PDA

View Full Version : ESPN.com - Spurs Winning it all?



flipspursfan
05-17-2012, 11:23 AM
http://espn.go.com/nba/playoffs/2012/story/_/page/5-on-5-120517/nba-playoffs-san-antonio-spurs-success


The San Antonio Spurs are 5-0 in the playoffs entering Thursday's Game 2 against the Los Angeles Clippers (ESPN, 9:30 ET). Here are five key questions about the team looking for its fifth NBA title since 1999:


1. Fact or Fiction: The Spurs are the best team in the NBA.

Henry Abbott, ESPN.com: Fact. John Hollinger called it back when Manu Ginobili was hurt: Don't sleep on the Spurs, he said. Now that the playoffs are in full swing, they're the one team you can sleep on. By that I mean, if you fall asleep watching TV, you wouldn't wonder about the outcome. The Spurs have been so strong that it appears only the Thunder or Heat at full strength are impediments to another title.

Kevin Arnovitz, ESPN.com: Fact. What are the defining features of a "best team"? Start with the NBA's most efficient offense. Stack that offense with a core group of stars who have mastered it together over a sustained period of success. Staff them with the league's most creative coach and professional role players whom that coach can seamlessly plug into his refined system. Then give them a very respectable defense that can compensate for a lack of athleticism with diligence and trust.

Israel Gutierrez, ESPN.com: Fiction. They might have the best offensive balance and the deepest team in the league, but I'd still lean toward the teams with potentially dominant defenses and transcendent superstars. The Thunder and a healthy Heat team are still better than the Spurs.

Marc Stein, ESPN.com: Fact. Given the groove they're in these days? Who else could you possibly nominate? The Thunder are also undefeated in the playoffs, which is an undeniable achievement given the teams they've had to deal with, but look at the numbers over the last 50 games. Fifty! The Spurs are rollin'.

Brian Windhorst, ESPN.com: Fact. This is obviously a roving designation until the Finals are over. But the Spurs haven't lost a game in more than a month. They have played well on little rest, played well on a lot of rest, won by scoring 124 points, won by scoring 87 points, won by playing very big and won by playing small. This is some darn impressive-looking squad right now.


2. Fact or Fiction: Tim Duncan's prowess at age 36 is a surprise.

Abbott: Fiction. Far from magic, this seems like the result of an incredibly rational process. The Spurs are more than a decade into figuring out what therapies and practices work for him, and they do those things. He has kept his weight down, which I suspect would benefit many players. And, importantly, Gregg Popovich has long managed his minutes. It's a smart long-term approach that is too rare.

Arnovitz: Fiction. One of Duncan's finest characteristics as a player is keen self-awareness. He's always understood his limitations (which might be one reason some fans haven't been drawn to him), and that's one feature that comes in handy as a player grows older. Popovich has been smart about rationing Duncan's minutes, and the Spurs are better than ever at getting Duncan the ball where he can anchor the offense.

Gutierrez: Fact. Given the drop in his numbers over the past three seasons, absolutely. Factor in that it was a compressed season, and it's even more surprising he held up this well. Yes, he got spot rest, but Duncan played only four less games than LeBron James this season and still looks like he's shaved two years off his career.

Stein: Fact. Because of where he was at age 35. But he took advantage of the extended prep period afforded by the lockout, lost all kinds of weight to ease the burden on his knees and turned back the clock. Of course, as I'm typing all this, it occurs to me that it really shouldn't have been a surprise since we know that the Spurs always make the most of a work-stoppage season.

Windhorst: Fact. The play of graybeards Duncan and Kevin Garnett in this type of season is simply amazing. It should serve as a reminder that we're watching two of the greatest big men in history and they're both hell-bent on another title. It's also an achievement for the Spurs and their discipline and long-term planning. They've been engaged in a project to maximize Duncan's career for four or so years now and it's working.


3. Rank the three people most responsible for the Spurs' success.

Abbott: (1) Duncan. There's a certain irony here. He might be the team's third-best player this season. But the whole team wouldn't exist without his uncommon play and leadership over the last decade and a half. (2) Popovich. On almost every issue this team is as smart as it comes, and he is the reason. (3) Peter Holt. This is a little like the strong economy under Bill Clinton. People will say he didn't do much to create it. And maybe that's true. But he was smart enough not to meddle.

(Crazy: Tony Parker was an MVP candidate this season and isn't on my list.)

Arnovitz: (1) Popovich. Systematic stability is so important to a basketball team's success -- something we saw last season and many others before. (2) R.C. Buford. Building an NBA roster is as much art as science, and the GM consistently produces beautiful work. (3) Duncan. You could insert Parker and Ginobili here, but Duncan's presence in San Antonio has made the whole enterprise work since the day he was drafted.

Gutierrez: (1) Parker. There have been discussions for a few years about possibly moving on from Parker. He has made the Spurs' front office look smart for keeping him. (2) Popovich. Best coach in the league, until Phil comes back. (3) Buford. Finished second for Executive of the Year, but would've looked just fine in first.

Stein: (1) Popovich. (2) Duncan. (3) Buford. Parker has to be in the top three if we're talking only about this season, but the three I chose were ranked in terms of their roles in establishing and maintaining San Antonio's one-of-a-kind team culture. And Pop connecting with Duncan right off the bat -- and then keeping it going for 15 years -- is where it all starts. (As long as you first acknowledge, as Pop and R.C. often do, how downright lucky the Spurs were to be in two lotteries over the course of a decade to land David Robinson and Timmy.)

Windhorst: (1) Duncan. The torch has gone from Kareem to Shaq to Duncan here as the greatest big man in the game. (2) Popovich. In a career stuffed with fantastic coaching and personnel decisions, he may be in the midst of his greatest job with how he prepped his club in this unusual season and added pieces along the way. (3) Parker. He's revolutionized his game a bit this season, taking on a different and more aggressive role. This is not common for a guy in his 11th season to do.


4. A fifth Spurs title in 14 seasons would be ________________.

Abbott: Very hard on LeBron. Also on Dwyane Wade, Kobe Bryant, Garnett and all those other players who, because of age or reputation, need this one.

Arnovitz: Further validation.

Gutierrez: The gold standard for small market teams everywhere.

Stein: Embarrassing for those of us who not only wrote 'em off for the umpteenth time coming into this season but also continue to ignore them. Still can't understand why there's so little chatter out there about Duncan chasing his fifth championship. LeBron's first ring or Kobe's sixth ring is all we talk about. When Duncan's drive for No. 5 is the most likely to happen.

Windhorst: Crowning. They won four titles and narrowly lost out on a fifth, but because three of them were in between more high-profile Lakers runs, they have not properly earned the attention for what they've accomplished. If they add that fifth one, Duncan, Ginobili and Parker need to be elevated to the same conversations as Magic, Kareem and Worthy, Jordan and Pippen, and Russell, Cousy and Heinsohn.


5. Fact or Fiction: The Spurs will win the 2012 NBA title.

Abbott: Fact. Of course, I have no idea. Anything can happen. But if I had to pick the most likely team, it's a cinch to pick the team that has managed minutes well, gets good shots on almost every possession and has yet to break a sweat.

Arnovitz: Fact, with an acknowledgment that a healthy Miami squad would be a very tough out and would certainly be a superior defensive team. But so long as the Heat lack the balance Chris Bosh gives them, the Spurs have that springtime look of a veteran team poised for a title run.

Gutierrez: Fiction. Still sticking by the tried and true idea that an offense-first team rarely wins it all. The Spurs were 17th in the regular season in field goal percentage allowed and are dead last among the remaining teams in that category. Yes, they can outscore you, but the Spurs as a defensive team is a thing of the past.

Stein: Fact. Closest thing we've got to a title favorite right now. Deepest, healthiest and, uh, grooviest team on the map.

Windhorst: Fact. They're my favorite at the moment. Right now they remind me a bit of the Argentinean national team from the 2002-06 era, a brilliantly coached team with players who knew each other so well, knew and executed their roles perfectly and consistently, had their systems so well-oiled they could perform them under any circumstance, and were the definition of a great "team." That's what the Spurs are doing right now.

Hopefully they do huh? :toast :lobt2:

sa_butta
05-17-2012, 11:30 AM
Mostly good but there always has to be a hater... Israel Gutierrez

cherylsteele
05-17-2012, 11:30 AM
Israel Gutierrez, ESPN.com: Fiction. They might have the best offensive balance and the deepest team in the league, but I'd still lean toward the teams with potentially dominant defenses and transcendent superstars. The Thunder and a healthy Heat team are still better than the Spurs.

What an ESPN tool.:rolleyes
Can you say hypocritical? The Spurs have the best balanced team in the league and a solid defense to go with it and their games haven't really been that close, and yet Miami lost to the Knicks and the Pacers.

jiggy_55
05-17-2012, 11:30 AM
:rollin Israel Gutierrez is just a tool.

flipspursfan
05-17-2012, 11:31 AM
Israel Gutierrez, ESPN.com: Fiction. They might have the best offensive balance and the deepest team in the league, but I'd still lean toward the teams with potentially dominant defenses and transcendent superstars. The Thunder and a healthy Heat team are still better than the Spurs.
What an ESPN tool.:rolleyes
Can you say hypocritical? The Spurs have the best balanced team in the league and a solid defense to go with it and their games haven't really been that close, and yet Miami lost to the Knicks and the Pacers.

Let the haters hate. In the end, Game will speak louder than words. :toast

Besides Israel is a shit analyst, commentator or whatever the hell he is tbh

cherylsteele
05-17-2012, 11:33 AM
Let the haters hate. In the end, Game will speak louder than words. :toast

Besides Israel is a shit analyst, commentator or whatever the hell he is tbh
Yes, I know, I was just venting.

Spursfan092120
05-17-2012, 11:34 AM
tbh..Israel isn't that far off on our defensive stats...but that was because in the beginning of the season, we were horrible. At the end of the year, our defense charged and really picked it up. We are a MUCH better defensive team now.

flipspursfan
05-17-2012, 11:39 AM
tbh..Israel isn't that far off on our defensive stats...but that was because in the beginning of the season, we were horrible. At the end of the year, our defense charged and really picked it up. We are a MUCH better defensive team now.

Yeah, he cherrypicked. Thus, the tool comments from above Spurfans. With our new additions, we managed to patch defensive holes while keeping the offense crisp.

Budkin
05-17-2012, 11:44 AM
Israel Gutierrez, ESPN.com: Fiction. They might have the best offensive balance and the deepest team in the league, but I'd still lean toward the teams with potentially dominant defenses and transcendent superstars. The Thunder and a healthy Heat team are still better than the Spurs.

This guy covers the Heat... he should not be part of these discussions.

Budkin
05-17-2012, 11:46 AM
Also I would rather the team stay under the radar. It's rare that the Spurs get this much press but with everyone and their mother saying the Spurs are going to win it all without a doubt it could get into their heads and diminish their effort.

ajballer4
05-17-2012, 11:48 AM
Before I even started reading I knew Israel was going to be one of the analysts asked

flipspursfan
05-17-2012, 11:48 AM
Also I would rather the team stay under the radar. It's rare that the Spurs get this much press but with everyone and their mother saying the Spurs are going to win it all without a doubt it could get into their heads and diminish their effort.

You do have a valid point. But with Pop, Timmy, Manu and Tony leading, I doubt the young guys would slack off and let the attention get in their heads. Just the culture of team I guess.

emanueldavidginobili
05-17-2012, 11:50 AM
Israel Gutierrez is a clown and that is all, the moron predicted the Spurs and Jazz to go 7 games! and predicted 7 game series with the Clipps..

Obstructed_View
05-17-2012, 11:53 AM
The guy's clearly got some personal issue with the Spurs. Time to start ignoring him.

flipspursfan
05-17-2012, 11:56 AM
The guy's clearly got some personal issue with the Spurs. Time to start ignoring him.

:toast

coyotes_geek
05-17-2012, 11:58 AM
I swear you could ask Gutierrez right now who won the Spurs/Jazz series and he'd say "offensive teams never win, so don't count out Utah".

DBMethos
05-17-2012, 12:00 PM
Loved the comparison of this team to the Argentinean national team...let's hope they achieve the same level of success.

BlairForceDejuan
05-17-2012, 12:05 PM
Lil Izzy Guti is such a transparent lil biyatch

SpursRock20
05-17-2012, 12:11 PM
Haha, does Israel really believe the words coming out of his mouth? What a little shit. I don't mind someone not picking the Spurs to win it all, I know that there are some question marks still left, but your reason has to better than, "I think the Heat and Thunder are better". Sounds like any casual NBA fan to me.

Horse
05-17-2012, 12:19 PM
When you see such a bias toward one team why the fuck do they even ask this moron his opinion. I know durant, westbroke and lebron are great players but as of today what the fuck have they accomplished? Nothing that's what! Who ever said the thunder is a better defensive team than us? I don't think they are. Right now we play zone against miami and how will they even score.

kidd_91
05-17-2012, 12:19 PM
Windhorst: (1) Duncan. The torch has gone from Kareem to Shaq to Duncan here as the greatest big man in the game.
Hakeem Olajuwon???

Jimcs50
05-17-2012, 12:20 PM
Israel Gutierrez seems to have his finger on the pulse of the NBA. I think he knows what is what , I'm very worried about SA winning it all now that I see his points.

:depressed

Horse
05-17-2012, 12:21 PM
I also think if Pop wins another this year you almost have to put him ahead of phil. jackson has always had the best player or players in the league. Pop has done all this and stayed competitive his entire time with the team besides when Drob was hurt. phil comes to a team thats ready to win then runs when he sees the end coming.

TimmehC
05-17-2012, 12:22 PM
:lol Gutierrez just hating like always.

Dr Cox
05-17-2012, 12:30 PM
Someone please post the Per diem (INSIDER) in the other thread please! : )

Andthentherewas21
05-17-2012, 12:32 PM
How the hell does Israel Gutierrez get work, I mean seriously. I looked at his predictions for all the first round series, and short of the obvious ones (Heat-Knicks) and (Orlando-Indiana), he couldn't predict shit.

Does he do research? Does he consider himself and analyst? Because he doesn't do any of it. I wouldn't mind if he didn't think that the Spurs were capable of winning it all and could back it up with a cogent argument. The problem is he can't, its just "I don't think the Spurs are that good" type of crap.

Favorite quote "Yes, they can outscore you, but the Spurs as a defensive team is a thing of the past." Now correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that the team that OUTSCORES the other wins the game. No? Is it the team with the most rebounds now, or blocks?

Seriously, if the Spurs win it all this year, I say the entirety of ST spams the shit out of this guy for his shitty analysis. I know its ESPN, but still this is a new low.

mabrignani
05-17-2012, 12:35 PM
http://a.espncdn.com/media/motion/2012/0429/dm_120429_nba_ps_gutierrez_spurs.jpg

what a fag

Knoxxx
05-17-2012, 12:40 PM
Haha, does Israel really believe the words coming out of his mouth? What a little shit. I don't mind someone not picking the Spurs to win it all, I know that there are some question marks still left, but your reason has to better than, "I think the Heat and Thunder are better". Sounds like any casual NBA fan to me.

He is entitled to his opinion as a Heat homer either way. He did say that Heat have more (star) firepower and better defense, and that was why.

I agree that he is a dipshit, but not going to base that only on the fact that he dissented with the others.

Not saying you did that either, just quoted to get the topic back on this clown.

I would concur his takes don't make a lot of sense. He threw in there a "healthy" Heat team. Therefore read between the lines he thinks we can beat them without Bosh, but it pains him to say it outright.

That leaves only the Thunder. Star power I can buy, but I don't consider OKC defense a strength at all. Not sure the stats there, but they seem to be an offensive team to me also. Should be a fun series.

Also will be fun watching this guy either vanish, or acknowledge he was wrong and the Spurs are great. Either way we win. :king

timtonymanurich
05-17-2012, 12:43 PM
Although it's been said many times, many ways:

Gutierrez = (LeBronda James) KING-SIZED TOOL.

Thunder a BETTER team than the Spurs? Is that why in the Reg. Season We beat them HANDILY by 10+ pts per contest?

Gutierrez = L-O-S-E-R. SOME respect would be appreciated. However, I don't respect him so I can't really expect the same in return.

Gutierrez: No need to start acting like a lady. Don't worry, you'll be back on your knees in no time.

The ADMIRAL 50
05-17-2012, 12:47 PM
Gutierrez is the same clown who picked us going 7 against Utah. :lol

not really surprised tbh

Knoxxx
05-17-2012, 12:54 PM
He's painful to look at. I guess ESPN needed to hire a Latino and he timed it right or something.

Spurs and Mavs fan
05-17-2012, 12:58 PM
From the article:

"Fact or Fiction: The Spurs are the best team in the NBA."

Abbott, Arnovitz, Stein, Windhorst: "Fact."
Gutierrez: "Fiction."



"Fact or Fiction: The Spurs will win the 2012 NBA title."

Abbott, Arnovitz, Stein, Windhorst: "Fact."
Gutierrez: "Fiction."


:rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes

therealtruth
05-17-2012, 01:05 PM
I also think if Pop wins another this year you almost have to put him ahead of phil. jackson has always had the best player or players in the league. Pop has done all this and stayed competitive his entire time with the team besides when Drob was hurt. phil comes to a team thats ready to win then runs when he sees the end coming.

Pop is not even in the conversation till he can defend a title. As Spoelstra is showing in Miami having the best players doesn't guarantee you a title.

tesseractive
05-17-2012, 01:11 PM
From the article:

"Fact or Fiction: The Spurs are the best team in the NBA."

Abbott, Arnovitz, Stein, Windhorst: "Fact."
Gutierrez: "Fiction."



"Fact or Fiction: The Spurs will win the 2012 NBA title."

Abbott, Arnovitz, Stein, Windhorst: "Fact."
Gutierrez: "Fiction."


:rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes
Remember: there's a fair chance that even the guy who put together the piece thinks he's a complete tool. But having 5 guys agree on everything is boring. So if everyone reasonable is going to say the same thing, you have to go find a dumbass and bring him into the discussion in order to get anything approaching debate.

Rummpd
05-17-2012, 01:23 PM
LOL on Westbrooke, Durant or even James being transcendal superstars a salient point can be made that the only TRUE superstars in the NBA are Duncan and Kobe with multiple titles and longterm "transcendal" accomplishments; while Dirk, KG, Kidd, Wade and a few others can at least make a case helping to lead teams to titles.

z0sa
05-17-2012, 01:30 PM
Who the hell is Israel Gutierrez and why does he sound like GNLF?

tesseractive
05-17-2012, 01:33 PM
LOL on Westbrooke, Durant or even James being transcendal superstars a salient point can be made that the only TRUE superstars in the NBA are Duncan and Kobe with multiple titles and longterm "transcendal" accomplishments; while Dirk, KG, Kidd, Wade and a few others can at least make a case helping to lead teams to titles.

They can "make a case" that they led teams to titles? Dirk, KG, and Wade did lead teams to titles. That's a fact.

cheguevara
05-17-2012, 01:35 PM
LOL Israel getting buttfucked in the comments section. Faggot probably likes it too

I'm surprised most NBA fans don't only believe Spurs are favorites, but actually get offended when someone does not give them props

:wow

coyotes_geek
05-17-2012, 01:35 PM
LOL on Westbrooke, Durant or even James being transcendal superstars a salient point can be made that the only TRUE superstars in the NBA are Duncan and Kobe with multiple titles and longterm "transcendal" accomplishments; while Dirk, KG, Kidd, Wade and a few others can at least make a case helping to lead teams to titles.

You forget, it's ESPN. "Transcendant superstar" = "dunks a lot"

manufan10
05-17-2012, 01:37 PM
Who cares what Israel Gutierrez thinks? I'll take Marc Stein's opinion over a nobody any day of the week. He's usually very fair in his analysis.

DMC
05-17-2012, 01:38 PM
Israel gets the Latino viewer, and he's a hard core Latino homer. He prides himself on going against the flow of conventional thought, and more often than not he looks like a tool. That one time he'll be right will be the time when he will stand up and say "see, I told you".

cheguevara
05-17-2012, 01:39 PM
Windhorst: Fact. They're my favorite at the moment. Right now they remind me a bit of the Argentinean national team from the 2002-06 era, a brilliantly coached team with players who knew each other so well, knew and executed their roles perfectly and consistently, had their systems so well-oiled they could perform them under any circumstance, and were the definition of a great "team." That's what the Spurs are doing right now.

:tu :tu

Viva Las Espuelas
05-17-2012, 01:42 PM
Fact or fiction: the Spurs win the 2012 title

Gutierrez: Fiction. Still sticking by the tried and true idea that an offense-first team rarely wins it all. The Spurs were 17th in the regular season in field goal percentage allowed and are dead last among the remaining teams in that category. Yes, they can outscore you....

Isn't that how teams beat other teams, you stupid jackass shitbag?!??????

timvp
05-17-2012, 01:56 PM
Not to stick up for Israel Gutierrez but the Spurs are far from assured of a championship right now. One game into the second round ... there's a long way and two extremely tough matchups remaining if the Spurs are going to reach their goal.

It's perfectly acceptable for someone to think the Spurs won't win the championship, tbh.

Cant_Be_Faded
05-17-2012, 02:03 PM
Too many people on the bandwagon, I don't like it

cheguevara
05-17-2012, 02:12 PM
Too many people on the bandwagon, I don't like it

meh, whatever just enjoy the ride.

IMO OKC-Spurs is a 50-50 series.

dbreiden83080
05-17-2012, 02:16 PM
Israel Gutierrez, ESPN.com: Fiction. They might have the best offensive balance and the deepest team in the league, but I'd still lean toward the teams with potentially dominant defenses and transcendent superstars. The Thunder and a healthy Heat team are still better than the Spurs.

OKC has a dominant defense.. :lol

dbreiden83080
05-17-2012, 02:18 PM
The hype is a bit troubling. There is such a long way to go and one injury wrecks everything.. One game at a time just cheer and be modest about it..

GSH
05-17-2012, 02:23 PM
Four out of the five writers say the Spurs are basically the team to beat, and everyone wants to focus on the one who doesn't? And even Israel Gutierrez can only name Miami and OKC as teams that can beat the Spurs. That's about all you can get from these kinds of articles, since the only thing that really matters is what happens on the court.

Mal
05-17-2012, 02:23 PM
meh, whatever just enjoy the ride.

IMO OKC-Spurs is a 50-50 series.

Spurs got HCA. That gives 65-35

rjv
05-17-2012, 02:27 PM
I swear you could ask Gutierrez right now who won the Spurs/Jazz series and he'd say "offensive teams never win, so don't count out Utah".

:lol

even when asked the fairly neutral question, 4. A fifth Spurs title in 14 seasons would be ________________, e responded with a cheap shot:
Gutierrez: The gold standard for small market teams everywhere.

guy just is not going to ever give any credit to the spurs in any way, shape or form.

manufan10
05-17-2012, 02:40 PM
Not to stick up for Israel Gutierrez but the Spurs are far from assured of a championship right now. One game into the second round ... there's a long way and two extremely tough matchups remaining if the Spurs are going to reach their goal.

It's perfectly acceptable for someone to think the Spurs won't win the championship, tbh.

I agree. I don't really have a problem with that prediction. However, when asked if the Spurs are the best team right now, and he says no, it's a little bothersome. They're on a heck of a roll right now, and it really shouldn't be denied. Although like I said, I'll take Marc Stein's opinion over that of some unknown guy.

G-Nob
05-17-2012, 02:43 PM
Can't say I blame the guy for conventional thought on team defense. Quite honestly I feel the same way of traditonally thinking defense wins championships. I'm completely shocked we have been as suucessful as we've been with this system. Let's see what happens when the clippers adjust or when the talent get more difficult.

The Reckoning
05-17-2012, 02:48 PM
funny because three weeks ago all of those votes would be "fiction."

espn on the bandwagon once again to maintain credibility.

G-Dawgg
05-17-2012, 03:28 PM
Imo, OKC is the Spurs biggest obstacle in this years playoffs... the Heat or the Lakers would get trampled by us... If the Spurs can beat OKC, they will win it all.

Mugen
05-17-2012, 03:35 PM
Can't say I blame the guy for conventional thought on team defense. Quite honestly I feel the same way of traditonally thinking defense wins championships. I'm completely shocked we have been as suucessful as we've been with this system. Let's see what happens when the clippers adjust or when the talent get more difficult.

The Spurs have been significantly better defensively since the acquisitions of Jax/Diaw. They've been one of the best defenses in the playoffs so it's not not like they are a porous squad.

Its just that their offense has been so elite that the improving defense has been overlooked.

DBMethos
05-17-2012, 03:38 PM
Gotta love the comments.


"Does Lebron have soft hands?"

Abbott: Wouldn't know
Arnovitz: Why are you asking me this dumb question?
Gutierrez: Very soft! Especially against my body
Stein: Dude really?
Windhorst: Get the F outta here!

:rollin

z0sa
05-17-2012, 03:41 PM
I remember Dex posting that the Spurs are the 5th best defense in the last third of the regular season. I haven't confirmed it myself but if true it pretty much shits on the logic Gutierrez is using.

Sense
05-17-2012, 03:44 PM
Not to stick up for Israel Gutierrez but the Spurs are far from assured of a championship right now. One game into the second round ... there's a long way and two extremely tough matchups remaining if the Spurs are going to reach their goal.

It's perfectly acceptable for someone to think the Spurs won't win the championship, tbh.

This...


All this talking about the Spurs winning it all this early worries me.

Budkin
05-17-2012, 03:58 PM
I think it's being taken as a given just because of the level of execution and chemistry we've seen from these guys in the last couple months. I agree though, even though we match up well with OKC it will be a tough series. And now seeing the way Boston is playing we'd probably have a hell of a time with them too.

Horse
05-17-2012, 04:33 PM
Pop is not even in the conversation till he can defend a title. As Spoelstra is showing in Miami having the best players doesn't guarantee you a title.

let him get a fair shake without 0.4second or being stuck on a plane or some other bullshit.

tesseractive
05-17-2012, 05:11 PM
Not to stick up for Israel Gutierrez but the Spurs are far from assured of a championship right now. One game into the second round ... there's a long way and two extremely tough matchups remaining if the Spurs are going to reach their goal.

It's perfectly acceptable for someone to think the Spurs won't win the championship, tbh.

Of course it is. Right now, OKC is looking terrific, and that's going to be a tough, tough series. If he's talked about that, given some breakdowns about how hard it will be to stop their big 3 and get good shots against a well coached team like that, I'd give him his due.

But his points sound like what you expect from someone who had never seen an actual basketball game and only watched SportsCenter instead.

rAm
05-17-2012, 05:26 PM
LOL Israel getting buttfucked in the comments section. Faggot probably likes it too

I'm surprised most NBA fans don't only believe Spurs are favorites, but actually get offended when someone does not give them props

:wow

The Spurs love this playoffs is mind boggling, before we were the cheapest/dirtiest/most boring team in the league and everyone hated us.

I mean, it's refreshing but it's weird.

Budkin
05-17-2012, 05:32 PM
Honestly I think what it really comes down to is coaching. With the talent and chemistry we are seeing right now from the Spurs, will Scott Brooks be able to outcoach Pop? How about Eric Spoelstra or Doc Rivers? PJ was the only coach that could get into Pop's head.

ambchang
05-17-2012, 05:41 PM
I never really worried about OKC that much. The Spurs match up with them quite well, and they are not a very well coached team. Same goes for Miami, in which the Spurs match up even better and the coaching is worse.

Lakers though, with their dominant frontline still worries me. If Kobe ever agrees to a supplimental role and let Gasol run the offensean they will be very tough to beat.

Out East, Boston will surprise some people with their defense and discipline. They also match up very well against the Spurs.

Uriel
05-17-2012, 08:18 PM
It's perfectly acceptable for someone to think the Spurs won't win the championship, tbh.

:lol That's some pretty revealing wording there, timvp.

Spurs and Mavs fan
05-17-2012, 08:47 PM
I wonder what Israel Gutierrez thinks about the Miami Heat now that they're in 2-1 deficit to the underdog Pacers?

ViceCity86
05-18-2012, 04:26 AM
Israel Gutierrez-Depth is not important in playoffs.
Miami Heat:lol:lol:lol:lol


What a clown

TampaDude
05-18-2012, 08:45 AM
Gutierrez sounds like a Hispanic Jon Barry. :lol

Budkin
05-18-2012, 09:00 AM
Gutierrez sounds like a Hispanic Jon Barry. :lol

Ironically Barry was the only one who picked us to sweep the Clips.

DMC
05-18-2012, 09:11 AM
The Spurs are the team to beat in the West. I don't see them making the Finals however, much less winning it.

DMC
05-18-2012, 09:16 AM
funny because three weeks ago all of those votes would be "fiction."

espn on the bandwagon once again to maintain credibility.
I disagree with that last one. ESPN is calling it like they see it. It's not about a bandwagon. If the writers think the Spurs are going to win it all, and they say so, that doesn't make them Spurs fans.

Teams have to prove they aren't fool's gold in the playoffs.

(btw, we haven't heard that term being used around here lately)

Obstructed_View
05-18-2012, 09:21 AM
Not really a bandwagon, since the Spurs didn't get a single mention in the Dime. It's amazing that every single thing they talk about is the team that lost by 20 and already has a Heat Index page dedicated to them.

therealtruth
05-18-2012, 02:02 PM
The Spurs have been significantly better defensively since the acquisitions of Jax/Diaw. They've been one of the best defenses in the playoffs so it's not not like they are a porous squad.

Its just that their offense has been so elite that the improving defense has been overlooked.

Diaw starting has really improved the defense.

Spurtacus
05-18-2012, 02:12 PM
Israel Gutierrez, ESPN.com: Fiction. They might have the best offensive balance and the deepest team in the league, but I'd still lean toward the teams with potentially dominant defenses and transcendent superstars. The Thunder and a healthy Heat team are still better than the Spurs.

Sorry but who has the better record? Who had the three longest winning streaks this season? Who is the hottest team right now?


Gutierrez: Fiction. Still sticking by the tried and true idea that an offense-first team rarely wins it all. The Spurs were 17th in the regular season in field goal percentage allowed and are dead last among the remaining teams in that category. Yes, they can outscore you, but the Spurs as a defensive team is a thing of the past.

The 2012 playoffs has been defined so far by sloppy offense and tired legs. Spurs have won 5 of 6 by scoring over 100 and not allowing more than 92 points in a game.

KaiRMD1
05-18-2012, 02:37 PM
So who would be his pick if the Spurs make it to the finals against the Celtics? The older Celtics team? I hope it happens just to hear that moron's prediction

tesseractive
05-18-2012, 03:19 PM
So who would be his pick if the Spurs make it to the finals against the Celtics? The older Celtics team? I hope it happens just to hear that moron's prediction

The Celtics obviously. They have real stars and the Spurs don't -- anyone can tell this just by watching SportsCenter regularly and seeing who is featured. :rollin

Budkin
05-18-2012, 03:32 PM
So who would be his pick if the Spurs make it to the finals against the Celtics? The older Celtics team? I hope it happens just to hear that moron's prediction

The Celtics because they are not as deep.