PDA

View Full Version : 2006 vs 2012


pass1st
06-06-2012, 11:04 PM
Which backdoor sweep hurts the most, Mav & Spurfans?
Jacob1983
06-06-2012, 11:07 PM
Are you fuckin' serious? 2006 in a landslide.
pass1st
06-06-2012, 11:08 PM
Are you fuckin' serious? 2006 in a landslide.

This year's WCF is pretty much the finals, pretty fair comparison imo
Bonner4MVPzz
06-06-2012, 11:10 PM
This year's WCF is pretty much the finals, pretty fair comparison imo

true story, and both involved zebra bs
pass1st
06-06-2012, 11:11 PM
true story, and both involved zebra bs

I think 2006 involved much more ref attention :lol
midnightpulp
06-06-2012, 11:11 PM
Mavs. No comparison. In the Finals, a 13 point lead in game 3 with six and a half minutes left, which ostensibly means six and a half minutes away from the NBA championship, and proceeded to lose the game and ultimately the series.
ElNono
06-06-2012, 11:12 PM
Personally, this one doesn't hurt at all, tbh... I started the season with very low expectations. Reaching the WCF was already gravy...
tesseractive
06-06-2012, 11:14 PM
Are you fuckin' serious? 2006 in a landslide.

True story.
pass1st
06-06-2012, 11:14 PM
Personally, this one doesn't hurt at all, tbh... I started the season with very low expectations. Reaching the WCF was already gravy...

:toastBeing one of the spurfans that didn't feel entitled to win it all based on a win streak
midnightpulp
06-06-2012, 11:15 PM
This year's WCF is pretty much the finals, pretty fair comparison imo

Difference is the Mavs looked thoroughly superior to the Heat after the first two games. OKC nearly stole game 1 and had a fighting chance in game 2 after coming back from a 22 point lead. Even though the Spurs went up 2-0, any logical fan realized OKC wasn't that much of an inferior team to the Spurs as we thought the Heat were to the Mavs.

The Heat also closed out the Mavs on their home floor, which adds a heap of insult to injury.
Jacob1983
06-06-2012, 11:17 PM
2006 was worse because if the Mavs had just played 1 percent better or made an extra free throw, they would have won. Yes, the Mavs choked ass in the Finals in 2006 but even with the massive chokejob and Wade's lovefest at the free throw line, it was fuckin' close. It being so damn close made it even worse and hurt more.
pass1st
06-06-2012, 11:18 PM
Difference is the Mavs looked thoroughly superior to the Heat after the first two games. OKC nearly stole game 1 and had a fighting chance in game 2 after coming back from a 22 point lead. Even though the Spurs went up 2-0, any logical fan realized OKC wasn't that much of an inferior team to the Spurs as we thought the Heat were to the Mavs.

The Heat also closed out the Mavs on their home floor, which adds a heap of insult to injury.

:lol

But good point :tu, at least Spurs didn't lose it all at home :tu