Yonivore
04-11-2012, 03:41 PM
The One Obama has been waiting for (http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/04/the-one-obama-has-been-waiting-for/)
Obama’s targeting of demonized groups has been narrowing over time (http://legalinsurrection.com/2009/03/barack-got-enemy/), something documented here since the 2008 campaign.
Remember when the Top 5% were the target? Phew, that’s so 2008 (http://articles.latimes.com/2008/aug/21/nation/na-taxplans21).
Then the Top 2%. Phew, that’s so 2009 (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123561551065378405.html).
Then the Top 1%. Phew, that’s so 2010 (http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2010/02/obamas-budget-2.html).
Then Wall Street. Phew, that’s so 2011 (http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-occupy-wall-st-protesters-you-are-reason-i-ran-office_610041.html).
No, old Eagle Eye has been circling long enough, and he has spotted his prey: About 400 people (http://nation.foxnews.com/warren-buffett/2012/04/11/obama-buffett-rule-only-targets-400-people) who would be afffected by the Buffett Rule.
But that will not suffice. 400 people is too broad. It’s hard to dig your claws into 400 people. There are too many job creators, innovators, and nice people.
Obama needs to lock onto and make an example of just one person (http://legalinsurrection.com/2011/09/cant-obama-just-find-someone-to-publicly-flog-and-be-done-with-it-already/):
“Can’t Obama just find someone to publicly flog and be done with it already?”
Yes he can. Yes he will. He can do this.
That person is The One (http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://static5.businessinsider.com/image/4ee9184eeab8ea440900001a/mitt-romney-money.jpg&imgrefurl=http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-12-14/politics/30515127_1_mitt-romney-ddi-corp-bain-capital&usg=__LQnpOrch0lLkYkPLd4FkA8usLVI=&h=300&w=400&sz=60&hl=en&start=1&zoom=1&tbnid=-uUY6voYfy5mOM:&tbnh=131&tbnw=162&ei=eL2FT9lT5d7RAbqpzLMH&prev=/search%3Fq%3Ddemocratic%2Bnational%2Bcommittee%2Br omney%2Bmoney%26tbnh%3D143%26tbnw%3D191%26hl%3Den% 26sa%3DX%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-us:IE-Address%26rlz%3D1I7SKPT_en%26sig%3D112714248313711 679751%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D798%26tbs%3Dsimg:CAESE gn65Rjq-hh_1LiFr8iM_1J0jD5Q%26tbm%3Disch%26prmd%3Dimvnsu&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=170&vpy=180&dur=239&hovh=194&hovw=259&tx=97&ty=54&sig=112714248313711679751&page=1&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:75) Obama has been waiting for.
:lmao
Speaking of the Buffett Rule -- The thing with which Barack Obama has gone back to beating about the head and face. Not such a big deal when you actually look at the numbers.
http://www.politicalmathblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Buffet_Rule_Summary.png
Obama’s targeting of demonized groups has been narrowing over time (http://legalinsurrection.com/2009/03/barack-got-enemy/), something documented here since the 2008 campaign.
Remember when the Top 5% were the target? Phew, that’s so 2008 (http://articles.latimes.com/2008/aug/21/nation/na-taxplans21).
Then the Top 2%. Phew, that’s so 2009 (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123561551065378405.html).
Then the Top 1%. Phew, that’s so 2010 (http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2010/02/obamas-budget-2.html).
Then Wall Street. Phew, that’s so 2011 (http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-occupy-wall-st-protesters-you-are-reason-i-ran-office_610041.html).
No, old Eagle Eye has been circling long enough, and he has spotted his prey: About 400 people (http://nation.foxnews.com/warren-buffett/2012/04/11/obama-buffett-rule-only-targets-400-people) who would be afffected by the Buffett Rule.
But that will not suffice. 400 people is too broad. It’s hard to dig your claws into 400 people. There are too many job creators, innovators, and nice people.
Obama needs to lock onto and make an example of just one person (http://legalinsurrection.com/2011/09/cant-obama-just-find-someone-to-publicly-flog-and-be-done-with-it-already/):
“Can’t Obama just find someone to publicly flog and be done with it already?”
Yes he can. Yes he will. He can do this.
That person is The One (http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://static5.businessinsider.com/image/4ee9184eeab8ea440900001a/mitt-romney-money.jpg&imgrefurl=http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-12-14/politics/30515127_1_mitt-romney-ddi-corp-bain-capital&usg=__LQnpOrch0lLkYkPLd4FkA8usLVI=&h=300&w=400&sz=60&hl=en&start=1&zoom=1&tbnid=-uUY6voYfy5mOM:&tbnh=131&tbnw=162&ei=eL2FT9lT5d7RAbqpzLMH&prev=/search%3Fq%3Ddemocratic%2Bnational%2Bcommittee%2Br omney%2Bmoney%26tbnh%3D143%26tbnw%3D191%26hl%3Den% 26sa%3DX%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-us:IE-Address%26rlz%3D1I7SKPT_en%26sig%3D112714248313711 679751%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D798%26tbs%3Dsimg:CAESE gn65Rjq-hh_1LiFr8iM_1J0jD5Q%26tbm%3Disch%26prmd%3Dimvnsu&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=170&vpy=180&dur=239&hovh=194&hovw=259&tx=97&ty=54&sig=112714248313711679751&page=1&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:75) Obama has been waiting for.
:lmao
Speaking of the Buffett Rule -- The thing with which Barack Obama has gone back to beating about the head and face. Not such a big deal when you actually look at the numbers.
http://www.politicalmathblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Buffet_Rule_Summary.png