PDA

View Full Version : If the 0.4 shot and the And1 didn't happen, would the Spurs 5peat?



irishock
05-08-2012, 12:33 AM
2004 would have been Minnesota (win) and Detroit (tough win)

2006 would have been Suns (easy win) and Miami (sweep)

Technique
05-08-2012, 12:34 AM
Yeah

midnightpulp
05-08-2012, 12:40 AM
No. Spurs lose to Pistons in Finals.

Trainwreck2100
05-08-2012, 12:41 AM
05 spurs went to 7 games and the pistons weren't as hungry so who knows who would have won that one

HarlemHeat37
05-08-2012, 12:41 AM
Agree with Mid, Pistons win in '04..

Spurs win easily in 2006, Wade wouldn't have went off on Bowen, tbh..the refs also wouldn't have given the superstar treatment against Bowen, tbh..

NewcastleKEG
05-08-2012, 12:50 AM
Maybe.

mavsfan1000
05-08-2012, 12:51 AM
It's .04. :D

NewcastleKEG
05-08-2012, 01:03 AM
What was ''the And1''

MavDynasty
05-08-2012, 01:06 AM
Dirk tying the game with 30 seconds left during game 7 to force OT on the road

TDMVPDPOY
05-08-2012, 01:10 AM
04 duncan was still in his prime, but something about that roster tells me they wont win it...maybe it has something to do with having the turgo on the team

06 i think spurs would sweep the heat unless refs and stern get involved....

MavDynasty
05-08-2012, 01:13 AM
You also love naruto so no one gives a shit what you think.

NewcastleKEG
05-08-2012, 01:13 AM
Dirk tying the game with 30 seconds left during game 7 to force OT on the road
1OmE3B-s8ow

Jacob1983
05-08-2012, 01:17 AM
Nope because Horry, Duncan, Bowen, Finley, Parker, and Barry would have died of exhaustion or heart attacks. Do you not realize how many games that would have been for them if they had 5peated? Those guys would have eventually gotten tired and hurt thus derailing the 5peat. If the Spurs had won the championship from 2003 to 2007, they would have played at least 500 games including the playoffs. They would have basically had played 6 seasons in a 5 year stretch.

Technique
05-08-2012, 01:20 AM
I respect your math

MavDynasty
05-08-2012, 01:21 AM
Damn that video brough back some memories of that team. Howard was such a beast bac then and wasn't a step back jump shooting pussy yet. He was a fearless slasher. Stack came up huge in OT as well as Diop. Most those players fell off a cliff sans Dirk and Terry. That was the true finals that year.

BoricuaCJA
05-08-2012, 01:42 AM
2006 yes imo. We could keep Wade in check with Bowen and Duncan would of been great. IDK about 2004 b/c that Pistons team was incredible and we had Turk. I think Pistons still win.

Venti Quattro
05-08-2012, 01:44 AM
If Horry hit the last shot during Game 5 of the 2003 West Semi-final, would the Lakers have won four straight?

Jacob1983
05-08-2012, 01:45 AM
If 0.4 hadn't have happened, the Spurs would have at least repeated. 3peating would have been tough.

pass1st
05-08-2012, 01:52 AM
Wouldn't it just push it to 7 games with Lakers having HCA?

Venti Quattro
05-08-2012, 01:54 AM
Wouldn't it just push it to 7 games with Lakers having HCA?

2004? The Spurs had HCA. You don't remember 0.4 at the SBC (before SBC took over AT&T) Center?

Robz4000
05-08-2012, 01:55 AM
No. Spurs lose to Pistons in Finals.
This. That Pistons team was not gonna be denied. Spurs wouldn't of gone down in 5 games tho.

pass1st
05-08-2012, 01:56 AM
2004? The Spurs had HCA. You don't remember 0.4 at the SBC (before SBC took over AT&T) Center?

Ah, memory fails me

davidbowie
05-08-2012, 01:56 AM
1OmE3B-s8ow

it's been 6 fuckin years and i still can't watch this video all the way thru. once was enough. the editing. the music. too brutal. :bang

NewcastleKEG
05-08-2012, 02:06 AM
Well it was a great move to the hoop for the Diggler

Venti Quattro
05-08-2012, 02:07 AM
Ginobili made a mistake of thinking he could block Dirk.

NewcastleKEG
05-08-2012, 02:14 AM
You know Finley wanted to beat them extra hard. See his celebration in the Manu shot

FkLA
05-08-2012, 02:28 AM
I dont think the 04' Pistons were as dominant as the 05' Pistons tbh. They were still elite defensively but they got Sheed at the deadline that year, he had a better season in 05' with a full season under his belt with the team. They also signed Dice for the 05' season. They dominated during the regular season that year and the playoffs until they ran into the Spurs. In 04' they kind of came out of nowhere, the win over the Lakers was a pretty big upset at the time. Kome being Kome helped alot too.

mavsfan1000
05-08-2012, 02:38 AM
04 Pistons had Mehmet Okur coming off the bench. They were shutting down teams to the extreme after the all star break when they got Wallace. The main thing I remember is the Pistons bench being much better in 04. 05 relied a ton on their starters.

PGDynasty24
05-08-2012, 03:05 AM
If If If.....Tim Duncan's Dad wears a condom than the Spurs are still title-less. There are hundreds of situations that change the course of a team's history.

TDMVPDPOY
05-08-2012, 03:11 AM
You also love naruto so no one gives a shit what you think.

so hows the sweep fag?

dunkman
05-12-2012, 12:21 AM
The Spurs would have lost game 7 in SA vs the Lakers, that team was better than the Spurs, they just had more talent. The Spurs won the first two games, but by then Phil figured how to contain Parker. The mistakes were to let Jack go and sign Rasho to replace DRob instead of Miller.

But the Spurs should have won it all in 06.

Both the 0.4 and the and1 were on Pop. While Bowen and Turkoglu were at the bench, Devin Brown and Manu were guarding Kobe and Fisher. And Pop should have told not to foul an 2 pt attempt.

FkLA
05-12-2012, 12:36 AM
That Lakers team had no chance of winning if 0.4 doesnt fall. Especially considering the fact that the Spurs had mounted a huge comeback that culminated with Timmys near gamewinner. Have you seen the way Laker teams have reacted when their back is against the wall this past decade? :lol

mavsfan1000
05-12-2012, 12:43 AM
That Lakers team had no chance of winning if 0.4 doesnt fall. Especially considering the fact that the Spurs had mounted a huge comeback that culminated with Timmys near gamewinner. Have you seen the way Laker teams have reacted when their back is against the wall this past decade? :lol
What about that Kings/Lakers Series or Blazers/Lakers?

FkLA
05-12-2012, 12:45 AM
Kings/Lakers was rigged. Blazers choked.

LkrFan
05-12-2012, 12:59 AM
That Lakers team had no chance of winning if 0.4 doesnt fall. Especially considering the fact that the Spurs had mounted a huge comeback that culminated with Timmys near gamewinner. Have you seen the way Laker teams have reacted when their back is against the wall this past decade? :lol

Tim hit a lucky shot. Then Fish followed suit. if anything, blame the Spurs clock operator. :lol

cherylsteele
05-12-2012, 01:05 AM
If Horry hit the last shot during Game 5 of the 2003 West Semi-final, would the Lakers have won four straight?
Who knows, that Spurs team didn't seem to be weak minded like that would effect them IMO, but on the other hand when you if he would have made it may have deflated their demeanor a bit.

tesseractive
05-12-2012, 01:47 AM
If Horry hit the last shot during Game 5 of the 2003 West Semi-final, would the Lakers have won four straight?

I knew that shot wasn't going in that game. Y'all had run him into the ground that year due to lack of depth, and he'd been short-arming 'em like crazy for most of the series.

By the same token, I think all of these what ifs are pointless from our end too.