PDA

View Full Version : Mitt Ronmey is no Friend to Gun Owners



Galileo
05-25-2012, 09:00 PM
In 2004, When Mitt Romney was Governor of Massachusetts. He signed the Assault Weapons Ban which is still in effect today.

He supported the Brady Bill that was declared unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court in the landmark decision Prinz Mack vs. Brady Bill.

He supported mandatory IDs for Firearm owners

He is for a five-day waiting period when purchasing a firearm.

He supported the Federal Feinstein Gun ban.

http://lonestarwatchdog.blogspot.com/2012/05/to-all-texans-mitt-ronmey-is-no-friend.html

:lmao

Wild Cobra
05-26-2012, 02:15 AM
In 2004, When Mitt Romney was Governor of Massachusetts. He signed the Assault Weapons Ban which is still in effect today.

He supported the Brady Bill that was declared unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court in the landmark decision Prinz Mack vs. Brady Bill.

He supported mandatory IDs for Firearm owners

He is for a five-day waiting period when purchasing a firearm.

He supported the Federal Feinstein Gun ban.

http://lonestarwatchdog.blogspot.com/2012/05/to-all-texans-mitt-ronmey-is-no-friend.html

:lmao
Did he actively support everything he signed, or was a a compromise package? is it even possible he simply signed what a liberal state wanted?

Politics a messy thing. Unless you can show he was actually wanted the bill as he signed it, this could just be meaningless.

Galileo
05-26-2012, 03:22 AM
Did he actively support everything he signed, or was a a compromise package? is it even possible he simply signed what a liberal state wanted?

Politics a messy thing. Unless you can show he was actually wanted the bill as he signed it, this could just be meaningless.

If he just does "what everyone else wants", what's the point of electing him president?

:nope

Wild Cobra
05-26-2012, 03:56 AM
If he just does "what everyone else wants", what's the point of electing him president?

:nope
You normally want to do the people's will, unless there is some compelling reason to do otherwise.

greyforest
05-26-2012, 07:17 AM
You normally want to do the people's will, unless there is some compelling reason to do otherwise.

lol, you think representatives represent us

Wild Cobra
05-26-2012, 07:26 AM
lol, you think representatives represent us
On some issues, they listen and do. that however only works when they get enough public response. Most people never contact their representatives offices.

Fabbs
05-26-2012, 07:59 AM
On some issues, they listen and do. that however only works when they get enough public response. Most people never contact their representatives offices.
I did.
Complete waste of time.

Galileo
05-26-2012, 11:11 AM
I did.
Complete waste of time.

good work, Fabbs.

:hat

boutons_deux
05-26-2012, 03:43 PM
You normally want to do the people's will, unless there is some compelling reason to do otherwise.

bull fucking shit. "normally"? GMAFB

politicians do whatever the 1% pays them to do.