Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman Information

[Poptech]

Trayvon Martin
Height: 6'0'' (http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2012/03/trayvon-martin-shooting-death-initial-police-reports.html)
Weight: 160 lbs (http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2012/03/trayvon-martin-shooting-death-initial-police-reports.html)

George Zimmerman
Height: 5'9'' (http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2012/03/trayvon-martin-shooting-death-initial-police-reports.html)
Weight: NA (http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2012/03/trayvon-martin-shooting-death-initial-police-reports.html)

Black friend defends shooter of Florida teen (http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/25/us-usa-florida-shooting-friend-idUSBRE82O0FE20120325) (Reuters, March 25, 2012)
Pot linked to Trayvon Martin suspension, his family says (http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/03/26/pot-linked-to-trayvon-martin-suspension-his-family-says/) (Fox News, March 26, 2012)
The Daily Caller obtains Trayvon Martin’s tweets (http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/26/the-daily-caller-obtains-trayvon-martins-tweets/) (The Daily Caller, March 26, 2012)
Police: Zimmerman says Trayvon decked him with one blow then began hammering his head (http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-03-26/news/os-trayvon-martin-zimmerman-account-20120326_1_miami-schools-punch-unarmed-black-teenager) (Orlando Sentinel, March 26, 2012)
Report: Trayvon Suspended Three Times from School (http://www.newsmax.com/US/treyvon-suspended-neighborhood-watch/2012/03/27/id/433993) (Newsmax, March 27, 2012)
Second Trayvon Martin Twitter feed identified (http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/29/second-trayvon-martin-twitter-feed-identified/) (The Daily Caller, March 29, 2012)
911 call shows Zimmerman stopped following Martin after dispatcher’s request, corroborates story (http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/02/911-call-shows-zimmerman-stopped-following-martin-after-dispatchers-request-corroborates-story/) (The Daily Caller, April 2, 2012)
ABC News exclusive: ABC News was wrong about George Zimmerman’s injuries (http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/02/abc-news-exclusive-abc-news-was-wrong-about-george-zimmermans-injuries/) (The Daily Caller, April 2, 2012)
In 2010 race-related beating case, George Zimmerman pushed to discipline same officers who investigated Trayvon Martin shooting (http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/04/zimmerman-demanded-discipline-in-2010-race-related-beating-for-officers-who-investigated-martin-shooting/) (The Daily Caller, April 4, 2012)
CNN Enhances Zimmerman 911 Call Again — And Reporter Now Doubts Racial Slur Used (http://www.theblaze.com/stories/cnn-enhances-zimmerman-911-call-again-and-reporter-now-doubts-racial-slur-used/) (Video) (The Blaze, April 5, 2012)
Zimmerman Said 'Cold' Not 'Co*n'; Most Trusted Name in News Backpedals (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/04/05/CNN-Coon-Cold-Zimmerman) (Breitbart, April 5, 2012)
NBC Fires Producer of Misleading Zimmerman Tape (http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/06/nbc-fires-producer-of-misleading-zimmerman-tape/?src=tp) (The New York Times, April 6, 2012)
Stand Your Ground Not Responsible for Trayvon Martin's Death (http://jurist.org/hotline/2012/04/tim-lynch-trayvon-martin.php) (Jurist, April 6, 2012)
Trayvon Tragedy: Manufactured Racism? How NBC Edited Racism Into the George Zimmerman 911 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72zJvVQWutA) (Video) (PJTV, April 9, 2012)
Why the Washington Post Is Wrong about Stand Your Ground Laws (http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/why-washington-post-is-wrong-about-stand-ground-laws) (Cato Institute, April 9, 2012)
The truth about Stand Your Ground laws (http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/10/the-truth-about-stand-your-ground-laws/) (The Daily Caller, April 10, 2012)
George Zimmerman pictured with bloodied head after Trayvon Martin shooting (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9218101/George-Zimmerman-pictured-with-bloodied-head-after-Trayvon-Martin-shooting.html) (Daily Telegraph, UK, April 21, 2012)
Second NBC employee loses job over deceptively edited George Zimmerman 911 tape (http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/04/second-nbc-employee-loses-job-over-deceptively-edited-george-zimmerman-911-tape/) (The Daily Caller, May 4, 2012)
Autopsy results show Trayvon Martin had injuries to his knuckles (http://www.wftv.com/news/news/local/autopsy-results-show-trayvon-martin-had-injuries-h/nN6gs/) (WFTV, May 15, 2012)
Zimmerman Medical Report Shows Broken Nose, Lacerations After Trayvon Martin Shooting (http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimmerman-medical-report-sheds-light-injuries-trayvon/story?id=16353532#.T7ZZEehSS8A) (ABC News, May 15, 2012)
Autopsy Reveals Trayvon Martin Had Drugs in System (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/Breaking-Autopsy-Reveals-Trayvon-Martin-Had-Drugs-in-System) (Breitbart, May 17, 2012)
New Witness Account, Autopsy Revealed in Martin Case (http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/New-Photos-Reports-on-George-Zimmerman-Released-by-Prosecutors-151951775.html) (NBC Miami, May 18, 2012)

I asked Mr. Martin if the voice calling for help was that of his son. Mr. Martin, clearly emotionally impacted by the recording, quietly responded 'no'.
Witness: Trayvon Martin Attacked George Zimmerman 'MMA Style' (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/18/Trayvon-MMA-style-attack) (Breitbart, May 18, 2012)

[clambake]

george is a liar.

confirmed.

[ElNono]

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=193187

[Poptech]

george is a liar.

confirmed.
ABC, CNN and NBC are confirmed liars.

[clambake]

ABC, CNN and NBC are confirmed liars.

i didn't realize they lied to the judge like george did.

[Trill Clinton]

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=193187

[ElNono]

They all lie one way or another... where's that huge FoxNews image? It always pops up when this comes up, and honestly, it's a great laugh.

[ChumpDumper]

lol another thread

lol pot

[Poptech]

i didn't realize they lied to the judge like george did.
I didn't realize you were the judge.

[ChumpDumper]

I didn't realize you were the judge.Right, you declared yourself judge.

Pot link!

[Poptech]

Right, you declared yourself judge.

Pot link!
That is not declaring myself judge, that is providing information reported on in the media. Don't be so defensive about your drug addiction.

[ChumpDumper]

That is not declaring myself judge, that is providing information reported on in the media.Sure it is. You are as selective as any biased news editor if not moreso since you have a declared agenda here.
Don't be so defensive about your drug addiction.Please explain this logical fallacy in full.

Thanks in advance.

[Poptech]

Sure it is. you are as selective as any biased news editor if not moreso since you have a declared agenda here.
Feel free to ignore relevant information regarding this case. What is my declared agenda?


Please explain this logical fallacy in full.

Thanks in advance.
Do you use or support the use of marijuana?

[ChumpDumper]

Feel free to ignore relevant information regarding this case.You certainly are doing just that, as well as adding irrelevant information.
What is my declared agenda?You don't even know?

You declared it.



Do you smoke or support smoking marijuana?That is not explaining your logical fallacy.

Please explain your logical fallacy in full.

[Poptech]

You certainly are doing just that, as well as adding irrelevant information.
I disagree and believe the information I provided to be relevant.


You don't even know?

You declared it.
Then quote it for me.


That is not explaining your logical fallacy.

Please explain your logical fallacy in full.
Answer the question if you would like me to explain it.

[ChumpDumper]

I disagree and believe the information I provided to be relevant.I disagree. It's completely irrelevant.

Answer the question if you would like me to explain it.You made the logical fallacy without knowing the answer in the first place. You need to explain why you made it.

[Poptech]

I disagree. It's completely irrelevant.
Marijuana does not cause changes to someone's brain chemistry?


You made the logical fallacy without knowing the answer in the first place. You need to explain why you made it.
You can prove this easily by answering my question,

Do you use or support the use of marijuana?

[ChumpDumper]

Marijuana does not cause changes to someone's brain chemistry?What does it do to backpacks?



You can prove this easily by answering my question,

Do you use or support the use of marijuana?You made the logical fallacy before you knew the answer -- so obviously you made the logical fallacy in error. And in wording your question, you moved the goalposts from clearly stated addiction to mere support of use.

You aren't good at this at all.

[ChumpDumper]

Gotta go. Looking forward to more squirming, Poptech.

Laterz!

[Poptech]

What does it do to backpacks?
So is your argument is he was a drug dealer and not a user? Has any medical testing been done to determine if Trayvon had used Marijuana? I would surely wish to clear my son's name of possible drug use.


You made the logical fallacy before you knew the answer -- so obviously you made the logical fallacy in error. And in wording your question, you moved the goalposts from clearly stated addiction to mere support of use.

You aren't good at this at all.
If I am not good at it, then answer the question and prove me wrong,

Do you use or support the use of marijuana?

You are the one squirming by not answering the question.

[MannyIsGod]

He doesn't need to answer the question to prove you wrong. Thats the point.

[Poptech]

He doesn't need to answer the question to prove you wrong. Thats the point.
He proved my theory right by not answering the question.

[MannyIsGod]

issues.

[Poptech]

There is no need to try and defend your buddies drug addiction, he can do this on his own by answering my question.

[MannyIsGod]

Alrighty then.

[ChumpDumper]

So is your argument is he was a drug dealer and not a user? Has any medical testing been done to determine if Trayvon had used Marijuana? I would surely wish to clear my son's name of possible drug use.So you made another assumption.

You're terrible at this.


If I am not good at it, then answer the question and prove me wrong,

Do you use or support the use of marijuana?

You are the one squirming by not answering the question.Not at all. You were wrong to present your logical fallacy in the first place.

You were wrong to try to mitigate it by asking me to validate your logical fallacy in a way that wouldn't even validate it.

You were wrong in moving the goalposts in your logical fallacy from outright addiction to mere support of marijuana use.

You need to admit you were wrong on all these counts, then we can continue this conversation.

[Wild Cobra]

Chump...

When a question mark is used, don't you think it might be a question if that's a position, rather than a statement of fact?

[ChumpDumper]

It's quite clear what is being asked, and quite clear why he's so wrong to ask in the first place.

[Wild Cobra]

Then it should be clear that you are so often wrong.

He's only mirroring your own game back at you.

[ChumpDumper]

No, it's a brand new game.

You are wrong.

Again.

[Wild Cobra]

No, it's a brand new game.

You are wrong.

Again.

Sure, some of it is different. Still, I find it ironic that you are complaining about the things you do.

[ChumpDumper]

Sure, some of it is different. Still, I find it ironic that you are complaining about the things you do.I'm not complaining.

I'm having fun.

[Wild Cobra]

I'm not complaining.

I'm having fun.

That doesn't surprise me with the way your twisted mind seems to work.

[ChumpDumper]

That doesn't surprise me with the way your twisted mind seems to work.I find your statement ironic, flaglot.

[Poptech]

So you made another assumption.
I am well aware I am making an assumption. You are free to state your position at anytime instead of hiding behind your rhetorical games you think you have learned here.


Not at all. You were wrong to present your logical fallacy in the first place.

You were wrong to try to mitigate it by asking me to validate your logical fallacy in a way that wouldn't even validate it.

You were wrong in moving the goalposts in your logical fallacy from outright addiction to mere support of marijuana use.

You need to admit you were wrong on all these counts, then we can continue this conversation.
I am well aware of everything I stated, that does not make me wrong. Prove me wrong anytime by answering the question. I will even make the question easier for you,

Do you or have you used marijuana?

This is very entertaining and revealing as anyone who is not a drug addict would have immediately answered the question no.

[clambake]

I didn't realize you were the judge.

i'm not george's judge. i think george's judge is named lester.

thats who george lied to.

[ChumpDumper]

I am well aware I am making an assumption. You are free to state your position at anytime instead of hiding behind your rhetorical games you think you have learned here.My position is that the assumptions you made are baseless and irrelevant. How could you not see that?



I am well aware of everything I stated, that does not make me wrong. Prove me wrong anytime by answering the question. I will even make the question easier for you,

Do you or have you used marijuana?

This is very entertaining and revealing as anyone who is not a drug addict would have immediately answered the question no.:lmao

Another logical fallacy!

You're on a roll.

This is great.

Actually anyone who realizes how completely flawed your "logic" here is would refuse to reward it. I proved you wrong already. Admit you were wrong and committed multiple logical fallacies. I want to see if you are capable of it.

[ElNono]

Wish I could see your IP address! Then I could tell you why you're not making sense! :lmao

[MannyIsGod]

I am well aware I am making an assumption. You are free to state your position at anytime instead of hiding behind your rhetorical games you think you have learned here.




:lmao

Oh the irony

[Poptech]

My position is that the assumptions you made are baseless and irrelevant. How could you not see that?
Then prove it.


Actually anyone who realizes how completely flawed your "logic" here is would refuse to reward it. I proved you wrong already. Admit you were wrong and committed multiple logical fallacies. I want to see if you are capable of it.
You haven't answered my question that you keep dodging,

Do you or have you used marijuana?

Addicts never like to answer this question.

[Poptech]

Wish I could see your IP address! Then I could tell you why you're not making sense! :lmao
Incorrect, that was to more easily determine sock puppet accounts.

Do you or have you used marijuana?

[Poptech]

Oh the irony
:lmao

Do you or have you used marijuana?

Drug addicts like to defend their fellow addicts.

[Poptech]

i'm not george's judge. i think george's judge is named lester.

thats who george lied to.
The Judge determined that he was lied to?

[ElNono]

Incorrect


Nevermind, I wish I could at least see IP addresses.:cry:cry:cry

:lol:rollin:lol:rollin

[Poptech]

:lol:rollin:lol:rollin
Yes incorrect, it had nothing to do with determining if you were making sense but to more easily determine sock puppet accounts.

Do you or have you used marijuana?

[ChumpDumper]

Then prove it.Having remnants of marijuana in a backpack has nothing at all to do with his getting shot.



You haven't answered my question that you keep dodging,

Do you or have you used marijuana?

Addicts never like to answer this question.You haven't explained why you made that logical fallacy in the first place when you didn't have the information you proved you needed by immediately asking for it in the next post.

Just say you made an error in posting that logical fallacy and we can move on.

[ChumpDumper]

Yes incorrect, it had nothing to do with determining if you were making sense but to more easily determine sock puppet accounts.

Do you or have you used marijuana?Now you think ElNono is me?

:rollin

[ElNono]

Yes incorrect


Nevermind, I wish I could at least see IP addresses.:cry:cry:cry

:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao

[Poptech]

Having remnants of marijuana in a backpack has nothing at all to do with his getting shot.
Has any medical testing been done to determine if Trayvon had used or was under the influence of Marijuana?


You haven't explained why you made that logical fallacy in the first place when you didn't have the information you proved you needed by immediately asking for it in the next post.

Just say you made an error in posting that logical fallacy and we can move on.
Do you or have you used marijuana?

I would have answered this question with an immediate NO but I am not an addict.

[Poptech]

Now you think ElNono is me?
Incorrect, I am asking him the same question.

[Poptech]

:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao
Yes, so I can more easily determine sock puppet accounts. It is interesting how you picked up where RG left off.

[ChumpDumper]

Has any medical testing been done to determine if Trayvon had used or was under the influence of Marijuana?That's exactly why it is completely irrelevant.

Do you or have you used marijuana?

I would have answered this question with an immediate NO but I am not an addict.You haven't explained why you made that logical fallacy in the first place when you didn't have the information you proved you needed by immediately asking for it in the next post.

Just say you made an error in posting that logical fallacy and we can move on.

[ChumpDumper]

Incorrect, I am asking him the same question.Why?

[Poptech]

That's exactly why it is completely irrelevant.
Incorrect, it could explain why he choose to assault Zimmerman.


You haven't explained why you made that logical fallacy in the first place when you didn't have the information you proved you needed by immediately asking for it in the next post.

Just say you made an error in posting that logical fallacy and we can move on.
I am not playing rhetorical games, I am asking you a question,

Do you or have you used marijuana?

[Poptech]

Why?
I've already stated why.

[ChumpDumper]

Incorrect, it could explain why he choose to assault Zimmerman.So you are not providing information at all. You are speculating and making things up.


I am not playing rhetorical games, I am asking you a question,

Do you or have you used marijuana?I am asking you a question.

Why did you make that logical fallacy in the first place when you did not have the information?

More speculation.

You look really bad right now.

[Poptech]

So you are not providing information at all. You are speculating and making things up.
It is not speculation that he was suspended multiple times, one for possession of traces of marijuana. If it was my son, I would immediately request medical testing to show that he had not used marijuana. Has this been done? I have extensive experience with drug addicts and their denial. This information is important for determine the character of Trayvon which appears to be very different then what is being stated about him by his supporters.


I am asking you a question.

Why did you make that logical fallacy in the first place when you did not have the information?
Keep dodging,

Do you or have you used marijuana?

[ChumpDumper]

It is not speculation that he was suspended multiple times, one for possession of traces of marijuana. If it was my son, I would immediately request medical testing to show that he had not used marijuana. Has this been done? I have extensive experience with drug addicts and their denial. This information is important for determine the character of Trayvon which appears to be very different then what is being stated about him by his supporters.It is important for you to assassinate the character of Trayvon because it suits you.



Keep dodging,

Do you or have you used marijuana?Sorry, there's no need to facilitate more logical fallacies from you if you won't admit the ones you made in the first place.

Besides -- I asked first. Quit dodging.

[Poptech]

It is important for you to assassinate the character of Trayvon because it suits you.
Only Trayvon's previous actions can determine his actual character.


Sorry, there's no need to facilitate more logical fallacies from you if you won't admit the ones you made in the first place.

Besides -- I asked first. Quit dodging.
I already stated it was an assumption. Now prove me wrong,

Do you or have you used marijuana?

[ChumpDumper]

Only Trayvon's previous actions can determine his actual character.Which is why speculating only proves you are trying to assassinate his character.


I already stated it was an assumption.No, it's a logical fallacy.

State you made a logical fallacy.

[Poptech]

Which is why speculating only proves you are trying to assassinate his character.
What did I state about Trayvon that was factually inaccurate?


No, it's a logical fallacy.

State you made a logical fallacy.
Incorrect, it is an educated guess,

Do you or have you used marijuana?

I will take your failure to defend your reputation as acknowledgement that you have used or do use marijuana.

[ElNono]

Yes, so I can more easily determine sock puppet accounts. It is interesting how you picked up where RG left off.

You think I'm RG? :lmao

:lol paranoia
:lol IP addresses

[ElNono]

bitching about bringing something to the "debate" while asking the same strawman over and over again :lmao

[Poptech]

You think I'm RG?
I have no idea who you are, that was my point. Without seeing your IP address I cannot rule out sock puppet accounts.

[Poptech]

bitching about bringing something to the "debate" while asking the same strawman over and over again
Do you or have you used marijuana?

[ElNono]

I have no idea who you are, that was my point. Without seeing your IP address I cannot rule out sock puppet accounts.

You can't rule out your paranoia either :lmao


Do you or have you used marijuana?

Have you made a point yet?

[Poptech]

You can't rule out your paranoia either
I do not use marijuana so I am not paranoid.


Have you made a point yet?
Yes, those who are not addicts immediately answer the question "NO",

Do you or have you used marijuana?

[ElNono]

I do not use marijuana so I am not paranoid.

But you think a poster with 48,000+ posts is a sock puppet account because you're stupid...

...and paranoid :lmao


Yes, those who are not addicts immediately answer the question "NO"

Have you made a point yet?

[Poptech]

But you think a poster with 48,000+ posts is a sock puppet account
I have no idea which account is a sock puppet for who.


Have you made a point yet?
Yes, those who are not addicts immediately answer the question "NO",

Do you or have you used marijuana?

[ElNono]

I have no idea which account is a sock puppet for who.

But you would love to find out because you're paranoid :lmao



Yes, those who are not addicts immediately answer the question "NO"

Have you made a point yet?

:lmao

[Wild Cobra]

You know Poptech, the marijuana issue isn't looking good for you. Since you are dealing with people who lack integrity, and like to play games, it isn't going to go where you think.

[ChumpDumper]

What did I state about Trayvon that was factually inaccurate?We're talking about your speculation. Stay on point.



Incorrect, it is an educated guessIncorrect. It's a logical fallacy. There is nothing educated about your logical fallacy making. You're actually displaying a decided ignorance concerning logical fallacies.

For someone who started a thread accusing others of such fallacies, you're really being a hypocrite here.


I will take your failure to defend your reputation as acknowledgement that you have used or do use marijuana.It still won't make you logical fallacy anything but a logical fallacy.

lol sock puppets

[TeyshaBlue]

"Yes, those who are not addicts immediately answer the question "NO",

Do you or have you used marijuana?"

Oooohhhh...another tautological event.

Those who are not addicts answer NO. Ergo, if you answer yes you are an addict.

I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me?
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-qsIERYmMhVU/ThIQnojj8XI/AAAAAAAACms/qA9stCOJ-wM/s1600/mtp.jpg

[clambake]

The Judge determined that he was lied to?......because i lack the courage to decide on my own.....which is pretty much why i wait to read what someone else decides for me on every subject. clearly, i'm addicted to that.

got it.

[George Gervin's Afro]

lol... a 17 year old character is defined prior to him being a legal adult..because he smoked a dooby..

[Oh, Gee!!]

wtf is this? did I just stumble into a 1950's propaganda film about the evils of marijuana?

[Blake]

marijuana addicts to the left of me.......sock puppets to the right.....

[TeyshaBlue]

You're a terrible lyricist, tbh.:lol

[Blake]

You're a terrible lyricist, tbh.:lol

Yeah, it didn't really sound good singing it out loud either.

[Agloco]

Do you or have you used marijuana?

If anyone were to answer "yes", what would your response be?

[clambake]

If anyone were to answer "yes", what would your response be?

he would say you're a violent criminal that deserves to die.

[Poptech]

You know Poptech, the marijuana issue isn't looking good for you. Since you are dealing with people who lack integrity, and like to play games, it isn't going to go where you think.
It actually has, all the addicts cannot help themselves and reply. This explains why it is not possible to have any sort of rational conversation with them.

[clambake]

It actually has, all the addicts cannot help themselves and reply. This explains why it is not possible to have any sort of rational conversation with them.

:downspin:

[boutons_deux]

It actually has, all the addicts cannot help themselves and reply. This explains why it is not possible to have any sort of rational conversation with them.

Holy shit, PoopTech is in cloud cookoo land of fantasies.

[Poptech]

This is good information on this case, wow.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Narcissistic personality disorder is a condition in which people have an inflated sense of self-importance and an extreme preoccupation with themselves.
Causes, incidence, and risk factors All Fail

The causes of this disorder are unknown. An overly sensitive personality and parenting problems may affect the development of this disorder.
Symptoms

A person with narcissistic personality disorder may:

React to criticism with rage, shame, or humiliation Fail - None of my reactions have been rage, shame or humiliation. This is a forum, you cannot see my physical person which remains completely calm at all times online.

Take advantage of other people to achieve his or her own goals Fail - I have not taken advantage of anyone. That is just absurd.

Have excessive feelings of self-importance Fail - I have no such feelings

Exaggerate achievements and talents Fail - I have exaggerated nothing

Be preoccupied with fantasies of success, power, beauty, intelligence, or ideal love Fail - on all counts, I am already successful, I do not seek "power", I am not vain, I have no fantasies about my intelligence, I am in a fullfilling relationship with a beautiful women

Have unreasonable expectations of favorable treatment True - You got me there, I do not expect to be dishonestly lied about and now smeared as you and RG have done.

Need constant attention and admiration Fail - Absolute fail, You have no idea how I do not care for attention or admiration.

Disregard the feelings of others, and have little ability to feel empathy Check - I could careless about yours or anyone else's feelings online. All I care about is what is true.

Have obsessive self-interest - Check - This is true but it has nothing to with this disorder but actually something else. I believe I have a mild form of aspergers syndrome similar to Michael Burry that allows me to relentlessly concentrate on a topic if I choose. This is actually a strength as I effectively never tire.

Pursue mainly selfish goals - Absolutely False - My whole point for doing this is I do not like liars like you and other alarmists. If you never stated any lies I would not even be here.


Misdiagnosing Personality Disorders as Asperger's Disorder

In contrast, the Asperger's patient, though verbose at times (and taciturn on other occasions) has a far more limited range of tediously repetitive topics. People with Asperger's fail to observe conversational rules and etiquette (for instance, let others speak in turn). The Asperger's patient is unaware and, therefore, unable to decipher body language and external social and nonverbal cues and gestures. He is incapable of monitoring his own misbehavior. Psychopaths, narcissists, borderlines, schizotypals, histrionics, paranoids, and schizoids are similarly inconsiderate - but they control their behavior and are fully cognizant of reactions by others. They simply choose to ignore these data.

James Robert Brasic, MD, MPH (2003) Pervasive Developmental Disorder: Asperger Syndrome Sam Vaknin ( http://samvak.tripod.com ) is the author of Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited and After the Rain - How the West Lost the East. He served as a columnist for Central Europe Review, Global Politician, PopMatters, eBookWeb , and Bellaonline, and as a United Press International (UPI) Senior Business Correspondent. He was the editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in The Open Directory and Suite101.

Oh and Burry is a billionaire hedge fund manager. And keep in mind that Popsociopath says that he has no delusions.

[Poptech]

Psychosis is a symptom or feature of mental illness typically characterized by radical changes in personality, impaired functioning, and a distorted or nonexistent sense of objective reality.

Patients suffering from psychosis have impaired reality testing; that is, they are unable to distinguish personal subjective experience from the reality of the external world. They experience delusions that they believe are real, and may behave and communicate in an inappropriate and incoherent fashion. Psychosis may appear as a symptom of a number of mental disorders, including mood and personality disorders. It is also the defining feature of schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder, and the psychotic disorders (i.e., brief psychotic disorder, shared psychotic disorder, psychotic disorder due to a general medical condition, and substance-induced psychotic disorder).

With regard to substance abuse, several different research groups reported in 2004 that cannabis (marijuana) use is a risk factor for the onset of psychosis.

Psychotic symptoms and behaviors are considered psychiatric emergencies, and persons showing signs of psychosis are frequently taken by family, friends, or the police to a hospital emergency room. A person diagnosed as psychotic can be legally hospitalized against his or her will, particularly if he or she is violent, threatening to commit suicide, or threatening to harm another person. A psychotic person may also be hospitalized if he or she has become malnourished or ill as a result of failure to feed, dress appropriately for the climate, or otherwise take care of him- or herself.
It is never too late to seek treatment Fuzzy.

[IWantsACuatro]

Holy shit, PoopTech is in cloud cookoo land of fantasies.


Coming from boutons, this is scary.

[Poptech]

Shocking stuff.

[ChumpDumper]

That's your drugs talking, Poptech.

[Poptech]

That's your drugs talking, Poptech.
I don't do drugs you and Trayvon do.

[ChumpDumper]

I don't do drugs you and Trayvon do.Denying and accusing others is precisely what drug addicts do.

Irrefutable proof.

[Poptech]

Denying and accusing others is precisely what drug addicts do.

Irrefutable proof.
Drug addicts follow the person who called them out on it around and constantly bring up the subject because of their denial.

[ChumpDumper]

Drug addicts follow the person who called them out on it around and constantly bring up the subject because of their denial.More denial from you!

More proof!

[RandomGuy]

Here is one of PopTechs better moments Yonivore.

He has a lot of them here.

[boutons_deux]

George Zimmerman: Killing Trayvon was God’s plan, and wishing he lived is ‘almost blasphemous’

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/03/george-zimmerman-killing-trayvon-was-gods-plan-and-wishing-he-lived-is-almost-blasphemous/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

[boutons_deux]

Super-Charged ‘Stand Your Ground’ Bill Could Make It Even Harder To Prosecute More George Zimmermans

Since Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law was adopted in 2005, vigilantes like George Zimmerman, who shot and killed unarmed 16-year-old Trayvon Martin, have claimed self-defense and avoided conviction. Ten years later, the man who co-sponsored the original legislation wants to make it even easier for defendants to get away scot-free (http://www.thetrace.org/2015/09/stand-your-ground-florida-bill-baxley/).

State Rep. Dennis Baxley, a vocal proponent of gun rights with deep ties to the NRA (http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/03/NRA-stand-your-ground-trayvon-martin), introduced a bill two weeks ago that would make Stand Your Ground claims virtually invincible. Normally a defendant claiming self-defense must prove he was attacked or threatened, but the new legislation would instead place the burden on the state to prove that he was not.

In other words, people like George Zimmerman, who has bragged about killing Martin (http://www.rawstory.com/2015/08/zimmerman-brags-about-killing-trayvon-martin-we-all-know-how-it-ended-for-the-last-moron-that-hit-me/) andretweeted a photo (http://www.theroot.com/blogs/the_grapevine/2015/09/george_zimmerman_solidifies_his_lowest_life_form_s tatus_by_retweeting_photo.html) of the teenager’s dead body last Friday, would not have to prove that he killed Martin in self-defense. The state would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt why Zimmerman didn’t.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/09/28/3706255/super-charged-stand-your-ground-bill-could-make-it-even-harder-to-prosecute-more-george-zimmermans/

fucked up gun fellators' psychopathic obsessions (paid for by the NRA/GOA/Gun indu$try), a shit stain on America.

[InRareForm]

http://www.wftv.com/news/officials-george-zimmerman-punched-in-face-for-allegedly-bragging-about-killing-trayvon-martin/417278308