of his FT attempts was late in games when the other team was in desperate foul mode. Now those attempts are going to Parker (Phx) or Neal (Sac).

jestersmash
03-30-2012, 06:07 PM
Manu made a comment during postgame interviews after the Kings game that I'm not quite sure what to make of.

He said something to the extent of "This season and going into the playoffs, I'm definitely looking to be more of a facilitator than a scorer."

Inherently there's nothing necessarily wrong with this statement, especially given the Spurs' team-first, "open man gets the shot...period" offense. Hypothetically in a future spurs game if Manu is consistently doubled 20 possessions and he properly passes out of the double team every single time to a wide open Danny Green who goes 0-20, costing the Spurs the game, I'm actually fine with that. If that's what the opposing team defense dictates, then so be it. It's exactly this sort of team first mentality that has the Spurs sitting top 3-ish (depending on the metric you use) in offense this season to begin with.

That being said, I don't want Ginobili to be too passive on the offensive end, especially when it comes to drawing fouls. I have a hunch that he's maybe saving his hard drives/euro-step finishes at the rim for games that actually matter (granted, he went this route at the end of the Kings game because we did not yet have the game in hand).

I think there's a risk for Ginobili to be too passive and perhaps forcing an assist when it may have been better for him to take the shot himself with the sort of mentality he espoused in that Spurs-Kings postagme interview.

I think especially against a team like OKC, wracking up fouls and getting into the bonus early could be pivotal in swaying a game or 2 in our favor. Just thinking about the 3 headed Durant-Westbrook-Harden "FT attempt" monster is making me quiver.

timvp
03-30-2012, 06:13 PM
One area where he racked up a bunch of his FT attempts was late in games when the other team was in desperate foul mode. Now those attempts are going to Parker (Phx) or Neal (Sac).
Good point :tu

Yeah, I'd say his massive drop in getting to the line is more odd than worrisome right now. I don't think the numbers are available anywhere but I'd say that over the years, Manu has averaged at least one free throw per game solely due to end of game fouls and shooting all technical fouls. (Maybe even around two; it's difficult to estimate.) This year, he hasn't gotten those extra FTs.

Plus it seems like Ginobili has just been unfortunate in terms of the refs not calling borderline (and some not-so-borderline) calls. That evens out over time but it has to be a bit frustrating for him right now. A couple times it looked like PHX players were taking intentional fouls against him ... and they weren't called.

roycrikside
03-30-2012, 06:15 PM
Last year, 43% of Manu's attempts were 3s, where this year it's 48% so far, so yeah, that's a big difference.

However, last year 26.5% of his attempts were at the basket and he only converted 59% of those. This year it's 32% and he's converting 70%.

He's shooting from the paint at about the same rate, 39% this year compared to 37.8 last year, but shooting 64% this year compared to 55% last year.

SpursRock20
03-30-2012, 06:17 PM
With all the scorers we have on this team there are only 4 that can create their own shot. This is Jackson, Parker, Neal, and Ginobili. I believe that Ginobili should end up coming off the bench with Jackson taking Green's spot in the playoffs. Along with Ginobili, I would like to see Neal come in with him at the 2. This is just my opinion, but I believe that Neal is the best pure shooter on the team and would like him to spot up on the wings and let Manu man the second unit.

For the second unit, I would like to see:
Ginobili
Neal
Leonard
Bonner/Diaw
Splitter

It's a perfect mix of offense and defense and Manu works well with these guys. Sadly this would mean reduced minutes for Green, but he is just too much of a streaky shooter for my tastes. If Neal is too much of a liability on the defense end, then Pop should stick Green in, but even he can be sketchy.

roycrikside
03-30-2012, 06:22 PM
Manu made a comment during postgame interviews after the Kings game that I'm not quite sure what to make of.

He said something to the extent of "This season and going into the playoffs, I'm definitely looking to be more of a facilitator than a scorer."

Inherently there's nothing necessarily wrong with this statement, especially given the Spurs' team-first, "open man gets the shot...period" offense. Hypothetically in a future spurs game if Manu is consistently doubled 20 possessions and he properly passes out of the double team every single time to a wide open Danny Green who goes 0-20, costing the Spurs the game, I'm actually fine with that. If that's what the opposing team defense dictates, then so be it. It's exactly this sort of team first mentality that has the Spurs sitting top 3-ish (depending on the metric you use) in offense this season to begin with.

That being said, I don't want Ginobili to be too passive on the offensive end, especially when it comes to drawing fouls. I have a hunch that he's maybe saving his hard drives/euro-step finishes at the rim for games that actually matter (granted, he went this route at the end of the Kings game because we did not yet have the game in hand).

I think there's a risk for Ginobili to be too passive and perhaps forcing an assist when it may have been better for him to take the shot himself with the sort of mentality he espoused in that Spurs-Kings postagme interview.

I think especially against a team like OKC, wracking up fouls and getting into the bonus early could be pivotal in swaying a game or 2 in our favor. Just thinking about the 3 headed Durant-Westbrook-Harden "FT attempt" monster is making me quiver.

Not too worried about his scoring. He scores when the team needs him to score. As long as the other guys are going well, he'll pass. If nobody can knock down a shot, he'll look to score more. I do think one of the reasons his percentages are so high is because he's taking, relative to him, high percentage attempts, he's not really forcing too much, because he doesn't have to.

One thing I am excited about is him working in concert with Diaw. He's never played with anyone on the second unit who can pass like he does, and Diaw can really get him some easy looks. It's very easy to understand why Manu's been very enthusiastic about that partnership.

It's ironic, if you think about it. Parker has wanted Diaw on the team forever, but really it's Ginobili who'll benefit more from it.

roycrikside
03-30-2012, 06:25 PM
With all the scorers we have on this team there are only 4 that can create their own shot. This is Jackson, Parker, Neal, and Ginobili. I believe that Ginobili should end up coming off the bench with Jackson taking Green's spot in the playoffs. Along with Ginobili, I would like to see Neal come in with him at the 2. This is just my opinion, but I believe that Neal is the best pure shooter on the team and would like him to spot up on the wings and let Manu man the second unit.

For the second unit, I would like to see:
Ginobili
Neal
Leonard
Bonner/Diaw
Splitter

It's a perfect mix of offense and defense and Manu works well with these guys. Sadly this would mean reduced minutes for Green, but he is just too much of a streaky shooter for my tastes. If Neal is too much of a liability on the defense end, then Pop should stick Green in, but even he can be sketchy.

Agree for the most part. I think Pop has a couple of lineup options to play with for the second unit. If the team is behind and he wants some quick points, I'd go Manu/Neal/Leonard/Bonner/Splitter. If we're ahead and he wants a defensive quintet, I'd go Manu/Jackson/Leonard/Diaw/Splitter.

jestersmash
03-30-2012, 06:31 PM
Yeah, the Ginobili-Diaw connection will be interesting to see. One aspect of Diaw's game that immediately caught my eye (the game we won against Dallas recently) was his ability to set crisp screens. He seemed to have a great knack for understanding the proper spacing/angles for the pick and roll up top.

In the Kings game, however, I think he was a rather sloppy with his screens for Manu, and several times he didn't really get the spacing right from the start, but I think these are chemistry issues that can be (hopefully) fixed with time.

Diaw to me seems like he could fulfill a Splitter-like role (setting solid screens, rolling to the open spot) with arguably better court vision (passing out of the roll) and perhaps less finishing prowess (compared to Tiago) around the rim. I'll admit - I have yet to see how Diaw can score consistently on the court, but I'm not too worried about it at the moment.

Cane
03-30-2012, 06:34 PM
\

1. Ginobili's defense has been bad this year. The only players who have defended worse for the Spurs this year are probably Blair and Neal. He had a stretch following his latest return from injury where he was actually by far the worst defender on the team. The good news (well, great news) is that his defense has been much better lately. In the last three or four games, I'd say he's back to about 80-85% of his normal defensive level. As he gets healthier and more in shape, I'm pretty confident he'll become an asset on that end of the floor again.




Is that based off of Synergy sports? Ginobili has been shaking off the rust since his injury but tbh I thought he was still one of the better defending guards on the roster, in particular Ginobili did a damn good job against the quicker Roddy not too long ago when they were matched up in the first half. Ginobili's energy and hustle on the defensive end has still been there too, and he's still a pesky defender that can stay in front of his man

siraulo23
03-30-2012, 06:45 PM
If healthy,

Oh god, this has been the case every year since 08 and manu have failed to stay healthy right when the spurs needed him the most

maybe ducks is right, we should trade manu while we still can

:lol

Seriously though, hopefully he can stay healthy for the rest of the year (20+ missed games in a lockout season is enough, right???)

DAF86
03-30-2012, 06:46 PM
The only concern regarding Manu come playoffs time is health, that's it. If he's healthy you know he's going to contribute one way or another.

jestersmash
03-30-2012, 06:49 PM
I haven't looked closely at the data, but from what I can gather based on my "eyeball test" of watching the games, Ginobili seems to be late on close outs to perimeter shooters more often than not.

Pay close attention to Manu trying to close out on a shooter next time. Not only does Manu appear to be late closing out (as of...late, since coming back from his injury), but the opposing perimeter players seems to make him pay for it more often than not.

Occasionally I'll see Manu close out late on a perimeter shooter, and the shooter still misses, but it's still mediocre-poor defense on Manu's part. I think the fact that Manu loves to roam around in the paint looking for steals or looking to trap makes him more vulnerable to getting burned on perimeter shots due to poor close outs. His attention is just too divided. Of course, every now and then this ends up paying off for us (Manu will get a couple of key steals for easy baskets, etc.) but nevertheless his defense overall has been pretty poor overall.

DPG21920
03-30-2012, 06:49 PM
Hopefully not like 06 I saidddd

jestersmash
03-30-2012, 06:54 PM
Also, just to be clear, when I say Manu appears to be poor at closing out on perimeter shooters, it's nothing overly blatant. Manu will still run out and put a hand up, and from afar if you sort of squint your eyes it may appear as though his defense isn't bad, but in reality I feel like he's always just a fraction of a second late.

DAF86
03-30-2012, 06:57 PM
Hopefully not like 06 I saidddd

What a fucking brain fart :depressed

angelbelow
03-30-2012, 07:00 PM
The analysis is nice and fancy but Manu will always be a game changer, he always has and he always will. If it's not his shooting, he'll contribute somewhere us, that is why he is Manu Ginobili. I'm optimistic we'll enter the offseason with full health so lets hope he continues his hot streak.

timvp
03-30-2012, 07:05 PM
Is that based off of Synergy sports? Ginobili has been shaking off the rust since his injury but tbh I thought he was still one of the better defending guards on the roster, in particular Ginobili did a damn good job against the quicker Roddy not too long ago when they were matched up in the first half. Ginobili's energy and hustle on the defensive end has still been there too, and he's still a pesky defender that can stay in front of his man

It's mostly based off of observation. As jestersmash noted, Ginobili's closeouts haven't been as crisp as usual -- something I definitely agree with.

Plus, when Ginobili wasn't moving well, his two options in one-on-one defense were to either overplay and allow the drive or back off and allow a shot. But now that he's moving better, he has gotten back to playing closer to typical level of Ginobili defense. He's never been more than an average one-on-one defender but for a while he was far below average.

Most of Ginobili's value on the defensive end will always lie in his team-defense abilities. He's one of the very best help defenders of the best decade. As he feels better, he'll get back to that.

If you want statistical evidence of Ginobili's defensive struggles so far, it's available (http://basketballvalue.com/teamplayers.php?year=2011-2012&mode=summary&sortnumber=83&sortorder=DESC&team=SAS). When he's been on the court this season, the Spurs allow 108.42 points per 100 possessions. That's worse than every player on the team outside of Cory Joseph. It's even worse than Blair and Neal who are bottom 10% defenders in the NBA.

But, like I said, Ginobili's D is improving. I was pretty darn impressed with his defense against the Suns. Earlier in the season, I think he just wasn't capable of playing very good defense due to being out of shape. As long as he stays healthy, his D should be fine come playoff time.

DPG21920
03-30-2012, 07:06 PM
Manu is a certified bad ass and I love watching him. I really hope he's healthy because like it or not, the fans and I believe the team feel a certain level of confidence when he's healthy.

therealtruth
03-30-2012, 07:07 PM
Yeah, the Ginobili-Diaw connection will be interesting to see. One aspect of Diaw's game that immediately caught my eye (the game we won against Dallas recently) was his ability to set crisp screens. He seemed to have a great knack for understanding the proper spacing/angles for the pick and roll up top.

In the Kings game, however, I think he was a rather sloppy with his screens for Manu, and several times he didn't really get the spacing right from the start, but I think these are chemistry issues that can be (hopefully) fixed with time.

Diaw to me seems like he could fulfill a Splitter-like role (setting solid screens, rolling to the open spot) with arguably better court vision (passing out of the roll) and perhaps less finishing prowess (compared to Tiago) around the rim. I'll admit - I have yet to see how Diaw can score consistently on the court, but I'm not too worried about it at the moment.

The second unit is loaded. I would like to see some of that talent in the starting lineup (Ginobili, Splitter) so they can start games better. Green and Diaw can take their place. It relieves pressure on the second unit as they will mainly just have to maintain a lead.

Starting will make Ginobili more aggressive offensively which is important. Think back to '10 where he started slow till he started starting. I think there was a game earlier in the year in which Ginobili started the game with a 10-0 run of his own.

DesignatedT
03-30-2012, 07:09 PM
Manu is a certified bad ass and I love watching him. I really hope he's healthy because like it or not, the fans and I believe the team feel a certain level of confidence when he's healthy.

No doubt about it.

Cane
03-30-2012, 07:13 PM
It's mostly based off of observation. As jestersmash noted, Ginobili's closeouts haven't been as crisp as usual -- something I definitely agree with.

Plus, when Ginobili wasn't moving well, his two options in one-on-one defense were to either overplay and allow the drive or back off and allow a shot. But now that he's moving better, he has gotten back to playing closer to typical level of Ginobili defense. He's never been more than an average one-on-one defender but for a while he was far below average.

Most of Ginobili's value on the defensive end will always lie in his team-defense abilities. He's one of the very best help defenders of the best decade. As he feels better, he'll get back to that.

If you want statistical evidence of Ginobili's defensive struggles so far, it's available (http://basketballvalue.com/teamplayers.php?year=2011-2012&mode=summary&sortnumber=83&sortorder=DESC&team=SAS). When he's been on the court this season, the Spurs allow 108.42 points per 100 possessions. That's worse than every player on the team outside of Cory Joseph. It's even worse than Blair and Neal who are bottom 10% defenders in the NBA.

But, like I said, Ginobili's D is improving. I was pretty darn impressed with his defense against the Suns. Earlier in the season, I think he just wasn't capable of playing very good defense due to being out of shape. As long as he stays healthy, his D should be fine come playoff time.

Imo Ginobili has been an overall above average defender including staying with his man but maybe its all the hustle and energy highlights that skew that judgment. But I was actually impressed with how well Manu was able to stay in front of and bother the quicker Roddy

I'm not sure how much stock we can put into those numbers unless it takes into account that Manu's also been coming off the bench

jetersmash's point about the close outs is interesting though...and it reminds me of an infamous point in the Grizz series where not a single Spur on the court including Manu even tried to contest against an open 3 point shooter :depressed

Anyway like you guys said, a healthy and in-shape Manu is a game changer on both ends of the court. Just don't foul a last second 3 point shot :downspin:

maverick1948
03-30-2012, 07:14 PM
I haven't looked closely at the data, but from what I can gather based on my "eyeball test" of watching the games, Ginobili seems to be late on close outs to perimeter shooters more often than not.

Pay close attention to Manu trying to close out on a shooter next time. Not only does Manu appear to be late closing out (as of...late, since coming back from his injury), but the opposing perimeter players seems to make him pay for it more often than not.

Occasionally I'll see Manu close out late on a perimeter shooter, and the shooter still misses, but it's still mediocre-poor defense on Manu's part. I think the fact that Manu loves to roam around in the paint looking for steals or looking to trap makes him more vulnerable to getting burned on perimeter shots due to poor close outs. His attention is just too divided. Of course, every now and then this ends up paying off for us (Manu will get a couple of key steals for easy baskets, etc.) but nevertheless his defense overall has been pretty poor overall.


Manu has actually been back from his second injury stint for a total of 26 days. That is less than the time for preseason training camp. He was not in great shape the first time he returned from the hand problem. I have noticed also that he is a little slower than usual at this time of the year but he does have a good reason. IMO he has established his defense a little more each game. I look forward to seeing him have another month of solid minutes and watching players like Harden get flustrated before games end.

GSH
03-30-2012, 07:42 PM
3. His free throw attempts per minute are down more than half from last season. A lot of Manu's value in the playoffs has been due to his ability to get to the line. Will his free throw rate improve as he gets healthy? That's the hope.





One of my pet stats. I hadn't noticed it, but a 50% drop is too much to overlook, or to blame on net getting the ball in the last seconds. But some portion of it probably is due to the injuries. And with a very small sample size for this time of year, just getting some bad breaks from the zebras could hurt the numbers. Still - 50% is a big drop.

Manu always had unbelievable court vision. He's probably the best I've ever seen at seeing passing lanes. More, he creates passing lanes better than just about anyone. When he was young he made some crazy-good passes, but he tried others that were just crazy. This year it's like he's the old Manu, but under more control. The best of both worlds.

roycrikside
03-30-2012, 08:05 PM
Manu has actually been back from his second injury stint for a total of 26 days. That is less than the time for preseason training camp. He was not in great shape the first time he returned from the hand problem. I have noticed also that he is a little slower than usual at this time of the year but he does have a good reason. IMO he has established his defense a little more each game. I look forward to seeing him have another month of solid minutes and watching players like Harden get flustrated before games end.

Spurs have 17 games left and given the nature of the schedule, I'd expect Manu to play somewhere between 12-14 of them, so yeah, I think he'll get to full fitness, assuming no set backs.

I'll know he's feeling really good about his game when he can go behind-the-back on his dribble or split a double team. The mid-range jumper coming back is a good sign of progress though.

ElNono
03-30-2012, 08:10 PM
Manu Ginobili is a badass

/thread

100%duncan
03-30-2012, 08:36 PM
Don't we all know already that we win with manu and we lose with him?

DPG21920
03-30-2012, 08:38 PM
That was me nono

pgardn
03-30-2012, 08:41 PM
When I watch him, I see a much slower player that is not only worse defensively, but who has not got his legs fully under him and not handling the ball that well on the dribble.

When the playoffs come, we must have more explosion from him on both ends. He is just not as quick to the basket by my eye. He is using much more anticipation on D because he is not as quick. His shot lacks legs when he is tired, and he gets tired much more rapidly.

bottom line... he is not Ginobili yet. I am not seeing the same player.

The above stated, he still is the one guy on the team that does more to get the other players going than anyone on the Spurs. For that reason alone he is still incredibly valuable. But I beg to see him at full G.

100%duncan
03-30-2012, 08:42 PM
^ People tire and get old, dude

pgardn
03-30-2012, 08:55 PM
^ People tire and get old, dude


ya dont say?

Older people also take longer to heal. Im still waiting for him to heal fully. I hope thats what Im waiting for. Either that or I have seen more than a years aging in a year.

I also see Duncan looking spry compared to last year. So its a difficult judgement. BTW, he is also a year older than last year.

100%duncan
03-30-2012, 09:01 PM
ya dont say?

Older people also take longer to heal. Im still waiting for him to heal fully. I hope thats what Im waiting for. Either that or I have seen more than a years aging in a year.

I also see Duncan looking spry compared to last year. So its a difficult judgement. BTW, he is also a year older than last year.

TBH, I think your arguing with your opinion. :wakeup

pgardn
03-30-2012, 09:08 PM
TBH, I think your arguing with your opinion. :wakeup

Observation: already made.

Reasoning and a question: Is it just age or is it still lingering mobility from the hip and old horrible ankle injuries?


Other Observations: Duncan looks better than last year physically imo.

so whats the verdict on Ginobili, will he get better, maybe even better than last year ala Duncan? Or have we seen what we will get. Because if we have, imo, we will not win the West.

ElNono
03-30-2012, 09:09 PM
That was me nono

Nope. timvp said it a few months ago. I'm sure he remembers.

benefactor
03-30-2012, 09:18 PM
The analysis is nice and fancy but Manu will always be a game changer, he always has and he always will. If it's not his shooting, he'll contribute somewhere us, that is why he is Manu Ginobili. I'm optimistic we'll enter the offseason with full health so lets hope he continues his hot streak.


Manu is a certified bad ass and I love watching him. I really hope he's healthy because like it or not, the fans and I believe the team feel a certain level of confidence when he's healthy.
:tu:tu

Seventyniner
03-30-2012, 09:23 PM
When he was young he made some crazy-good passes, but he tried others that were just crazy. This year it's like he's the old Manu, but under more control. The best of both worlds.

This is why youth is not always good. Manu is definitely a smarter, more savvy player than he was 9 years ago.

MannyIsGod
03-30-2012, 10:15 PM
I'd argue 20 games IS a small sample size.

MannyIsGod
03-30-2012, 10:24 PM
To further elaborate, Manu's taken 175 FGs this season so far. Thats a very small number in a statistical context. Of those, 84 (or nearly half) have been from the 3 point line.

The biggest skew in those 3s is that 2/3rds of those have come at home where he's shooting 51% as compared to 26% on the road.

You can say Manu is playing well, but you can't point to his shooting and say those percentages are statistically significant in any way.

therealtruth
03-30-2012, 10:36 PM
Who's going to be the starting bigmen in the playoffs, Tim and Diaw or Tim and Tiago?

I'd like Tim and Tiago for better starting defense. A frontcourt of KL, Tim, and Tiago would be formidable on defense with their length.

wildbill2u
03-31-2012, 12:35 AM
Regarding the fewer FT attempts, it might have something to do with the Offensive Efficiency vs. Defensive efficiency rate. We are fifth in the league on that according to Hoopdata.com.

We aren't playing in as many close games so often Ginobilli and TD and TP aren't even on the court at the end of the game. I noticed the other night that at the end of the game it was Ginobilli and a bunch of the youngsters out there. Manu wasn't taking shots but just 'facilitating'.

It sorta looked like the old Alpha male wolf taking the pack's cubs out for a lesson in how to bring down prey.

TJastal
03-31-2012, 12:46 AM
Manu made a comment during postgame interviews after the Kings game that I'm not quite sure what to make of.

He said something to the extent of "This season and going into the playoffs, I'm definitely looking to be more of a facilitator than a scorer."

Inherently there's nothing necessarily wrong with this statement, especially given the Spurs' team-first, "open man gets the shot...period" offense. Hypothetically in a future spurs game if Manu is consistently doubled 20 possessions and he properly passes out of the double team every single time to a wide open Danny Green who goes 0-20, costing the Spurs the game, I'm actually fine with that. If that's what the opposing team defense dictates, then so be it. It's exactly this sort of team first mentality that has the Spurs sitting top 3-ish (depending on the metric you use) in offense this season to begin with.

That being said, I don't want Ginobili to be too passive on the offensive end, especially when it comes to drawing fouls. I have a hunch that he's maybe saving his hard drives/euro-step finishes at the rim for games that actually matter (granted, he went this route at the end of the Kings game because we did not yet have the game in hand).

I think there's a risk for Ginobili to be too passive and perhaps forcing an assist when it may have been better for him to take the shot himself with the sort of mentality he espoused in that Spurs-Kings postagme interview.

I think especially against a team like OKC, wracking up fouls and getting into the bonus early could be pivotal in swaying a game or 2 in our favor. Just thinking about the 3 headed Durant-Westbrook-Harden "FT attempt" monster is making me quiver.

As Timvp outlined, Manu is probably the best offensive player in the league at the moment. And you want to change that????? :rolleyes

Brah, the spurs now have Green, Neal, Tiago, and even Leonard taking it hard to the rack to help draw shooting fouls. Last year it was often only Hill doing this. I don't know about you but I'm perfectly fine if Ginobili trades a few of those 5-14 type shooting nights for the occassional double digit assist game. I've always thought he forced a few too many shots in past years, but this was also mostly due to the fact that he had less bonafide weapons to throw the ball to. Now that he does, he's operating at peak efficiency. Why have him sacrificing his body all game long and putting himself at considerable risk to draw fouls when he has all these new weapons around him?

TJastal
03-31-2012, 12:51 AM
Who's going to be the starting bigmen in the playoffs, Tim and Diaw or Tim and Tiago?

Pop's making em all draw straws this year.

TJastal
03-31-2012, 12:52 AM
I'd like Tim and Tiago for better starting defense. A frontcourt of KL, Tim, and Tiago would be formidable on defense with their length.

Keep dreaming.

Silent
03-31-2012, 01:49 PM
manu is sometimes turning into turnoboli

TheSkeptic
03-31-2012, 02:02 PM
Pop's making em all draw straws this year.

:pctoss

Keep dreaming.

:pctoss:pctoss

I feel like I'm going through the stages of grief. Just completely fluctuating between anger, sadness, and bargaining where the frontcourt is concerned.

It'll be mostly anger if Blair is starting in the playoffs though.


P & R >>>>>>>> motion offense. Run the TP-Tiago high screen to death which leaves Timmy open for a dunk once TP blows past his man and the other big man not picked off has to stop him.

I'd agree with this. Those easy baskets could do a lot to boost confidence since it seems like this team has more energy when people are making their shots. No stats or anything, just my impression.

To the OP:

I thought it was obvious?

benefactor
03-31-2012, 03:05 PM
To the OP:

I thought it was obvious?
Cut him some slack. He still thinks people from Texas drag gays into the street and beat them while the police watch.

kaji157
03-31-2012, 04:33 PM
I think there is a lot of good analysis here, but once the PO kicks in and teams start packing the paint and closing the lines for the 3, goodbye to open 3īs and goodbye to the fast break (defense not set) penetration.
And balls will be going back to ginobili because he is the only one who really has all 4 offensive options polished, 3, midrange, penetration and assist.
TPīs game slows a bit in the PO because he cannot take a 3 off the dribble like Manu can, so teams can close out on him or pack for his penetrations, that happened last year en this year will be similar, Ginobili offensive production will be increased a lot once teams take away the most basic offensive schemes.

roycrikside
03-31-2012, 04:42 PM
Cut him some slack. He still thinks people from Texas drag gays into the street and beat them while the police watch.

So you're saying the police don't participate in the beatings? :lol

Keepin' it real
03-31-2012, 05:06 PM
Who's going to be the starting bigmen in the playoffs, Tim and Diaw or Tim and Tiago?

Duncan and Blair. Why mess with something that is working?

TheSkeptic
03-31-2012, 05:13 PM
Duncan and Blair. Why mess with something that is working?

I...uh...I...

I really admire your optimism.

spurs10
03-31-2012, 05:14 PM
With all the scorers we have on this team there are only 4 that can create their own shot. This is Jackson, Parker, Neal, and Ginobili. I believe that Ginobili should end up coming off the bench with Jackson taking Green's spot in the playoffs. Along with Ginobili, I would like to see Neal come in with him at the 2. This is just my opinion, but I believe that Neal is the best pure shooter on the team and would like him to spot up on the wings and let Manu man the second unit.

For the second unit, I would like to see:
Ginobili
Neal
Leonard
Bonner/Diaw
Splitter

It's a perfect mix of offense and defense and Manu works well with these guys. Sadly this would mean reduced minutes for Green, but he is just too much of a streaky shooter for my tastes. If Neal is too much of a liability on the defense end, then Pop should stick Green in, but even he can be sketchy.
If you have Kawhi playing the 3 in the second unit and Jack playing 2 for Green, who plays the 3 on the starting unit?

Obstructed_View
03-31-2012, 05:23 PM
If you have Kawhi playing the 3 in the second unit and Jack playing 2 for Green, who plays the 3 on the starting unit?

Might be moot, as the Spurs probably won't be running a 10 man rotation for the playoffs.

spurs10
03-31-2012, 05:32 PM
Might be moot, as the Spurs probably won't be running a 10 man rotation for the playoffs.
You're right and it's got me thinking. Who's out? I am very curious as to which of the bigs will sit.

MaNu4Tres
03-31-2012, 05:33 PM
Might be moot, as the Spurs probably won't be running a 10 man rotation for the playoffs.

I think they have to utilize their depth.

The past few playoff runs, Spurs have been terrible at executing down the stretch which could be because of Tim, Manu and Tony being gassed (playing more minutes than their bodies have grown accustomed to). I think in order to get the most out of the big 3, Pop will have to manage their minutes (especially Tim and Manu) to a slight extent.

In other words, I rather have Tim and Manu play a highly efficient 32-34 minutes and be sharp in crunch time, than have them play a sloppy/inefficient 38-42 minutes where they're not as sharp in crunch time-- which has been the case in recent years.

pgardn
03-31-2012, 05:33 PM
I...uh...I...

I really admire your optimism.

Well I will try to justify Blair in the first part of games.

Blair is a very good junk man. He cleans up messes. Where he gets into trouble is trying to do too much. Defense. He is bad. So Pop might just have him waste a few fouls, while beating on the opposition on the offensive boards ( he will actually always keep the ball alive or even rebound).

He also can get himself open. Tony and Manu seem to find him for uncontested layups if the opposition goes to sleep. He has does have some usefullness. Diaw is the one I am really interested to see the contributions. He could really help us, or not. Tiago gets that back together, and all of the sudden we are not overwhelmed like last year with the Bonner Blair pair as bigs. It is quite a contrast to last year.

jjktkk
03-31-2012, 05:44 PM
I think they have to utilize their depth.

The past few playoff runs, Spurs have been terrible at executing down the stretch which could be because of Tim, Manu and Tony being gassed (playing more minutes than their bodies have grown accustomed to). I think in order to get the most out of the big 3, Pop will have to manage their minutes (especially Tim and Manu) to a slight extent.

In other words, I rather have Tim and Manu play a highly efficient 32-34 minutes and be sharp in crunch time, than have them play a sloppy/inefficient 38-42 minutes where they're not as sharp in crunch time-- which has been the case in recent years.

This. IMO, the Spur's greatest strength, so its up to Pop to make sure the big 3 don't get gassed. I also see Pop giving quick hokks in the playoffs, for players underperforming, and yes that includes Bonner.(Hope).

jestersmash
03-31-2012, 05:51 PM
I think they have to utilize their depth.

The past few playoff runs, Spurs have been terrible at executing down the stretch which could be because of Tim, Manu and Tony being gassed (playing more minutes than their bodies have grown accustomed to). I think in order to get the most out of the big 3, Pop will have to manage their minutes (especially Tim and Manu) to a slight extent.

In other words, I rather have Tim and Manu play a highly efficient 32-34 minutes and be sharp in crunch time, than have them play a sloppy/inefficient 38-42 minutes where they're not as sharp in crunch time-- which has been the case in recent years.

Wait, what? Why are you making it sound like Pop is considering playing Manu 38-42 minutes in the playoffs?

Manu has averaged 31.4 MPG game through the playoffs in his career. For '10 and '11, he averaged 35.2 and 34.8 MPG, respectively - the highest playoff MPG numbers of his career. He's never been even close to seeing 38-42 MPG in the playoffs, so no it hasn't been the case in recent years that Manu's been gassed near the end of games as a result of playing 38-42 MPG. He's never played anything close to 38-42 MPG in the playoffs.

Edit: Upon looking at the individual game logs, it seems like you're right. Pop has played Manu 38-42 minutes in various playoff games (certainly in the '10 playoff season). My bad, you were right. Carry on :lol

His average is deceptively low because he'll have an outlier game or two where he doesn't play many (or any) minutes at all due to injuries, Pop throwing the white flag, etc.

MaNu4Tres
03-31-2012, 05:57 PM
Wait, what? Why are you making it sound like Pop is considering playing Manu 38-42 minutes in the playoffs?

Manu has averaged 31.4 MPG game through the playoffs in his career. For '10 and '11, he averaged 35.2 and 34.8 MPG, respectively - the highest playoff MPG numbers of his career. He's never been even close to seeing 38-42 MPG in the playoffs, so no it hasn't been the case in recent years that Manu's been gassed near the end of games as a result of playing 38-42 MPG. He's never played anything close to 38-42 MPG in the playoffs.

You can't look at averages because blow-out games (on either side) bring the average down considerably. You have to look at the minutes in competitive/close games.

For instance, go look at the Suns series in 2010-- where every game was close going into the 4th quarter.

If you're too lazy.

Here are the box scores.

Game 1: http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/201005030PHO.html

Game 2:http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/201005050PHO.html

Game 3:http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/201005070SAS.html

Game 4: http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/201005090SAS.html

jestersmash
03-31-2012, 05:59 PM
^ Already sniped you with the edit, sorry bro :lol

MaNu4Tres
03-31-2012, 06:02 PM
^ Already sniped you with the edit, sorry bro :lol

All good. :tu

TheSkeptic
03-31-2012, 06:04 PM
Well I will try to justify Blair in the first part of games.

Blair is a very good junk man. He cleans up messes. Where he gets into trouble is trying to do too much. Defense. He is bad. So Pop might just have him waste a few fouls, while beating on the opposition on the offensive boards ( he will actually always keep the ball alive or even rebound).

He also can get himself open. Tony and Manu seem to find him for uncontested layups if the opposition goes to sleep. He has does have some usefullness. Diaw is the one I am really interested to see the contributions. He could really help us, or not. Tiago gets that back together, and all of the sudden we are not overwhelmed like last year with the Bonner Blair pair as bigs. It is quite a contrast to last year.

Hi,

I don't dispute that he's a good junk man. If anything else I think that his strengths and his weaknesses are what ultimately make him a better asset off the bench. It doesn't matter how many other bigs we have if the coach is going to keep playing Tim and Blair together like last time.

Although I will admit that Tim has been looking good as of late we can't afford another repeat of last year where Duncan had to do it all by himself. We can't afford to be spotting the other team points by keeping Blair in the starting line-up. That would be inexcusable in light of the fact that Tiago is better than advertised and Diaw's available as well. Blair needs to be the 4th big if he plays at all.

Bonner, for all intents and purposes, is simply not a big imo.

therealtruth
03-31-2012, 07:43 PM
I think there is a lot of good analysis here, but once the PO kicks in and teams start packing the paint and closing the lines for the 3, goodbye to open 3īs and goodbye to the fast break (defense not set) penetration.
And balls will be going back to ginobili because he is the only one who really has all 4 offensive options polished, 3, midrange, penetration and assist.
TPīs game slows a bit in the PO because he cannot take a 3 off the dribble like Manu can, so teams can close out on him or pack for his penetrations, that happened last year en this year will be similar, Ginobili offensive production will be increased a lot once teams take away the most basic offensive schemes.

Good point. In the playoffs teams are going to force you to beat them from midrange. They will try to take away paint points and 3's. A couple of ways to counter that is by being able to hit from midrange (taking what they're giving you) and with a dominant low post scorer who forces the defense to collapse to open up 3's.

MannyIsGod
03-31-2012, 08:28 PM
I think they have to utilize their depth.

The past few playoff runs, Spurs have been terrible at executing down the stretch which could be because of Tim, Manu and Tony being gassed (playing more minutes than their bodies have grown accustomed to). I think in order to get the most out of the big 3, Pop will have to manage their minutes (especially Tim and Manu) to a slight extent.

In other words, I rather have Tim and Manu play a highly efficient 32-34 minutes and be sharp in crunch time, than have them play a sloppy/inefficient 38-42 minutes where they're not as sharp in crunch time-- which has been the case in recent years.

The Goods

Keepin' it real
03-31-2012, 08:30 PM
Hi,

Bonner, for all intents and purposes, is simply not a big imo.

I agree; I laugh when Bonner is referred to as a "big." The truth is he's a 6 foot 10 shooting guard.

TheSkeptic
03-31-2012, 08:37 PM
I agree; I laugh when Bonner is referred to as a "big." The truth is he's a 6 foot 10 shooting guard.

Yeah, but sadly without the handles of a guard. :depressed

Why does he play so much exactly?

TMTTRIO
03-31-2012, 11:46 PM
Still concerned about Manu not getting to the line or getting any calls from the refs. There were a few times where he was hacked when he drove the lane and still no calls. It looks like he's going to have to rely on making his 3 point shots and passing. Fortunately his 3 point shot right now looks pretty good.